Bug#600074: marked as done (wmbubble: FTBFS unstable - undefined reference to 'XrmInitialize')
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 10:59:26 +0300 with message-id <871umky2sh@test20.cante.net> and subject line Bug#600074 Close bts:debian has caused the Debian Bug report #600074, regarding wmbubble: FTBFS unstable - undefined reference to 'XrmInitialize' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 600074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600074 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wmbubble Version: Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS The LIBS variable in Makefile is probably missing -lX11 $ LC_ALL=C debuild ubblemon.c: In function 'render_secondary': bubblemon.c:1078: warning: format '%6llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t' bubblemon.c:1080: warning: format '%6llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t' bubblemon.c:1087: warning: format '%6llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t' bubblemon.c:1089: warning: format '%6llu' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t' gcc -O3 -ansi -Wall `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --cflags` -DENABLE_DUCK -DENABLE_CPU -DENABLE_MEMSCREEN -DUPSIDE_DOWN_DUCK -DNAME=\"bubblemon\" -c -o sys\ _linux.o sys_linux.c sys_linux.c: In function 'system_cpu': sys_linux.c:69: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:69: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:69: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 5 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:69: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 6 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c: In function 'system_memory': sys_linux.c:127: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:132: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:137: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:142: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 5 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 6 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 7 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:160: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 8 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:161: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 3 has type 'u_int64_t *' sys_linux.c:161: warning: format '%Ld' expects type 'long long int *', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t *' gcc -O3 -ansi -Wall `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --cflags` -DENABLE_DUCK -DENABLE_CPU -DENABLE_MEMSCREEN -DUPSIDE_DOWN_DUCK -DNAME=\"bubblemon\" -o bubblemo\ n bubblemon.o sys_linux.o `pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs | sed "s/-lgtk//g"` -lX /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find -lX /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x102e): error: undefined reference to 'XrmInitialize' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x105c): error: undefined reference to 'XrmGetFileDatabase' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x1091): error: undefined reference to 'XrmGetResource' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x10fd): error: undefined reference to 'XrmGetResource' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x1165): error: undefined reference to 'XrmGetResource' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function bubblemon_session_defaults:bubblemon.c(.text+0x11cd): error: undefined reference to 'XrmGetResource' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function main:bubblemon.c(.text+0x25d4): error: undefined reference to 'XSetWMNormalHints' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function main:bubblemon.c(.text+0x26ce): error: undefined reference to 'XSetWMHints' /usr/bin/ld: bubblemon.o: in function main:bubblemon.c(.text+0x3a3a): error: undefined reference to 'XQueryKeymap' /usr/bin
Bug#673146: [synfigstudio] Crash at starting.
Package: synfigstudio Version: 0.62.00-1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, when I start Synfigstudio, it throws me the next messages: ~$ synfigstudio Synfig Studio: iniciando aplicación... synfig(18267) [14:29:28] información: Cargando módulos desde /etc/synfig/synfig_modules.cfg (synfigstudio:18267): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Object class gtkmm__CustomObject_N6studio15ValueBase_EntryE doesn't implement property 'editing-canceled' from interface 'GtkCellEditable' GLib (gthread-posix.c): Unexpected error from C library during 'pthread_cond_timedwait': Argumento inválido. Aborting. Abortado --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-686 Debian Release: wheezy/sid 500 testing security.debian.org 500 testing ftp.de.debian.org 500 testing debian-multimedia.informatik.uni-erlangen.de --- Package information. --- Depends(Version) | Installed -+-== libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0) | 2.4.0-2 libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6~) | 2.13-32 libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4) | 1.12.2-1 libcairomm-1.0-1 (>= 1.6.4) | 1.10.0-1 libfontconfig1(>= 2.8.0) | 2.9.0-3 libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1) | 2.4.9-1 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.7.0-7 libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) | 2.32.2-1 libglibmm-2.4-1c2a (>= 2.22.0) | 2.32.0-1 libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0) | 2.24.10-1 libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a (>= 1:2.18.0) | 1:2.24.2-1 libltdl7 (>= 2.2.6b) | 2.4.2-1 libpango1.0-0(>= 1.14.0) | 1.30.0-1 libpangomm-1.4-1 (>= 2.26.0) | 2.28.4-1 libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.49-1 libsigc++-2.0-0c2a(>= 2.0.2) | 2.2.10-0.1 libstdc++6(>= 4.4.0) | 4.7.0-7 libsynfig0 | 0.62.00-2+b1 libsynfigapp0| 0.62.00-1 libx11-6 | 2:1.4.99.901-2 libxml++2.6-2(>= 2.24.0) | 2.34.2-1 libxml2 (>= 2.6.27) | 2.7.8.dfsg-9 libxrender1 | 1:0.9.7-1 zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.7.dfsg-1 Recommends (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== synfig-examples| 0.62.00-2 Package's Suggests field is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb3a158.4030...@eresmas.com
Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: adept | 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc adept | 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+b1 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; RC buggy, unmaintained, low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 673...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/673085 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1suhpx-00035f...@franck.debian.org
Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1suhq1-00035x...@franck.debian.org
Bug#454045: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454045, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-manager containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454044: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454045, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-installer Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-installer containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#445649: marked as done (Support and display Homepage field)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #445649, regarding Support and display Homepage field to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 445649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if Adept Manager could display the "Homepage" field, like in "apt-cache show ikiwiki" for example. This will be linked from http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgHomepageFieldTransition --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#401004: marked as done (adept-manager: Desktop Entry (menu) GenericName not a name)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #401004, regarding adept-manager: Desktop Entry (menu) GenericName not a name to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 401004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=401004 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.2 Severity: minor Adept uses "Manage Packages" as GenericName. The issue is simply that this isn't a *name* :) This makes the Adept menu entry look bad in the default format of K Menu, reading "Adept Manager Manage Packages". I personally think that the default format is strange anyway, but "Adept Manager Package Manager" would already be less irritating. BTW, you could use a bit of plagia on synaptic's synaptic.desktop, which has it right: "Package Manager", as for KPackage. synaptic.desktop includes a lot more translations than adept_manager.desktop. At least GenericName[fr]=Gestionnaire de paquets is a good translation and should be copied to adept_manager.desktop. And...thanks for Adept. I'm starting to ponder which one to use between Adept and Synaptic :) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454045: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454044, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-manager containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454046: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454044, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-updater Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-updater containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#416867: marked as done (adept-notifier: adept doesn't respected hold flag)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #416867, regarding adept-notifier: adept doesn't respected hold flag to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 416867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416867 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-notifier Version: 2.1.2 Severity: normal Whenever I click on the adept notifier, it wants to upgrade all packages, even those marked as hold (or is this a bug in a adept-updater?). Aptitude, apt-get get, and even dselect are all smart enough not do this without at least asking for persmission first. It would also be nice if the updater would ignore packages marked hold in its little status icon, although I suppose that might be really part of bug #386473. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (100, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages adept-notifier depends on: ii adept-updater 2.1.2 system update tool for KDE ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.6.46.4-0.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6 core libraries and binaries for al ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc11:4.1.1-21GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-21 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb11.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime adept-notifier recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454046: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454045, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-updater Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-updater containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454045: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454046, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_manager.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-manager containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#673040: marked as done ([adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #673040, regarding [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673040 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 Severity: serious adept was apparently not adapted to work with the new Packages files that do not have extended descriptions. Consequently, it shows short descriptions instead of extended descriptions, as if APT had been configured to download no description files. See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/01/msg4.html for background on the change which caused this. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 Debian Release: wheezy/sid 990 testing security.debian.org 990 testing debian.mirror.iweb.ca 500 unstable debian.mirror.iweb.ca --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+-=== kde-runtime | 4:4.7.4-2 libapt-pkg4.12 (>= 0.8.16~exp9) | 0.9.3 libc6 (>= 2.8) | 2.13-32 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.7.0-7 libkdecore5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libkdeui5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libkio5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libqt4-dbus (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqt4-svg (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.7.0~beta1) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.8.0) | 4:4.8.1-1 libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0) | 4.7.0-7 libxapian22 | 1.2.8-1 zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.7.dfsg-1 apt-xapian-index (>= 0.15) | 0.45 app-install-data | 2010.11.17 anacron | 2.3-18 Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#405758: marked as done (adept-installer: unparsed SGML character entity in details tooltips)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #405758, regarding adept-installer: unparsed SGML character entity in details tooltips to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 405758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-installer Version: 2.1.2 Severity: minor In the Package Relationships tab, letting the mouse on a relationship brings a tooltip when the relationship is too long for the Package column (which is when the package ends in "..."). When a relationship contains a greater sign, the tooltip contains an unparsed SGML character entity ">" rather than ">". For example, the relationship from libkscan1 to libc6 shows as "required: libc6 >= 2.3.6-6. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages adept-installer depends on: ii adept-common 2.1.2 package manager for KDE -- common ii app-install-data 0.1.32.2debianApplication Installer Data Files ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.6.46.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core libraries and binaries for al ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc11:4.1.1-19GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb11.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages adept-installer recommends: ii libqt-perl3.008-2Perl bindings for the Qt library -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454044: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454044, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454044 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-installer Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-installer containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#516791: marked as done (adept is hidden when started through start menu or kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #516791, regarding adept is hidden when started through start menu or kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 516791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta4 Severity: important When starting adept either through the start menu or using kdesu, adept is hidden and cannot be used. Adept does run however as it can be seen running using 'ps'. Also when logging off, adept shows up as though it was hidden behind desktop. Adept does show up fine however by running 'sudo adept' inside a terminal session. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages adept depends on: ii app-install-data 2008.11.27Application Installer Data Files ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.7.20.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii apt-xapian-index 0.17 maintenance tools for a Xapian ind ii kdebase-runtime4:4.1.0-2 runtime components from the offici ii kdelibs5 4:4.1.0-3+b1 core libraries for all KDE 4 appli ii libc6 2.9-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libept00.5.26High-level library for managing De ii libgcc11:4.3.3-4 GCC support library ii libqt4-dbus4.4.3-2 Qt 4 D-Bus module ii libqt4-network 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 network module ii libqt4-svg 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 SVG module ii libqt4-xml 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 XML module ii libqtcore4 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4.4.3-2 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++6 4.3.3-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxapian151.0.10-1 Search engine library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime adept recommends no packages. adept suggests no packages. -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454046: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454046, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_updater.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-updater Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-updater containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#439806: marked as done (adept-manager: sort by popcon statistics)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #439806, regarding adept-manager: sort by popcon statistics to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 439806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-manager Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Hi, It would be nice if adept-manager could sort by popularity. thanks! --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.22.3 Debian Release: lenny/sid 990 testing security.debian.org 990 testing ftp.egr.msu.edu 980 testing ftp.sunet.se 50 unstableftp.uwsg.indiana.edu 25 feisty us.archive.ubuntu.com 25 edgyus.archive.ubuntu.com --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+-== adept-common | 2.1.3 kdelibs4c2a (>= 4:3.5.7-1) | 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-4 libapt-pkg-libc6.6-6-4.4 | libc6 (>= 2.6-1) | 2.6.1-1+b1 libept0(>= 0.5.10) | 0.5.10+b1 libgcc1(>= 1:4.2-20070516) | 1:4.2.1-4 libqt3-mt (>= 3:3.3.7) | 3:3.3.7-6 libstdc++6 (>= 4.2-20070516) | 4.2.1-4 libxapian15| 1.0.2-1 zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-1) | 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-5 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#540649: marked as done (adept: Uses an embedded copy of libept.)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #540649, regarding adept: Uses an embedded copy of libept. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 540649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta5 Severity: important Tags: security Hi again. I read: | Ship internal copy of libept, remove build-depends: libept-dev. I'm not sure you have a good reason to do so, but I'm pretty sure it should be documented in a better way than that. Mraw, KiBi. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#405715: marked as done (adept_installer process remains after exiting adept-installer during package configuration)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #405715, regarding adept_installer process remains after exiting adept-installer during package configuration to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 405715: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=405715 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-installer Version: 2.1.2 Severity: normal If a user exits adept-installer during a package configuration (for example during a debconf prompt), an adept_installer process continues to run "in background", locking dpkg's database until the process is killed as root. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686 Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages adept-installer depends on: ii adept-common 2.1.2 package manager for KDE -- common ii app-install-data 0.1.32.2debianApplication Installer Data Files ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.6.46.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii kdelibs4c2a4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 core libraries and binaries for al ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc11:4.1.1-19GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.7-2 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-19 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb11.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime Versions of packages adept-installer recommends: ii libqt-perl3.008-2Perl bindings for the Qt library -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#454044: marked as done (/usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu)
Your message dated Wed, 16 May 2012 17:16:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673085: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #454046, regarding /usr/share/applications/kde/adept_installer.desktop: should use su-to-root instead of kdesu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 454046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept-installer Version: 2.1.3+b1 Severity: wishlist Usertag: su-to-root kdesu-su-to-root Hello maintainer, While searching for desktop files on my system using kdesu instead of su-to-root I've found adept-installer containing one. It would be nice if you patched the .desktop files so they use su-to-root instead. Why? Quoting Daniel Baumann from #453931: "0. Desktop Integration It doesn't make sense that e.g. a KDE application calls (hardcoded) kdesu when beeing used on a Gnome environment. It should use su-to-root, which will automatically call either gksu (default) or kdesu (when beeing launched under KDE) for better integration into the running desktop environment. 1. Live Integration On Debian Live systems, we can not use su, but sudo (avoid setting a root password for security and usability reasons). If all desktop entries and menu files would use su-to-root, we can overwrite the default usage of su on one central place (/etc/su-to-rootrc resp. ~/.su-to-rootrc) and be done with it. Currently, an application on a live system which requires root rights but calls kdesu or gsku instead of su-to-root uses therefore su, which won't work, and thus, the user ends up with a non-working application." Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Raphael Geissert -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2+rm Dear submitter, as the package adept has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673085 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#670794: gnunet: FTBFS on hurd-i386.
On 04/30/12 10:25, Bertrand Marc wrote: Hello Cyril, Thank you for the report and these patches. I am trying to adopt GNUnet (0.9.2-1 is already on mentors). Did you provide patches against the current version in unstable or the one in mentors ? Sorry for the late reply. The patches are against the 0.8.x version found in Sid. I hope they still apply :) Otherwise, just let me know, I'll have another look at the code. Good luck ! Cyril. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb431bd.5080...@gmail.com
Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
On 2012-05-15 18:19, Neil Williams wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:50 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...] adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit for release. Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from the package names and get the dependencies right, upgrade packages and remove packages, it is basically functional. For reference, see #657557 That's for the www.d.o website, not a package! Completely inapplicable. I'm not sure what you are describing as inapplicable. Comparing a pseudo-package for a website with a package in the archive is just inapplicable. There's no basis for comparison. I was comparing bugs. I'd expect: Users to avoid trying adept Nothing to do with the severity of any bugs, that has been happening all of it's own since 2009 according to the popcon graph. adept had RC bugs other than this one since 2009. Developers to notice that adept needs love That hasn't happened all the time adept has been orphaned (5 months), it's not likely to happen before the release. I guess it did happen in so far as there were some NMUs to fix previous RC bugs. Indeed, it didn't trigger a strong and long-lasting love so far. The release team to remove adept from testing, if it can't find love No point just removing from testing. Removing from testing will ensure adept doesn't make it to wheezy in its current state. But indeed, I wasn't saying adept should only be removed from testing. Do you want to have it removed from Debian completely? Orphaned bugs rarely receive bug fixes, more likely that someone will seek to remove the package. adept has already missed the Squeeze release by being removed before that release. If it's going to miss Wheezy as well, it probably is worth removing from Debian entirely. I won't say that adept should be removed from Debian completely. As a KDE user curious about package management, I find adept interesting to try. Until it's fixed, it could have a place in experimental. No. That requires an upload and there's obviously nobody willing to do it. Experimental is for packages where there is some development ongoing, not bitrot stuff which has nobody to maintain it. There are really no package quality standards in experimental besides - possibly - not to break unrelated packages. Some broken packages keep being uploaded even to unstable, even though they've been unusable for years. I didn't say that adept should or would be uploaded to experimental, just that it could. But realistically, adept was started in 2005, never made a stable release since then, is still beta (for KDE 4) and was discontinued over 3 years ago. I wouldn't expect a stable adept too soon, and doubt it's worth to have more NMUs. I found this bug with 10 minutes of testing - obviously nobody's used it since 4 months. So all your bug report has done is to have brought removal closer. OK, that's what happens with RC bugs in orphaned leaf packages more often than not. So be it. #673085 That's a fair decision in the current situation. Thank you very much -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb440b3.5070...@gmail.com
