Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 Severity: serious adept was apparently not adapted to work with the new Packages files that do not have extended descriptions. Consequently, it shows short descriptions instead of extended descriptions, as if APT had been configured to download no description files. See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/01/msg4.html for background on the change which caused this. --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 Debian Release: wheezy/sid 990 testing security.debian.org 990 testing debian.mirror.iweb.ca 500 unstable debian.mirror.iweb.ca --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+-=== kde-runtime | 4:4.7.4-2 libapt-pkg4.12 (>= 0.8.16~exp9) | 0.9.3 libc6 (>= 2.8) | 2.13-32 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.7.0-7 libkdecore5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libkdeui5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libkio5 (>= 4:4.3.4) | 4:4.7.4-4 libqt4-dbus (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqt4-svg (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.7.0~beta1) | 4:4.8.1-1 libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.8.0) | 4:4.8.1-1 libstdc++6 (>= 4.4.0) | 4.7.0-7 libxapian22 | 1.2.8-1 zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.7.dfsg-1 apt-xapian-index (>= 0.15) | 0.45 app-install-data | 2010.11.17 anacron | 2.3-18 Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb287f5.1070...@gmail.com
Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 673040 normal Bug #673040 [adept] [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > done Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:44:37 -0400 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Filipus Klutiero wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Package: adept Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > > Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673040 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133710307316202.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
severity 673040 normal done On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:44:37 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: adept > Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 > Severity: serious No justification for this severity. Downgrading. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpPO3QGOpFgv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#624399: marked as done (libtextcat: CVS directories in source)
Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 18:07:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#673002: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #624399, regarding libtextcat: CVS directories in source to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 624399: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624399 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libtextcat Version: 2.2-2 Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: era+deb...@iki.fi lucid$ apt-get source libtextcat <... output as expected, getting version 2.2 ...> lucid$ cd libtextcat-2.2 lucud$ find . -name CVS -ls 29246614 drwxr-xr-x 2 era era 4096 May 19 2003 ./langclass/ShortTexts/CVS 29245804 drwxr-xr-x 2 era era 4096 May 22 2003 ./langclass/LM/CVS 29245744 drwxr-xr-x 2 era era 4096 May 19 2003 ./langclass/CVS /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.2-11+rm Dear submitter, as the package libtextcat has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673002 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#673046: i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization)
Package: i8kutils Version: 1.33 Severity: normal Hi, I know this package is orphaned, but found some information that might be interesting for other kernel related bugs, like #507635. When I start i8kmon service, touchpad becomes randomly irresponsive and affects user experience. This bug happens both in X and console mode, but it happens more often when using a graphical session. I'm writing this bug from the console with gpm (no X processes running). One has to intensively use the touchpad with such settings to reproduce this behaviour. During an X session it's much more frequent. Steps to reproduce it: 1) Load the i8k module 2) Enable i8kmon service in /etc/default/i8kmon 3) Start i8kmon service Entries appear in /var/log/messages: May 15 19:29:12 kotetsu kernel: [ 1108.89] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 1 bytes away. [...] May 15 19:31:02 kotetsu kernel: [ 1218.750811] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 4 bytes away. [...] May 15 19:31:02 kotetsu kernel: [ 1218.750811] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 4 bytes away. This issue goes away if i8kmon service is stopped. Unloading i8k module is not necessary. I'm writing from a Dell Inspiron 14z and psmouse module is loaded with default options. Regards, Abel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages i8kutils depends on: ii libc6 2.13-30 ii tk8.4 [wish] 8.4.19-4 i8kutils recommends no packages. i8kutils suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/default/i8kmon changed: ENABLED=1 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120515175206.4408.81268.report...@kotetsu.lan
Bug#673002: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libtextcat | 2.2-11 | source libtextcat-data | 2.2-11 | all libtextcat-dev | 2.2-11 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libtextcat0 | 2.2-11 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- ROM; orphaned; dead upstream; unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 673...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/673002 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sum9m-0003tl...@franck.debian.org
Bug#673002: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.2-11+rm Dear submitter, as the package libtextcat has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/673002 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sum9t-0003u1...@franck.debian.org
Processed: Re: i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 673046 src:linux-2.6 3.2.17-1 Bug #673046 [i8kutils] i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization) Bug reassigned from package 'i8kutils' to 'src:linux-2.6'. No longer marked as found in versions i8kutils/1.33. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #673046 to the same values previously set Bug #673046 [src:linux-2.6] i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization) Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.17-1. > affects 673046 + i8kutils Bug #673046 [src:linux-2.6] i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization) Added indication that 673046 affects i8kutils > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13371065415498.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:34:44 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > severity 673040 serious Don't do severity ping-pong. adept is orphaned, so I lowered the severity as part of the QA team. You, as submitter, must provide justification for the severity. Anyone else on the QA team agree on this severity? > adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit > for release. Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from the package names and get the dependencies right, upgrade packages and remove packages, it is basically functional. > For reference, see #657557 That's for the www.d.o website, not a package! Completely inapplicable. Justification should reference Debian Policy, as advised by reportbug itself. adept is not unusable without extended descriptions, it is a bit harder to use but that is NOT a justification for a release critical bug, it's just a bug. Just what do you expect to happen by making adept have an RC bug when it is orphaned? Do you want to have it removed from Debian completely? Orphaned bugs rarely receive bug fixes, more likely that someone will seek to remove the package. adept has already missed the Squeeze release by being removed before that release. If it's going to miss Wheezy as well, it probably is worth removing from Debian entirely. Severity does NOTHING to influence how quickly a bug is fixed, especially with an orphaned package. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpwtdT8HOqxL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#673046: i8kutils: Touchpad random irresponsiveness (isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization)
reassign 673046 src:linux-2.6 3.2.17-1 affects 673046 + i8kutils quit Hi Abel, Abel Martín wrote: > When I start i8kmon service, touchpad becomes randomly irresponsive > and affects user experience. This bug happens both in X and console > mode, but it happens more often when using a graphical session. I'm > writing this bug from the console with gpm (no X processes running). > One has to intensively use the touchpad with such settings to > reproduce this behaviour. [...] > 1) Load the i8k module > 2) Enable i8kmon service in /etc/default/i8kmon > 3) Start i8kmon service [...] > [ 1108.89] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost > synchronization, throwing 1 bytes away. > > [ 1218.750811] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost > synchronization, throwing 4 bytes away. > > [ 1218.750811] psmouse serio1: TouchPad at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost > synchronization, throwing 4 bytes away. > > This issue goes away if i8kmon service is stopped. Unloading i8k > module is not necessary. > > I'm writing from a Dell Inspiron 14z and psmouse module is loaded > with default options. Thanks! Reassigning to kernel. Please attach full "dmesg" output from booting up and reproducing this bug. Is this a regression? Do earlier or later kernel versions behave differently? (The squeeze and experimental kernels should work fine in the context of a wheezy/sid system.) Curious, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120515182837.GA6326@burratino
Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
severity 673040 serious thanks Hi Neil, On 2012-05-15 13:31, Neil Williams wrote: severity 673040 normal done On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:44:37 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 Severity: serious No justification for this severity. Downgrading. adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit for release. For reference, see #657557 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb2a1c4.8040...@gmail.com
Re: Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
On 2012-05-15 14:45, Neil Williams wrote: On Tue, 15 May 2012 14:34:44 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: severity 673040 serious Don't do severity ping-pong. adept is orphaned, so I lowered the severity as part of the QA team. You, as submitter, must provide justification for the severity. I just did that - adept is unfit for release with this bug. [...] adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit for release. Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from the package names and get the dependencies right, upgrade packages and remove packages, it is basically functional. For reference, see #657557 That's for the www.d.o website, not a package! Completely inapplicable. I'm not sure what you are describing as inapplicable. Justification should reference Debian Policy, as advised by reportbug itself. A policy violation is only one possible cause of a serious bug. adept is not unusable without extended descriptions, it is a bit harder to use but that is NOT a justification for a release critical bug, it's just a bug. The severity for bugs making packages unusable is /grave/. Just what do you expect to happen by making adept have an RC bug when it is orphaned? I'd expect: Users to avoid trying adept Developers to notice that adept needs love The release team to remove adept from testing, if it can't find love Do you want to have it removed from Debian completely? Orphaned bugs rarely receive bug fixes, more likely that someone will seek to remove the package. adept has already missed the Squeeze release by being removed before that release. If it's going to miss Wheezy as well, it probably is worth removing from Debian entirely. I won't say that adept should be removed from Debian completely. As a KDE user curious about package management, I find adept interesting to try. Until it's fixed, it could have a place in experimental. But realistically, adept was started in 2005, never made a stable release since then, is still beta (for KDE 4) and was discontinued over 3 years ago. I wouldn't expect a stable adept too soon, and doubt it's worth to have more NMUs. I found this bug with 10 minutes of testing - obviously nobody's used it since 4 months.
Bug#673040: [adept] Short descriptions displayed instead of extended descriptions
On Tue, 15 May 2012 15:20:50 -0400 Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > Don't do severity ping-pong. adept is orphaned, so I lowered the > > severity as part of the QA team. You, as submitter, must provide > > justification for the severity. > > I just did that - adept is unfit for release with this bug. I find that questionable but as nobody else has bothered to do much about adept, it's not worth fighting over it. It's orphaned, it has bugs, nobody is showing any sign of dealing with the existing bugs. I've filed for removal from Debian. #673085 > [...] > >> adept is a package manager, displaying wrong descriptions makes it unfit > >> for release. > > Not true - it is a bug but as long as adept can install packages from > > the package names and get the dependencies right, upgrade packages and > > remove packages, it is basically functional. > > > >> For reference, see #657557 > > That's for the www.d.o website, not a package! Completely inapplicable. > > I'm not sure what you are describing as inapplicable. Comparing a pseudo-package for a website with a package in the archive is just inapplicable. There's no basis for comparison. > I'd expect: > Users to avoid trying adept Nothing to do with the severity of any bugs, that has been happening all of it's own since 2009 according to the popcon graph. > Developers to notice that adept needs love That hasn't happened all the time adept has been orphaned (5 months), it's not likely to happen before the release. > The release team to remove adept from testing, if it can't find love No point just removing from testing. > > Do you want to have it removed from Debian completely? > > Orphaned bugs rarely receive bug fixes, more likely that someone will > > seek to remove the package. adept has already missed the Squeeze > > release by being removed before that release. If it's going to miss > > Wheezy as well, it probably is worth removing from Debian entirely. > > > > > I won't say that adept should be removed from Debian completely. As a > KDE user curious about package management, I find adept interesting to > try. Until it's fixed, it could have a place in experimental. No. That requires an upload and there's obviously nobody willing to do it. Experimental is for packages where there is some development ongoing, not bitrot stuff which has nobody to maintain it. > But > realistically, adept was started in 2005, never made a stable release > since then, is still beta (for KDE 4) and was discontinued over 3 years > ago. I wouldn't expect a stable adept too soon, and doubt it's worth to > have more NMUs. I found this bug with 10 minutes of testing - obviously > nobody's used it since 4 months. So all your bug report has done is to have brought removal closer. OK, that's what happens with RC bugs in orphaned leaf packages more often than not. So be it. #673085 -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpVt6Jlzziak.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processing of mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.changes
mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mpc123_0.2.4-2.dsc mpc123_0.2.4-2.debian.tar.gz mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1surfa-0006cg...@franck.debian.org
mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: mpc123_0.2.4-2.debian.tar.gz to main/m/mpc123/mpc123_0.2.4-2.debian.tar.gz mpc123_0.2.4-2.dsc to main/m/mpc123/mpc123_0.2.4-2.dsc mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.deb to main/m/mpc123/mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.deb Changes: mpc123 (0.2.4-2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * debian/control, debian/compat - Set maintainer to QA group - Update Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no other changes) - Bump debhelper compatibility level to 9 - Add Homepage field - Improve descriptions a bit * debian/source/format, debian/patches/* - Switch to source package format '3.0 (quilt)' - Add current source changes as single patch - New patch to fix manpage hyphens and typo (thanks lintian!) * debian/rules, debian/dirs, debian/install, debian/manpages - Switch to debhelper sequencer * debian/watch - Added watch file * debian/copyright - Updated to Copyright Format 1.0 Override entries for your package: mpc123_0.2.4-2.dsc - source sound mpc123_0.2.4-2_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1surv4-00079x...@franck.debian.org
