Bug#664715: kerneloops: default submission site dead, should not be shipped in wheezy
Package: kerneloops-daemon Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org The default submission site for kerneloops-daemon is dead and does not appear to be coming back any time soon, despite recentish interest: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/1/436 https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/360 Either the package should be removed or the default submission site should be replaced with one run by the Debian kernel team so that the package does something useful by default. Fedora have removed the package since abrt provides similar services (but Fedora-specific): http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=kerneloops.git;a=blob;f=dead.package -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#269771: marked as done (popfile: should provide per user settings)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #269771, regarding popfile: should provide per user settings to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 269771: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=269771 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.21.2-1 Severity: normal You should provide popfile interface per users. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.30.2 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite-perl0.29-1 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.03-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information excluded --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#309996: marked as done (popfile: Confuses Evolution)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #309996, regarding popfile: Confuses Evolution to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 309996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.0-1 Severity: normal For the 8th time, Evolution ended up popping the entire collection of emails saved in popfile's history. I am unsure under what conditions this happens. I had experienced network problems before this happened,like a router malfunction or switching from an eth0 to a wlan0 network device. After that, whatever the popfile pop daemon says to Evolution it confuses it. Another problem related to this, is that when I change network subnets or network devices or manually change /etc/resolv.conf, I need to restart the popfile service. I'm wondering if there is some caching going on that throws popfile off. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux syd.mkgnu.net 2.4.23-kpm #1 Thu Jan 29 20:00:03 MST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.47 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.3.22 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite-perl0.29-1 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.03-1 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.6-2 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libtimedate-perl 1.11-1 Time and date functions for perl. ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: * popfile/popport: 7071 * popfile/backupcorpus: true * popfile/poplocal: true * popfile/uiport: 7070 * popfile/uilocal: true --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#366402: marked as done (popfile: Closes when non-root does "nmap localhost")
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #366402, regarding popfile: Closes when non-root does "nmap localhost" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 366402: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366402 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.4-1 Severity: normal Hello, If, as a regular user I do "nmap localhost," it shows that popfile is running on the correct port. Thereafter, however, popfile is no longer running. There appears to be no information in the log (I increased the loglevel to 2, but the only items printed have to do with connections made before nmap was run, and then after I restarted popfile). Also, when I do "nmap localhost" as root, popfile does not close. Maybe this is actually a security feature? Thanks, Jason -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.87 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite2-perl 2:0.33-6 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.10-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.8-1 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.67-1 Client and server side SOAP implem ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-5 Time and date functions for Perl ii perl 5.8.8-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction popfile recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * popfile/uilocal: false * popfile/popport: 7071 popfile/backupcorpus: true * popfile/poplocal: true * popfile/uiport: 7070 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#438464: marked as done (popfile: Doesn't handle headers with mixed dos and unix newlines too well)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #438464, regarding popfile: Doesn't handle headers with mixed dos and unix newlines too well to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 438464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438464 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.4-1 Severity: normal Hi! Occasionally, I get emails with slightly weird headers - with a mix of dos and unix line endings in the headers (Like the lower 6 header lines has windows endings). Popfile doesn't handle this too well, as it treats it like the doss newline is the end of headers, so popfile inserts its headers after that. I guess the cause for this is some semi-broken webmail thingies, but I see it more and more common. A snippet from a email that has been thru popfile is here: (the occurences of ^M in my vim has been replaced by me with ¤ Received: by xx.xx (Postfix, from userid 33) id A8DD3704AA; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:37:37 + (UTC) To: y...@.xx Subject: mod_rewrite Received: from 84.16.171.200 (auth. user x...@xxx.xxx)¤X-Text-Classification: ham X-POPFile-Link: http://127.0.0.1:7070/jump_to_message?view=229737 Status: R X-Status: NC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: by x.xx with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:37:37 +0200¤ To: y...@.xx¤ Subject: mod_rewrite¤ Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:37:37 +0200¤ X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: .xx)¤ Message-ID: ¤ (the email body also uses dos line endings) If popfile could correct this, it would be very nice. /SUne -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-vserver-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.104 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.14 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite2-perl 2:0.33-6 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.10-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.9-1 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.69-2 Client and server side SOAP implem ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-8 Time and date functions for Perl ii perl 5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction popfile recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * popfile/popport: 7071 * popfile/backupcorpus: true * popfile/poplocal: true * popfile/uiport: 7070 * popfile/uilocal: true --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#458349: marked as done (popfile: An error has occurred which has caused POPFile to return the error 500.)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #458349, regarding popfile: An error has occurred which has caused POPFile to return the error 500. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 458349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458349 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.4-1 Severity: important I've been using POPFile for the past 6 months with Evolution as the client with no problems. Today, all of the sudden, Evolution is unable to pop mail from all 8 of the email personalities I'm using. The log of a session manually connecting through telnet follows: $ telnet 127.0.0.1 7070 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to 127.0.0.1. Escape character is '^]'. user pop.gmail.com;995;recent:makri...@asu.edu;ssl pass HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 241 POPFile Web Server Error 500 POPFile Web Server Error 500 An error has occurred which has caused POPFile to return the error 500. Click here to continue. Connection closed by foreign host. I'm not sure why this happens, or what caused it. Restarting the daemon does not help. What can I do to better understand or correct the error ? -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.102Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11etch1 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite2-perl 2:0.33-6 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.10-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.8-1HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.69-1 Client and server side SOAP implem ii libtimedate-perl1.1600-5 Time and date functions for Perl ii perl5.8.8-7etch1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction popfile recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * popfile/popport: 7071 * popfile/backupcorpus: true * popfile/poplocal: true * popfile/uiport: 7070 * popfile/uilocal: true --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#462683: marked as done (New upstream release: 1.0.0)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #462683, regarding New upstream release: 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 462683: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462683 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Popfile has made its 1.0 release. Please update the Debian package. See http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=767078 for a list of changes. Thank you. -- http://daniel.hahler.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#538080: marked as done (popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #462683, regarding popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 462683: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462683 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.4-1.2 Severity: normal The Debian release seems to date from Feb 2006, which is 3 1/2 years old! -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite2-perl 2:0.33-8 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.20-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.9-1 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.710.08-2 Client and server side SOAP implem ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-9 Time and date functions for Perl ii perl 5.10.0-24 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction popfile recommends no packages. Versions of packages popfile suggests: ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.26-1 Perl module implementing object or pn libtext-kakasi-perl(no description available) -- debconf information: popfile/popport: 7071 popfile/backupcorpus: true popfile/poplocal: true popfile/uiport: 7070 popfile/uilocal: true --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#538080: marked as done (popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #538080, regarding popfile: new upstream release v1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 538080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Version: 0.22.4-1.2 Severity: normal The Debian release seems to date from Feb 2006, which is 3 1/2 years old! -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages popfile depends on: ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii libdbd-sqlite2-perl 2:0.33-8 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.20-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML ii libhtml-template-perl 2.9-1 HTML::Template : A module for usin ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.710.08-2 Client and server side SOAP implem ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-9 Time and date functions for Perl ii perl 5.10.0-24 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction popfile recommends no packages. Versions of packages popfile suggests: ii libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.26-1 Perl module implementing object or pn libtext-kakasi-perl(no description available) -- debconf information: popfile/popport: 7071 popfile/backupcorpus: true popfile/poplocal: true popfile/uiport: 7070 popfile/uilocal: true --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#462683: marked as done (New upstream release: 1.0.0)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #538080, regarding New upstream release: 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 538080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: popfile Severity: wishlist --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Popfile has made its 1.0 release. Please update the Debian package. See http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=767078 for a list of changes. Thank you. -- http://daniel.hahler.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#664507: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: blm |0.9.3-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 664...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/664507 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s9wzz-0002d0...@franck.debian.org
Bug#664507: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.9.3-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package blm has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664507 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s9wzd-0002dd...@franck.debian.org
Bug#664324: marked as done ([PATCH] popfile: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:54:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #664324,
regarding [PATCH] popfile: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
664324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: popfile
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The dpatch patch management system has been deprecated for some time. The
Lintian currently flags use of dpatch packages as an error. The new 3.0
packaging format is an improved version which, among other things, contains
patch management built-in. For more information, see:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0
I had some free time; see attached patch to migrate to new package
format. Note that all files in debian/patches/* are canocalized to
*.patch.
Let me know if there is anything that needs adjusting or if it is ok
to upload this version in a NMU in case you are working on other
issues needing attention.
Thanks,
Jari
>From 434b63526c9577a12d2b6dc75ca379346b505964 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jari Aalto
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:00:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] format-3.0
Organization: Private
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto
---
Makefile | 27 --
debian/changelog | 13 +++
debian/compat |2 +-
debian/control |4 +-
debian/patches/00list |2 -
...n_config.dpatch => 01_fullpath_in_config.patch} |9 +
debian/patches/01_logdir.dpatch| 20 ---
debian/patches/01_logdir.patch | 19 ++
...rator.dpatch => 01_server_user_separator.patch} |9 +
debian/patches/02_sqlite2.dpatch | 30
debian/patches/02_sqlite2.patch| 28 +++
debian/patches/10_makefile.patch | 37
debian/patches/series |3 ++
debian/popfile.manpages|6 ++--
debian/rules |7 ++--
debian/source/format |1 +
{debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-bayes |0
.../wrappers}/popfile-bayes.8 |0
.../wrappers}/popfile-insert |0
.../wrappers}/popfile-insert.8 |0
{debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-pipe |0
.../wrappers}/popfile-pipe.8 |0
.../wrappers/start_popfile.sh |0
23 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Makefile
delete mode 100644 debian/patches/00list
rename debian/patches/{01_fullpath_in_config.dpatch => 01_fullpath_in_config.patch} (96%)
delete mode 100644 debian/patches/01_logdir.dpatch
create mode 100644 debian/patches/01_logdir.patch
rename debian/patches/{01_server_user_separator.dpatch => 01_server_user_separator.patch} (77%)
delete mode 100644 debian/patches/02_sqlite2.dpatch
create mode 100644 debian/patches/02_sqlite2.patch
create mode 100644 debian/patches/10_makefile.patch
create mode 100644 debian/patches/series
create mode 100644 debian/source/format
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-bayes (100%)
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-bayes.8 (100%)
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-insert (100%)
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-insert.8 (100%)
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-pipe (100%)
rename {debian_wrappers => debian/wrappers}/popfile-pipe.8 (100%)
rename start_popfile.sh => debian/wrappers/start_popfile.sh (100%)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
deleted file mode 100644
index e6b34a9..000
--- a/Makefile
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-
-.PHONY: all install clean
-
-all:
- cp v*.change changelog
-
-install:
- cp *.gif *.pl *.sh $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/
- cp stopwords popfile.pck $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/
- chmod +x $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/*.pl \
- $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/*.sh
- cp -Rf Classifier $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/
- cp -Rf POPFile $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/
- cp -Rf Proxy $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/popfile/
- cp -Rf UI $(DESTDIR)/usr/share
Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: popfile | 0.22.4-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 664...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/664503 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s9why-0003ht...@franck.debian.org
Bug#664503: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.22.4-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package popfile has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/664503 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s9whc-0003ha...@franck.debian.org
Bug#664772: israndom: lzma/ppmd compression do not work: "Error, cannot load compressor lzmax."
Package: israndom Version: 1.0.7-4 Severity: normal Hi, I am trying to figure out how to use the other compression methods. But so far, only bzlib seems to work: $ israndom -q -c bzlib some.rand $ israndom -q -c lzma some.rand Error, cannot load compressor lzma. $ israndom -q -c lzmax some.rand Error, cannot load compressor lzmax. $ israndom -q -c ppmd some.rand Error, cannot load compressor ppmd. $ israndom -q -c ppmdx some.rand Error, cannot load compressor ppmdx I cannot find any suggestions in the manpage about what to do in this case, so I guess it is a bug. Cheers, Linus -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages israndom depends on: ii libc6 2.13-27 ii libcomplearn1 1.1.7-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-6 ii libgsl0ldbl1.15+dfsg-1 ii libxml22.7.8.dfsg-7 israndom recommends no packages. israndom suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120320191328.2852.34680.reportbug@Linus-Debian
Processed: tagging 664612
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 664612 + help Bug #664612 [src:wu-ftpd] wu-ftpd: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: 'struct dqblk64' has no member named 'dqb_fhardlimit' Added tag(s) help. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664612 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13322754578697.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#664809: wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files
Package: wdm Version: 1.28-11 Severity: wishlist User: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: selinux-dm Dear maintainer, To ease the use of selinux in debian for the user, it could be convinient if the desktop managers were calling the necessary pam module required to properly set the user security context. If SELinux is not enabled on the user system, the pam module will return a success. You can find an example in my proposed a patch[0] for GDM3 or in the login service. You can find my inital request for feedback on debian-devel[1]. Cheers, Laurent Bigonville [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661289 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/03/msg00295.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-packages
