Re: Bug#654417: Migration on good tracks

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi again.

Cyril Brulebois  (25/02/2012):
> Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip
> 
> The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]:
>  - arb/non-free, missing libmotif-dev on other platforms, so not
>binNMU'd.

Building non-free issue: #661280

>  - openmsx: binNMU FTBFS

#660415

>  - rlvm: sid-only

BinNMU'd on all platforms but powerpc, where it FTBFS: #638271

>  - spring: binNMU FTBFS

#660450

>  - tulip: binNMU FTBFS, sid-only

#650653

> So I've hinted arb/non-free, openmsx, and spring for removal so that
> the transition can happen. Since outdated binaries were still around,
> I “simulated” a britney dry run by “forcing” glew in, which seemed to
> work fine.
> 
> Hopefully tomorrow morning's (10:00Z) run should see packages migrate.
> 
> I'll make sure all the above-mentioned packages have bugs filed against
> them, and I'll see what needs to be done to remove old glew binaries
> from testing.

Done, and old glew binaries are gone. ben file moved away accordingly.

Closing this bug report.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#649819: marked as done (openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#649819: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #649819,
regarding openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of 
incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
649819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openmsx
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: wishlist
User: lib...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: libpng15-transition

Hi,

I uploaded libpng 1.5 to experimental.
libpng maintainers plan to transition from libpng 1.2 to 1.5.
I am checking build it the package depend to libpng.

I noticed your package FTBFS by libpng 1.5.
I attached build log.
Could you check your package?

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


openmsx_0.8.1-4.2_amd64.build.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openmsx
Source-Version: 0.8.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 649...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bas Wijnen  (supplier of updated openmsx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:05 +0100
Source: openmsx
Binary: openmsx openmsx-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bas Wijnen 
Changed-By: Bas Wijnen 
Description: 
 openmsx- MSX emulator that aims for perfection
 openmsx-data - datafiles for openMSX, an MSX emulator
Closes: 634066 649819 659040 660415
Changes: 
 openmsx (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #659040, #649819)
   * Adopting the package. (Closes: #634066)
   * Remove patches which are accepted upstream.
   * Simplify build system.
   * Include zlib.h instead of declaring the struct. (Closes: #660415)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 9be57cfc9ee5c3573f375308b458f4832fa7ee57 1323 openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 06bfb3c649ecc82d129bbe258d2167ea89ebacfa 2881089 openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
 9aa2d60cab0635c7f41d83f093c18a4e4d74e351 9653 openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
 878c2c00f059c4e1f126026e49d3a3a1348f15b7 2012286 openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
 868b5115b0883c0749e1e7c37d37c65bd6af0b0b 1339434 openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 93e7b4cc8ad57bb1ec61412e02e4b19a6f25864345700d2fd270c0643e990a7a 1323 
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 437c43cda43adb7df84e2ae6180b6e76a9dfd92d177981b0c7d10bf16cc32411 2881089 
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
 193d11f1b8b856e979ff7375e4c10204192d035e76cf06a5543dde637353082c 9653 
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
 eed2652a5125aa888bac76e77516c52a795fc25ad92d8713cf6681ef07fb065b 2012286 
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
 cabc203f4d1beec838bb8d21fbefd8a0d2d0a0a423bc079694c74bc63ff908ee 1339434 
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Files: 
 270abbdf46507cb39cf81c9b39c86aa3 1323 otherosfs optional openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 42bceabdd89a4986e745f74ac44da631 2881089 otherosfs optional 
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
 5c999df76f35fe6f2f760c708b8f 9653 otherosfs optional 
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
 fcd8f828cd13b99c6f6b0c942845e136 2012286 otherosfs optional 
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
 6ed822289258156e2b23fe98c7d7bf18 1339434 otherosfs optional 
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9LvtoACgkQFShl+2J8z5XflACfW6SQZ/4FpxrAAfJ1VhCpxzMt
6ywAoKeezdGhHD0agrYUrAJyTVCp78Ys
=+LWw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#659040: marked as done (openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#659040: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #659040,
regarding openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
659040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659040
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openmsx
Version: 0.8.1-4
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Please upgrade openMSX in Debian to 0.8.2, it also fixes at least one
Debian bug (the FTBFS).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openmsx depends on:
ii  cbios 0.25-2
ii  libc6 2.13-24
ii  libgcc1   1:4.6.2-12
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  7.11.2-1
ii  libglew1.61.6.0-4
ii  libogg0   1.2.2~dfsg-1
ii  libpng12-01.2.46-4
ii  libsdl-ttf2.0-0   2.0.9-1.1
ii  libsdl1.2debian   1.2.14-7
ii  libstdc++64.6.2-12
ii  libtheora01.1.1+dfsg.1-3
ii  libvorbis0a   1.3.2-1.1
ii  libxml2   2.7.8.dfsg-7
ii  openmsx-data  0.8.1-4
ii  tcl8.58.5.11-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3

openmsx recommends no packages.

Versions of packages openmsx suggests:
pn  openmsx-catapult  0.8.1-3
pn  openmsx-debugger  

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openmsx
Source-Version: 0.8.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
  to main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 659...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bas Wijnen  (supplier of updated openmsx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:05 +0100
Source: openmsx
Binary: openmsx openmsx-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bas Wijnen 
Changed-By: Bas Wijnen 
Description: 
 openmsx- MSX emulator that aims for perfection
 openmsx-data - datafiles for openMSX, an MSX emulator
Closes: 634066 649819 659040 660415
Changes: 
 openmsx (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #659040, #649819)
   * Adopting the package. (Closes: #634066)
   * Remove patches which are accepted upstream.
   * Simplify build system.
   * Include zlib.h instead of declaring the struct. (Closes: #660415)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 9be57cfc9ee5c3573f375308b458f4832fa7ee57 1323 openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 06bfb3c649ecc82d129bbe258d2167ea89ebacfa 2881089 openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
 9aa2d60cab0635c7f41d83f093c18a4e4d74e351 9653 openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
 878c2c00f059c4e1f126026e49d3a3a1348f15b7 2012286 openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
 868b5115b0883c0749e1e7c37d37c65bd6af0b0b 1339434 openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 93e7b4cc8ad57bb1ec61412e02e4b19a6f25864345700d2fd270c0643e990a7a 1323 
openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 437c43cda43adb7df84e2ae6180b6e76a9dfd92d177981b0c7d10bf16cc32411 2881089 
openmsx_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz
 193d11f1b8b856e979ff7375e4c10204192d035e76cf06a5543dde637353082c 9653 
openmsx_0.8.2-1.debian.tar.gz
 eed2652a5125aa888bac76e77516c52a795fc25ad92d8713cf6681ef07fb065b 2012286 
openmsx_0.8.2-1_i386.deb
 cabc203f4d1beec838bb8d21fbefd8a0d2d0a0a423bc079694c74bc63ff908ee 1339434 
openmsx-data_0.8.2-1_all.deb
Files: 
 270abbdf46507cb39cf81c9b39c86aa3 1323 otherosfs optional openmsx_0.8.2-1.dsc
 42bceabdd89a

Bug#660415: marked as done (openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#660415: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660415,
regarding openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: 
conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660415: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: openmsx
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
x-debbugs-cc: wij...@debian.org

openmsx FTBFS in unstable with the following error.

Compiling serialize.cc...
g++ \
 -MP -MMD -MF derived/x86_64-linux-debian/dep/serialize.d \
-o derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o  -g 
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security 
-Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3   -m64 -pipe -Wall -Wextra 
-Wundef -Wunused-macros -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Isrc -Isrc/cassette 
-Isrc/commands -Isrc/config -Isrc/console -Isrc/cpu -Isrc/debugger -Isrc/events 
-Isrc/fdc -Isrc/file -Isrc/ide -Isrc/input -Isrc/laserdisc -Isrc/memory 
-Isrc/security -Isrc/serial -Isrc/settings -Isrc/sound -Isrc/thread -Isrc/utils 
-Isrc/video -Isrc/video/ld -Isrc/video/scalers -Isrc/video/v9990 
-Iderived/x86_64-linux-debian/config -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 
-D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT 
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DPACKAGE_NAME=tcl 
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=tcl -DPACKAGE_VERSION=8.5 -DPACKAGE_STRING=tcl\\\ 8.5 
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT= -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 
-DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 
-DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 
-DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 
-DHAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_SETSTACKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP=1 
-DGETATTRNP_NOT_DECLARED=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -DTCL_CFGVAL_ENCODING=iso8859-1 
-DMODULE_SCOPE=extern\ __attribute__\(\(__visibility__\(hidden\)\)\) 
-DTCL_SHLIB_EXT=.so -DTCL_CFG_OPTIMIZED=1 -DTCL_CFG_DEBUG=1 -DTCL_TOMMATH=1 
-DMP_PREC=4 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_IS_LONG=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1 
-DHAVE_OPENDIR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 -DHAVE_WAITPID=1 -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1 
-DHAVE_GETPWUID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R_5=1 
-DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R=1 
-DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6=1 
-DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R_8=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R=1 
-DUSE_TERMIOS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_GMTIME_R=1 
-DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_MKTIME=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1 
-DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLOCKS=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLKSIZE=1 
-DHAVE_BLKCNT_T=1 -DHAVE_INTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_UINTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_SIGNED_CHAR=1 
-DHAVE_LANGINFO=1 -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DTCL_UNLOAD_DLLS=1 
-I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -I/usr/include/libxml2-c src/serialize.cc
In file included from src/serialize.cc:15:0:
/usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct 
gzFile_s* gzFile'
src/serialize.hh:20:15: error: 'gzFile' has a previous declaration as 'typedef 
void* gzFile'
make[1]: *** [derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd-openmsx_0.8.1-4+b1-amd64-0_JeL0/openmsx-0.8.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

This appears to be the result of a change in zlib.h changing how gzfile 
is defined.


The attatched patch removes the definition of gzfile from serialize.hh 
and replaces it with an include of zlib.h


Note: I'm ccing wij...@debian.org as he has expressed an intent to adopt 
this package.



Description: Fix build with recent zlib
  replace definition of gzFile which conflicts with recent zlib with include
  of zlib.h
Author: Peter Michael Green 
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/???

---
The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:

Origin: , 
Bug: 
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/
Forwarded: 
Reviewed-By: 
Last-Update: 

--- openmsx-0.8.1.orig/src/serialize.hh
+++ openmsx-0.8.1/src/serialize.hh
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-
-typedef void* gzFile;
+#include 
 
 namespace openmsx {
 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openmsx
Source-Version: 0.8.2-1

We believe

Bug#578046: currupts archives on 64bit systems with buffers larger than 2gb

[Koen Holtman]

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Yuri D'Elia wrote:


Package: afio
Severity: important
Tags: patch

When the block size * block count equals to 2gb or more, afio corrupts the
archive by truncating all files larger than 2gb.

[...]

Thanks for the bug report and patch, I am reviewing and incorporating it 
in the upstream.


The patch upgrades some uints to size_t, but it does not upgrade the count 
argument of readall to size_t, so I think this might lead to the achive 
ending up corrupt because not all data is written into it if your memory 
buffer (size * block count) is over 4GB and the file being archived is 
over 4 GB. I am not entirely sure, I have not tested it to verify, but 
just a warning: if you upgraded to 4GB memory buffer you might have gotten 
corrupt archives.


Cheers,

Koen.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.00.1202272345540.1958@noodle

Processing of apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s2de9-g4...@franck.debian.org

Bug#592006: marked as done (apt-build: Should use "debchange" instead of "debchange --append")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#592006: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #592006,
regarding apt-build: Should use "debchange" instead of "debchange --append"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi,

apt-build uses "debchange --append" to add entries on the changelog
file. Therefore, the change (build infos) is logged into the same log 
entry as the official maintainer's one.

- First, the change is expected to be logged in a new entry, tagged
"non-maintainer upload" since it is generally indeed the case.

- Second, it means that the version of the local-built package will be the
same as the one from the official repository. This leads to a very
annoying bug with apt (see #351056). Indeed, after you've built all your
"world" and have stored them in your local repository, apt will want to
upgrade *all* your installed packages to the same version - the one from
your local repository - again and again...

These two issues are fixed by modifying "debchange --append" into
"debchange". This will add a new entry in the change log, tag it as
"non-maintainer upload" if you're not recognized as author of the
package and increment the minor version as expected.

I've attached a patch to fix this that way (though it's not very
useful given the small size of the adjustment).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.7.25.3   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.7.25.3   APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.33 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.10.66scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.15.8.3   Debian package development tools
ii  g++   4:4.4.4-2  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.4.4-2  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  perl  5.10.1-13  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.5   Informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.14.4-1   Gives a fake root environment

apt-build suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build'

-- debconf information excluded
Index: apt-build-0.12.37/apt-build
===
--- apt-build-0.12.37.orig/apt-build	2010-08-06 21:41:42.0 +0200
+++ apt-build-0.12.37/apt-build	2010-08-06 21:44:26.0 +0200
@@ -288,11 +288,11 @@
 chdir "$src_name-$upver";
 
 # Add an entry in changelog 
-system "debchange --append 'Built by apt-build'";
+system "debchange 'Built by apt-build'";
 for (@{$conf->patch})
 {
 	$_ =~ s[.*/(.*)\n$][$1]gio; # basename + chomp
-		system "debchange --append 'Patched with $_'";
+		system "debchange 'Patched with $_'";
 }
 	
 # Patch if asked
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
 	$buildoptions = "Build options: ".
 	$conf->Olevel." ".$conf->mtune." ".$conf->options;
 
-	system "debchange --append \"$buildoptions\"";
+	system "debchange \"$buildoptions\"";
 	
 	# Now build
 	$r = !system $conf->build_command;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for

Bug#314155: marked as done (Unable to find source information for hpijs at /usr/bin/apt-build line 475. (source is called 'hplip'))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#314155: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #314155,
regarding Unable to find source information for hpijs at /usr/bin/apt-build 
line 475. (source is called 'hplip')
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
314155: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: normal


During an "apt-build upgrade", the 'hpijs' package will be upgraded but 
'apt-build' is "Unable to find source 
information" while 'apt' seems to find it :

$ apt-get source hpijs
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait
Nécessité de prendre 10,9Mo dans les sources.
Réception de : 1 ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main hplip 0.9.3-2 
(dsc) [1081B]
Réception de : 2 ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main hplip 0.9.3-2 
(tar) [10,9MB]
Réception de : 3 ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main hplip 0.9.3-2 
(diff) [89,2kB]
10,9Mo réceptionnés en 2m16s (80,5ko/s)

An "apt-cache show hpijs" give us an essential information I think : "Source: 
hplip".

I think that 'apt-build' searches for 'hpijs' instead of 'hplip' ;)

Good luck,
KnuX


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-custom
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.5.28.6   APT utility programs
ii  debconf   1.4.50 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.9 Package building tools for Debian
ii  g++   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.7-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information:
* apt-build/arch_amd: athlon-xp
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
* apt-build/options:
  apt-build/arch_intel: pentium
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /mnt/data/apt-build/build
* apt-build/repository_dir: /mnt/data/apt-build/repository
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 314...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #36917

Bug#391449: marked as done (apt-build: update-source thinks it should downgrade to lower-priority version)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#391449: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #391449,
regarding apt-build: update-source thinks it should downgrade to lower-priority 
version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
391449: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391449
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.24
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

$ apt-cache policy amarok
amarok:
  Installed: 1.4.3-1
  Candidate: 1.4.3-1
  Version table:
 *** 1.4.3-1 0
990 file: apt-build/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.4.3-1 0
800 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
 1.4.1-3 0
900 http://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages

$ sudo apt-build update-source
- -> Updating sources <-
New version for amarok_1.4.3-1.dsc available.
Updating from 1.4.3-1 to 1.4.1-3
Some error occured building package



As you can see, apt-build wants to downgrade to the version in testing, even 
though that's not the candidate according to apt-cache.  Fortunately (I guess), 
it didn't 
proceed, as, "Some error occured building package."  :/

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.6.46 APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.5  Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.9.21 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.22package building tools for Debian
ii  g++   4:4.1.1-7  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.1.1-7  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.20 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.8-6.1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.3   informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.5.10 Gives a fake root environment

- -- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Strong
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
* apt-build/arch_amd: athlon-xp
* apt-build/options:
  apt-build/arch_intel: pentium
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
  apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFJnYK5+GdyTDsrJsRAkx3AKChGxsynEXQPq9NK0mXvKllhnnBGACdEakH
TdaMoSjBpHoaT1QxP2xWLG4=
=Xglb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 391...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 29216

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #291565,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal

Hello Julien,

Here is the promised br ;-)

Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in .

(apt-build 0.11.4)

# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);

# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

=><=

this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in "sub source" and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)

Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)

This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@

chdir $conf{build_dir};

- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

><
(again just a work around ;-) )

just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
-> Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) <-
-> Updating package lists <-
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
-> Building exo <-
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
 debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status] Erro

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #292169,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal

Hello Julien,

Here is the promised br ;-)

Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in .

(apt-build 0.11.4)

# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);

# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

=><=

this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in "sub source" and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)

Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)

This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@

chdir $conf{build_dir};

- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

><
(again just a work around ;-) )

just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
-> Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) <-
-> Updating package lists <-
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
-> Building exo <-
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
 debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status] Erro

Bug#507881: marked as done (apt-build failes with sources using cmake)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#507881: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #507881,
regarding apt-build failes with sources using cmake
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
507881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: normal

when source package uses cmake (such as KDE 4 or phonon), it probes for
compiler and the calls is directly (/usr/lib/apt-build/g++) when doing so,
build failes.
when building the source using regualr debian/rules binary-arch everything
is fine.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-10
Locale: LANG=he_IL, LC_CTYPE=he_IL (charmap=ISO-8859-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.7.18 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.7.18 APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.10.35scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.14.23Debian package development tools
ii  g++   4:4.3.2-2  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.3.2-2  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.22+b1  Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  perl  5.10.0-18  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.4   Informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.11   Gives a fake root environment

apt-build suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
* apt-build/options: -march=pentium3
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium3
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/make_options: -j2
* apt-build/olevel: Strong
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: false


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 507...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: 

Bug#425044: marked as done (apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#425044: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #425044,
regarding apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
425044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.28
Severity: normal

~> apt-build install libgtk2.0-dev
Unable to find source information for libgtk2.0-dev at /usr/bin/apt-build line 
482.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (60, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.34
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
de_DE)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt 0.6.46.4-0.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils   0.6.46.4-0.1 APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.13   Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts  2.9.26   Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev1.13.25  package building tools for Debian
ii  g++ 4:4.1.1-15   The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc 4:4.1.1-15   The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl   1.56-2   Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.20   Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl5.8.8-7  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.3   informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.5.10 Gives a fake root environment

- -- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Strong
* apt-build/build_dir: /misc/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
* apt-build/options:
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium4
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /misc/debian-build
  apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true

- -- 
Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/
pub  2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen 
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE  EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBRk3bQZ+OKpjRpO3lAQJsswgAmD4n7JVVtjPAmo+m8c8H6nALICDIJfyy
TPGmK0R5JAcyhtVf/nqhv9uKATAUdK56fsrHylyQkXpsLh0ob4omg61c5ewTrgv8
E3vPVEb6l4i+zgAqqphmrAdd3u+X/hv4lVYcl+aZj2eCR5dCaPJMkZ7W++3ODdg0
ymqdKTiVrUo+8JnA6g1eLHRFoxq/EpGnQRJ2hSjsKBqL8rl1ecEboXnmpbLCgZEc
RDUDylo8WVlKm+utdFTzMtA6qAMZn9/TNKMQiek6Jm1pZnc/3UTF4ij/y+yHK9mq
+SX6+3NrC/uCtDGMrgy/cprl59w72FR7bBEbmo2WDtGqtGQrLj3pxw==
=/Lw6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 425...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA uploa

Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #316572,
regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or 
--allow-unauthenticated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
316572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.17

apt-build install coreutils
fails:

WARNUNG: Die folgenden Pakete können nicht authentifiziert werden!
  coreutils
E: Es gab Probleme und -y wurde ohne --force-yes verwendet

There was a question about this problem september last year on
debian-users, but no answears:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg01402.html

I think it should not be necessary to do any additional steps (creating
keys, etc) just to get some package installed. Whatever is necessary
should be done by installing apt-build.

Philipp

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 316...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296
   * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning.
   * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages
 registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169
   * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are
 completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590
   * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9.
   * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
 bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550 
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 ab5b8695bafd872058436ec3b18eddf8

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #292169,
regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.8

apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded  but its binary
is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary
packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but
apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An
apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris
source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install
module like the check for arch independent packages.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 292...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296
   * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning.
   * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages
 registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169
   * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are
 completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590
   * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9.
   * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
 bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550 
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 ab5b8695bafd872058436ec3b18eddf83b7efe07f9f25181d334c96c04d7d363 52168

Bug#596296: marked as done (apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package sources are stored in sources.list.d)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#596296: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #596296,
regarding apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package 
sources are stored in sources.list.d
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596296
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: normal

albin@nyx:~$ ls /etc/apt/
apt-build.conf  old-sourcessources.list.d  trusted.gpg.d
apt.conf.d  preferencestrustdb.gpg
apt-file.conf   preferences.d  trusted.gpg
listbugssecring.gpgtrusted.gpg~

During config: add line to sources.list? yes

Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ...
dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please use 
'--print-architecture' instead.
grep: /etc/apt/sources.list: No such file or directory

albin@nyx:~$ sudo apt-build update
Ignoring file 'apt-build' in directory '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has no 
filename extension
Opening /etc/apt/sources.list - ifstream::ifstream (2: No such file or 
directory)
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list

Notice how it also creates an out-of-place file in sources.list.d/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.8.0  Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.8.0  APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.10.66scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.15.8.4   Debian package development tools
ii  g++   4:4.4.4-2  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.4.4-2  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24+b1  Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  perl  5.10.1-14  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.5   Informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.14.4-1   Gives a fake root environment

apt-build suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build'

-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
  apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
  apt-build/options:
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium
  apt-build/make_options:
  apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
  apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt t

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #292169,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available 
is back]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
292169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: apt-build
Severity: normal

- Forwarded message from Joel Soete  -

> From: Joel Soete 
> To: Julien Danjou 
> Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
>   version=3.0.2
> 
> Hello Julien,
> 
> Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
> a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
> but already in  .
> 
> (apt-build 0.11.4)
> 
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
> my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
> 
> # apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> =><=
> 
> this first hunk make sens as it stand in "sub source" and help me to make:
> # apt-build source libexo-dev
> successfuly :-)
> 
> This second hunk
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
> 
> chdir $conf{build_dir};
> 
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> ><
> help me to go a bit further:
> # apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
> Building the following packages from source:
> libexo-dev
> libexo-1
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Need to get 514kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
> Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
> Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
> Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
> dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root 
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
>  debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> /usr/bin/make distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> # Add here commands to configure the package.
> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
> --prefix=/usr
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
> checking for style of include used by make... GNU
> checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
> compiler

Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #369173,
regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or 
--allow-unauthenticated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
369173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


"apt" was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages.

"apt-build" doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log :
-> Moving packages to repository <-
-> Building repository <-
-> Updating package lists <-
Ign file: apt-build Release.gpg
Get:1 file: apt-build Release [89B]
Ign file: apt-build/main Packages
Get:2 http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release.gpg [197B]
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages
Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release.gpg
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release
Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages
Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Sources
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
Fetched 90B in 1s (54B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Suggested packages:
  cdtool setcd hal-doc dialog
Recommended packages:
  librsvg2-bin libterm-size-perl libterm-readkey-perl
The following packages will be upgraded:
  eject grep libhal-dev libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 libhal0 
libldap-2.2-7 librsvg2-2 librsvg2-common 
librsvg2-dev
  module-assistant net-tools
12 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 723kB/1333kB of archives.
After unpacking 262kB of additional disk space will be used.
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  net-tools libhal-dev libhal0 libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0
E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes

An apt-cache show net-tools give me :
# apt-cache show net-tools
Package: net-tools
Priority: important
Section: net
Installed-Size: 756
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels 
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.60-15
Replaces: netbase (<< 4.00)
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
Filename: ./net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb
Size: 244628
MD5sum: cca4ed10446c6449a7e3550c5d103371
Description: The NET-3 networking toolkit
 This package includes the important tools for controlling the network
 subsystem of the Linux kernel.  This includes arp, ifconfig, netstat,
 rarp, nameif and route.  Additionally, this package contains utilities
 relating to particular network hardware types (plipconfig, slattach,
 mii-tool) and advanced aspects of IP configuration (iptunnel, ipmaddr).
 .
 In the upstream package 'hostname' and friends are included. Those are
 not installed by this package, since there is a special 
"hostname*.deb".

Package: net-tools
Priority: important
Section: net
Installed-Size: 656
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels 
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.60-15
Replaces: netbase (<< 4.00)
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
Filename: pool/main/n/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb
   

Bug#624365: marked as done (apt-build: Fails to find source package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#624365: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #624365,
regarding apt-build: Fails to find source package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.38
Severity: normal

While "apt-get source iceweasel" works fine, apt-build fails to find the
source package for iceweasel:

$ apt-build install iceweasel
iceweasel will not be built because it doesn't have a source package.
Missing source package name for source_by_source().

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.8.14.1   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.8.14.1   APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.10.72scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.16.0.2   Debian package development tools
ii  g++   4:4.5.2-5  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.5.2-5  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24+b1  Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libc6 2.11.2-13  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  perl  5.10.1-20  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.5   Informational list of build-essent
ii  fakeroot  1.15.1-1   tool for simulating superuser priv

apt-build suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list [Errno 13] Permission denied: 
u'/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list'

-- debconf-show failed


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 624...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help infor

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #179850,
regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.11.4
Severity: normal

Hello Julien,

Here is the promised br ;-)

Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
but already in .

(apt-build 0.11.4)

# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);

# apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

=><=

this first hunk make sens to me as it stand in "sub source" and help me to
make:
# apt-build source libexo-dev
successfuly :-)

Anyway (as discust in private) you could had good reason to not apply :-)

This second hunk
# diff -Nau /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
--- /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig 2005-01-21 15:20:52.0 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/apt-build 2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@

chdir $conf{build_dir};

- read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
+ read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
sub {
- my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
+ my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
});

><
(again just a work around ;-) )

just help me to go a bit further:
# apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
--build-only libexo-dev
Building the following packages from source:
libexo-dev
libexo-1
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
-> Downloading exo source (exo 0.2.0-2) <-
-> Updating package lists <-
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Need to get 514kB of source archives.
Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
-> Building exo <-
W: Unable to locate package exo
E: No packages found
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
 debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
/usr/bin/make distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
dh_clean
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
--prefix=/usr
--mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc
--enable-final
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler
cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [config.status] Erro

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #291565,
regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.8

apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded  but its binary
is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary
packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but
apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An
apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris
source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install
module like the check for arch independent packages.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 291...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296
   * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning.
   * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages
 registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169
   * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are
 completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590
   * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9.
   * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
 bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550 
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 ab5b8695bafd872058436ec3b18eddf83b7efe07f9f25181d334c96c04d7d363 52168

Bug#511853: marked as done ([apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation script)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #511853,
regarding [apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation 
script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
511853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: important

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

apt errormessage:

Errors were encountered while processing:
 apt-build
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ...
mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing apt-build (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 apt-build

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.26-1-686

Debian Release: 5.0
  500 unstableftp.no.debian.org 
  500 unstableftp.acc.umu.se 
  500 unstabledebian.cihar.com 
  500 testing security.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-
libc6  (>= 2.7-1) | 2.7-18
perl  | 5.10.0-19
apt  (>= 0.5) | 0.7.20
gcc   | 4:4.3.2-2
g++   | 4:4.3.2-2
dpkg-dev (>= 1.9) | 1.14.24
libappconfig-perl(>= 1.5) | 1.56-2
libapt-pkg-perl   (>= 0.1.11) | 0.1.22+b1
debconf   | 1.5.24
 OR debconf-2.0   | 
devscripts| 2.10.44
apt-utils | 0.7.20





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes

Bug#660590: marked as done (apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#660590: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #660590,
regarding apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not 
modified by the user
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.40
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails.
But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt
shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile
at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded...

This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3,
which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary
questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good
citizens."

http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring
out how to do this properly.

In http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and
followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with
severity serious.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
(upgrade test squeeze -> sid)

  Setting up apt-build (0.12.40) ...
  
  Configuration file `/etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build.list'
   ==> File on system created by you or by a script.
   ==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
 What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
  Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
  N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
D : show the differences between the versions
Z : start a shell to examine the situation
   The default action is to keep your current version.
  *** apt-build.list (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing 
apt-build (--configure):
   EOF on stdin at conffile prompt
  configured to not write apport reports
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   apt-build


cheers,

Andreas


apt-build_0.12.40.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 660...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
  

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #291565,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available 
is back]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
291565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291565
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: apt-build
Severity: normal

- Forwarded message from Joel Soete  -

> From: Joel Soete 
> To: Julien Danjou 
> Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
>   version=3.0.2
> 
> Hello Julien,
> 
> Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
> a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
> but already in  .
> 
> (apt-build 0.11.4)
> 
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
> my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
> 
> # apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> =><=
> 
> this first hunk make sens as it stand in "sub source" and help me to make:
> # apt-build source libexo-dev
> successfuly :-)
> 
> This second hunk
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
> 
> chdir $conf{build_dir};
> 
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> ><
> help me to go a bit further:
> # apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
> Building the following packages from source:
> libexo-dev
> libexo-1
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Need to get 514kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
> Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
> Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
> Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
> dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root 
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
>  debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> /usr/bin/make distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> # Add here commands to configure the package.
> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
> --prefix=/usr
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
> checking for style of include used by make... GNU
> checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
> compiler

Bug#392844: marked as done (apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude backend)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#392844: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #392844,
regarding apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude 
backend
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
392844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.24
Severity: important

Hi,

I have problem with apt-build because on help says:

(...)
Options:
  --apt-get - Specify an alternative apt-get application to use
(...)

but don't work.. I get:

# apt-build --apt-get=aptitude world
Unknown option: apt-get

and when I try with --apt_get work, but the apt-build calls 'aptitude
--yes' and crash...

***
# apt-build --apt_get=aptitude world
Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
-> Rebuilding the world! <-
-> Building package list <-
W: Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list file: apt-build/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/_var_cache_apt-build_repository_dists_apt-build_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
-> Installing build dependencies (for firefox) <-
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
   aptitude [options]  ...
  Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):

(...messages of aptitude --help)

  This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
-> Updating package lists <-
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
   aptitude [options]  ...
  Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):

(...messages of aptitude --help)

  This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
-> Downloading source firefox (1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-1) <-
aptitude: unrecognized option `--yes'
aptitude 0.4.1
Usage: aptitude [-S fname] [-u|-i]
   aptitude [options]  ...
  Actions (if none is specified, aptitude will enter interactive mode):
 install  - Install/upgrade packages

(...messages of aptitude --help)

  This aptitude does not have Super Cow Powers.
-> Building firefox <-
Can't chdir(firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7): No such file or directory at
(eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7') called at
/usr/bin/apt-build line 288
main::build('firefox', '1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7', 'undef') called at
/usr/bin/apt-build line 510
main::install('undef') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 714
main::world called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82

***

Then.. I suggest you to use '-y' option instead of '--yes'. It's
compatible with apt-get and aptitude. Ah.. please.. fix the '--help' too
for '--apt_get' instead of '--apt-get'.

Thanks a lot.. sorry for my poor english... ;)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (999, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to pt_BR)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.44.2   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.6.44.2   APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2  Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.9.20 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.13.21package building tools for Debian
ii  g++   4:4.0.3-4  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.0.3-4  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.20 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.8-6.1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages

Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #316572,
regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or 
--allow-unauthenticated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
316572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=316572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


"apt" was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages.

"apt-build" doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log :
-> Moving packages to repository <-
-> Building repository <-
-> Updating package lists <-
Ign file: apt-build Release.gpg
Get:1 file: apt-build Release [89B]
Ign file: apt-build/main Packages
Get:2 http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release.gpg [197B]
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages
Ign http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages
Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release.gpg
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release
Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Release
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
Ign http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages
Hit http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org ./ Packages
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/main Sources
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/contrib Sources
Hit ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable/non-free Sources
Fetched 90B in 1s (54B/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Suggested packages:
  cdtool setcd hal-doc dialog
Recommended packages:
  librsvg2-bin libterm-size-perl libterm-readkey-perl
The following packages will be upgraded:
  eject grep libhal-dev libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0 libhal0 
libldap-2.2-7 librsvg2-2 librsvg2-common 
librsvg2-dev
  module-assistant net-tools
12 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 723kB/1333kB of archives.
After unpacking 262kB of additional disk space will be used.
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
  net-tools libhal-dev libhal0 libhal-storage-dev libhal-storage0
E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes

An apt-cache show net-tools give me :
# apt-cache show net-tools
Package: net-tools
Priority: important
Section: net
Installed-Size: 756
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels 
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.60-15
Replaces: netbase (<< 4.00)
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
Filename: ./net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb
Size: 244628
MD5sum: cca4ed10446c6449a7e3550c5d103371
Description: The NET-3 networking toolkit
 This package includes the important tools for controlling the network
 subsystem of the Linux kernel.  This includes arp, ifconfig, netstat,
 rarp, nameif and route.  Additionally, this package contains utilities
 relating to particular network hardware types (plipconfig, slattach,
 mii-tool) and advanced aspects of IP configuration (iptunnel, ipmaddr).
 .
 In the upstream package 'hostname' and friends are included. Those are
 not installed by this package, since there is a special 
"hostname*.deb".

Package: net-tools
Priority: important
Section: net
Installed-Size: 656
Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels 
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.60-15
Replaces: netbase (<< 4.00)
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
Filename: pool/main/n/net-tools/net-tools_1.60-15_i386.deb
   

Bug#434859: marked as done (apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#434859: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #434859,
regarding apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with 
"+b1"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
434859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---


Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.28
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.7.3  Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.7.3  APT utility programs
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.13 Debian configuration 
management sy
ii  devscripts2.10.6 Scripts to make the life of 
a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.14.5 package building tools for 
Debian

ii  g++   4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:4.1.1-15 The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for 
configuration file

ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.21 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical 
Extraction


Versions of packages apt-build recommends:
ii  build-essential   11.3   informational list of 
build-essent

ii  fakeroot  1.7.1  Gives a fake root environment

-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
* apt-build/options: -march=pentium3m -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium3m
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd64: x86-64
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true



When a package version number is terminated with "+b1", apt-build 
download and install a version without this extension, and download and 
"--reinstall" the original version with "+b1".


This bug is very annoying because in the case of a multiple binaries 
source package, the whole set of binary packages is rebuilt with each 
single package building query... for nothing !


I don't know the meaning of this "+b1" debian revision number, but I'd 
like to know if, in the wait of a fix some day, I can rename my rebuilt 
packages by adding the "+b1" without compromising the integrity of my 
system ?


regards

Marc Gasnot


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 434...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt

Bug#520818: marked as done ([apt-build] apt-build fails to install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #511853,
regarding [apt-build] apt-build fails to install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
511853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511853
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.37
Severity: critical

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Errors were encountered while processing:
 apt-build
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up apt-build (0.12.37) ...
mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing apt-build (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 apt-build

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.26-1-686

Debian Release: 5.0
  500 unstabledebian.cihar.com 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.no.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.acc.umu.se 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-
libc6  (>= 2.7-1) | 2.7-18
perl  | 5.10.0-19
apt  (>= 0.5) | 0.7.20.2
gcc   | 4:4.3.2-3
g++   | 4:4.3.2-3
dpkg-dev (>= 1.9) | 1.14.25
libappconfig-perl(>= 1.5) | 1.56-2
libapt-pkg-perl   (>= 0.1.11) | 0.1.22+b1
debconf   | 1.5.24
 OR debconf-2.0   | 
devscripts| 2.10.45
apt-utils | 0.7.20.2





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 511...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored 

Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #369173,
regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or 
--allow-unauthenticated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
369173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=369173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.17

apt-build install coreutils
fails:

WARNUNG: Die folgenden Pakete können nicht authentifiziert werden!
  coreutils
E: Es gab Probleme und -y wurde ohne --force-yes verwendet

There was a question about this problem september last year on
debian-users, but no answears:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/09/msg01402.html

I think it should not be necessary to do any additional steps (creating
keys, etc) just to get some package installed. Whatever is necessary
should be done by installing apt-build.

Philipp

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 369...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296
   * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning.
   * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages
 registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169
   * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are
 completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590
   * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9.
   * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
 bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550 
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 ab5b8695bafd872058436ec3b18eddf8

Bug#315102: marked as done (apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#315102: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #315102,
regarding apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
315102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: normal

maybe related, but not same, to 307677

apt-build build-source downloads other version than it tries to build.
apt-get source is ok, apt-build install installs version
with higher priority (in the example kpdf 4:3.3.2-2).
For packages, where there is only one version works ok.

situation in examples -
default distribution: unstable
kpdf 4:3.3.2-2 in unstable
kpdf 4:3.4.1-1 in experimental
(source package: kdegraphics)
psi  0.9.3-1 (the only version in archives)

example - listing of the use with various parameters:

root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update 
build-source kpdf
Building the following packages from source:
-> Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
-> Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
-> Building kdegraphics <-
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build 
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update 
build-source kdegraphics
Building the following packages from source:
-> Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
-> Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
-> Building kdegraphics <-
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build 
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update 
build-source kdegraphics=4:3.3.2-2
Building the following packages from source:
-> Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
-> Downloading source kdegraphics (3.3.2-2) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
-> Building kdegraphics <-
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build 
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/apt-build/build# LANG=C apt-build --no-update 
build-source kdegraphics=4:3.4.1-1
Building the following packages from source:
-> Installing build dependencies (for kdegraphics) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1436 not upgraded.
-> Downloading source kdegraphics (3.4.1-1) <-
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Unable to find a source package for kdegraphics
-> Building kdegraphics <-
Can't chdir(kdegraphics-3.3.2): No such file or directory at (eval 1) line 3
main::__ANON__('kdegraphics-3.3.2') called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 
286
main::build('kdegraphics', '4:3.3.2', -2) called at /usr/bin/apt-build 
line 603
main::build_source called at /usr/bin/apt-build line 82
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
root@delfin:/var/cache/

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #179850,
regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available 
is back]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: apt-build
Severity: normal

- Forwarded message from Joel Soete  -

> From: Joel Soete 
> To: Julien Danjou 
> Subject: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:34:43 +0100
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
>   version=3.0.2
> 
> Hello Julien,
> 
> Sorry, I was busy somewhere else but I come back to you with this pb to build
> a pkg with only src without bin (my case is the new xfce not yet in debian
> but already in  .
> 
> (apt-build 0.11.4)
> 
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -230,9 +230,9 @@
> my ($srcpkg, $srcver, @packages);
> 
> # apt-get here prints lines, we pick the one talking about .deb file.
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> =><=
> 
> this first hunk make sens as it stand in "sub source" and help me to make:
> # apt-build source libexo-dev
> successfuly :-)
> 
> This second hunk
> # diff -Nau  /usr/bin/apt-build.Orig /usr/bin/apt-build
> +++ /usr/bin/apt-build  2005-01-21 15:33:01.0 +0100
> @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@
> 
> chdir $conf{build_dir};
> 
> -   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args install $pkg |", "^'",
> +   read_apt_list("apt-get --print-uris @apt_args source $pkg |", "^'",
> sub {
> -   my ($n, $v) = extract_deb($_) or return;
> +   my ($n, $v) = extract_dsc($_) or return;
> ($srcpkg, $srcver) = ($n, $v)
> });
> 
> ><
> help me to go a bit further:
> # apt-build --sources-list=/Sources/AptBuild/apt-build-src.list build-source
> Building the following packages from source:
> libexo-dev
> libexo-1
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Sources
> Hit http://www.os-works.com testing/main Release
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Need to get 514kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (dsc) [621B]
> Get:2 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (tar) [507kB]
> Get:3 http://www.os-works.com testing/main exo 0.2.0-2 (diff) [6406B]
> Fetched 514kB in 0s (936kB/s)
> dpkg-source: extracting exo in exo-0.2.0
> W: Unable to locate package exo
> E: No packages found
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is exo
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2.0-2
> dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is root 
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is hppa
>  debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> /usr/bin/make distclean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.  Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/Develop/AptBuild/build/exo-0.2.0'
> make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> # Add here commands to configure the package.
> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" ./configure --host=hppa-linux --build=hppa-linux 
> --prefix=/usr
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
> checking for style of include used by make... GNU
> checking for hppa-linux-gcc... hppa-linux-gcc
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
> compiler

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42
has caused the Debian Bug report #179850,
regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
179850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.8

apt-build wll not build a package whose source is uploaded  but its binary
is not. For instance, most architectures aside from i386 do not have binary
packages the same day the source is apt'able. So the apt source exists but
apt-build install fails. The offending code is in the install module. An
apt-get -y --print-uris install is run. Instead an apt-get -y --print-uris
source should be used. However, this breaks other checks in the install
module like the check for arch independent packages.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.42

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 179...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dominique Lasserre  (supplier of updated apt-build 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:02:46 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source mipsel
Version: 0.12.42
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Dominique Lasserre 
Description: 
 apt-build  - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 425044 
434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590
Changes: 
 apt-build (0.12.42) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Bump source format to 3.0 (native).
   * Added archive suite. Clear solution for #639859.
   * Allow non authenticated installation from apt-build repository. Closes:
 #316572, #369173
   * Added new cpu-type profiles to debconf templates.
   * Changed default make option in template (-j`cpu_cores`). Set question
 priority to "high".
   * debian/dirs: Removed due to its redundancy.
   * Prevent empty directory for build_dir and repository_dir (use loop).
 Closes: #511853
   * Move debconf-only related content from postinst to config file and pimp
 debconf stuff (configuration file handling).
   * --yes (assume-yes) functionality is now recognized by aptitude. Also
 renamed help information from apt-get and apt-cache to aptget and aptcache.
 (thanks to Bryant Wong) Closes: #392844
   * Improved source version and name handling. Closes: #314155, #315102,
 #425044, #434859
   * Pull correct build dependencies. Closes: #624365
   * Compilation with cmake is supported (no code changes). Closes: #507881
   * Build with local version number (suffix +aptbuild). Closes: #391449,
 #592006
   * Support sources stored at /Dir::Etc::sourceparts. Closes: #596296
   * Rebuild Packages.gz after repository cleaning.
   * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Allow package builds without binary packages
 registered in sources. Closes: #179850, #291565, #292169
   * Unregister conffiles located in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/. Changes are
 completely managed by debconf and maintainer scripts. Closes: #660590
   * Bump debhelper compatibility mode to 9.
   * Bump Standards version to 3.9.3.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 88b86903c8156f48205e89371093fd53f2da3b7d 1550 apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 469be4c4c6aafd483a05566025fb0891f4ce12c6 52168 apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
 bf5f8c657aa98cde4eb583d534a17f3a140cb502 41298 apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 95b37faa6d66d09a6ffd6d623b36f38f89ff4fda9520fea27c14536e681aa00c 1550 
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
 ab5b8695bafd872058436ec3b18eddf83b7efe07f9f25181d334c96c04d7d363 52168

apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc
apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb
  to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb


Override entries for your package:
apt-build_0.12.42.dsc - source devel
apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb - optional devel

Announcing to debian-experimental-chan...@lists.debian.org
Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 179850 291565 292169 314155 315102 316572 369173 391449 392844 
425044 434859 507881 511853 592006 596296 624365 660590 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1s2dnq-0001yj...@franck.debian.org