Bug#659040: openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2
Hi, On 02/08/2012 10:37 AM, Bas Wijnen wrote: Sorry about not uploading earlier. I am making some changes to the package build system, but obviously it shouldn't take this long. At the latest, I should upload a new package this weekend. If not, please ping again. On your request: ping! :P -- Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX FOR EVER! (Questions? http://faq.msxnet.org/ ) PPS: Visit my homepage at http://manuel.msxnet.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3f6ba1.5000...@gmail.com
Bug#642371: Bug #642371 Should this package be removed?
Hi, The question in subject line should be revisited now. I'm not sure about what's your opinions now, as there still isn't any activity to implement Osamu's proposal (and a QA upload underway). -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w6i8sw995_qhuxpfw17srxled6gujbegumg9ednazc...@mail.gmail.com
Processing of worklog_1.8-6_amd64.changes
worklog_1.8-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: worklog_1.8-6.dsc worklog_1.8-6.debian.tar.gz worklog_1.8-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ryq7p-0007ya...@franck.debian.org
worklog_1.8-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: worklog_1.8-6.debian.tar.gz to main/w/worklog/worklog_1.8-6.debian.tar.gz worklog_1.8-6.dsc to main/w/worklog/worklog_1.8-6.dsc worklog_1.8-6_amd64.deb to main/w/worklog/worklog_1.8-6_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: worklog_1.8-6.dsc - source misc worklog_1.8-6_amd64.deb - optional misc Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ryqh2-ik...@franck.debian.org
Bug#660397: qpxtool: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Source: qpxtool
Version: 0.7.1.002-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
qpxtool FTBFS on kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} when rebuilt for the freebsd-libs
transition. From the kfreebsd-amd64 build log:
g++ -Wall -O2 -fPIC -DUSE_LIBPNG -g -I. -I./include -I../include -c -o
qpx_transport.o qpx_transport.cpp
In file included from ./include/qpx_transport.h:214:0,
from qpx_transport.cpp:15:
/usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/sys/mount.h: In function 'int
getvfsbyname(const char*, xvfsconf*)':
/usr/include/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/sys/mount.h:398:23: error: invalid conversion
from 'void*' to 'xvfsconf*' [-fpermissive]
make[3]: *** [qpx_transport.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-qpxtool_0.7.1.002-5+b1-kfreebsd-amd64-ylol1R/qpxtool-0.7.1.002/lib/qpxtransport'
make[2]: *** [qpxtransport] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-qpxtool_0.7.1.002-5+b1-kfreebsd-amd64-ylol1R/qpxtool-0.7.1.002/lib'
make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-qpxtool_0.7.1.002-5+b1-kfreebsd-amd64-ylol1R/qpxtool-0.7.1.002'
dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
Full build logs available via
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qpxtool
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1329596686.23989.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: block 660022 with 660395 660396 660397 660398 660400 660401 660403
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 660022 with 660395 660396 660397 660398 660400 660401 660403 Bug #660022 [release.debian.org] transition: freebsd-libs Was blocked by: 659615 659659 Added blocking bug(s) of 660022: 660398, 660395, 660397, 660400, 660403, 660396, and 660401 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660022: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660022 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132959823225157.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#642371: RM: scim-bridge -- ROM; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 642371 RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit > for KDE4/QT4 Bug #642371 [src:scim-bridge] Should this package be removed? Changed Bug title to 'RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4' from 'Should this package be removed?' > retitle 642560 RM: scim-bridge-el -- RoQA; removal of dependency, no response > from maintainer Bug #642560 [scim-bridge-el] Subject: scim-bridge-el: one of your dependencies is at risk of being dropped from the archive Changed Bug title to 'RM: scim-bridge-el -- RoQA; removal of dependency, no response from maintainer' from 'Subject: scim-bridge-el: one of your dependencies is at risk of being dropped from the archive' > reassign 642371 ftp.debian.org Bug #642371 [src:scim-bridge] RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4 Bug reassigned from package 'src:scim-bridge' to 'ftp.debian.org'. > severity 642371 normal Bug #642371 [ftp.debian.org] RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4 Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > reassign 642560 ftp.debian.org Bug #642560 [scim-bridge-el] RM: scim-bridge-el -- RoQA; removal of dependency, no response from maintainer Bug reassigned from package 'scim-bridge-el' to 'ftp.debian.org'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 642560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642560 642371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132960727621506.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#642371: RM: scim-bridge -- ROM; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4
retitle 642371 RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit for KDE4/QT4 retitle 642560 RM: scim-bridge-el -- RoQA; removal of dependency, no response from maintainer reassign 642371 ftp.debian.org severity 642371 normal reassign 642560 ftp.debian.org quit On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:25:41 +0800 Aron Xu wrote: > Hi, > > The question in subject line should be revisited now. I'm not sure > about what's your opinions now, as there still isn't any activity to > implement Osamu's proposal (and a QA upload underway). There's no need to pursue this through another round of non-responses. There have been no changes since : Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:20:19 + > Unless someone intends to look after the existing software and maintain > it within Debian then the answer will be yes - remove it. Either fix it > or let it be removed due to inaction. Simple. > > Unmaintained software which is dead upstream and has not been ported to > updated libraries in Debian is always a candidate for removal. > > Those who care about this software need to step up and do the work. > That's all there is to it. It's not enough to just protest or complain - > unless someone does the work, the package remains a candidate for > removal. The RC bugs mentioned originally don't seem to be open any > longer, so there is time for the work to be done. > > If the work isn't done, I'll reassign the removal bug myself. So reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org for removal of scim-bridge. Nobody has stepped up to do the work in the previous month, so there can be no complaints about the removal. Also seeking the removal of scim-bridge-el as there has been no response to #642560 re the removal of scim-bridge since Sat, 24 Sep 2011. If someone wants eventually does the work, the package can be re-introduced but it's been 5 months since the original bug report, so that seems unlikely. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpEvaO9XocGQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#660415: openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile'
Package: openmsx
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
x-debbugs-cc: wij...@debian.org
openmsx FTBFS in unstable with the following error.
Compiling serialize.cc...
g++ \
-MP -MMD -MF derived/x86_64-linux-debian/dep/serialize.d \
-o derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o -g
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security
-Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -m64 -pipe -Wall -Wextra
-Wundef -Wunused-macros -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Isrc -Isrc/cassette
-Isrc/commands -Isrc/config -Isrc/console -Isrc/cpu -Isrc/debugger -Isrc/events
-Isrc/fdc -Isrc/file -Isrc/ide -Isrc/input -Isrc/laserdisc -Isrc/memory
-Isrc/security -Isrc/serial -Isrc/settings -Isrc/sound -Isrc/thread -Isrc/utils
-Isrc/video -Isrc/video/ld -Isrc/video/scalers -Isrc/video/v9990
-Iderived/x86_64-linux-debian/config -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1
-D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DPACKAGE_NAME=tcl
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=tcl -DPACKAGE_VERSION=8.5 -DPACKAGE_STRING=tcl\\\ 8.5
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT= -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1
-DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1
-DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1
-DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1
-DHAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_SETSTACKSIZE=1 -DHAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP=1
-DGETATTRNP_NOT_DECLARED=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -DTCL_CFGVAL_ENCODING=iso8859-1
-DMODULE_SCOPE=extern\ __attribute__\(\(__visibility__\(hidden\)\)\)
-DTCL_SHLIB_EXT=.so -DTCL_CFG_OPTIMIZED=1 -DTCL_CFG_DEBUG=1 -DTCL_TOMMATH=1
-DMP_PREC=4 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_IS_LONG=1 -DHAVE_GETCWD=1
-DHAVE_OPENDIR=1 -DHAVE_STRTOL=1 -DHAVE_WAITPID=1 -DHAVE_GETADDRINFO=1
-DHAVE_GETPWUID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETPWUID_R=1 -DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R_5=1
-DHAVE_GETPWNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRGID_R=1
-DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R_5=1 -DHAVE_GETGRNAM_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6=1
-DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R_8=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYADDR_R=1
-DUSE_TERMIOS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DHAVE_GMTIME_R=1
-DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R=1 -DHAVE_MKTIME=1 -DHAVE_TM_GMTOFF=1 -DHAVE_TIMEZONE_VAR=1
-DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLOCKS=1 -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLKSIZE=1
-DHAVE_BLKCNT_T=1 -DHAVE_INTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_UINTPTR_T=1 -DHAVE_SIGNED_CHAR=1
-DHAVE_LANGINFO=1 -DHAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H=1 -DTCL_UNLOAD_DLLS=1
-I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -I/usr/include/libxml2-c src/serialize.cc
In file included from src/serialize.cc:15:0:
/usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct
gzFile_s* gzFile'
src/serialize.hh:20:15: error: 'gzFile' has a previous declaration as 'typedef
void* gzFile'
make[1]: *** [derived/x86_64-linux-debian/obj/serialize.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-openmsx_0.8.1-4+b1-amd64-0_JeL0/openmsx-0.8.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
This appears to be the result of a change in zlib.h changing how gzfile
is defined.
The attatched patch removes the definition of gzfile from serialize.hh
and replaces it with an include of zlib.h
Note: I'm ccing wij...@debian.org as he has expressed an intent to adopt
this package.
Description: Fix build with recent zlib
replace definition of gzFile which conflicts with recent zlib with include
of zlib.h
Author: Peter Michael Green
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/???
---
The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:
Origin: ,
Bug:
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/
Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/
Forwarded:
Reviewed-By:
Last-Update:
--- openmsx-0.8.1.orig/src/serialize.hh
+++ openmsx-0.8.1/src/serialize.hh
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
-
-typedef void* gzFile;
+#include
namespace openmsx {
