Re: Bug#631019: HDF5 transition from version 1.8.6 => 1.8.8
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:36:47PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 13:41:02 +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Who from the GIS team is going to build and upload netcdf? > > I've just scheduled binNMUs for netcdf, there should be no need for a > source upload. > Right, I'm currently working on the experimental branch that will need a specific transition in the next future. Current unstable version is good enough as it is. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120127084140.ga2...@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it
Bug#657596: wmauda: FTBFS with audacious 3.2
Package: wmauda Version: 0.7-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, Audacious was recently updated with the 3.2 release, and now wmauda doesn't build anymore. Here is the build log : CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2" /usr/bin/make PREFIX=/usr make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/wmauda-0.7' cc -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/include -c -o wmauda.o wmauda.c wmauda.c:19:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory I already contacted the upstream about this issue. Let's wait until they answer. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120127105331.22831.65954.report...@grunthos.davromaniak.eu
Bug#642753: marked as done (liquidlnf: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:57:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#638352: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #642753, regarding liquidlnf: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 642753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642753 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: liquidlnf Version: 2.9.1-8 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > fakeroot debian/rules clean > test -x debian/rules > dh_testroot > You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! > make: *** [testsanity] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/liquidlnf_2.9.1-8_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.9.1-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package liquidlnf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/638352 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#638352: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.9.1-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package liquidlnf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/638352 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqob8-be...@franck.debian.org
Bug#638352: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: liquidlnf |2.9.1-8 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 638...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/638352 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqob4-bv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#639724: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: tinylaf |1.4.0-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 639...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/639724 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqok3-00025p...@franck.debian.org
Bug#639724: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.4.0-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tinylaf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/639724 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqoka-000267...@franck.debian.org
Bug#642759: marked as done (tinylaf: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:06:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639724: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #642759, regarding tinylaf: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 642759: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642759 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: tinylaf Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > fakeroot debian/rules clean > test -x debian/rules > dh_testroot > You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! > make: *** [testsanity] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/tinylaf_1.4.0-2_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.4.0-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tinylaf has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/639724 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#642770: marked as done (libgdata-java: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:07:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#637015: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #642770, regarding libgdata-java: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 642770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libgdata-java Version: 1.30.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > fakeroot debian/rules clean > test -x debian/rules > dh_testroot > You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! > make: *** [testsanity] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/libgdata-java_1.30.0-2_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.30.0-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libgdata-java has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/637015 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#637015: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.30.0-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libgdata-java has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/637015 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqphb-0001tm...@franck.debian.org
Bug#637015: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libgdata-java | 1.30.0-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 637...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/637015 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqph6-0001tf...@franck.debian.org
