Bug#646555: [Pkg-geany-team] Bug#646555: geany-plugin-spellcheck: Spellcheck missing dependency
retitle 646555 libenchant1c2a: should depend on at least one dictionary. tag 646555 +pending thanks On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:24:39PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > reassign 646555 enchant > kthxbye > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for spotting this bug. Seeing as geany-plugin-spellcheck depends on > libenchant, and libenchant is meant to be an abstraction layer for several > spell > checker backends, the dependency should go there instead, so I'm reassigning > this bug to enchant instead. Hi both, I'd put the dependency on (myspell|aspell|ispell|hunspell)-dictionary. Committed that change to enchant collab-maint git repo. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/enchant.git;a=commit;h=df7f2c6e709abfca052024ef7f9a4d2974e62991 Note that enchant is orphaned. I will not upload inmediately, but would like to first prepare a new QA upload with some fixes in manpages. This change will go with it. Thanks for your help, Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111026104746.ga3...@agmartin.aq.upm.es
Processed: Re: Bug#646555: [Pkg-geany-team] Bug#646555: geany-plugin-spellcheck: Spellcheck missing dependency
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 646555 libenchant1c2a: should depend on at least one dictionary. Bug #646555 [libenchant1c2a] geany-plugin-spellcheck: Spellcheck missing dependency Changed Bug title to 'libenchant1c2a: should depend on at least one dictionary.' from 'geany-plugin-spellcheck: Spellcheck missing dependency' > tag 646555 +pending Bug #646555 [libenchant1c2a] libenchant1c2a: should depend on at least one dictionary. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646555 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131962608127104.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
ca-certificates
Hello I did post a message into bug report number 537382 which was opened on July 2009. I'm writing directly Debian QA Group because a new version of ca-certificates was issued and the script which needs to be modified remains the same as previous version, i.e. the bug persists. Those report consists on the script which generates /etc/ssl/certs symbolic links structure (update-ca-certificates). As you know, /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt is a bundle of all certificates in one single file; this file must be skipped searching for hashes of all certificates when "*.0" symlinks are created. Using the script in its current state, first certificate appended into ca-certificates.crt will match as the hash of ca-certificates.crt and symbolic link will be created from the hash of that file (brasil.gov.br.pem because is alphabetically the first) to ca-certificates.crt leaving brasil.gov.br.pem without a symlink with its hash. I did supply a patch that may be used after some test by Debian. Thanks! Best regards! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ea82401.5050...@gmail.com
Bug#537382: marked as done (WARNING: Skipping duplicate certificate)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#537382: fixed in ca-certificates 20111025 has caused the Debian Bug report #537382, regarding WARNING: Skipping duplicate certificate to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 537382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ca-certificates Version: 20090709 Severity: minor Hi! Probably inoffensive, but while installing ca-certificates on a clean system: Setting up ca-certificates (20090709) ... Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... WARNING: Skipping duplicate certificate brasil.gov.br.pem Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.1.naoliv1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ca-certificates depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii openssl 0.9.8k-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ca-certificates recommends no packages. ca-certificates suggests no packages. -- debconf information excluded --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ca-certificates Source-Version: 20111025 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ca-certificates, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ca-certificates_20111025.dsc to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.dsc ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 537...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Shuler (supplier of updated ca-certificates package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:10 -0500 Source: ca-certificates Binary: ca-certificates Architecture: source all Version: 20111025 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Shuler Changed-By: Michael Shuler Description: ca-certificates - Common CA certificates Closes: 537382 588219 619587 630232 643667 Changes: ca-certificates (20111025) unstable; urgency=low . [ Michael Shuler ] * Add 3.0 (native) source format * Add Vcs-Git/Browser fields * Add myself as new Maintainer with Uploaders Closes: #588219 * Update mozilla/certdata.txt to latest (NSS branch version 1.64.2.13) Certificates added (+) and removed (-): + "AffirmTrust Commercial" + "AffirmTrust Networking" + "AffirmTrust Premium" + "AffirmTrust Premium ECC" + "A-Trust-nQual-03" + "Bogus Global Trustee" + "Bogus GMail" + "Bogus Google" + "Bogus kuix.de" + "Bogus live.com" + "Bogus Mozilla Addons" + "Bogus Skype" + "Bogus Yahoo 1" + "Bogus Yahoo 2" + "Bogus Yahoo 3" + "Certinomis - Autorité Racine" + "Certum Trusted Network CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA 2nd" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Root CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Services 1024 CA" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid G2" + "Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "Root CA Generalitat Valenciana" + "Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "TWCA Root Certification Authority" - "AOL Time Warner Root Certification Authority 1" - "AOL Time Warner Root Certification Authority 2" - "DigiNotar Root CA" - "Entrust.net Global Secure Personal CA" - "Entrust.net Global Secure Server CA" - "Entrust.net Secure Personal CA" - "IPS Chained CAs root" - "IPS CLASE1 root" - "IPS CLASE3 root" - "IPS CLASEA1 root" - "IPS CLASEA3 root"
Bug#619587: marked as done (FW: ca-certificate: blacklist invalid certs)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#619587: fixed in ca-certificates 20111025 has caused the Debian Bug report #619587, regarding FW: ca-certificate: blacklist invalid certs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 619587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ca-certificate Version: 20090814+nmu2 From: giffgi...@hotmail.com To: t...@security.debian.org Subject: ca-certificate: blacklist invalid certs Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:02:03 + Package: ca-certificate Version: 20090814+nmu2 Hello! This is in response to DSA 2200-1 http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00068.html The issue got fixed for iceweasel but to my understanding this still leaves other browsers, libraries and tools that use TLS/SSL vulnerable. Therefore the fraudulent certificates need to be blacklisted in ca-certificate as well. Thank you. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ca-certificates Source-Version: 20111025 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ca-certificates, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ca-certificates_20111025.dsc to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.dsc ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 619...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Shuler (supplier of updated ca-certificates package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:10 -0500 Source: ca-certificates Binary: ca-certificates Architecture: source all Version: 20111025 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Shuler Changed-By: Michael Shuler Description: ca-certificates - Common CA certificates Closes: 537382 588219 619587 630232 643667 Changes: ca-certificates (20111025) unstable; urgency=low . [ Michael Shuler ] * Add 3.0 (native) source format * Add Vcs-Git/Browser fields * Add myself as new Maintainer with Uploaders Closes: #588219 * Update mozilla/certdata.txt to latest (NSS branch version 1.64.2.13) Certificates added (+) and removed (-): + "AffirmTrust Commercial" + "AffirmTrust Networking" + "AffirmTrust Premium" + "AffirmTrust Premium ECC" + "A-Trust-nQual-03" + "Bogus Global Trustee" + "Bogus GMail" + "Bogus Google" + "Bogus kuix.de" + "Bogus live.com" + "Bogus Mozilla Addons" + "Bogus Skype" + "Bogus Yahoo 1" + "Bogus Yahoo 2" + "Bogus Yahoo 3" + "Certinomis - Autorité Racine" + "Certum Trusted Network CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA 2nd" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Root CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Services 1024 CA" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid G2" + "Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "Root CA Generalitat Valenciana" + "Starfield Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "TWCA Root Certification Authority" - "AOL Time Warner Root Certification Authority 1" - "AOL Time Warner Root Certification Authority 2" - "DigiNotar Root CA" - "Entrust.net Global Secure Personal CA" - "Entrust.net Global Secure Server CA" - "Entrust.net Secure Personal CA" - "IPS Chained CAs root" - "IPS CLASE1 root" - "IPS CLASE3 root" - "IPS CLASEA1 root" - "IPS CLASEA3 root" - "IPS Timestamping root" - "Thawte Personal Freemail CA" - "Thawte Time Stamping CA" * "Bogus *" CAs above address Comodo MITM 03/11 Closes: #619587 * Update CAcert-Class 3-Subroot-certificate Closes: #630232 . [ Steve Langasek ] * sbin/update-ca-certificates: move the ca-certifica
Bug#630232: marked as done (New signatures for CAcert-Class 3-Subroot-certificate)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#630232: fixed in ca-certificates 20111025 has caused the Debian Bug report #630232, regarding New signatures for CAcert-Class 3-Subroot-certificate to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 630232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ca-certificates Version: 20110421: all Severity: important Tags: security CAcert has re-signed its Class 3-certificate with a new SHA256 signature. The formerly used MD5 signature is not seen as fully secure any more by Mozilla (see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:MD5and1024). Users of Mozilla products like Firefox, and Thunderbird may experience errors when these programs try to verify such certificates - others may follow. Hence all users of CAcert's Class 3-certificates have to download and install the newly signed certificates from CAcert's website. The procedure in short: 1. Download the new Class 3 PKI Key from http://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3 2. SHA1-fingerprint must be: AD:7C:3F:64:FC:44:39:FE:F4:E9:0B:E8:F4:7C:6C:FA:8A:AD:FD:CE 3. Make it of use in the ca-certificates package I've added the tag that this bug is a security vulnerability. Well, not exactly in the package itself, and the file itself also not. But if not updated users experience errors and may find a security issue has occured when it has not, or will experience a security vulnerability because they have called a bad site with a hacked MD5 signature. So I consider this as a security issue of priority low. Nevertheless I would definitely want this bugfix to be included in all supported Debian versions from stable (oldstable if supported) to experimental. In case of further questions please don't hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Alexander Bahlo, CAcert. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ca-certificates Source-Version: 20111025 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ca-certificates, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ca-certificates_20111025.dsc to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.dsc ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025.tar.gz ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20111025_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 630...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Shuler (supplier of updated ca-certificates package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:12:10 -0500 Source: ca-certificates Binary: ca-certificates Architecture: source all Version: 20111025 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Shuler Changed-By: Michael Shuler Description: ca-certificates - Common CA certificates Closes: 537382 588219 619587 630232 643667 Changes: ca-certificates (20111025) unstable; urgency=low . [ Michael Shuler ] * Add 3.0 (native) source format * Add Vcs-Git/Browser fields * Add myself as new Maintainer with Uploaders Closes: #588219 * Update mozilla/certdata.txt to latest (NSS branch version 1.64.2.13) Certificates added (+) and removed (-): + "AffirmTrust Commercial" + "AffirmTrust Networking" + "AffirmTrust Premium" + "AffirmTrust Premium ECC" + "A-Trust-nQual-03" + "Bogus Global Trustee" + "Bogus GMail" + "Bogus Google" + "Bogus kuix.de" + "Bogus live.com" + "Bogus Mozilla Addons" + "Bogus Skype" + "Bogus Yahoo 1" + "Bogus Yahoo 2" + "Bogus Yahoo 3" + "Certinomis - Autorité Racine" + "Certum Trusted Network CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Cyber CA 2nd" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Root CA" + "Explicitly Distrust DigiNotar Services 1024 CA" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid" + "Explicitly Distrusted DigiNotar PKIoverheid G2" + "Go Daddy Root Certificate Authority - G2" + "Root CA Generalitat Valenciana" + "Starfield Root Certificate
Bug#643667: marked as done (Broken symlinks on upgrade due to plain c_rehash call)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643667: fixed in ca-certificates 20111025 has caused the Debian Bug report #643667, regarding Broken symlinks on upgrade due to plain c_rehash call to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643667 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ca-certificates Version: 20110502+nmu1 Severity: serious Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch Hi See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/854927 ca-certificates.postinst runs: # Call c_rehash when upgrading from older versions to that we # have both the old and new style of symlink if [ ! -z "$2" ]; then if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le 20090814+nmu3; then c_rehash fi fi but a plain c_rehash call is wrong because at this point there might be a /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt file with all certificates that c_rehash picks up and links to. Instead, this file should be removed, then c_rehash should be called after clearing all other symlinks, then ca-certificates.crt should be regenerated. update-ca-certificates --fresh is meant to do that, but didn't move /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt away. The attached patch moves /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt away (credit to Steve Langasek for fixing this), and removes the c_rehash upgrade snippet in favor. NB: The patch needs to be updated with this bug number and the uploaded version (see XXXs in patch). Cheers, -- Loïc Minier diff -Nru ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/debian/changelog ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/debian/changelog --- ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/debian/changelog 2011-08-31 04:02:49.0 +0200 +++ ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/debian/changelog 2011-09-28 15:45:59.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ +ca-certificates (20110502+nmu2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ Steve Langasek ] + * sbin/update-ca-certificates: move the ca-certificates.crt bundle out of +the way before calling c_rehash, so that symlinks don't accidentally get +pointed here, breaking openssl certificate verification. LP: #854927. + + [ Loïc Minier ] + * Drop bogus c_rehash on upgrades, which caused issue when +ca-certificates.crt was still in place; instead, call +update-ca-certificates --fresh on upgrades to this version, and +the usual update-ca-certificates otherwise; closes: #XXX. + + -- Loïc Minier Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:44:05 +0200 + ca-certificates (20110502+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. diff -Nru ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/debian/postinst ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/debian/postinst --- ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/debian/postinst 2011-04-21 19:37:20.0 +0200 +++ ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/debian/postinst 2011-09-28 15:42:28.0 +0200 @@ -137,13 +137,12 @@ -e 's/^[[:space:]]*1[[:space:]]*/!/' \ >> /etc/ca-certificates.conf fi - update-ca-certificates - # Call c_rehash when upgrading from older versions to that we - # have both the old and new style of symlink - if [ ! -z "$2" ]; then - if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le 20090814+nmu3; then - c_rehash - fi + # fix bogus symlink to ca-certificates.crt on upgrades; see + # Debian #XXX; drop after wheezy + if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 20110502+nmu2+XXX; then + update-ca-certificates --fresh + else + update-ca-certificates fi ;; diff -Nru ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/sbin/update-ca-certificates ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/sbin/update-ca-certificates --- ca-certificates-20110502+nmu1/sbin/update-ca-certificates 2009-07-08 23:23:12.0 +0200 +++ ca-certificates-20110502+nmu2/sbin/update-ca-certificates 2011-09-28 15:43:57.0 +0200 @@ -127,8 +127,7 @@ done fi -chmod 0644 "$TEMPBUNDLE" -mv -f "$TEMPBUNDLE" "$CERTBUNDLE" +rm -f "$CERTBUNDLE" ADDED_CNT=$(wc -l < "$ADDED") REMOVED_CNT=$(wc -l < "$REMOVED") @@ -144,6 +143,9 @@ fi fi +chmod 0644 "$TEMPBUNDLE" +mv -f "$TEMPBUNDLE" "$CERTBUNDLE" + echo "$ADDED_CNT added, $REMOVED_CNT removed; done." HOOKSDIR=/etc/ca-certificates/update.d --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ca-certificates Source-Version: 20111025 We believe that the bug you
Bug#646555: [Pkg-geany-team] Bug#646555: geany-plugin-spellcheck: Spellcheck missing dependency
On 26/10/2011 18:47, Agustin Martin wrote: > I'd put the dependency on (myspell|aspell|ispell|hunspell)-dictionary. > Committed that change to enchant collab-maint git repo. > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/enchant.git;a=commit;h=df7f2c6e709abfca052024ef7f9a4d2974e62991 Thanks for the fix. > Note that enchant is orphaned. I will not upload inmediately, but would like > to first prepare a new QA upload with some fixes in manpages. This change > will go with it. Regarding that, it looks like Bastien ROUCARIES wants to adopt the package, as mentioned on the O: bug[1]. It might be a good idea to check with him before uploading. Otherwise, if nobody else steps up to adopt this package, I can look into adopting it myself, seeing as I'm maintainer of geany-plugins which uses it. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580680#45 -- Kind regards, Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing of keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.changes
keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.dsc keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.debian.tar.gz keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rjbih-0002er...@franck.debian.org
keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.debian.tar.gz to main/k/keysafe/keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.debian.tar.gz keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.dsc to main/k/keysafe/keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.dsc keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.deb to main/k/keysafe/keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: keysafe_0.4.0.2-4.dsc - source gnome keysafe_0.4.0.2-4_amd64.deb - optional gnome Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rjbmd-0002pb...@franck.debian.org
