Bug#641094: marked as done (jrexx: wrong maintainer address)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:09:06 + with message-id <20111002100906.ga23...@master.debian.org> and subject line jrexx: wrong maintainer address has caused the Debian Bug report #641094, regarding jrexx: wrong maintainer address to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 641094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641094 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: jrexx Version: 1.1.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.3 There's a typo in the Maintainer field: Maintainer: Debian QA Group (note the missing "s" before @). -- Jakub Wilk --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- See http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jrexx/news/20110911T150236Z.html Changes: jrexx (1.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Fix Maintainer address fo the QA group. --- End Message ---
Processing of dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.changes
dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dates_0.4.8-2.dsc dates_0.4.8-2.diff.gz dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajn1-0005nv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#643372: marked as done (dates: FTBFS: dates_gtk.c:1117:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:47:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643372: fixed in dates 0.4.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #643372, regarding dates: FTBFS: dates_gtk.c:1117:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643372 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: dates Version: 0.4.8-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs hardening-format-security hardening Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src > -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/dates\" -DDATES_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" > -DDATADIR=\""/usr/share"\" -std=c99 -Wall -pthread -DORBIT2=1 > -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include > -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 > -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo > -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-3.0 > -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 > -I/usr/include/libsoup-2.4 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0-g -O2 > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c: In function > 'calendar_do_edit_dialog_response_cb': > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c:1117:5: error: format not a > string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c: In function > 'create_calendars_dialog': > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c:1581:13: warning: variable > 'cal_edit_button' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c:1580:13: warning: variable > 'cal_new_button' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c: In function > 'create_exceptions_dialog': > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c:1668:13: warning: variable > 'repeats_close_button' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c: In function > 'dates_platform_import_dialog': > /build/dates-L5nnhv/dates-0.4.8/./src/dates_gtk.c:2114:21: warning: variable > 'default_iter' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[3]: *** [dates_gtk.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/dates_0.4.8-1.1_lsid64.buildlog This happened because since dpkg 1.16.0 [0], hardening flags are enabled under various conditions. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: dates Source-Version: 0.4.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dates, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb to main/d/dates/dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb dates_0.4.8-2.diff.gz to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2.diff.gz dates_0.4.8-2.dsc to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2.dsc dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bart Martens (supplier of updated dates package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb to main/d/dates/dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb dates_0.4.8-2.diff.gz to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2.diff.gz dates_0.4.8-2.dsc to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2.dsc dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb to main/d/dates/dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: dates-hildon_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb - optional gnome dates_0.4.8-2.dsc - source gnome dates_0.4.8-2_amd64.deb - optional gnome Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 643372 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajze-0006ed...@franck.debian.org
Bug#643367: marked as done (contacts: FTBFS: contacts-callbacks-ui.c:224:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])
Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:02:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#643367: fixed in contacts 0.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #643367, regarding contacts: FTBFS: contacts-callbacks-ui.c:224:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 643367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: contacts Version: 0.9-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs hardening-format-security hardening Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/contacts\" > -DCONTACTS_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" -DDATADIR=\""/usr/share"\" > -Wall -export-dynamic -pthread -DCAMEL_HAVE_NSS -DCAMEL_HAVE_SSL -DORBIT2=1 > -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include > -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 > -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 > -I/usr/include/nss -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ > -I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-3.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 > -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libsoup-2.4 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 > -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 > -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gconf/2 > -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread > -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dbus-1.0/include > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -g -O2 > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -Wall -c contacts-callbacks-ui.c > contacts-callbacks-ui.c: In function 'contacts_delete_cb': > contacts-callbacks-ui.c:224:7: error: format not a string literal and no > format arguments [-Werror=format-security] > contacts-callbacks-ui.c: In function 'contacts_export': > contacts-callbacks-ui.c:403:5: warning: format '%lld' expects argument of > type 'long long int', but argument 5 has type 'GnomeVFSFileSize' [-Wformat] > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > make[3]: *** [contacts-callbacks-ui.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/09/23/contacts_0.9-1.1_lsid64.buildlog This happened because since dpkg 1.16.0 [0], hardening flags are enabled under various conditions. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: contacts Source-Version: 0.9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of contacts, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: contacts_0.9-2.diff.gz to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2.diff.gz contacts_0.9-2.dsc to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2.dsc contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bart Martens (supplier of updated contacts package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:36:54 +0200 Source: contacts Binary: contacts Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Bart Martens Description: contacts - lightweight addressbook Closes: 64336
Processing of contacts_0.9-2_amd64.changes
contacts_0.9-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: contacts_0.9-2.dsc contacts_0.9-2.diff.gz contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajbz-0006s8...@franck.debian.org
Processing of zgv_5.9-4_amd64.changes
zgv_5.9-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: zgv_5.9-4.dsc zgv_5.9-4.diff.gz zgv_5.9-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajgq-0007cs...@franck.debian.org
contacts_0.9-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: contacts_0.9-2.diff.gz to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2.diff.gz contacts_0.9-2.dsc to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2.dsc contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb to main/c/contacts/contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: contacts_0.9-2.dsc - source gnome contacts_0.9-2_amd64.deb - optional gnome Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 643367 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajo9-6m...@franck.debian.org
zgv_5.9-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: zgv_5.9-4.diff.gz to main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-4.diff.gz zgv_5.9-4.dsc to main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-4.dsc zgv_5.9-4_amd64.deb to main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-4_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: zgv_5.9-4.dsc - source graphics zgv_5.9-4_amd64.deb - optional graphics Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rajpm-lw...@franck.debian.org
Processing of libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.changes
libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.dsc libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.debian.tar.gz libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb libmusicbrainz4c2a_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb python-musicbrainz_2.1.5-6.1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rakeo-0002mj...@franck.debian.org
libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.debian.tar.gz to main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.debian.tar.gz libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.dsc to main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.dsc libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb to main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb libmusicbrainz4c2a_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb to main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz4c2a_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb python-musicbrainz_2.1.5-6.1_all.deb to main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/python-musicbrainz_2.1.5-6.1_all.deb Override entries for your package: libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.5-6.1.dsc - source libs libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libmusicbrainz4c2a_2.1.5-6.1_amd64.deb - optional libs python-musicbrainz_2.1.5-6.1_all.deb - optional python Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rakk1-0003pe...@franck.debian.org
Processing of libvncserver_0.9.8-2_amd64.changes
libvncserver_0.9.8-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libvncserver_0.9.8-2.dsc libvncserver_0.9.8-2.debian.tar.gz libvncserver-dev_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb libvncserver0_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb libvncserver0-dbg_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb linuxvnc_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ralfz-0003na...@franck.debian.org
libvncserver_0.9.8-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: libvncserver-dev_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb to main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver-dev_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb libvncserver0-dbg_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb to main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver0-dbg_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb libvncserver0_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb to main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver0_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb libvncserver_0.9.8-2.debian.tar.gz to main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver_0.9.8-2.debian.tar.gz libvncserver_0.9.8-2.dsc to main/libv/libvncserver/libvncserver_0.9.8-2.dsc linuxvnc_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb to main/libv/libvncserver/linuxvnc_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: libvncserver-dev_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb - optional x11 libvncserver0-dbg_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb - extra debug libvncserver0_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb - optional libs libvncserver_0.9.8-2.dsc - source x11 linuxvnc_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb - optional x11 Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ralsr-0004ts...@franck.debian.org
libvncserver override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libvncserver-dev_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says x11. linuxvnc_0.9.8-2_amd64.deb: package says section is net, override says x11. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ralsz-0004tf...@franck.debian.org
