Bug#614196: olvwm: New(er) upstream version available
Package: olvwm Version: 4.4.3.2p1.4-25 Severity: normal On http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20081204203055/http://home.nyc.rr.com/twopks/olvwm/ there seems to be a newer version available (4.5). Download link is http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20070204232957/http://home.nyc.rr.com/twopks/olvwm/olvwm4.src.tar.gz ,[ CHANGES ]--- | | Version 4.5 fix: | 1) More fixes for 24-bit framebuffers. I gotta get me one of those. | ` I'm currently not using olvwm, so I cannot judge if that patch fixes issues that may still exist with the current version in Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.iso885915, LC_CTYPE=en_US.iso885915 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages olvwm depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-4 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.1.2-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxpm4 1:3.5.9-1 X11 pixmap library olvwm recommends no packages. Versions of packages olvwm suggests: ii menu 2.1.44 generates programs menu for all me ii olwm 3.2p1.4-25 Open Look Window Manager pn xview-clients (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110220101304.8859.56790.report...@pc128.trash.bin
Bug#292144: marked as done (archmag: automatically set type of sealed branches)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#55: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #292144, regarding archmag: automatically set type of sealed branches to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 292144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292144 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: archway Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if sealed branches were automatically categorised differently to ordinary branches; I'm thinking that marking them 'hidden' might be a bit too much, but a new 'sealed' type would be quite handy. I guess you could go extra nuts and automatically do a blank commit --seal if you set a branch to sealed, but I can see the downsides to doing that. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages archway depends on: ii libarch-perl 0.4.1-1Perl library for GNU Arch ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.061-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#292141: marked as done (archmag doesn't save branch metadata between invocations)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#55: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #292141, regarding archmag doesn't save branch metadata between invocations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 292141: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292141 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: archway Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: normal Quite a pest, that. Mark all my old branches as hidden and obsolete, quit, and when I come back all my useful metadata is gone. Whoops. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages archway depends on: ii libarch-perl 0.4.1-1Perl library for GNU Arch ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.061-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#292146: marked as done (archmag doesn't show downstream branches as partner versions)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#55: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #292146, regarding archmag doesn't show downstream branches as partner versions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 292146: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292146 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: archway Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: minor This may be my understanding of how archmag works (hence the 'minor' severity), but it seems like archmag's partner versions list is missing some useful branches. In particular, I've got lots of feature branches all tagged off a trunk, and when I archmag in the trunk I can't see the feature branches. >From the look of the merge feature (unimplemented, I know) I'm supposed to select a partner version and then merge that into the currently archmag'd tree -- but, since the feature branches I'd want to merge from aren't available, I can't. The reverse operation -- merge the current tree into the selected partner version -- is the only way I can think of that makes sense, UI-wise, but I would think that the common operation is to merge lots of branches into one, not merge one branch into lots of different other places... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages archway depends on: ii libarch-perl 0.4.1-1Perl library for GNU Arch ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.061-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#292147: marked as done (archmag: ability to filter partner versions)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#55: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #292147, regarding archmag: ability to filter partner versions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 292147: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292147 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: archway Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: wishlist Filtering based on the version metadata would be wonderful, but I'd settle at the moment for being able to exclude sealed versions (a la rbrowse). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages archway depends on: ii libarch-perl 0.4.1-1Perl library for GNU Arch ii libgtk2-perl 1:1.061-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#362735: marked as done (archway: Spelling mistake in package description)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#55: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #362735, regarding archway: Spelling mistake in package description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 362735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362735 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: archway Severity: minor s/Alternativelly/Alternatively/ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.2 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#544445: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: archway | 0.2.1+patch-85-1 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 544...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/55 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8s2-0008j9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#544445: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.2.1+patch-85-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package archway has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/55 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8s5-0008jc...@franck.debian.org
Bug#542688: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: arch2darcs | 1.0.12 | source, hurd-i386 arch2darcs | 1.0.15 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 542...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/542688 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8ub-si...@franck.debian.org
Bug#438730: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gkrellmss | 2.6-7 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2007 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 438...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/438730 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8a0-0001dh...@franck.debian.org
Bug#436118: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dict-gazetteer | 1.3-3 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2007 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 436...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/436118 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8ba-0001pq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#326112: marked as done (rpncalc: Double precision error.)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:55:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#614188: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #326112, regarding rpncalc: Double precision error. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 326112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326112 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: rpncalc Version: 1.34 Severity: normal When I compute '23 !' (factorial), the result returned was incorrect. Here is a transcript: mickey@bunny:~$ rpncalc rpncalc version 1.34. Copyright © 1993-2004 David Frey et. al. Il s'agit d'un logiciel libre SANS AUCUNE GARANTIE. Pour de plus amples informations, tapez 'warranty'. Tapez 'quit' pour quitter ou '?' pour obtenir de l'aide. 22 ! 1: 11240007260768 23 ! 2: 11240007260768 1: 25852016738884978212864 The result must be '2585201673888497664'. I think it's a problem with the C double precision. So, it could be a good idea, if the fix is not easy to do, to report this error to the user by an Overflow message for example. Best regards. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-k7-bunny Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages rpncalc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline44.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information -- A+, MiKaël. http://klnavarro.free.fr --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.36.8+rm Dear submitter, as the package rpncalc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/614188 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#543939: marked as done (xtartan: Debian tartan displayed rotated 90 degrees from normal)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:53:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#540847: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #543939, regarding xtartan: Debian tartan displayed rotated 90 degrees from normal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 543939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: xtartan Version: 2.3-14 Severity: minor Hi, Thanks for including the Debian Tartan :-) A minor nit to pick though. The top left corner would normally (in a kilt) be the one that has the dash-dot-dot (Morse 'D') running in both directions, so that it reads both left-to-right and top-to-bottom. You currently have that corner at bottom-left, rather than top-left. I'd imagine that you are displaying it in what would be the strictly correct orientation, as I got the impression that the kilt-makers had to rotate it before they started making the kilts from it. If you look at the newly instituted official register, they also have it wrong, although they are 180-degrees out: http://www.tartanregister.gov.uk/tartanDetails.aspx?ref=5936 whereas the earlier registration at the STWR had it the right way round. http://www.scottish-tartans-world-register.com/tartan.aspx?record=3256 I'm guessing that the new tartanregister.gov.uk site has generated its images from the setts (as xtartan presumably does) without taking orientation into account (which is normally irrelevant for fully symmetric tartans). Cheers, Phil. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xtartan depends on: ii libc6 2.9-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgd2-xpm 2.0.36~rc1~dfsg-3 GD Graphics Library version 2 ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library ii libxpm41:3.5.7-1 X11 pixmap library ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library xtartan recommends no packages. xtartan suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.3-16+rm Dear submitter, as the package xtartan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/540847 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#553841: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:55:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#614188: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #553841, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 553841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553841 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: rpncalc Version: 1.36.8 Severity: important User: d...@debian.org Usertags: readline6 Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.36.8+rm Dear submitter, as the package rpncalc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/614188 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#543877: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dahb-html | 4.0.1.4-4 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 543...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/543877 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8ck-0001yw...@franck.debian.org
Bug#528941: marked as done (Different voice options with say-epos cause eposd to crash)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:01:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#497140: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #528941,
regarding Different voice options with say-epos cause eposd to crash
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
528941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528941
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: epos
Version: 1:2.5.37-7
Severity: normal
The use of different voices with say-epos cause eposd to crash.
The program ends with "Segment number 1261 occurred, but the maximum is 442."
execve("/usr/bin/say-epos", ["say-epos", "--voice", "kubec-int", "hello"], [/*
35 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x605000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f62700fa000
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f62700f8000
access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=193489, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 193489, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x7f62700c8000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\300g\5\0"..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1019216, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 3191480, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x7f626fbd4000
mprotect(0x7f626fcc4000, 2097152, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x7f626fec4000, 36864, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0xf) = 0x7f626fec4000
mmap(0x7f626fecd000, 74424, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f626fecd000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libm.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0P>\0\0\0"..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=534736, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2629848, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x7f626f951000
mprotect(0x7f626f9d3000, 2093056, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x7f626fbd2000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x81000) = 0x7f626fbd2000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libgcc_s.so.1", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0 ,\0\0\0"..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=93016, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f62700c7000
mmap(NULL, 2188856, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x7f626f73a000
mprotect(0x7f626f75, 2097152, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x7f626f95, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x16000) = 0x7f626f95
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\300\342"..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1375536, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 3482232, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x7f626f3e7000
mprotect(0x7f626f531000, 2093056, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x7f626f73, 20480, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x149000) = 0x7f626f73
mmap(0x7f626f735000, 17016, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f626f735000
close(3)= 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f62700c6000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f62700c5000
arch_prctl(ARCH_SET_FS, 0x7f62700c56f0) = 0
mprotect(0x7f626f73, 12288, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x7f626fec4000, 24576, PROT_READ) = 0
munmap(0x7f62700c8000, 193489) = 0
brk(0) = 0x605000
brk(0x62a000) = 0x62a000
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
getpid()= 9965
open("/etc/resolv.conf", O_RDONLY) = 4
fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=42, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, M
Bug#556498: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:00:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#543927: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #556498, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 556498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556498 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: tpm-tools Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: minor User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. Objects inside an .a archive aren't linked yet. This means that you must resolve their symbols when linking them to a program. More informations can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -m64 -Wall -Werror -Wreturn-type -Wsign-compare -o tpmtoken_init data_init.o ../../lib/libtpm_pkcs11.la -ltspi libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -m64 -Wall -Werror -Wreturn-type -Wsign-compare -o tpmtoken_init data_init.o ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a /usr/lib/libtspi.so -lpthread -lcrypto /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function closeToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:287: error: undefined reference to 'dlclose' /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function openToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:157: error: undefined reference to 'dlopen' /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function openToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:163: error: undefined reference to 'dlsym' /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function openToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:263: error: undefined reference to 'dlclose' /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function openToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:159: error: undefined reference to 'dlerror' /usr/bin/ld: ../../lib/.libs/libtpm_pkcs11.a(tpm_pkcs11.o): in function openToken:tpm_pkcs11.c:165: error: undefined reference to 'dlerror' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [tpmtoken_init] Error 1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tpm-tools has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543927 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#564980: marked as done (epos: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:01:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#497140: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #564980, regarding epos: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 564980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564980 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: epos Version: 1:2.5.37-8 Severity: normal Tags: sid User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.5 The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4. For the compiler version used, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/01/msg00230.html The full build log can be found at: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/01/08b/epos_1:2.5.37-8_lsid64b.buildlog The last lines of the build log are cwat the end of this report. The reason of the build failure is likely in the package (compiler or linker message found in the build log), if this turns out as a gcc bug, please reassign to the gcc-4.5 package. If the build ends with a message "confused by earlier errors, bailing out", please ignore it for now; these compiler errors are filed separately. [...] else rm -f ".deps/matrix.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi rm -f .libs/matrix.lo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT matrix.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/matrix.Tpo -c matrix.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/matrix.lo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT matrix.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/matrix.Tpo -c matrix.cc -o matrix.o >/dev/null 2>&1 mv -f .libs/matrix.lo matrix.lo if /bin/bash ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT stream.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/stream.Tpo" \ -c -o stream.lo `test -f 'stream.cc' || echo './'`stream.cc; \ then mv -f ".deps/stream.Tpo" ".deps/stream.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/stream.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi rm -f .libs/stream.lo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT stream.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/stream.Tpo -c stream.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/stream.lo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT stream.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/stream.Tpo -c stream.cc -o stream.o >/dev/null 2>&1 mv -f .libs/stream.lo stream.lo if /bin/bash ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT neural_parse.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/neural_parse.Tpo" \ -c -o neural_parse.lo `test -f 'neural_parse.cc' || echo './'`neural_parse.cc; \ then mv -f ".deps/neural_parse.Tpo" ".deps/neural_parse.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/neural_parse.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi rm -f .libs/neural_parse.lo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./.. -w -DEPOS -ggdb -DBASE_DIR=/usr/share/epos -g -O2 -MT neural_parse.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/neural_parse.Tpo -c neural_parse.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/neural_parse.lo neural_parse.yy: In function 'int neuralerror(char*)': neural_parse.yy:258:144: error: cannot pass objects of non-trivially-copyable type 'class CString' through '...' make[4]: *** [neural_parse.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1:2.5.37-9+rm Dear submitter, as the package epos has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/497140 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#596548: marked as done (tpm-tools - tpm_unsealdata changes file contents)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:00:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#543927: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #596548, regarding tpm-tools - tpm_unsealdata changes file contents to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 596548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596548 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tpm-tools Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/tpm_unsealdata tpm_unsealdata changes the data on output to stdout. For no particular reason, it prepends and appends the string "\n\n" to the output. This makes it impossible to use this output of possibly binary data directly as input for another toool. Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages tpm-tools depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-2 SSL shared libraries ii libtpm-unseal0 1.3.3-2 Management tools for the TPM hardw ii libtspi10.3.5-2 open-source TCG Software Stack (li ii opencryptoki2.2.8+dfsg-4 PKCS#11 implementation for Linux ( ii trousers0.3.5-2 open-source TCG Software Stack (da tpm-tools recommends no packages. tpm-tools suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tpm-tools has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543927 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#555174: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:03:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#543929: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #555174, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 555174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555174 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libengine-tpm-openssl Version: 0.4.1+20071221-8 Severity: minor User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. More informations can be found at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o create_tpm_key create_tpm_key.o -ltspi gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o create_tpm_key create_tpm_key.o /usr/lib/libtspi.so /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_print_errors:create_tpm_key.c:88: error: undefined reference to 'ERR_load_ERR_strings' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_print_errors:create_tpm_key.c:89: error: undefined reference to 'ERR_load_crypto_strings' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_get_modulus_and_prime:create_tpm_key.c:119: error: undefined reference to 'BN_bn2bin' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_get_modulus_and_prime:create_tpm_key.c:125: error: undefined reference to 'BN_bn2bin' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_read_key:create_tpm_key.c:99: error: undefined reference to 'BIO_new_file' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_read_key:create_tpm_key.c:105: error: undefined reference to 'PEM_read_bio_RSAPrivateKey' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_read_key:create_tpm_key.c:109: error: undefined reference to 'BIO_free' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:436: error: undefined reference to 'RSA_size' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:498: error: undefined reference to 'BIO_new_file' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:504: error: undefined reference to 'ASN1_OCTET_STRING_new' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:512: error: undefined reference to 'ASN1_STRING_set' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:513: error: undefined reference to 'i2d_ASN1_OCTET_STRING' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:514: error: undefined reference to 'PEM_write_bio' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:516: error: undefined reference to 'BIO_free' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:312: error: undefined reference to 'EVP_read_pw_string' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:361: error: undefined reference to 'EVP_read_pw_string' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:468: error: undefined reference to 'RSA_free' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:448: error: undefined reference to 'RSA_free' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function main:create_tpm_key.c:439: error: undefined reference to 'RSA_free' /usr/bin/ld: create_tpm_key.o: in function openssl_print_errors:create_tpm_key.c:90: error: undefined reference to 'ERR_print_errors_fp' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [create_tpm_key] Error 1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.1+20071221-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package libengine-tpm-openssl has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543929 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#538966: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: etl | 0.04.13-1 | source etl-dev | 0.04.13-1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 538...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/538966 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8lr-0003pm...@franck.debian.org
Bug#540847: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xtartan | 2.3-16 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 540...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/540847 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8mf-0003sn...@franck.debian.org
Bug#540847: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.3-16+rm Dear submitter, as the package xtartan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/540847 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8mj-0003t1...@franck.debian.org
Bug#203947: marked as done (tkvnc: README is more informative than man page.)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#486769: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #203947, regarding tkvnc: README is more informative than man page. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 203947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203947 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: tkvnc Version: 0.6-7.1 Severity: normal README is more informative than man page. I see this as being a vary small app, so the correct action would be to append/insert the important parts of the README into the man page. AFAIK the README is not needed, it should go. It's bloated with build instructions, only usefull with the source not the package. Important parts I see are vnchost this should be a man page all by it self IMHO. Also There is no mention of global config(/etc)? This would be a seperat bug I have yet to discover. Other chevats that should be in the man page, that are not documented. Handeling of servers that are not responding, up or running. Also gktsu(or whatever) has a password interface, maby MANY programs could make use of a common API? I use a password file there is no documantation on any of this, only to point out that there are BUGS in this area(also not in the man page!). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux overrun 2.5.75 #1 Tue Jul 29 18:08:34 CDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages tkvnc depends on: ii perl [perl5] 5.8.0-18 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-tk1:800.024-1.1 Perl module providing the Tk graph ii xvncviewer 3.3.7-1 Virtual network computing client s -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6-10+rm Dear submitter, as the package tkvnc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/486769 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#613667: marked as done (toshutils.postinst: 19: MAKEDEV: not found)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:07:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#543237: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #613667, regarding toshutils.postinst: 19: MAKEDEV: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613667 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: toshutils Version: 2.0.1+debian-24 Severity: important I cannot install this package on my toshiba laptop: After this operation, 487 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main toshutils amd64 2.0.1+debian-24 [126 kB] Fetched 126 kB in 0s (424 kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package toshutils. (Reading database ... 176470 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking toshutils (from .../toshutils_2.0.1+debian-24_amd64.deb) ... Processing triggers for menu ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up toshutils (2.0.1+debian-24) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/toshutils.postinst: 19: MAKEDEV: not found dpkg: error processing toshutils (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 configured to not write apport reports Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: toshutils E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers squeeze-updates APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages toshutils depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-4 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.1.2-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library ii udev 164-3 /dev/ and hotplug management daemo toshutils recommends no packages. toshutils suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.0.1+debian-24+rm Dear submitter, as the package toshutils has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543237 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#614188: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: rpncalc | 1.36.8 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, orphaned, low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 614...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/614188 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8p0-0003pn...@franck.debian.org
Bug#614188: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.36.8+rm Dear submitter, as the package rpncalc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/614188 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8p3-0003pw...@franck.debian.org
Bug#455006: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: python-webut |0.2 | all webut |0.2 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2007 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 455...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/455006 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8qp-0004fy...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543860: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: tack | 1.06-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc tack-dbg | 1.06-9 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 543...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/543860 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8rk-0004kk...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543927: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libtpm-unseal-dev |1.3.3-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc libtpm-unseal0 |1.3.3-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc tpm-tools |1.3.3-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc tpm-tools-dbg |1.3.3-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 543...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/543927 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8ty-0004vq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543927: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.3.3-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package tpm-tools has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543927 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8u2-0004vz...@franck.debian.org
Bug#497140: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: epos | 1:2.5.37-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2008 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 497...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/497140 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8um-000508...@franck.debian.org
Bug#497140: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1:2.5.37-9+rm Dear submitter, as the package epos has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/497140 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8uz-00050y...@franck.debian.org
Bug#509889: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: yydecode | 0.2.10-5 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2008 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 509...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/509889 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8ut-00053o...@franck.debian.org
Re: Bug#388360: pydance-music: requesting removal
tags 388360 + moreinfo thanks * Lucas Nussbaum [110220 08:38]: > The pydance-music package has been orphaned for a long time, and nobody has > been willing to take it over. > I am therefore requesting its removal from Debian. # Broken Depends: pydance: pydance Should that be remove,d too? Then please open a sepparate bug report for that. Best Regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110220131238.ga25...@melusine.alphascorpii.net
Bug#543929: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libengine-tpm-openssl | 0.4.1+20071221-8 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 543...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/543929 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8wh-0005ic...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543929: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.4.1+20071221-8+rm Dear submitter, as the package libengine-tpm-openssl has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543929 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8wt-0005ju...@franck.debian.org
Bug#478227: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: tla-tools | 2005.0.patch.29-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2008 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 478...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/478227 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr8xo-0005nv...@franck.debian.org
Bug#486769: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: tkvnc | 0.6-10 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2008 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 486...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/486769 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr901-0006hg...@franck.debian.org
Bug#486769: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 0.6-10+rm Dear submitter, as the package tkvnc has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/486769 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr908-0006hs...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543237: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: toshutils | 2.0.1+debian-24 | source, amd64, i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned low popcon -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 543...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/543237 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr90x-0006kz...@franck.debian.org
Bug#543237: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 2.0.1+debian-24+rm Dear submitter, as the package toshutils has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/543237 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1pr90b-0006lc...@franck.debian.org
Bug#250213: marked as done (Does not need to depend on pydance-music)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:30:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#388361: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #250213, regarding Does not need to depend on pydance-music to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 250213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=250213 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pydance Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: minor Tags: sid pydance-music is not required for pydance to work as it can use other music. im not sure how this is affected by debian policiy but i think it should onlly reccomend pydance-music instead of depending on it? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages pydance depends on: ii pydance-music 3 Songs and step patterns for pydanc ii python2.3.3-7An interactive high-level object-o ii python-pygame 1.6-0.1SDL bindings for games development -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.1.0-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pydance has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/388361 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#279664: marked as done (pydance: Nonstop mode's Random should not allow same song twice)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:30:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#388361: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #279664, regarding pydance: Nonstop mode's Random should not allow same song twice to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 279664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=279664 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pydance Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: minor Under nonstop mode, when you pick to do Random songs, it is possible to get the same song in the set twice. This is usually not what the user wants. It would be nice if the Random song picker checked to make sure there were no duplicates in the set of random songs returned. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 Versions of packages pydance depends on: ii pydance-music 4 Songs and step patterns for pydanc ii python2.3.4-4An interactive high-level object-o ii python-pygame 1.6-2 SDL bindings for games development -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.1.0-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pydance has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/388361 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Re: Bug#474528: mffm-timecode: requesting removal
tags 474528 + moreinfo thanks Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum [110219 18:39]: > The mffm-timecode package has been orphaned for a long time, and nobody has > been willing to take it over. > I am therefore requesting its removal from Debian. Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: wsola: wsola-dev # Broken Build-Depends: wsola: mffm-timecode-dev Shall that package be removed, too? If yes, please fill if a sepparate bug report. Best Regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110220174008.ga5...@melusine.alphascorpii.net
Bug#388361: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pydance |1.1.0-1 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 388...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/388361 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prd6f-0001zj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#388361: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 1.1.0-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package pydance has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/388361 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prd6i-0001f1...@franck.debian.org
Bug#388360: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pydance-music | 5 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned since 2006 -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 388...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/388360 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prd79-0001qj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#388360: Removed package(s) from unstable
Version: 5+rm Dear submitter, as the package pydance-music has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/388360 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prd7e-0001qe...@franck.debian.org
Processing of gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.changes
gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdesklets_0.36.1-5.dsc gdesklets_0.36.1-5.diff.gz gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prf71-000137...@franck.debian.org
gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: gdesklets_0.36.1-5.diff.gz to main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.36.1-5.diff.gz gdesklets_0.36.1-5.dsc to main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.36.1-5.dsc gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.deb to main/g/gdesklets/gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: gdesklets_0.36.1-5.dsc - source gnome gdesklets_0.36.1-5_amd64.deb - optional gnome Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 614269 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1prffz-0001if...@franck.debian.org
