Bug#597162: mock: does nothing when called as user
Package: mock Version: 1.0.8-1 Severity: important Hi! I can't get mock to do *anything* at all, when running as a normal user. # without a $DISPLAY $ mock $ With a DISPLAY set, I get a dialog box with the following message: The password you typed is invalid. Please try again. $ ls -la /usr/bin/mock lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Sep 17 09:33 /usr/bin/mock -> consolehelper $ ls -la /usr/sbin/mock -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 29880 Jun 13 22:34 /usr/sbin/mock If this is a bug in usermode, please reassign. Thanks, Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mock depends on: ii adduser 3.112 add and remove users and groups ii python2.6.6-1interactive high-level object-orie ii python-decoratortools 1.8-1 version-agnostic decorators suppor ii python-support1.0.9 automated rebuilding support for P ii rpm 4.8.1-5package manager for RPM ii usermode 1.106-1Graphical tools for certain user a ii yum 3.2.25-1 Advanced front-end for rpm mock recommends no packages. mock suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100917074653.7748.19635.report...@percival.namespace.at
Bug#597164: mock: fails with ImportError: No module named root_cache
Package: mock Version: 1.0.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Trying to run mock as root yields the following error message: debian:~# mock -r epel-5-i386 --init INFO: mock.py version 1.0.8 starting... State Changed: init plugins ERROR: No module named root_cache Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 693, in main(retParams) File "/usr/sbin/mock", line 535, in main chroot = mock.backend.Root(config_opts, uidManager) File "", line 3, in __init__ def __init__(self, config, uidManager): return __decorated(self, config, uidManager) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/mock/backend.py", line 102, in __init__ self._initPlugins() File "", line 3, in _initPlugins def _initPlugins(self): return __decorated(self) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/mock/backend.py", line 571, in _initPlugins fp, pathname, description = imp.find_module(modname, [self.pluginDir]) ImportError: No module named root_cache As mock does not seem to work without 'root_cache', which appears to be something shipped by mock, I consider mock to be broken in it's current state. Thanks, Christian -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages mock depends on: ii adduser 3.112 add and remove users and groups ii python2.6.6-1interactive high-level object-orie ii python-decoratortools 1.8-1 version-agnostic decorators suppor ii python-support1.0.9 automated rebuilding support for P ii rpm 4.8.1-5package manager for RPM ii usermode 1.106-1Graphical tools for certain user a ii yum 3.2.25-1 Advanced front-end for rpm mock recommends no packages. mock suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100917075043.8459.46893.report...@percival.namespace.at
Processing of yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.changes
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owyxs-0008le...@franck.debian.org
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc - source graphics yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb - optional graphics Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 595956 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owzb0-hz...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595956: marked as done (yafray: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: KeyError: 'gnukfreebsd8')
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:32:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#595956: fixed in yafray 0.0.9+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #595956,
regarding yafray: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: KeyError: 'gnukfreebsd8'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
595956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: yafray
Version: 0.0.9+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
yafray now FTBFS on kfreebsd-* since it only knows about previous kernel
versions. It probably should strip the version out of it and use
'gnukfreebsd' as a key.
Log excerpt:
| scons prefix=/usr
| scons: Reading SConscript files ...
| KeyError: 'gnukfreebsd8':
| File
|
"/build/buildd-yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-4+b1-kfreebsd-amd64-KsEAxK/yafray-0.0.9+dfsg/SConstruct",
| line 20:
| fichero = ficheros[sys.platform.split('-')[0]]
| make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Full build logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=yafray
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: yafray
Source-Version: 0.0.9+dfsg-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
yafray, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz
to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc
to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
to main/y/yafray/yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alessio Treglia (supplier of updated yafray package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:54:53 +0200
Source: yafray
Binary: yafray
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.0.9+dfsg-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia
Description:
yafray - a modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system
Closes: 595956
Changes:
yafray (0.0.9+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Store sys.platform value into the platform variable and strip versions
out of it if the arch is kfreebsd-* to fix FTBFS on those architectures;
Closes: #595956
* Refresh patches.
Checksums-Sha1:
b093d5d2cff6fdc1f82e5223b990d8e0ed2447ec 1205 yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc
1d8c6baa5cd3038dd221120688497f72ec4ac0ea 10223 yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz
6ba89f5c950d73da7093eaf17292b725de27bf35 622500 yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
1e517840fc2c5de67ce6127b86c512b058f067cbd4de7654c299326206c5166b 1205
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc
0a614f9db9106463f8d2727fbedd9608194c69a33702d2e04bc08ec5d8cb8d7b 10223
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz
4a3fcb70a2bbb5d7dbce06f754354d29b65955c911c95a334408fe765577546e 622500
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
Files:
1f6193c9fca3f39329f959907487625a 1205 graphics optional yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.dsc
d70ff7b85e30f0526a2d4276d5538e40 10223 graphics optional
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5.diff.gz
275f13e9f8c439b8aaafdaeb7c87f324 622500 graphics optional
yafray_0.0.9+dfsg-5_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkyTTYEACgkQRdSMfNz8P9CRrACfYp5gsKvtUB+IOvcohkpH5Rcv
KHgAnjmqtqBWS8NQUorOPFLUdtzt02Qn
=RghG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
Bug#597164: mock: fails with ImportError: No module named root_cache
I cannot reproduce this bug, I just built rpms for both epel-5-x86_64 and epel-5-i386 on two different machines running squeeze (one being a x86_64 machine, the other one is an i386). # dpkg -l mock [...] ii mock 1.0.8-1Build rpm packages inside a chroot # mock -r epel-5-i386 nc-1.84-10.fc6.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.0.8 starting... State Changed: init plugins /bin/sh: /usr/sbin/getenforce: No such file or directory State Changed: start INFO: Start(nc-1.84-10.fc6.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 1.0.8 INFO: Mock Version: 1.0.8 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(nc-1.84-10.fc6.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-i386) 1 minutes 22 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/epel-5-i386/result I noticed that mock tries to use /usr/sbin/getenforce from selinux-utils which is not a dependency of the mock package. I tested building packages with and without the selinux-utils package being installed and it worked either way. I'd guess that it assumes that selinux is disabled when the userspace tools aren't installed, but it would be nicer to add it to the list of dependencies to get rid of the ugly error message. Cheers, Justus signature.asc Description: PGP signature
intercal REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the intercal source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 28:0.28-4 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owdxy-0001y4...@franck.debian.org
opensched REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the opensched source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.4.4-6 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owdxy-0001za...@franck.debian.org
wmget REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the wmget source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.6.0-3 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owdxy-0001zy...@franck.debian.org
pympd_0.07-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: pympd_0.07-2.diff.gz to main/p/pympd/pympd_0.07-2.diff.gz pympd_0.07-2.dsc to main/p/pympd/pympd_0.07-2.dsc pympd_0.07-2_all.deb to main/p/pympd/pympd_0.07-2_all.deb Override entries for your package: pympd_0.07-2.dsc - source sound pympd_0.07-2_all.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 594129 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1owjkg-0002kl...@franck.debian.org
