Danke Thilo!
Moin packages ! Meinungsfreiheit muß man schützen ! Man kann zu Thilo Sarrazin und seinem Buch stehen wie man will, aber es geht hier nicht nur um die Person Thilo Sarrazin, sondern auch im den Schutz unserer Demokratie und insbesondere im den Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit in unserem Land. Deshalb sind alle Demokraten aufgefordert, sich bei dieser Unterstützungliste einzutragen, und somit für den Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit einzustehen. http://thilosarrazinhatrecht.wordpress.com/ http://www.google.de/#sclient=psy&hl=de&q=site%3AThilo-Sarrazin-hat-Recht.i nfo ~~~ Macht mit! Bitte leitet diese eMail an alle Freunde & Bekannte weiter, informiert in Foren, Communities, Blogs und Chats über diese Unterstützerliste oder auch per Messenger (ICQ, MSN, usw.). Mach mit und helfe die Meinungsfreiheit zu schüzen! ~~~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/0e9a8380.d5b27...@politikerclub.de
Bug#469250: marked as done (metastore: doc/examples/pre-commit is broken by current git)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:47:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#469250: fixed in metastore 1+20080623+debian-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #469250, regarding metastore: doc/examples/pre-commit is broken by current git to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 469250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469250 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: metastore Version: 1-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch As of commit f5bbc322 (so in particular in Debian version 1:1.5.4.3-1), git pre-commit hooks do not get stdin. I have worked around this by reading from /dev/tty. I'm not 100% this has no other issues, but it works for me (TM). Maybe this is really a git bug, but I attach a workaround patch for metastore. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages metastore depends on: ii libc6 2.7-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries metastore recommends no packages. -- no debconf information *** .git/hooks/pre-commit~ 2008-03-04 07:53:13.0 +0100 --- .git/hooks/pre-commit 2008-03-04 08:33:27.0 +0100 *** *** 8,14 echo "Going to commit the following metadata changes" >&2 metastore -c -m >&2 echo -n "Ok to commit? (y/n): " >&2 ! read -n1 REPLY echo "" if [ "$REPLY" != "y" ]; then --- 8,14 echo "Going to commit the following metadata changes" >&2 metastore -c -m >&2 echo -n "Ok to commit? (y/n): " >&2 ! read -n1 REPLY < /dev/tty echo "" if [ "$REPLY" != "y" ]; then --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: metastore Source-Version: 1+20080623+debian-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of metastore, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 469...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Romain Francoise (supplier of updated metastore package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:56:36 +0200 Source: metastore Binary: metastore Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1+20080623+debian-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Romain Francoise Changed-By: Romain Francoise Description: metastore - Store and restore metadata from a filesystem Closes: 469250 540588 594134 Changes: metastore (1+20080623+debian-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #540588). * Fix getopt parsing of -f (closes: #594134). * Remove prompting from example Git pre-commit hook (closes: #469250); hooks now run with stdin closed (since Git version 1.5.4) and prompting will not work when using a high-level interface such as git-gui or Emacs anyway. * Switch (back) to a minimal rules files; restores missing examples. * Switch to source format 3.0 (quilt). * Add debian/watch. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1, no changes needed. Checksums-Sha1: 343d96af3dbb87d44f9c3c84953a35ca4eee73b4 1173 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc dfb1303bb6dccaa3e8c5ff6a4468ba15a23195d6 3161 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz 2e3b52884477090fcea9322785e359f2392e8b98 16200 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: e8c5ad8aa3f9c273f263e63f8043ca09c9955211caf24c49eb5fd2f344a50816 1173 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc 74ba6ea5cf99257c71d1b456e0e4896e277aa0affc6911150cd87eba0cad 3161 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz f60b9da8f56f1e8bd315a5b3fa302f60bb08e13d04e17c82153c66121a5b4fab 16200 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb Files: 5b6a049a8ad9d2b9fb0961f8ac00ac78 1
Bug#594134: marked as done (metastore(1) -f option's argument isn't handled properly)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:47:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#594134: fixed in metastore 1+20080623+debian-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #594134, regarding metastore(1) -f option's argument isn't handled properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 594134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: metastore Version: 1+20080623+debian-1 Apparently, the command's ‘-f’ option's argument isn't handled properly: $ command time metastore -sf FILE -- . Failed to open (null): Bad address Command exited with non-zero status 1 … $ command time metastore -s -f FILE -- . Failed to open (null): Bad address Command exited with non-zero status 1 … $ While the (should be) synonymous ‘--file’ long option has no such problem: $ command time metastore -s --file FILE -- . 0.00user 0.01system 0:00.02elapsed 50%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4352maxresident)k 0inputs+136outputs (0major+331minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ command time metastore -s --file=FILE -- . 0.00user 0.01system 0:00.02elapsed 50%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4368maxresident)k 0inputs+136outputs (0major+332minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ -- FSF associate member #7257 pgp99QFTchKFf.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: metastore Source-Version: 1+20080623+debian-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of metastore, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb to main/m/metastore/metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 594...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Romain Francoise (supplier of updated metastore package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:56:36 +0200 Source: metastore Binary: metastore Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1+20080623+debian-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Romain Francoise Changed-By: Romain Francoise Description: metastore - Store and restore metadata from a filesystem Closes: 469250 540588 594134 Changes: metastore (1+20080623+debian-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #540588). * Fix getopt parsing of -f (closes: #594134). * Remove prompting from example Git pre-commit hook (closes: #469250); hooks now run with stdin closed (since Git version 1.5.4) and prompting will not work when using a high-level interface such as git-gui or Emacs anyway. * Switch (back) to a minimal rules files; restores missing examples. * Switch to source format 3.0 (quilt). * Add debian/watch. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1, no changes needed. Checksums-Sha1: 343d96af3dbb87d44f9c3c84953a35ca4eee73b4 1173 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc dfb1303bb6dccaa3e8c5ff6a4468ba15a23195d6 3161 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz 2e3b52884477090fcea9322785e359f2392e8b98 16200 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: e8c5ad8aa3f9c273f263e63f8043ca09c9955211caf24c49eb5fd2f344a50816 1173 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc 74ba6ea5cf99257c71d1b456e0e4896e277aa0affc6911150cd87eba0cad 3161 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz f60b9da8f56f1e8bd315a5b3fa302f60bb08e13d04e17c82153c66121a5b4fab 16200 metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb Files: 5b6a049a8ad9d2b9fb0961f8ac00ac78 1173 misc optional metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.dsc 0c041d0da48b61106ac92ed91ea1ffca 3161 misc optional metastore_1+20080623+debian-2.debian.tar.gz d610083b19e286d245d1bbc7e4532bc2 16200 misc optional metastore_1+20080623+debian-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMjK1oogN2vsA8Vt8RAnTRAJ4uo3j1agY8JfmN/WaqWuY5fMhtqQCgwWKl 9kKcwfqMRRVVszmGIs9iCuw= =Ex37 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Sei dabei und helfe mit!
Hallo packages ! Meinungsfreiheit muß man schützen, vor denen die da oben sitzen! Man kann zu Thilo Sarrazin und seinem Buch stehen wie man will, aber es geht hier nicht nur um die Person Thilo Sarrazin, sondern auch im den Schutz unserer Demokratie und insbesondere im den Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit in unserem Land. Deshalb sind alle Demokraten aufgefordert, sich bei dieser Unterstützungliste einzutragen, und somit für den Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit einzustehen. Schau rein unter: http://thilosarrazinhatrecht.wordpress.com/ ~~~ Macht mit! Bitte leitet diese eMail an alle Freunde & Bekannte weiter, informiert in Foren, Communities, Blogs und Chats über diese Unterstützerliste oder auch per Messenger (ICQ, MSN, usw.). Informiert auf euren Profilen bei Facebook, MySpace, Jappy, usw. über diese Aktion. Mach mit und helfe die Meinungsfreiheit zu schüzen! ~~~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/01a3576c.39666...@politikerclub.de
Bug#596548: tpm-tools - tpm_unsealdata changes file contents
Package: tpm-tools Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/tpm_unsealdata tpm_unsealdata changes the data on output to stdout. For no particular reason, it prepends and appends the string "\n\n" to the output. This makes it impossible to use this output of possibly binary data directly as input for another toool. Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages tpm-tools depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-2 SSL shared libraries ii libtpm-unseal0 1.3.3-2 Management tools for the TPM hardw ii libtspi10.3.5-2 open-source TCG Software Stack (li ii opencryptoki2.2.8+dfsg-4 PKCS#11 implementation for Linux ( ii trousers0.3.5-2 open-source TCG Software Stack (da tpm-tools recommends no packages. tpm-tools suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912145231.5702.82742.report...@bushhammer.waldi.eu.org
Bug#596535: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dict-easton | 1.5A-2 | all dict-hitchcock | 1.5A-2 | all dict-misc | 1.5A-2 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596535 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ounwl-0005nd...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596524: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: zblast | 1.3-3 | source zblast-data | 1.3-3 | all zblast-svgalib | 1.3-3 | amd64, i386 zblast-x11 | 1.3-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596524 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ounxt-0005wa...@franck.debian.org
Bug#177754: marked as done (zblast-x11: New kernels with timer tweaks make zblast too fast)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:09:32 + with message-id and subject line Package zblast has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #177754, regarding zblast-x11: New kernels with timer tweaks make zblast too fast to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 177754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: zblast-x11 Version: 1.2.1-6 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Kernels such as 2.4.20-ck2 and 2.5.x have VM tweaks that make zblast speed up immensely. Such speed up is not noticeable on 2.4.20 vanilla. -Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux fuuma 2.5.58-dj1 #5 Wed Jan 15 20:35:46 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set) Versions of packages zblast-x11 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.2.1-4X Window System client libraries ii zblast-data 1.2.1-6sound files for zblast game -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3-3+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/177754 in Debian BTS against the package zblast. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596524. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#263975: marked as done (zblast-x11: Fullscreen mode would be nice)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:09:32 + with message-id and subject line Package zblast has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #263975, regarding zblast-x11: Fullscreen mode would be nice to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 263975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=263975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: zblast-x11 Version: 1.3-1 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if zblast could be put into fullscreen mode. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE Versions of packages zblast-x11 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zblast-data 1.3-1 sound files for zblast game -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3-3+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/263975 in Debian BTS against the package zblast. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596524. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#378307: marked as done (finger-ldap does not handle multiple nss_base_passwd options)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:09:52 + with message-id and subject line Package finger-ldap has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #378307, regarding finger-ldap does not handle multiple nss_base_passwd options to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 378307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378307 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: finger-ldap Version: 1.3-1 The libnss-ldap.conf configuration file can contain multiple nss_base_passwd options - finger-ldap however only reads the last one. Example config file: base dc=example,dc=com binddn cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com rootbinddn cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com idle_timelimit 3600 pam_login_attribute uid pam_check_host_attr no pam_password exop nss_base_passwd ou=systemusers,dc=example,dc=com?one nss_base_passwd ou=users,dc=example,dc=com?one nss_base_shadow ou=systemusers,dc=example,dc=com?one nss_base_shadow ou=users,dc=example,dc=com?one nss_base_group ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com?one In this case, finger-ldap only uses ou=users,dc=example,dc=com. This feature is documented in the nss_ldap(5) manpage that ships with package libnss-ldap/251-1: nss_base_ Specify the search base, scope and filter to be used for specific maps. (Note that map forms part of the configuration file keyword and is one of passwd, shadow, group, hosts, services, networks, protocols, rpc, ethers, netmasks, bootparams, aliases and netgroup.) The syntax of basedn and scope are the same as for the configuration file options of the same name, with the addition of being able to omit the trailing suffix of the base DN (in which case the global base DN will be appended instead). The filter is a search filter to be added to the default search filter for a specific map, such that the effective filter is the logical intersection of the two. The base DN, scope and filter are separated with literal question marks (?) as given above; this is for compatibility with the DUA configuration profile schema and the ldapprofile tool. This option may be specified multiple times. I am using finger-ldap/1.1-2 (stable), but the code indicates that the problem also exists in finger-ldap/1.3-1 (testing/unstable). Cheers, Patrick --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/378307 in Debian BTS against the package finger-ldap. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596531. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#330062: marked as done (uwm should provide a session file for kdm and gdm)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:40 + with message-id and subject line Package ude has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #330062, regarding uwm should provide a session file for kdm and gdm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 330062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330062 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: uwm Version: 0.2.9b-2 Severity: wishlist Hello, To make uwm/ude a selectable option in gdm and kdm (though for the moment kdm provides its own file), uwm should ship /usr/share/xsessions/uwm.desktop (or perhaps ude.desktop). These .desktop files take 2 minutes to create. Examples of the contents of such files can be found in the blackbox, afterstep, and wmaker packages. Cheers, Christopher Martin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.9b-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/330062 in Debian BTS against the package ude. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596506. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#532071: marked as done (The "open window" statement fails)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:16 + with message-id and subject line Package yabasic has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #532071, regarding The "open window" statement fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 532071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: yabasic Version: 2.763-4 Severity: important The "open window" statement fails. This bug report reopens #496962, which is probably archived. The open window statement causes the yabasic interpreter to crash. This problem still occurs on 32 bit IBM compatible computers using i486 compatible processors. The bug is still exhibited in stable, testing, and unstable. Mark. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i386) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-486 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages yabasic depends on: ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.7+20090314-1 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsm62:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library yabasic recommends no packages. yabasic suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.763-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/532071 in Debian BTS against the package yabasic. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596532. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#553714: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:28 + with message-id and subject line Package adesklets has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #553714, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 553714: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553714 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adesklets Version: 0.6.1-5 Severity: important User: d...@debian.org Usertags: readline6 Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6.1-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/553714 in Debian BTS against the package adesklets. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/477485. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#561402: marked as done (ude: should this package be removed?)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:40 + with message-id and subject line Package ude has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #561402, regarding ude: should this package be removed? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 561402: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561402 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: ude Version: 0.2.9b-5 Severity: normal Justification: low popcon, last upstream in 2004, orphaned since 2007 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-removal ude/uwm seem like a possible candidate for removal from Debian: * low popcon (17 votes each for ude and uwm) * no upstream releases since 2004 (although there seems to be some activity on Sourceforge this year) * orphaned since April 2007 * alternatives exist (it's yet another minimal window manager) If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug, and do an upload to fix the issues in it. If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nn with this bug's number: severity nn normal reassign nn ftp.debian.org retitle nn RM: -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, alternatives thanks For more information, see http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt Regards, smcv signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.9b-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/561402 in Debian BTS against the package ude. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596506. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#574959: marked as done (missing configuration file /etc/libnss-ldap.conf)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:09:52 + with message-id and subject line Package finger-ldap has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #574959, regarding missing configuration file /etc/libnss-ldap.conf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 574959: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: finger-ldap Version: 1.3-2 Severity: important Hi, finger command exits with 2 status and complains: /usr/bin/finger: Can't read /etc/libnss-ldap.conf furthermore, finger-ldap diverts /usr/bin/finger to /usr/bin/finger.real instead of ising alternatives mechanism As finger-ldap is orphaned, I am going to manage and fix this - I've never packaged before and I am suffering of procrastination - jsut urge me up if necessary :) Cheers Yves Lambert -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages finger-ldap depends on: ii finger0.17-14user information lookup program ii libnet-ldap-perl 1:0.39-1 client interface to LDAP servers ii libnss-ldapd [libnss-ldap]0.7.3 NSS module for using LDAP as a nam ii perl 5.10.1-11 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction finger-ldap recommends no packages. Versions of packages finger-ldap suggests: ii doc-rfc-std-proposed 20030621-3 Proposed Standard RFCs -- debconf-show failed --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.3-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/574959 in Debian BTS against the package finger-ldap. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596531. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#589150: marked as done (Warning during installation)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:28 + with message-id and subject line Package adesklets has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #589150, regarding Warning during installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 589150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589150 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adesklets Version: 0.6.1-5 Severity: normal Setting up adesklets (0.6.1-5) ... Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script The package adesklets should be rebuilt with new debhelper to get trigger support -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1001, 'unstable'), (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (101, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages adesklets depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libfontconfig12.8.0-2.1 generic font configuration library ii libimlib2 1.4.2-8+b1 powerful image loading and renderi ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.2-7 GNU readline and history libraries ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-3 X11 client-side library ii python2.5.4-9An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central0.6.16 register and build utility for Pyt ii ttf-dejavu2.31-1 Metapackage to pull in ttf-dejavu- Versions of packages adesklets recommends: ii python-tk 2.6.5-1Tkinter - Writing Tk applications adesklets suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv "Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur." --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6.1-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/589150 in Debian BTS against the package adesklets. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/477485. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#553624: marked as done ([adesklets] FTBFS with binutils-gold)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:28 + with message-id and subject line Package adesklets has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #553624, regarding [adesklets] FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 553624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adesklets Version: 0.6.1 Severity: normal Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -O2 -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/adesklets\" -o adesklets -lX11 -lImlib2 - lncurses -lreadline -lhistory -lfontconfig adesklets-main.o adesklets-adesklets.o adesklets-xwindow.o adesklets-xmenu.o adesklets-cfgfile.o adesklets-cfg_parser.o adesklets-cfg_scanner.o adesklets-command.o adesklets-event.o adesklets-variable.o adesklets-vector.o adesklets-vector_free.o adesklets-tree.o adesklets-error.o /usr/bin/ld: adesklets-adesklets.o: in function adesklets_events_loop:adesklets.c(.text+0x7636): error: undefined reference to 'floor' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [adesklets] Error 1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6.1-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/553624 in Debian BTS against the package adesklets. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/477485. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#591669: marked as done (x11-apps: [xclock] Processes negative geometry offset values incorrectly)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:10:40 + with message-id and subject line Package ude has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #591669, regarding x11-apps: [xclock] Processes negative geometry offset values incorrectly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 591669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591669 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x11-apps Version: 7.5+5 Severity: normal When starting up xclock with negative offsets to the geometry option, e.g. xclock -geometry 120x240+-10+-10 xclock opens the window in the center of the display rather than offset left and up by 10 (pixels). This format for the geometry value might easily be output from a xwininfo execution. The X man page states for +XOFF: XOFF may be negative, in which case the window's left edge will be off the screen. And similarly for YOFF. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages x11-apps depends on: ii cpp 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libpng12-01.2.44-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm62:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-3 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 2:1.0.7-1 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.10-2 X cursor management library ii libxext6 2:1.1.2-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxft2 2.1.14-2 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxkbfile1 1:1.0.6-2 X11 keyboard file manipulation lib ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxmuu1 2:1.0.5-1 X11 miscellaneous micro-utility li ii libxrender1 1:0.9.6-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt61:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii x11-common1:7.5+6X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc x11-apps recommends no packages. Versions of packages x11-apps suggests: pn mesa-utils (no description available) -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.2.9b-5+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/591669 in Debian BTS against the package ude. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596506. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#486860: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wprint | 2.05+dfsg-1 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, orphaned for a long time, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 486...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/486860 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ounzq-0005lo...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596531: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: finger-ldap | 1.3-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596531 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo05-0005pj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596532: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: yabasic |2.763-5 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, orphaned for a long time, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596532 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo1b-0005xe...@franck.debian.org
Bug#477485: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: adesklets |0.6.1-5 | source adesklets | 0.6.1-5+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc adesklets | 0.6.1-5+b2 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; unmaintained upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 477...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/477485 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo2t-0006e5...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596533: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: latex.service | 0.1-5 | source latex.service | 0.1-5+b1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 latex.service | 0.1-5+b2 | hurd-i386 latex.service | 0.1-5+b3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned for a long time, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596533 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo3j-0006je...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596506: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ude | 0.2.9b-5 | source, all uwm | 0.2.9b-5 | alpha, hppa, hurd-i386 uwm | 0.2.9b-5+b1 | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned for a long time, unused, plenty of alternatives -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596506 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo62-0007u5...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596534: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: hk-classes |0.8.3-7 | source libhk-classes-dev | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-mdb | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-mysql | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-odbc | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-paradox | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-postgres | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-sqlite | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-sqlite3 | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes-xbase | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libhk-classes15ldbl | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc python-hk-classes | 0.8.3-7+b1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596534 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouo9a-00080x...@franck.debian.org
Bug#166526: marked as done (wmtz: Does not get proper timezone abbreviation)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:17 + with message-id and subject line Package wmtz has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #166526, regarding wmtz: Does not get proper timezone abbreviation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 166526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wmtz Version: 0.7-3 Severity: normal I am (at least for another 8 or so hours) in Daylight Savings Time for my timezone. I have wmtz configured to look at my current timezone as well as others in the United States. The display is showing standard time (ie: EST instead of EDT). Other programs on the system are accurately identifying the current zone as EDT. It is displaying the proper time, however. Pertinent lines from my .wmtzrc: time1=TZONE time2=TZONE time3=TZONE time4=xxx time5=TZONE utdiff1=America/New_York utdiff2=America/Chicago utdiff3=America/Los_Angeles utdiff4=0 utdiff5=GMT -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mystic 2.4.19mystic #1 Sat Sep 14 00:43:20 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages wmtz depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7-9+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/166526 in Debian BTS against the package wmtz. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596550. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#484067: marked as done (Partitions copied with pcopy have two problems)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:01:53 + with message-id and subject line Package pcopy has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #484067, regarding Partitions copied with pcopy have two problems to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 484067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: pcopy Version: 1.5-1 I used pcopy to copy two partitions from a 60GB hard drive to a 120GB hard drive. One was the 7GB system partition. The other was a 48GB /home partition. I pcopied the first to a 10GB partition, and the second to a 100GB partition. Two things happened: 1. The space used and free reported (on the 120GB drive) of both copied partitions was wrong. They reported the same amount of space used and free on both drives: a. The 10GB partition was showing the same amount of disk space used *and free* as the 7GB original; it should have been showing 3GB more space free. b. The 100GB partition was also showing the same figures as the 48GB original partition. Instead of showing 56GB free, it was showing only 2.5GB free (the amount free on the original partition). 2. After using the system for a few hours, it suddenly started reporting the pcopied system partition as read-only. After I shutdown and restarted, the boot process reported errors with the system partition (mostly about files it couldn't fine). It left me at a command prompt reading "(initramfs)". I rebooted the system using two different recent live Linux CDs that fully support ext3 filesystems, and both times fsck reported that it was incompatible with the ext3 journal version on the system partition. So I reformatted the partition, used partimage to restore the original disks system partition to it, restarted, and it came up fine, reporting the proper amounts of disk space used and free, and reporting no incompatibilities with the journal version. It has been working fine for several days now. I fixed the problem on the second partition by simply copying the data from the original drive. I had prepared the 120GB disk by fscking with -c to check for badblocks and update the badblock list before using pcopy. So there were no hardware problems with the disk. pcopy reported no errors during the copying process and didn't crash. I think pcopy hosed the journal when copying the system partition, and at least did a number on the directory structure when copying the other partition. Thank you for the opportunity to try pcopy. I will stick with partimage instead for copying partitions. -- David gn...@hawaii.rr.com authenticity, honesty, community --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.5-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/484067 in Debian BTS against the package pcopy. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596552. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#521588: marked as done (Bugfixes for wmtz)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Package wmtz has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #521588,
regarding Bugfixes for wmtz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
521588: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wmtz
Version: 0.7-8
wmtz has an open bug related to incorrect daylight savings time zone
string changes [See: Bug# #166526]. wmtz doesn't take into account the
zone name changes [e.g: EST to EDT for Eastern Standard to Eastern
Daylight]. This is a bug in code and I'm including a patch below.
One more issue that I've addressed (which IMHO is a useful fix to
avoid too many wakeups) is the sleep interval. wmtz seems to sleep for
1 microseconds (effectively resulting in 100 wakeups per second).
This can quite safely be upped to 10 microseconds, reducing
wakeups to 10 per second (and correspondingly changing the response
latency to a worst case of 0.1s which is quite OK since the only
option is a simple menu click).
This has improved power savings quite a bit as well as my processor
goes remains in the lower C states for far longer.
The patch is roughly [this is a diff of the final files after applying
the debian specific patches as well]
--
--- wmtz.c 2001-04-16 15:26:34.0 -0400
+++ wmtz.new2009-03-28 13:20:09.240867000 -0400
@@ -51,8 +51,7 @@
#define STRSIZE 10
#define LMST 1
#define GMST 0
-#define ABOUT "xmessage -center -buttons \"Close\" \"WMTZ - Window
Maker Time Zone dockapp v0.7
-http://www.geocities.com/jl1n/wmtz/wmtz.html\"";
+#define ABOUT "xmessage -center -buttons \"Close\" \"WMTZ - Window
Maker Time Zone dockapp
v0.7\nhttp://www.geocities.com/jl1n/wmtz/wmtz.html\"";
/*
@@ -401,7 +400,10 @@
tzset();
clk = localtime(&curtime);
- strncpy(buf, tzname[0], 3);
+ // Obtain the Time Zone string
+ if (strftime(buf, sizeof(buf), "%Z", clk) == 0) {
+strncpy(buf, tzname[0], 3);
+}
for (k=0; k<3; k++)
if (buf[k] == 0)
@@ -478,11 +480,10 @@
}
but_stat = -1;
break;
- default:
}
}
-usleep(1);
+usleep(10);
}
}
@@ -528,7 +529,6 @@
case 4:
exit(0);
break;
- default:
}
return;
}
--
Please apply these fixes and confirm that the zone changes work.
Thanks.
Narayanan.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7-9+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/521588 in Debian BTS
against the package wmtz. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596550. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Luca Falavigna
--- End Message ---
Bug#553879: marked as done (replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:05 + with message-id and subject line Package xbsql has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #553879, regarding replacing libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 553879: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553879 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: xbsql Version: 0.11-8 Severity: important User: d...@debian.org Usertags: readline6 Sent to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00549.html As a package maintainer you got this email directly as well. Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available in unstable and testing. If possible, please replace the libreadline5-dev build dependency with libreadline-dev, so that in future changes of the libreadline soname binNMU's can be used for this kind of update. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11-8+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/553879 in Debian BTS against the package xbsql. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596553. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#558191: marked as done (Several errors in pcopy (1.5-2))
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:01:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Package pcopy has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #558191,
regarding Several errors in pcopy (1.5-2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
558191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pcopy
Version: 1.5-2
Hi!
After having a lot of problems with pcopy I found several bugs in the source
code:
- Missing #include , which brakes strerror(errno) and memset();
therefore you don't get an error message opening non-existent files in line 460
(see below), but instead a segfault (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1635237.html).
- write_fd = open(dstdev, O_WRONLY+O_SYNC) in line 457 does't create new files,
so I suggest to use something like
if (fstat(read_fd, &read_sb) == -1)
{
fprintf(stderr, ...);
}
write_fd = creat(dstdev, read_sb.st_mode);
if (write_fd < 0)
{
fprintf(stderr, ...);
}
instead.
- The most severe bug (and I guess this leads to #484067) is the
if (write_pos =! pos) [should be of course "!="]
in line 176 when writing the new file.
I fixed these bugs (new source in attachment) and besides that I reformatted
the source code and added some curly brackets in nested if-statements (so the
diff is quite large and not very useful).
Cheers,
Carsten
___
Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
pcopy_original.c
Description: Binary data
pcopy_fixed.c
Description: Binary data
pcopy.diff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5-2+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/558191 in Debian BTS
against the package pcopy. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596552. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Luca Falavigna
--- End Message ---
Bug#562049: marked as done (Using psh as user shell prevents X session from starting)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:37 + with message-id and subject line Package psh has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #562049, regarding Using psh as user shell prevents X session from starting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 562049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: psh Version: 1.8-9 Severity: normal When using psh as the login shell for my user, I'm no longer able to open an X session with slim. Switching back to bash makes it work. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: lang=fr...@euro, lc_ctype=fr...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages psh depends on: ii debianutils 3.2.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libbsd-resource-perl 1.2903-1 BSD process resource limit and pri ii libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.19-2 Perl extension for the GNU Readlin ii perl 5.10.1-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction psh recommends no packages. psh suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.8-9+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/562049 in Debian BTS against the package psh. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/596551. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#562101: marked as done (psh fails to properly evaluate regular expressions)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:02:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Package psh has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #562101,
regarding psh fails to properly evaluate regular expressions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
562101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: psh
Version: 1.8-9
Severity: normal
Hi there,
I admit that this can be stupidity on my side, failing to see what's wrong
here, but I think it also might be a bug...
Look at this log, please:
bash$ perl -e '$a=10518; if ($a =~ /\d+/) {print "yes\n";} else {print "no\n";}'
yes
bash$ psh
psh% $a=10518; if ($a =~ /\d+/) {print "yes\n";} else {print "no\n";}
no
psh%
Any reason why psh doesn't think that $a is composed of digits?
Thanks,
Marcos Marado
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-bpo.2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages psh depends on:
ii debianutils 2.30 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii libbsd-resource-perl 1.28-1+b1 perl BSD::Resource - BSD process r
ii libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.17a-2+b1 Perl extension for the GNU Readlin
ii perl 5.10.0-23 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
psh recommends no packages.
psh suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.8-9+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/562101 in Debian BTS
against the package psh. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/596551. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Luca Falavigna
--- End Message ---
Bug#596552: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pcopy | 1.5-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, buggy, dead upstream, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596552 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouoso-0003fq...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596553: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libxbsql-bin | 0.11-8 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libxbsql-dev | 0.11-8 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libxbsql0c2 | 0.11-8 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xbsql | 0.11-8 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, orphaned -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596553 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouotd-0003j5...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596543: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mailleds |0.93-14 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596543 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouotq-0003sa...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596550: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wmtz | 0.7-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, unused, buggy -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596550 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ououx-0003vh...@franck.debian.org
Bug#596551: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: psh | 1.8-9 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned for a long time, dead upstream, buggy, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 596...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/596551 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ouoxl-00047t...@franck.debian.org
СЛYЖБА РАССЫЛОК
3дравствуйте! Я могу заняться поиском заказчиков для Вашего бизнеса, используя электронные рассылки. Предложу различные схемы взаимодействия. Связь со мной: Тел: (495)51Ч 42 65 icq: -56977-58--57- С уважением, Александр. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100912135426.e092vckl234...@www.echoplus.ru
