Bug#595621: iceowl-l10n-de: all iceowl-l10n-xx packages need an update to provide a correct localization

2010-09-05 Thread Oliver Schwank
Package: iceowl-l10n-de
Version: 0.8+debian-2
Severity: important
Tags: l10n

Hello,

even with an installed version of iceowl-l10n-de iceowl and iceowl-extension in
icedove does not show correct localization of the menu entries for the calendar
application lightning / iceowl

This had been reported in #592907 as well but not against the l10n package
which is due to incorrect version the root cause.

iceowl is reporting:

Deutsch (DE) Language Pack 0.8 Not compatible with Calendar 1.0b1

Regards

Oli



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages iceowl-l10n-de depends on:
ii  iceowl1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 Standalone Calendar Application

Versions of packages iceowl-l10n-de recommends:
ii  myspell-de-de   20091006-4.1 German dictionary for myspell

iceowl-l10n-de suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100905120214.31354.88795.report...@halo.flinx.sub.org



Bug#595611: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

xml-resume-library |   1.5.1-10 | source, all

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned, minimal popcon, RC buggy, not part of Squeeze
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595611

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osgao-0007vb...@franck.debian.org



Bug#202526: marked as done (xml-resume-library: PDF output formatting error)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:01 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #202526,
regarding xml-resume-library: PDF output formatting error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
202526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=202526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-3
Severity: normal

This seems to be related to the project/achievement tags...
This  entry (shown in text format) formats *very* badlay in PDF:
* P/370 VM administrator - Responsible for 32 machines. Set up
  TCP/IP, XAGENT, RSCS, PVM, and VTAM routing for these machines and
  a gateway router (betwixt our private network and IBM's VTAM,
  RSCS, PVM). Also handled customer support for these machines and
  VM/ESA-370.
 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux renegade.badlands.org 2.6.0-test1-mm2 #2 Mon Jul 21 13:59:40 PDT 
2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 1.9.1  Common SGML and XML DTDs and entit

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/202526 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#177817: marked as done (xml-resume-library: Illegally uses document() function and breaks current implementations)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #177817,
regarding xml-resume-library: Illegally uses document() function and breaks 
current implementations
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
177817: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=177817
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

Since my last upgrade xml-resume-library has started trying to embed CSS
documents into the resulting HTML file.  It does this by default which
means it will break current implementations which use a relative URL for
the CSS.  More importantly it uses the XSLT document() function
illegally.  It is only supposed to be used to load XML documents and CSS
is far from XML.  xsltproc follows the spec and breaks when trying to
make an HTML page.

I suggest defaulting css.embed to 0, so that this problem will only
appear if the user uses a customization layer.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elektrono 2.4.19 #1 Fri Aug 16 13:02:17 EDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 1.7.1  Common SGML and XML DTDs and entit

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/177817 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#507025: marked as done (xml-resume-library: Create link in PDF output)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #507025,
regarding xml-resume-library: Create link in PDF output
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
507025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-10
Severity: minor


Hi, current implementation of XSL transformation renders links as plain text in 
PDF.

Best regards 
Andrei Emeltchenko 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 2.0.3  common SGML and XML data

Versions of packages xml-resume-library recommends:
ii  xalan 1.10-3.3   XSLT processor
ii  xmltex1.9.debian.1-1 TeX package for processing XML fil
ii  xmlto 0.0.20-3   XML-to-any converter
ii  xsltproc  1.1.24-2   XSLT command line processor

Versions of packages xml-resume-library suggests:
ii  dillo [www-browser]  0.8.6-3 Small and fast web browser
ii  evince [pdf-viewer]  2.22.2-4~lenny1 Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii  iceape-browser [www-brow 1.1.12-1Iceape Navigator (Internet browser
ii  iceweasel [www-browser]  3.0.3-3 lightweight web browser based on M
ii  links [www-browser]  2.1pre37-1.1Web browser running in text mode
ii  lynx-cur [www-browser]   2.8.7dev9-2.1   Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup
ii  sun-java5-jre [java2-run 1.5.0-16-3  Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
ii  sun-java6-jre [java2-run 6-07-4  Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
ii  w3m [www-browser]0.5.2-2+b1  WWW browsable pager with excellent
ii  xpdf-utils [pdf-viewer]  3.02-1.4Portable Document Format (PDF) sui

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/507025 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#528121: marked as done (xml-resume-library: contains non-free material)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #528121,
regarding xml-resume-library: contains non-free material
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
528121: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528121
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1


This package includes the following files:

/usr/share/java/xmlresume-filter.jar

which correspond to the following files in the source tarball:

java/xmlresume-filter.jar

The source package does not include their source code.  This goes
against the DFSG requirement that "the program must include source
code" therefore the package at present should not be in main.
This jar file does not have a package in the Debian archive; for
this package to remain in main the relevant source code should be
found and packaged for Debian and the new packages should be added
to Depends and/or Build-Depends-Indep.  Once this process is complete
the package's source tarball should be repackaged not to include the
above listed jar files.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/528121 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#323480: marked as done (ivtools-bin: broken bashscripts)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package ivtools has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #323480,
regarding ivtools-bin: broken bashscripts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
323480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323480
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ivtools-bin
Version: 1.1.3-4
Severity: normal

The scripts /usr/X11R6/bin/ivgetjpg and ivtiftopnm fail to run, due
to the absence of "tmpnam"; they're fixable, but it's not worth the
effort. 



> #!/bin/bash
> # ** requires w3c from w3c.org and djpeg from jpeg.org as well **
> #
> # ivgetjpeg

There are versions of /usr/bin/w3c in libwww-ssl0 and libwww0;
/usr/bin/djpeg is in libjpeg-progs.  But ivtools-bin declares no
form of dependency on these packages, and these scripts don't bother
to check for the presence of the executables.

> #
> # bash script to download a jpeg file and import to a local drawing editor
> #
> # Parameters:
> # $1 URL 
> # $2 import port on drawing editor
> url=$1
> importport=$2
> echo import $url to port $importport
> tempfile=`tmpnam`
> cmapfile=`tmpnam`

There is no such utility as "tmpnam".  Presumably it could instead
point at /usr/X11R6/bin/ivtmpnam; but as far as protection against
tempfile creation-races is concerned it would be better to use the
standard /bin/tempfile in debianutils (which may also imply that
ivtmpnam should be removed from the package).

> stdcmapppm >$cmapfile

I don't claim to understand quite what stdcmapppm does (WTFM!), but
wouldn't it have been easier just to keep a single permanent copy of
this file in /usr/share/ivtools-bin or somewhere? 

> w3c $url >$tempfile; djpeg -map $cmapfile -dither fs -pnm $tempfile | comterp 
> telcat localhost $importport
> rm $tempfile $cmapfile

According to "man djpeg", "djpeg -dither fs -pnm" is redundant,
since that's the default.  And it can take standard input, so the
$tempfile is unnecessary too - the whole script boils down to:

w3c $1 | djpeg -map /usr/share/ivtools-bin/cmap.ppm | comterp telcat localhost 
$2

But now I'm boggling slightly at the concept of a graphics
manipulation package that loads images by piping them through a 
local telnet connection.



And the other one:

> #!/bin/bash
> #
> # ivtiftopnm [file]
> #
> # bash script to wrap tifftopnm which can't handle stdin

Wouldn't #!/bin/sh work equally well for these scripts anyway?

I'm glad to see this time there's at least a "Suggests: netpbm" to
pull in /usr/bin/tifftopnm.  But it should still check.

> #
> # Parameters:
> # $1 optional tiff image filename
> #
> case "$#" in 
> 0)  tempfile=`tmpnam`

Again, broken and not worth fixing.

>   cat >$tempfile
>   tifftopnm $tempfile
>   rm $tempfile
> ;;
> *)  tifftopnm $1
> ;;
> esac

Meanwhile, "man tifftopnm" clearly states that it *does* handle
stdin in a perfectly standard fashion.  So this whole script is
rather a waste of effort. 



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.hurakan
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ivtools-bin depends on:
ii  ivtools-interviews 1.1.3-4   C++ GUI library with Motif Look an
ii  ivtools-unidraw1.1.3-4   Application Frameworks layered on 
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg62  6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4   3.7.2-3   Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emul 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X terminal emulator
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information
-- 
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.6-1+nmu3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/323480 in Debian BTS
against the package ivtools. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595612. That bug might give the reasons

Bug#346092: marked as done (xml-resume-library: Some fields don't appear in the output)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #346092,
regarding xml-resume-library: Some fields don't appear in the output
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
346092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=346092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-3
Severity: normal

Hello.

The  tag doesn't show up in the output files.  [And indeed,
I couldn't find any use of the parameter in any of the "xsl" files.]

Best regards,
Gilles

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-vs2.1.0-rc5+g3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 2.0.3  common SGML and XML data

Versions of packages xml-resume-library recommends:
ii  passivetex1.25-2 Macros to process XSL formatting o
ii  xmlto 0.0.18-5   XML-to-any converter
ii  xsltproc  1.1.15-1   XSLT command line processor

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/346092 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#554923: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package ivtools has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #554923,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
554923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554923
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ivtools
Version: 1.2.6-1+nmu1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed

Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executables.

You must link your C++ object files/files generated from C++ source code with
g++ to resolve these symbols.

More informations can be found at
 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS#A2009-11-02Packagesfailingbecausebinutils-gold.2BAC8-indirectlinking

gcc  -gdwarf-2 -O2-o a.out *.o 
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/ComTerp/LINUX -lComTerp 
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/Attribute/LINUX 
-lAttribute -L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/ComUtil/LINUX 
-lComUtil 
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/Unidraw-common/LINUX 
-lUnidraw-common 
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/IV-common/LINUX 
-lIV-common  -lm
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function global constructors keyed to 
type_names:/usr/include/c++/4.3/iostream:77: error: undefined reference to 
'std::ios_base::Init::Init()'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function global constructors keyed to 
type_names:/usr/include/c++/4.3/iostream:77: error: undefined reference to 
'std::ios_base::Init::~Init()'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::cout'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream >& 
std::__ostream_insert >(std::basic_ostream >&, char const*, long)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::cout'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream >& 
std::__ostream_insert >(std::basic_ostream >&, char const*, long)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::cout'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream >& 
std::__ostream_insert >(std::basic_ostream >&, char const*, long)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::cout'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:514: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream >& 
std::__ostream_insert >(std::basic_ostream >&, char const*, long)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:543: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream 
>::put(char)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:564: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream 
>::flush()'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/bits/basic_ios.h:152: error: undefined reference to 
'std::basic_ios >::clear(std::_Ios_Iostate)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/bits/basic_ios.h:152: error: undefined reference to 
'std::basic_ios >::clear(std::_Ios_Iostate)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:543: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream 
>::put(char)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/ostream:564: error: 
undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream 
>::flush()'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/comtest/LINUX/../main.c:66:
 error: undefined reference to 'std::cerr'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/comtest/LINUX/../main.c:66:
 error: undefined reference to 'std::basic_ostream 
>& std::operator<<  >(std::basic_ostream >&, char const*)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/bits/basic_ios.h:152: error: undefined reference to 
'std::basic_ios >::clear(std::_Ios_Iostate)'
/usr/bin/ld: main.o: in function 
main:/usr/include/c++/4.3/bits/basic_ios.h:152: error: undefined reference to 
'std::basic_

Bug#573937: marked as done (xml-resume-library: Differentiate between paid/volunteer work)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:02 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #573937,
regarding xml-resume-library: Differentiate between paid/volunteer work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573937: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573937
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-9
Severity: minor


Hi,
It seems wrong to use 'Employment' to list volunteer work. It would be good if 
there was a way to specify paid vs volunteer work.
thanks,
kk

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.7-libre-fshoppe1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 2.0.3  common SGML and XML data

Versions of packages xml-resume-library recommends:
pn  xmlto  (no description available)
ii  xsltproc  1.1.24-2   XSLT command line processor

Versions of packages xml-resume-library suggests:
ii  epiphany-gecko [www-br 2.22.3-9gnewsense Intuitive GNOME web browser - Geck
ii  evince [pdf-viewer]2.22.2-4~lenny1   Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii  icecat [www-browser]   3.5.4-0hardy2 GNU version of the Firefox browser
ii  java-gcj-compat [java2 1.0.78-2  Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii  lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.7dev9-2.1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup
ii  openjdk-6-jre [java2-r 6b11-9.1+lenny2   OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo
ii  w3m [www-browser]  0.5.2-2+b1WWW browsable pager with excellent
ii  xpdf-reader [pdf-viewe 3.02-1.4+lenny1   Portable Document Format (PDF) sui

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/573937 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#573938: marked as done (xml-resume-library: produce bulleted lists)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xml-resume-library has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #573938,
regarding xml-resume-library: produce bulleted lists
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573938: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573938
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-9
Severity: minor


Hi,
I would like to use bulleted lists in the text version of my cv. At the moment 
it outputs all skills as a comma separated list.
thanks,
kk

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.7-libre-fshoppe1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xml-resume-library depends on:
ii  sgml-data 2.0.3  common SGML and XML data

Versions of packages xml-resume-library recommends:
pn  xmlto  (no description available)
ii  xsltproc  1.1.24-2   XSLT command line processor

Versions of packages xml-resume-library suggests:
ii  epiphany-gecko [www-br 2.22.3-9gnewsense Intuitive GNOME web browser - Geck
ii  evince [pdf-viewer]2.22.2-4~lenny1   Document (postscript, pdf) viewer
ii  icecat [www-browser]   3.5.4-0hardy2 GNU version of the Firefox browser
ii  java-gcj-compat [java2 1.0.78-2  Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii  lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.7dev9-2.1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup
ii  openjdk-6-jre [java2-r 6b11-9.1+lenny2   OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo
ii  w3m [www-browser]  0.5.2-2+b1WWW browsable pager with excellent
ii  xpdf-reader [pdf-viewe 3.02-1.4+lenny1   Portable Document Format (PDF) sui

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.5.1-10+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/573938 in Debian BTS
against the package xml-resume-library. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it 
will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595611. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#96554: marked as done (ivtools-bin: Conflict idraw and xfonts-cyrillic)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package ivtools has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #96554,
regarding ivtools-bin: Conflict idraw and xfonts-cyrillic
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
96554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=96554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ivtools-bin
Version: 0.7.9-6
Severity: normal

When I draw some text (font: helvetica) using idraw all German umlauts (äöü)
are converted to russion characters. idraw seems to be the only package having
that trouble.  When I uninstall xfonts-cyrillic and restart idraw and xfs, all
characters are displayed correctly. 

xfonts-cyrillic is installed automatically when you choose package
task-x-window-system 

BTW: I use xfs (3.3.6-11potato32) and xfonts-cyrillic (3.3.6-2) and xfstt (1.1)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux wavelight 2.2.19 #4 Fri May 4 15:12:14 CEST 2001 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages ivtools-bin depends on:
ii  ivtools-interv 0.7.9-6C++ GUI library with Motif Look and Feel.
ii  ivtools-unidra 0.7.9-6Unidraw is a C++ framework for drawing edito
ii  libace5.0  5.0.7-4An Object-Oriented Network Programming Toolk
ii  libc6  2.1.3-18   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libjpeg62  6b-1.2 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime li
ii  libstdc++2.10  2.95.2-13  The GNU stdc++ library
ii  libtiff3g  3.5.4-5Tag Image File Format library
ii  xlib6g 3.3.6-11potato shared libraries required by X clients
ii  zlib1g 1.1.3-5compression library - runtime
^^^ (Provides virtual package libz1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.6-1+nmu3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/96554 in Debian BTS
against the package ivtools. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595612. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#99580: marked as done (ivtools-dev: Missing symlinks for some man pages)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:26 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package ivtools has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #99580,
regarding ivtools-dev: Missing symlinks for some man pages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
99580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=99580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ivtools-dev
Severity: normal

Hi,

An upcoming release of Debian policy, version 3.5.5.0, contains an amendment
which clarifies the way man pages need to be installed.

Until now, packages could install /usr/share/man/man1/foo.1.gz with 'foo,
bar \- programs to do something' in the NAME section and have no
corresponding symbolic link from bar.1.gz (policy suggested using a symbolic
link, but wasn't clear that it's required), and our man program happened to
magically figure it out for itself and display the right man page when you
typed 'man bar'. However, guaranteeing that this would work even when you've
recently installed some new packages has a serious performance impact on
man, as it frequently has to go and look through the filesystem to update
its database.

Before woody's base system is frozen, I intend to remove this "feature" from
man-db, so that its performance is consistent and acceptable for a
reasonable number of people. It isn't a standard feature even among the
various man page browsers in Debian, let alone in other Linux distributions,
so there should be no compatibility problems. However, your package seems to
rely on it, so this bug is being filed to let you know that the way some of
your man pages are installed needs to be improved in order to work properly
in woody. All you need to do, if you already have, say, foo(1) and expect
bar(1) to work as well, is install a symbolic link to foo.1.gz as bar.1.gz
(.so links and hard links are also OK, though symlinks are recommended).

Here's a list of man pages and the names that don't appear anywhere in the
filesystem:

  usr/X11R6/man/man3/BasicDialog.3.gz: AcknowledgeDialog
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/BasicDialog.3.gz: ConfirmDialog
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/BasicDialog.3.gz: GridDialog
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/BasicDialog.3.gz: PrintDialog
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/BasicDialog.3.gz: UChooser
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Border.3.gz: HBorder
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Border.3.gz: VBorder
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Box2_6.3.gz: Box
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Box2_6.3.gz: HBox
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Box2_6.3.gz: VBox
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: Button
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: ButtonState
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: CheckBox
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: PushButton
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: RadioButton
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Button2_6.3.gz: TextButton
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Connector.3.gz: ConnectorView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Control.3.gz: ControlState
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/EllipseComp.3.gz: EllipseView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/EllipseComp.3.gz: PSEllipse
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/ExternView.3.gz: InorderView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/ExternView.3.gz: PostorderView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/ExternView.3.gz: PreorderView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Frame.3.gz: BorderFrame
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Frame.3.gz: MarginFrame
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Frame.3.gz: ShadowFrame
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Frame.3.gz: ShowFrame
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Frame.3.gz: TitleFrame
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Glue2_6.3.gz: Glue
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Glue2_6.3.gz: HGlue
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Glue2_6.3.gz: VGlue
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Graphic.3.gz: FullGraphic
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/GraphicComp.3.gz: GraphicComps
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/GraphicView.3.gz: GraphicViews
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LineComp.3.gz: LineView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LineComp.3.gz: MultiLineComp
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LineComp.3.gz: MultiLineView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LineComp.3.gz: PSLine
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LineComp.3.gz: PSMultiLine
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LinkComp.3.gz: LinkView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/LinkComp.3.gz: PSLink
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: Menu
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: MenuBar
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: MenuItem
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: PopupMenu
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: PulldownMenu
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/Menu2_6.3.gz: PullrightMenu
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PadComp.3.gz: PSPad
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PadComp.3.gz: PadGraphic
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PadComp.3.gz: PadView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PinComp.3.gz: PSPin
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PinComp.3.gz: PinGraphic
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PinComp.3.gz: PinView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PolygonComp.3.gz: PSPolygon
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/PolygonComp.3.gz: PolygonView
  usr/X11R6/man/man3/P

Bug#181704: marked as done (xnc: some menu colors have poor contrast)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #181704,
regarding xnc: some menu colors have poor contrast
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
181704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=181704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.0-1
Severity: normal

'xnc' has some popup menus (like F2) which feature 
black letters on a gun-metal blue background.  Quite difficult 
to read.  There's no menu option to change those colors.  

'xncsetup' has an elaborate  color changing tab, but it only 
seems to set the main 'xnc' window colors.
 

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux Arf 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 2003 i586 
unknown unknown GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.1-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  libgcc13.2.3-0pre1GCC support library
ii  libjpeg62  6b-6   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime li
ii  libpng21.0.12-8   PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5 3.2.3-0pre1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff3g  3.5.7-2Tag Image File Format library
ii  xlibs  4.2.1-5X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g 1.1.4-9compression library - runtime

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.0.4-4+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/181704 in Debian BTS
against the package xnc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595604. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#335511: marked as done (xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #118332,
regarding xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
118332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=118332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Version: 3.3.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


If I create a note, write some stuff, select "Hide All Notes"
then the "Show All Note" function does not make them to appear
again (they are basically lost if unsaved). The only way to make
them to appear again is to save them, exit xpostit and re-open
it.

The same if I use "Left Mouse Button + CTRL key".


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: lang=it...@euro, lc_ctype=it...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages xpostit depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

xpostit recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/118332 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#299902: marked as done (under debian-amd64 XNC crashes when skin is different from default)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:09 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #299902,
regarding under debian-amd64 XNC crashes when skin is different from default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
299902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299902
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

To reporduce the bug:
1. Run XNC and go to
Options -> Configuration -> GUI plugin (skin)
and change to anything different from default (e.g., Five Look)
2. Restart XNC

$ xnc
Plugin LookFive v.1.1.2 registered
Loading resourcesOK
**Image Engine**
*  *
*Visual:  TrueColor*
*Depth:   24  (4 bytes/pixel)  *
*RGB: 8:8:8*
*Colors:  16777216 *
*Images:  GIF,JPEG,PCX *
*  *
 (c) Leo 96-98 *
Loading skins

***
OOPS! It seems that You found a bug in XNC!!!
If You can repeat this situation then send me a bug report
to  with subject  'XNC - bug report'
Body of the mail:
   -What are You doing to produce this bug.
   -XNC configuration (~/.xnc/xnc.ini) file.
   -Output of 'ldd xnc' command.
   -X Server configuration (resolution and color depth)
   -And Your reply mail address, for more information about situation if need
Do NOT include 'CORE' dump file in the following letter.
Thanks, and sorry for BUG
***
Segmentation fault

I've tried to reach the original author but got
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown

Max



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3.64
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)

Versions of packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.0.4-4+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/299902 in Debian BTS
against the package xnc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595604. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#118332: marked as done (xpostit: clicking on a note's close button makes it dissapear)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #118332,
regarding xpostit: clicking on a note's close button makes it dissapear
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
118332: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=118332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Version: 3.3.1-7
Severity: normal

 1. Create note
 2. Save it (I don't know if this is necessary)
 3. Click on the window's close button

 The note is gone and clicking on "show all" doesn't bring it back.
 Restarting xpostit restores the note.

-- System Information
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ysabell 2.4.13-pre5-xfs #1 Wed Oct 24 18:00:56 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xpostit depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.4-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   4.1.0-9X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-9X Window System client libraries

-- 
Marcelo | Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.
mmaga...@debian.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/118332 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#118334: marked as done (xpostit: remove decorations from notes)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #118334,
regarding xpostit: remove decorations from notes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
118334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=118334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Version: 3.3.1-7
Severity: wishlist

 Would it be possible to do away with the post-it note's menu's?  I'd
 really like to have a post-it on my monitor, without the inconviniences
 of having an actual post-it on the monitor.  That is, I want a yellow
 thing where I can write stuff.  I don't have a problem with
 right-clicking or using shortcuts to perform the functions available on
 the menu.

 In fact, I'd love to be able to *rotate* the notes, but that's
 eye-candy.

 Bonus points if the notes wear-out with time :-)

-- System Information
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ysabell 2.4.13-pre5-xfs #1 Wed Oct 24 18:00:56 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xpostit depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.4-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   4.1.0-9X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-9X Window System client libraries

-- 
Marcelo | "Idiot I may be, but tied up I ain't."
mmaga...@debian.org | -- Gaspode the wonder dog
|(Terry Pratchett, Moving Pictures)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/118334 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#306718: marked as done ('man xnc' typos: "Usefull", "Virtiual", "apperas", "arhiver", "arhiver", "beggining", "choosen", "directoty", "directy", etc.)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #306718,
regarding 'man xnc' typos: "Usefull", "Virtiual", "apperas", "arhiver", 
"arhiver", "beggining", "choosen", "directoty", "directy", etc.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
306718: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306718
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found some typos in '/usr/share/man/man1/xnc.1.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4 3.7.2-2 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information
--- -   2005-04-28 02:25:51.846276000 -0400
+++ /tmp/xnc1.gz.14589  2005-04-28 02:25:51.840625136 -0400
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 This manual page describes the \fBxnc\fP program, the file manager for
 X Window\&. It provides many operations with files in Virtual File System,
 such as copy, move, delete, rename, view, edit \&.\&.\&.
-Currently Virtiual File System in \fBxnc\fP can work with normal disk
+Currently Virtual File System in \fBxnc\fP can work with normal disk
 filesystem, with various archives in popular formats and with FTP 
 sessions on remote machines\&.
 \fBxnc\fP is highly and easily configurable with \fBxncsetup\fP, that
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 .IP o 
 View two directories in two panels with highlighting\&.
 .IP o 
-Copy, move, rename, delete files and directories recursivly\&.
+Copy, move, rename, delete files and directories recursively\&.
 .IP o 
 View or edit files with internal \fBives\fP or external editors\&.
 .IP o 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 .IP o 
 Processes information/Signal sending\&.
 .IP o 
-Memory infromation\&.
+Memory information\&.
 .IP o 
 Disk summary infromation\&.
 .IP o 
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
 Move cursor page up/down [PageUp/PageDown] - 
MoveCursorPageUp/MoveCursorPageDown\&. This command moves cursor
 one page up or down if number of files in current directory are more that for 
one page\&. 
 .IP o 
-Move cursor home [Home] - MoveCursorHome\&. This command moves cursor to the 
beggining of the directory list
+Move cursor home [Home] - MoveCursorHome\&. This command moves cursor to the 
beginning of the directory list
 where \'\&.\&.\' is shown\&. 
 .IP o 
 Move cursor to the end [End] - MoveCursorEnd\&. This command moves cursor to 
the last file in the current
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 and continue browsing your file system tree\&. 
 .IP o 
 Set inactive panel directory to current one [Ctrl+j] - SetPanelToCurrent\&. 
This command takes directory path
-from active panel and sets the same path to inactive one\&. Usefull if you 
want to copy to the same directory\&. 
+from active panel and sets the same path to inactive one\&. Useful if you want 
to copy to the same directory\&. 
 .IP o 
 Swap directories in the panels [Ctrl+u] - SwapPanels\&. This command exchanges 
directory paths between two
 panels\&.
@@ -94,11 +94,11 @@
 .IP 
 .IP o 
 Insert left panel directory path [Ctrl+[] - InsertLeftDir\&. If this command 
is activated, then xnc will insert
-into the command line full path from left (top) panel\&. This command is 
usefull if you want combine filename
+into the command line full path from left (top) panel\&. This command is 
useful if you want combine filename
 with it full path\&. 
 .IP o 
 Insert right panel directory path [Ctrl+]] - InsertRightD

Bug#352933: marked as done (xnc: Mouse-1 clicks on menus does not work correctly (menu does not open, does not stay open))

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:09 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #352933,
regarding xnc: Mouse-1 clicks on menus does not work correctly (menu does not 
open, does not stay open)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
352933: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352933
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2.1
Severity: normal

Hi,

there are some problems under fluxbox window manager with the menus in
the program:

1.
- Mouse-1 (left button) click once on [Left] => menu opens ok

2.
- Mouse-1 (left button) click once on [Commands] => menu only flashes,
  does not open
- Mouse-1 (left button) hold click on [Commands] => menu is opened

3.
- Mouse-1 (left button) click once on [Operations] => menu does not
  flash not open.
- Mouse-1 (left button) hold click on [Operations] => menu opens

4.
- Mouse-1 (left button) click once on [Options] => menu opens ok


so the cases 1,4 are ok, but 2 and 3 does not work correctly.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-9  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62 6b-11  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-9The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4  3.8.0-2Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-9  compression library - runtime

xnc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.0.4-4+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/352933 in Debian BTS
against the package xnc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595604. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#335511: marked as done (xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #335511,
regarding xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
335511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Version: 3.3.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


If I create a note, write some stuff, select "Hide All Notes"
then the "Show All Note" function does not make them to appear
again (they are basically lost if unsaved). The only way to make
them to appear again is to save them, exit xpostit and re-open
it.

The same if I use "Left Mouse Button + CTRL key".


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: lang=it...@euro, lc_ctype=it...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages xpostit depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

xpostit recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/335511 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#118332: marked as done (xpostit: clicking on a note's close button makes it dissapear)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #335511,
regarding xpostit: clicking on a note's close button makes it dissapear
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
335511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Version: 3.3.1-7
Severity: normal

 1. Create note
 2. Save it (I don't know if this is necessary)
 3. Click on the window's close button

 The note is gone and clicking on "show all" doesn't bring it back.
 Restarting xpostit restores the note.

-- System Information
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ysabell 2.4.13-pre5-xfs #1 Wed Oct 24 18:00:56 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages xpostit depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.4-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxaw7   4.1.0-9X Athena widget set library
ii  xlibs 4.1.0-9X Window System client libraries

-- 
Marcelo | Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.
mmaga...@debian.org | -- (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/335511 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#350904: marked as done (xnc always crashes with segfault when trying to start)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:09 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #350904,
regarding xnc always crashes with segfault when trying to start
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
350904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=350904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Just after installing xnc, I tried to start it and I got :

Loading resourcesOK
**Image Engine**
*  *
*Visual:  TrueColor*
*Depth:   16  (2 bytes/pixel)  *
*RGB: 5:6:5*
*Colors:  65536*
*Images:  GIF,JPEG,PCX *
*  *
 (c) Leo 96-98 *
Connecting to IVE System.failed (make it later)
Compiling Key 
Support..OK
(0) warnings, (0) errors
Total actions defined: 65
Compiling AFS supports: ZIP TAR GZIP BZIP2 TARBZ2 TARGZ RPM DEB UNARJ RAR LHA
(0) warnings, (0) errors
Error: Can't open support '/root/.xnc/xnc.ftp'
  
  
***
OOPS! Il semblerait que vous ayez découvert un bug dans XNC!!!
Si vous pouvez reproduire cette situation envoyez un rapport de bug
à  avec en objet  'XNC - bug report'
Dans le corps du message :
- ce que vous faites pour obtenir le bug.
- la configuration de XNC configuration (~/.xnc/xnc.ini) file ;
- résultat de la commande 'ldd xnc' ;
- configuration du serveur X (résolution et nombre de couleurs) ;
- votre adresse mail, pour retour d'information éventuel si nécessaire.
N'incluez PAS le fichier 'CORE' dump dans le message.
Merci, et désolé pour ce bug.
***
Erreur de segmentation
 

this is my ~/.xnc/xnc.ini file :


#This is initialisation file for X Northern Captain...
#COLORS
leoprogs.background: black
leoprogs.foreground:  white
leoprogs.keys.background:  #b7b0ae
northgui.color.background:  #d4d2de
northgui.color.shadow:  #515250
northgui.color.text:  #00
northgui.color.text_warn:  #ff
northgui.color.text2:  #33
northgui.color.cursor:  #bbb4f0
xnc.panel_color.info:  #00
xnc.panel_color.selected_file:  #00
xnc.panel_color.extension_file:  #769ab5
xnc.panel_color.normal_file:  #00
xnc.panel_color.directory_file:  #1312f8
xnc.panel_color.execution_file:  #00ae3e
xnc.panel_color.link_file:  #00a799
xnc.panel_color.afs_file:  #fb5056
xnc.panel_color.image_file:  #ff
#FONTS
leoprogs.font:   -*-helvetica-medium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
leoprogs.list.font:   -*-helvetica-*-r-*-*-14-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
leoprogs.font.fixed:   8x13
leoprogs.viewer.font:   9x15
leoprogs.font.minifixed:   6x10
#COMMON
xnc.sysfiles.path:   auto
xnc.editor.name:   internal
xnc.viewer.name:   internal
xnc.geometry:   750x700+10+5
xnc.viewer.geometry:   750x550+10+5
xnc.panels.layout: vertical
xnc.bookmark.show_and_use: yes
xnc.afs.update: prompt
leoprogs.focus.return: no
#File generated by X Northern Captain Setup.

this is the result of the command ldd /usr/bin/xnc

libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x40022000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x40048000)
libtiff.so.4 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.4 (0x4005c000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x400b)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x400b9000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400d1000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4019c000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x401ab000)
libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x401af000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x401cf000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x402ac000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x402d2000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x402dd000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#370530: marked as done (maybe add Replaces/Provides xpostitplus?)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xpostit has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #370530,
regarding maybe add Replaces/Provides xpostitplus?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
370530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=370530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xpostit
Severity: wishlist

Hi, to facilitate upgrades from now nonexisting xpostitplus package,
it might be nice to add Replaces (and Provides?) for it.  I've only
found out it didn't exist in the archive any more when the upgrade
to X.Org 7.0 tried to delete stuff in /usr/X11R6.

Regards,
Zoran

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-ck11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=hr_HR (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.3.1-9+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/370530 in Debian BTS
against the package xpostit. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595607. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#354343: marked as done (xnc-setup, and so xnc segfaults because it cannot find hardcoded font)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #354343,
regarding xnc-setup, and so xnc segfaults because it cannot find hardcoded font
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
354343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2.1
Severity: normal

When I try to start xnc-setup, to configure my xnc I have this error:
~$ xncsetup
Initialisation:
XClient...
Loading resourcesxncsetup: Error loading font 
-*-helvetica-*-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Segmentation fault
~$

This is fresh install of xnc, on fresh Debian. I have xnc running on different
machines.
To run xnc-setup and configure xnc in my own way I need font helvetica. Of
course it will be better if xnc could select one of the currently installed
fonts instead of trying this one. 
As long as this font is hardcoded it is like dependency of this package. Maybe
package with this font should be added to Depends filed of xnc.
I can do strace, and apt-file on different machine to find-out this package if
you wan't :-P.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-9  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62 6b-11  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-9The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4  3.8.0-2Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-9  compression library - runtime

xnc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.0.4-4+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/354343 in Debian BTS
against the package xnc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595604. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#384660: marked as done (xnc: expanding directories from .tar.gz, .tar.bz2, .deb archives doesn't work)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:21:08 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package xnc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #384660,
regarding xnc: expanding directories from .tar.gz, .tar.bz2, .deb archives 
doesn't work
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
384660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384660
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xnc
Version: 5.0.4-2.1
Severity: normal

to extract directory from tar archive xnc is using something like that:
gzip -c -f -d /home/emil/examplearchive.tar.gz | tar -xf - exampledir/\\* 
It works for tar 1.15.1, but doesn't work fur current package in sid (tar
1.15.91-2).

To make it working with this version of tar we need to add --wildcards
argument. And after modyfing those three methods in ~/.xnc/xnc.afs:

single_ex: bzip2 -c -d archive | tar --wildcards -xf - file;
single_ex: gzip -c -f -d archive | tar --wildcards -xf - file;
single_ex: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile archive | tar --wildcards -xf - file;

it works again. 

However I don't know how to make those changes in upstream package. This
~/.xnc/afs.xnc is generated when you run xnc for the first time. and all 
files in xnc-5.0.4/other/xncafs* are different from those newly-generated
file.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages xnc depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.1-2  GCC support library
ii  libice6   1:1.0.0-3  X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62 6b-11  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm61:1.0.0-4  X11 Session Management library
ii  libstdc++64.1.1-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4  3.8.2-2Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6  2:1.0.0-8  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  1:1.0.0-4  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime

xnc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.0.4-4+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/384660 in Debian BTS
against the package xnc. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595604. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#595604: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   xnc |5.0.4-4 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; unused, orphaned, dead upstream, replacements exist
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595604

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osghm-po...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595574: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  giftcurs |0.6.2-6 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; dead upstream, obsolete
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595574

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osgfc-ed...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595601: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  xpm2wico |  0.2.4.3-4 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; unused, replacements exist
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595601

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osges-67...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595607: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   xpostit |3.3.1-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, unused
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595607

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osgg0-lw...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595612: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   ivtools | 1.2.6-1+nmu3 | source
ivtools-bin | 1.2.6-1+nmu3 | alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc
ivtools-bin | 1.2.6-1+nmu3+b1 | amd64, i386, powerpc
ivtools-dev | 1.2.6-1+nmu3 | all
libiv-unidraw1 | 1.2.6-1+nmu3 | alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, 
sparc
libiv-unidraw1 | 1.2.6-1+nmu3+b1 | amd64, i386, powerpc
libiv1 | 1.2.6-1+nmu3 | alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc
libiv1 | 1.2.6-1+nmu3+b1 | amd64, i386, powerpc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned for eight years, low popcon, not in Lenny, outdated
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595612

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osgdo-0008m9...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595580: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

stepulator.app |  1.0-6 | source
stepulator.app |   1.0-6+b1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
stepulator.app |   1.0-6+b2 | hurd-i386
stepulator.app |   1.0-6+b3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, 
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; orphaned for a long time, unused
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595580

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osggp-xn...@franck.debian.org



Bug#232969: marked as done (libopenft-gift: seg fault)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:55:54 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package gift-openft has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #232969,
regarding libopenft-gift: seg fault
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
232969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=232969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libopenft-gift
Version: 0.2.1.2-1
Severity: normal

Okay, here goes. I'm fiddling around with the Interface Protocal, trying
to see what happens and what not. I open up a telnet session to
localhost:1213, and i decided to type in...

search;

that will cause gift to crash, if i have openft loaded as a protocal, but
not if i have none, or gnutella loaded. giftd -v spits out...

[21:18] OpenFT: 68.116.100.143:1215  SEARCH (+SEARCH)
[21:18] OpenFT: 80.13.105.245:0 (USER) -> FINAL: 
[21:18] OpenFT: 80.13.105.245:0 (USER) -> DISCO: VerMismatch: 00010005
giftd: ft_search_obj.c:39: set_params: Assertion `query != ((void *)0)' failed.
Aborted

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 29066)]
0x4070a571 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4070a571 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x40661761 in pthread_kill () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2  0x40661a6b in raise () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x4070a324 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4  0x4070b838 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#5  0x40703a4f in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6  0x40827c25 in ft_search_cmp () from /usr/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so
#7  0x40827da8 in ft_search_new () from /usr/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so
#8  0x40822a8e in ft_browse_reply () from /usr/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so
#9  0x40822b5d in openft_search () from /usr/lib/giFT/libOpenFT.so
#10 0x0804dbbc in daemon_command_handle ()
#11 0x4002a2e4 in dataset_foreach_ex () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#12 0x4002f64c in list_foreach () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#13 0x4002a332 in dataset_foreach_ex () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#14 0x0804fa11 in plugin_foreach ()
#15 0x0804de8e in daemon_command_handle ()
#16 0x0804d887 in daemon_command_handle ()
#17 0x08052b03 in if_event_detach ()
#18 0x4002c3ca in event_quit () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#19 0x4002c672 in event_quit () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#20 0x4002c789 in event_poll_once () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#21 0x4002c819 in event_loop () from /usr/lib/libgift.so.0
#22 0x08054f9d in if_transfer_finish ()
#23 0x0805506a in gift_main ()
#24 0x080550ab in main ()
#25 0x406f6dc6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6

I have no idea if this helps, but the last part of a strace on giftd, is
this...

write(2, "giftd: ft_search_obj.c:39: set_p"..., 80giftd:
ft_search_obj.c:39: set_params: Assertion `query != ((void *)0)' failed.
) = 80
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0
write(26, "\374rz\344\v[\264E\301h&\376\\\224\3\317\326P*R\36\1\n"..., 769) = 
769
write(24, "n\377[z\270\257\360\24\277\32\316\220% \303\265z\f\331"..., 258) = 
258
write(23, "]\316\310\315K\36\320\322^\"\3422vOBm.MDb\1L&5\23\262T"..., 352) = 
352
kill(29071, SIGABRT)= 0
--- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGABRT +++

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mini-sharth 2.4.23-epia1 #1 Sat Dec 27 21:21:08 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libopenft-gift depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.14.1.25-16Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [
ii  libgift00.11.5-2.0   helper library for various giFT co
ii  libgiftproto0   0.11.5-2.0   interface library for giFT and pro
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.1-3compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.2.1.6-3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/232969 in Debian BTS
against the package gift-openft. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595573. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#247577: marked as done (giftd: init script + true daemonization + debconf script)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:55:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package gift has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #247577,
regarding giftd: init script + true daemonization + debconf script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
247577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=247577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: giftd
Version: 0.11.6-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

It would be very nice to have an init script and a wrapper that would launch 
giftd under a specific user (say, gift), under a specific directory, and
a debconf script to configure that stuff and the gift-setup stuff.

What I'm thinking of, is a mldonkey-like way of doing thing.

Please, tell me if you need help to implement it, if you are willing to.

Best Regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4-1-k7-evms
Locale: lang=fr...@euro, lc_ctype=fr...@euro

Versions of packages giftd depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgift00.11.6-1 helper library for various giFT co
ii  libgiftproto0   0.11.6-1 interface library for giFT and pro
ii  libltdl31.5.6-1  A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libogg0 1.1.0-1  Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libvorbis0a 1.0.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3  1.0.1-1  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi

-- no debconf information

-- 
Clément 'nodens' Hermann
- "L'air pur ? c'est pas en RL, ça ? c'est pas hors charte ?"
Jean in L'Histoire des Pingouins, http://tnemeth.free.fr/fmbl/linuxsf/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.8.1-3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/247577 in Debian BTS
against the package gift. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595572. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#544005: marked as done (gift: unlear debian/copyright file)

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:55:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package gift has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #544005,
regarding gift: unlear debian/copyright file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
544005: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544005
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gift
Version: 0.11.8.1-2
Severity: minor


The debian/copyright reads:

It was downloaded from:
 http://gift.sourceforge.net/

The upstream contributors are listed in the AUTHORS file.

NOTES

1) Please update debian/copyright to follow latest dh-make format
   for clearer appearance

   /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/gpl2

2) Clarify who are the authors. It is also unlear where the authors
refers to gift metapackage authors or or those in
debian/control::Depends:

  Depends: giftd (>= 0.11.8.1-2), giftd (<< 0.11.8.1-2.1~), libopenft-gift, 
libgnutella-gift, giftcurs | gift-client

2) Please b explicit spell about the AUTHORS file: in which package,
Which path location?

SUGGESTION

It was downloaded from:

 None. This is a metapackage that loads other packages.
 See http://gift.sourceforge.net for more information.

Upstream Authors:

[The metapackage author]



Copyright:



License:
  
...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.8.1-3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/544005 in Debian BTS
against the package gift. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595572. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#544006: marked as done (giftd: gift-setup - Q: protocol plugins to load by default (impossible))

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:55:00 +
with message-id 
and subject line Package gift has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #544006,
regarding giftd: gift-setup - Q: protocol plugins to load by default 
(impossible)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
544006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: giftd
Version: 0.11.8.1-2+b2
Severity: normal


While running gift-setup, there is question:


#

Colon separated list of protocol plugins to load by default.  If dynamic
library support is enabled, the plugin specified will be stat'd to check if
it is a loadable path.  If that fails, the fallback method is to attempt to
construct the fully qualified path based on the configured environment.

NOTES:
 Without dynamic library support, this plugin must have been compiled into
 your giFT binary.  With, this plugin must exist in the installed
 plugin directory.  giFT -V will output this path to you, if you are not
 sure.

 Protocol names are case sensitive, so use OpenFT, not Openft.

For example, to use the OpenFT and Gnutella protocols use:

 OpenFT:Gnutella

Default: none

The help suggests running program that not exist:

$ giFT -V
bash: giFT: command not found

The help also doesn't say, that it is not possible to run
rhat command -- even if it existed -- when running the setup
for the first time. From /usr/share/doc/giftd/QUICKSTART.gz

SETUP
=

...
Please make sure to select the plugins you wish to load in the configuration
unless you plan to override on the command line using the --protocol (or -p)
switch.  For a list of available plugins you can use the --version (or -V)
>>  switch, although this cannot be used until after a basic functioning
>>  giftd.conf is in place (whacky internal design, sorry).  Be sure to run
gift-setup again after you install each additional plugin so that you can be
certain it is properly configured!

SUGGESTION

1. Please patch the gift-setup to announce correct command

2. Please patch the help (and take it to upstream) to say, that
   if this is the first time configuration, you can't run that command.
   Suggest to type "OpenFT" and change it later in ~/.giFT/giftd.conf

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages giftd depends on:
ii  libc6  2.9-23GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgift0   0.11.8.1-2+b2 helper library for various giFT co
ii  libgiftproto0  0.11.8.1-2+b2 interface library for giFT and pro
ii  libltdl7   2.2.6a-4  A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libogg01.1.4~dfsg-1  Ogg bitstream library
ii  libvorbis0a1.2.0.dfsg-6  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3 1.2.0.dfsg-6  The Vorbis General Audio Compressi

Versions of packages giftd recommends:
ii  giftcurs [gift-client]   0.6.2-6 text-based interface to the giFT f
ii  giftoxic [gift-client]   0.0.10-4GTK2 based GUI for the giFT filesh
ii  giftui [gift-client] 0.4.1-9 Graphical user interface to giFT u
ii  libgnutella-gift [gift-plugi 0.0.10.1-1  giFT plugin for the Gnutella netwo
ii  libopenft-gift [gift-plugin] 0.2.1.6-2.1 giFT plugin for the OpenFT network

giftd suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.8.1-3+rm

You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/544006 in Debian BTS
against the package gift. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/595572. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Luca Falavigna

--- End Message ---


Bug#595659: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   pskmail |0.8.5-2 | source, all

--- Reason ---
RoQA; unused, orphaned
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595659

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshtw-0006pd...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595577: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

 paq8l | 20070308-3 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; unused, orphaned
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595577

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshtt-0006ua...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595573: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

gift-openft |  0.2.1.6-3 | source
libopenft-gift |  0.2.1.6-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; obsolete, dead upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595573

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshwu-0007d2...@franck.debian.org



Bug#595572: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-05 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

  gift | 0.11.8.1-3 | source, all
 giftd | 0.11.8.1-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgift-dev | 0.11.8.1-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
  libgift0 | 0.11.8.1-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgiftproto-dev | 0.11.8.1-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgiftproto0 | 0.11.8.1-3 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

--- Reason ---
RoQA; obsolete, dead upstream
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595572

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshxh-0007js...@franck.debian.org



wip REMOVED from testing

2010-09-05 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the wip source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2p3-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# done 2010-01-24

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osifp-0003sx...@franck.debian.org



xtris REMOVED from testing

2010-09-05 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xtris source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.15-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osifp-0003t1...@franck.debian.org



twlog 2.5-4 MIGRATED to testing

2010-09-05 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the twlog source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.5-3
  Current version:  2.5-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osifp-0003sx...@franck.debian.org



yagiuda 1.19-7 MIGRATED to testing

2010-09-05 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the yagiuda source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.19-5
  Current version:  1.19-7

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osifp-0003t5...@franck.debian.org



qtparted 0.4.5-7 MIGRATED to testing

2010-09-05 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the qtparted source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.4.5-6
  Current version:  0.4.5-7

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1osifo-0003rq...@franck.debian.org