Bug#167926: bug 167926 is not forwarded, bug 203889 is not forwarded, bug 479049 is not forwarded
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 #discontinued upstream notforwarded 167926 notforwarded 203889 notforwarded 479049 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ororr-0001nm...@ravel.debian.org
Processed: bug 167926 is not forwarded, bug 203889 is not forwarded, bug 479049 is not forwarded
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > #discontinued upstream > notforwarded 167926 Bug #167926 [offlineimap] offlineimap: When host is not present, offlineimap dies with stacktrace Bug #203889 [offlineimap] offlineimap: does not handle network downtime gracefully Bug #479049 [offlineimap] Graceful handling of connection problems Unset Bug forwarded-to-address Unset Bug forwarded-to-address Unset Bug forwarded-to-address > notforwarded 203889 Bug #203889 [offlineimap] offlineimap: does not handle network downtime gracefully Bug #167926 [offlineimap] offlineimap: When host is not present, offlineimap dies with stacktrace Bug #479049 [offlineimap] Graceful handling of connection problems Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#203889 to the same value Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#167926 to the same value Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#479049 to the same value > notforwarded 479049 Bug #479049 [offlineimap] Graceful handling of connection problems Bug #167926 [offlineimap] offlineimap: When host is not present, offlineimap dies with stacktrace Bug #203889 [offlineimap] offlineimap: does not handle network downtime gracefully Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#479049 to the same value Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#167926 to the same value Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#203889 to the same value > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 479049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479049 203889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203889 167926: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=167926 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1283591795772.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#595435: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: rnv | 1.7.10-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, orphaned, alternatives exist -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595435 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orojl-0007sh...@franck.debian.org
Bug#564938: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wip | 2p3-9 | source, i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, orphaned since 3.5 years, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 564...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/564938 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oromd-0008gz...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595398: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: ysm | 2.9.9.1-1 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ysmv7 | 2.9.9.1-1 | source --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, unused, alternatives exist -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595398 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oroqg-gt...@franck.debian.org
Bug#341385: marked as done (wip: Wip crashed on amd64 while generating a ps-file from FITS input)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:31:33 + with message-id and subject line Package wip has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #341385, regarding wip: Wip crashed on amd64 while generating a ps-file from FITS input to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 341385: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341385 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wip Version: 2p3-7 Severity: important wip crashed with while writing a ps-file on amd64 systems. Tracing the coredump it seems that there is a bug in psdriv_ of the pgplot-library. I can't check if there is a problem with wip or a general problem with the pgplot-library. PNG output of wip is functioning! Oliver -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages wip depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libedit2 2.9.cvs.20040827-1BSD editline and history libraries ii libg2c01:3.3.5-13Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 ii libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library ii libncurses55.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System protocol client li ii pgplot55.2.2-6 large subroutine library for plott ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2p3-9+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/341385 in Debian BTS against the package wip. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/564938. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#419886: marked as done (cabber: does not startup after fresh install)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Package cabber has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #419886, regarding cabber: does not startup after fresh install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 419886: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419886 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cabber Version: 0.4.0-test5-2 After a fresh install, invoking "cabber" leads simply to an error message, claiming that it needs a file ~HOME/.cabberrc. -Ralf. -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Spécification et Vérification CNRS, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan, INRIA Futurs http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/~treinen --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.5.0-test1-3+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/419886 in Debian BTS against the package cabber. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/553902. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#503422: marked as done (cabber: does not set the correct terminal mode on error exit)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Package cabber has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #503422, regarding cabber: does not set the correct terminal mode on error exit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 503422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503422 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cabber Version: 0.4.0-test5-2.1 Severity: normal When I have cabber configured for the wrong password it will abort without fixing the terminal mode. Echo is turned off and blind typing "reset" is necessary to get the terminal working again. Also displaying a fragment of XML to report a basic error such as unauthorised is not good for usability. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cabber depends on: ii libc6 2.7-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.6+20080830-1 shared libraries for terminal hand cabber recommends no packages. cabber suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.5.0-test1-3+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/503422 in Debian BTS against the package cabber. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/553902. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#503424: marked as done (SEGV when the resource line is commented out of .cabberrc)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Package cabber has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #503424, regarding SEGV when the resource line is commented out of .cabberrc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 503424: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503424 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cabber Version: 0.4.0-test5-2.1 Severity: important cabber will SEGV when the resource line is commented, presumably no validation is done on the rc file. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cabber depends on: ii libc6 2.7-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.6+20080830-1 shared libraries for terminal hand cabber recommends no packages. cabber suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.5.0-test1-3+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/503424 in Debian BTS against the package cabber. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/553902. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#511099: marked as done (vuurmuur package does not install services in the right directory)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:27 + with message-id and subject line Package vuurmuur has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #511099, regarding vuurmuur package does not install services in the right directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 511099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511099 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vuurmuur Version: 0.6+debian-1 The vuurmuur package does not install the services in /etc/vuurmuur/services, but in /usr/share/vuurmuur/services . This causes vuurmuur to have no services at all. Please install the services in /etc/vuurmuur/services, so that vuurmuur can be configured after installation. I'm using Debian unstable --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7+debian-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/511099 in Debian BTS against the package vuurmuur. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595307. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#547669: marked as done (upgrade vuurmuur fails because of problem with init script)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:28 + with message-id and subject line Package vuurmuur has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #547669, regarding upgrade vuurmuur fails because of problem with init script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 547669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547669 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vuurmuur Version: 0.7+debian-1 Severity: important When I tried to upgrade vuurmuur to version vuurmuur_0.7+debian-2_i386 I got the following output: Preparing to replace vuurmuur 0.7+debian-1 (using .../vuurmuur_0.7+debian-2_i386.deb) ... Stopping Vuurmuur Firewall: - Stopping vuurmuur:kill: 147: Illegal option -n invoke-rc.d: initscript vuurmuur, action "stop" failed. dpkg: warning: old pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping Vuurmuur Firewall: - Stopping vuurmuur:kill: 147: Illegal option -n invoke-rc.d: initscript vuurmuur, action "stop" failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vuurmuur_0.7+debian-2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 update-rc.d: warning: vuurmuur start runlevel arguments (S) do not match LSB Default-Start values (1 2 3 4 5) Starting Vuurmuur Firewall: - Loading modules: ip_tables iptable_filter iptable_mangle iptable_nat ip_conntrack ipt_state ip_conntrack_ftp ip_nat_ftp ip_queue. - Starting vuurmuur: already running. - Starting vuurmuur_log: already running. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/vuurmuur_0.7+debian-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I think the upgrade should succeed normally. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages vuurmuur depends on: ii libc6 2.9-26 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libvuurmuur00.7+debian-2 netfilter frontend (library) Versions of packages vuurmuur recommends: ii iptables1.4.4-2 administration tools for packet fi ii vuurmuur-conf 0.7+debian-2 netfilter frontend (ncurses GUI) vuurmuur suggests no packages. -- no debconf information Tiger!P -- A random quote: De winnaar geeft nooit op, de opgever wint nooit. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7+debian-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/547669 in Debian BTS against the package vuurmuur. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595307. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#549421: marked as done (ysm: save command does not seem to work)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:31:56 + with message-id and subject line Package ysmv7 has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #549421, regarding ysm: save command does not seem to work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 549421: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549421 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ysm Version: 2.9.9.1 Severity: normal When I type 'save friend' on the command prompt I get this message: YSM POLITICAL ASYLUM FOR SLAVES Please wait.. Saving [friend] [123456789] [OK] SLAVE SAVED When I type it again I get that message (as expected): YSM POLITICAL ASYLUM FOR SLAVES Please wait.. The slave is already stored online. But when I now quit ysm, start it again an type 'save friend' I get the first message again. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages ysm depends on: ii libc6 2.9-27 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libreadline5 5.2-6 GNU readline and history libraries ysm recommends no packages. Versions of packages ysm suggests: ii perl 5.10.1-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.9.9.1-1+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/549421 in Debian BTS against the package ysmv7. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595398. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#565729: marked as done (Logrotate postrotate script fails when vuurmuur is disabled or not running)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:28 + with message-id and subject line Package vuurmuur has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #565729, regarding Logrotate postrotate script fails when vuurmuur is disabled or not running to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 565729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565729 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vuurmuur Version: 0.8~beta1-1 Severity: normal When vuurmuur_log is not running (because vuurmuur is installed but not used or not currently running), the postrotate script fails: postrotate /bin/kill -HUP `pidof vuurmuur_log` pidof outputs nothing, so kill outputs a usage error. This can probably be solved by putting a "pidof vuurmuur_log &&" before the current script (though this would still cause a non-zero return value, so something more fanycy might be required). Gr. Matthijs -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-rc8 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages vuurmuur depends on: ii libvuurmuur 0.8~beta1-1 Iptables frontend. Common library Versions of packages vuurmuur recommends: ii iproute 20090324-1 networking and traffic control too ii iptables 1.4.6-2 administration tools for packet fi ii vuurmuur-conf0.8~beta1-1 Iptables frontend. Ncurses GUI, fo vuurmuur suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7+debian-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/565729 in Debian BTS against the package vuurmuur. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595307. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#158116: marked as done (increases the game-counter when loosing game in multiplayer)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:59 + with message-id and subject line Package xtris has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #158116, regarding increases the game-counter when loosing game in multiplayer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 158116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158116 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: xtris Version: 1.15-3 Severity: normal Tags: upstream -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux server 2.2.20 #5 Mon Jul 8 21:10:05 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de...@euro Versions of packages xtris depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.1.0-17 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information There's a bug in xtris: Imagine you are playing a game against one or more other players (or bots), YOU win the game. xtris increases your game counter. After some seconds a new game will start... but when you loose the game _before_ the new game has started, the game counter is increased once more since xtris thinks you're playing single player. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.15-9+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/158116 in Debian BTS against the package xtris. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595395. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#525273: marked as done (vuurmuur-conf not compiled with utf-8 support)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:46 + with message-id and subject line Package vuurmuur-conf has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #525273, regarding vuurmuur-conf not compiled with utf-8 support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 525273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525273 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vuurmuur-conf Version: 0.6+debian-1 The package is not built against libncursesw. This means at least the Russian translation is not functional. In the debian/rules file this is disabled: CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" ./configure $(CROSS) --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-widec=no The --with-widec variable should have been set to "yes". I'm using Debian Lenny. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7+debian-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/525273 in Debian BTS against the package vuurmuur-conf. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595389. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#529893: marked as done (vuurmuur-conf: in the rule edit dialog, i can't select a service)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:46 + with message-id and subject line Package vuurmuur-conf has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #529893, regarding vuurmuur-conf: in the rule edit dialog, i can't select a service to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 529893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529893 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: vuurmuur-conf Severity: important i can't select a service for the rule: it only ahows any (service). -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.7+debian-2+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/529893 in Debian BTS against the package vuurmuur-conf. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595389. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#86575: marked as done (xtris: Refuses to run if insufficient colours are available, even with -bw)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:32:59 + with message-id and subject line Package xtris has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #86575, regarding xtris: Refuses to run if insufficient colours are available, even with -bw to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 86575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=86575 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: xtris Version: 1.14-9 Severity: normal If xtris complains "Can't allocate colors" (e.g., on my 8-bit display, when Netscape has taken all the colour cells), I should still be able to run it by specifying -bw (why does it need to allocate colours when it's running in black and white?) Better still, it could fall back to black and white automatically. Wishlist: that xtris have an '-install' option to force it to install a private colourmap (or do this automatically). -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux datum 2.2.13 #1 Sat Jan 1 20:59:33 EST 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages xtris depends on: ii libc6 2.1.3-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii xlib6g 3.3.6-11potato shared libraries required by X clients --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.15-9+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/86575 in Debian BTS against the package xtris. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/595395. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Luca Falavigna --- End Message ---
Bug#552416: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: cournol | 0.5-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 552...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/552416 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orotc-rj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#553902: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: cabber | 0.5.0-test1-3 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; outdated, replaced by mcabber, orphaned, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 553...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/553902 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orov1-hs...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595438: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: smtpfeed | 1.20-1 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, orphaned, unmaintained for a long time -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595438 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orowb-zw...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595394: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: w-bassman | 1.0-21 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595394 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oroxf-00013v...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595389: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: vuurmuur-conf | 0.7+debian-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc vuurmuur-conf-dbg | 0.7+debian-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; related to vuurmuur -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595389 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oroyu-00018i...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595433: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: audiere |1.9.4-4 | source libaudiere-1.9.4 |1.9.4-4 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libaudiere-1.9.4-dbg |1.9.4-4 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libaudiere-dev |1.9.4-4 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, orphaned, dead upstream -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595433 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orp02-0001md...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595395: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xtris | 1.15-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, alternatives exist, dead upstream, unused -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595395 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orp18-0001xp...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595307: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: vuurmuur | 0.7+debian-2 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc vuurmuur-dbg | 0.7+debian-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, NPOASR -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595307 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orp2t-0001hj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595434: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: axp | 0.2.1+patch-92-4 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, dead upstream, orphaned -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595434 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orp3k-0002dg...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595387: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libvuurmuur | 0.7+debian-2 | source libvuurmuur-dbg | 0.7+debian-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libvuurmuur-dev | 0.7+debian-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libvuurmuur0 | 0.7+debian-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; related to vuurmuur -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 595...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/595387 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orp51-0003h4...@franck.debian.org
sdr REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the sdr source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.0-7 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orvlq-0004by...@franck.debian.org
grokking-the-gimp REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the grokking-the-gimp source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1orvlq-0004ak...@franck.debian.org
Bug#595518: jack-tools: refuses to install with jackd2
Package: jack-tools Version: 0.0.2-7+b1 Severity: normal jack-tools can use libjack-jackd2-0 but depend uncnditionally on jackd. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (295, 'experimental'), (290, 'stable-i386'), (280, 'testing-i386'), (270, 'unstable-i386'), (150, 'experimental-i386') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-rc3-r600fence-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100904195949.8909.67766.report...@heretic.burning-in-hell
