III Научно-практический семинар в Сочи.
yвaжaeмыe кoллeги! Пpиглaшaeм Вac пpинять yчacтиe в oбщepoccийcкoм нayчнo-пpaктичecкoм ceминape "peпpoдyктивный пoтeнциaл poccии: вepcии и кoнтpaвepcии", кoтopый - yжe в тpeтий paз - cocтoитcя в coчи 9-11 ceнтябpя. Этo знaкoвoe мepoпpиятиe c кaждым гoдoм coбиpaeт вcё бoльшe дoктopoв co вceй cтpaны. В нayчнoй пpoгpaммe - caмыe ocтpыe и нeпpocтыe тeмы coвpeмeннoгo aкyшepcтвa и гинeкoлoгии. Вac ждyт дoклaды, кpyглыe cтoлы, cимпoзиyмы, клиничecкиe paзбopы и мacтep-клaccы... Пo oкoнчaнии ceминapa дeлeгaтaм выдaётcя имeннoй cepтификaт c yкaзaниeм пpocлyшaнных чacoв. И жypнaл "StatusPraesens. Гинeкoлoгия, aкyшepcтвo, бecплoдный бpaк" в знaк yвaжeния к Вaшeмy пpoфeccиoнaлизмy. Пocлe мoщнeйшeгo интeллeктyaльнoгo штypмa opгaнизaтopы пpeдлaгaют вeчepнюю кyльтypнo-дeлoвyю пpoгpaммy, кoтopaя зaпoмнитcя нe мeньшe, чeм yчacтиe в нayчных бaтaлиях. Бyдeм paды вcтpeтить Вac нa Нayчнo-пpaктичecкoм ceминape в coчи: бyдeт интepecнo, кaк вceгдa! opгкoмитeт http://sochi-seminar.narod2.ru P.S. aдлep - cтoлицa мини-oтeлeй, нo нoмepa лyчшe бpoниpoвaть yжe ceйчac: apинa и Людмилa c paдocтью пpeдлoжaт Вaм oтличныe вapиaнты... +7 (862-2) 9O1-9O1. a opгкoмитeт вceгдa oтвeтит пo тeлeфoнy +7 (499) 558-O2-5З. В paбoтe ceминapa пpинимaeт yчacтиe вeдyщaя пpoфeccypa cтpaны: paдзинcкий В.e. (Мocквa), Кypцep М.a. (Мocквa), Лoгyтoвa Л.c. (Мocквa), Пoдзoлкoвa Н.М. (Мocквa), Мaнyхин И.Б. (Мocквa), Киpa e.Ф. (Мocквa), Дoбpoхoтoвa Ю.Э. (Мocквa), Мaльцeвa Л.И. (Кaзaнь), caвeльeвa И.c. (Мocквa), Милoвaнoв a.П. (Мocквa), Бaшмaкoвa Н.В. (eкaтepинбypг), Пeкapeв o.Г. (Нoвocибиpcк), Пeнжoян Г.a. (Кpacнoдap), apтымyк Н.В. (Кeмepoвo), Гpигopьeвa e.e. (Бapнayл), oбocкaлoвa Т.a. (eкaтepинбypг), Бeлoцepкoвцeвa Л.Д., Пpoтoпoпoвa Н.В. (Иpкyтcк), Линёвa o.И. (caмapa), Жapкин Н.a. (Вoлгoгpaд), Фaткyллин И.Ф. (Кaзaнь), oвcянникoвa Т.В. (Мocквa), Минкинa Г.Н. (Мocквa), Хaмoшинa М.Б. (Мocквa), opдиянц И.М. (Мocквa), pымaшeвcкий a.Н. (pocтoв-нa-Дoнy), Кoкoлинa В.Ф. (Мocквa), Кpoтин П.Н. (caнкт-Пeтepбypг), Пacмaн Н.М. (Нoвocибиpcк), Бeлoкpиницкaя Т.e. (Читa), Цхaй В.Б. (Кpacнoяpcк) и дpyгиe cпeциaлиcты. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/82924-0541-esroels-ash0z-z9md2-h5f94ba-xzpsxs-e-m8-59256519-4y01101f8h0i...@wc.ru
КУПИТЬ МОТОЦИКЛ
http://www.мото.su купить мотоцикл, продать мотоцикл. частные объявления о продаже мотоциклов. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805092302.c823zasl702...@www.syu.ru
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Thu Aug 5 08:03:52 UTC 2010
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: doc-rfc
> tags 209491 + pending
Bug #209491 [doc-rfc-3000-3999] The package description does not follow Debian
policy
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #209491 to the same tags previously set
> # Source package in NEW: simplegeneric
> tags 591295 + pending
Bug #591295 [wnpp] ITP: python-simplegeneric -- Simple generic functions for
Python
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: vlc
> tags 587792 + pending
Bug #587792 {Done: Christophe Mutricy } [vlc] Please
compile with --enable-vaapi
Added tag(s) pending.
> # Source package in NEW: relational
> tags 590780 + pending
Bug #590780 [wnpp] RFA: relational -- Educational tool for relational algebra
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
590780: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590780
587792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587792
209491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209491
591295: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591295
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128099555822578.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 541562, tagging 541709, tagging 542300, tagging 542320, tagging 542446, tagging 591648
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not affecting/relevant for stable
> tags 541562 + squeeze sid
Bug #541562 {Done: Stefano Zacchiroli } [serpentine]
serpentine: uses python-gnome2-desktop which is going away
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 541709 + squeeze sid
Bug #541709 {Done: Patrick Matthäi } [fglrx-driver]
xserver-xorg-core and fglrx-driver: error when trying to install together
Bug #538889 {Done: Patrick Matthäi } [fglrx-driver]
fglrx-glx and libgl1-mesa-glx: error when trying to install together
Bug #538890 {Done: Patrick Matthäi } [fglrx-driver]
fglrx-glx and libgl1-mesa-swx11: error when trying to install together
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 542300 + squeeze sid
Bug #542300 {Done: Sebastien Delafond }
[libdataobjects-mysql-ruby] FTBFS: mysql_c.c:4264: error: 'gptr' undeclared
(first use in this function)
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 542320 + squeeze sid
Bug #542320 {Done: Marco Nenciarini } [htcheck] FTBFS:
HtmysqlDB.cc:102: error: 'load_defaults' was not declared in this scope
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 542446 + squeeze sid
Bug #542446 {Done: Barry deFreese } [lineakd] lineakd:
FTBFS due to automake version mismatch
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
> tags 591648 + squeeze sid
Bug #591648 [doxygen] clp: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: bus error/segmentation fault
Added tag(s) sid and squeeze.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
591648: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591648
542446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542446
542300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542300
541562: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541562
542320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542320
541709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12810009074010.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#200828: marked as done (/usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs: not found)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#200828: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #200828, regarding /usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 200828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=200828 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-3000-3999 Version: 20030621-1 Severity: important Tags: sid While setting up this package during an upgrade, I get the following error: /var/lib/dpkg/info/doc-rfc-3000-3999.postinst: 42: /usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs: not found This of course prevents the successful installation of this package. After upgrading doc-rfc-std as well, this problem went away, so I guess, a versioned dependency on doc-rfc-std should do the trick. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux jroger 2.4.21 #1 Sam Jun 14 16:38:16 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 Versions of packages doc-rfc-3000-3999 depends on: ii doc-rfc-std 20010829-1.1 Standard RFCs -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 200...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #223504). * Update/enhance the long description of packages (Closes: #209456, #209471, #209491, #209631), thanks Clément Stenac. Checksums-Sha1: be5f6459d91c37
Bug#209491: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#209491: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #209491,
regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
209491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209491
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-rfc-3000-3999
Version: 20030621-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.ga7...@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: doc-rfc
Source-Version: 20100731-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 209...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400
Source: doc-rfc
Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational
doc-rfc-others
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100731-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Iustin Pop
Changed-By: Iustin Pop
Description:
doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage
doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs
doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs
doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs
doc-rfc-old-std
Bug#201618: marked as done (doc-rfc-std: can't purge)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#201618: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #201618, regarding doc-rfc-std: can't purge to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 201618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=201618 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20010829-1.1 Severity: important Removing doc-rfc-std ... cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/.dhelp': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing doc-rfc-std (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: doc-rfc-std -- System Information Debian Release: post-3.0(+) Kernel Version: Linux phoenix 2.4.21 #1 Fri Jun 13 20:24:54 UTC 2003 i586 GNU/Linux --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 201...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #223504). * Update/enhance the long description of packages (Closes: #209456, #209471, #209491, #209631), thanks Clément Stenac. Checksums-Sha1: be5f6459d91c374485ae29e568b85165ff694a20 1995 doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc 30aff896453be64d5656e102c34201bde03474f0 131361696 doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz b4eaa0a1520920829581f2a838dfbc7513cb2481 4464203 doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz d73ebae1d0506cdafffb3b549e9c3aba63251dad 8218 doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb 93b5fcc7ed981691ef3fe0ade2c0e473b1a9b937 5648252
Bug#209471: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#209471: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #209471,
regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
209471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-rfc-1000-1999
Version: 20030621-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.ga7...@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: doc-rfc
Source-Version: 20100731-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 209...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400
Source: doc-rfc
Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational
doc-rfc-others
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100731-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Iustin Pop
Changed-By: Iustin Pop
Description:
doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage
doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs
doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs
doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs
doc-rfc-old-std
Bug#209456: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#209456: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #209456,
regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
209456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-rfc-2000-2999
Version: 20030621-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.ga7...@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: doc-rfc
Source-Version: 20100731-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 209...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400
Source: doc-rfc
Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational
doc-rfc-others
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100731-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Iustin Pop
Changed-By: Iustin Pop
Description:
doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage
doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs
doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs
doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs
doc-rfc-old-std
Bug#209631: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#209631: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #209631,
regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
209631: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-rfc-0001-0999
Version: 20030621-1
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <20030620155309.ga7...@dat.etsit.upm.es>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: doc-rfc
Source-Version: 20100731-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz
doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc
doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb
doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 209...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400
Source: doc-rfc
Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational
doc-rfc-others
Architecture: source all
Version: 20100731-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Iustin Pop
Changed-By: Iustin Pop
Description:
doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage
doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs
doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs
doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs
doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs
doc-rfc-old-std
Bug#215068: marked as done (doc-rfc-0001-0999: postinst script fails (no such file as /usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs))
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#215068: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #215068, regarding doc-rfc-0001-0999: postinst script fails (no such file as /usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 215068: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=215068 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-0001-0999 Version: 20030621-1 Severity: important doc-rfc-0001-0999 failed to install properly on my system. I imagine you can diagnose the failure (lack of a critical file) better than I can, so I've included the error message. FWIW, there is no directory /usr/lib/doc-rfc on my system (a mostly-sarge with some sid). Unsurprisingly, the same error prevents me from installing doc-rfc-1000-1999 and so on. brainchild:/home/ctl/test# apt-get install doc-rfc-0001-0999 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: doc-rfc-0001-0999 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 529 not upgraded. Need to get 12.4MB of archives. After unpacking 14.6MB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu sarge/non-free doc-rfc-0001-0999 20030621-1 [12.4MB] Fetched 12.4MB in 1m34s (131kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package doc-rfc-0001-0999. (Reading database ... 74396 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking doc-rfc-0001-0999 (from .../doc-rfc-0001-0999_20030621-1_all.deb) ... Setting up doc-rfc-0001-0999 (20030621-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/doc-rfc-0001-0999.postinst: line 41: /usr/lib/doc-rfc/register-doc-rfc-docs: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing doc-rfc-0001-0999 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: doc-rfc-0001-0999 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux brainchild 2.4.21-ctl #19 Wed Jul 23 15:51:30 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages doc-rfc-0001-0999 depends on: ii doc-rfc-std 20010829-1.1 Standard RFCs -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 215...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iusti
Bug#223504: marked as done (rfc1918 missing)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#223504: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #223504, regarding rfc1918 missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 223504: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=223504 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-1000-1999 Version: 20030621-1 Hi, the prominent RFC 1918 is missing. regards Hadmut --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 223...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #223504). * Update/enhance the long description of packages (Closes: #209456, #209471, #209491, #209631), thanks Clément Stenac. Checksums-Sha1: be5f6459d91c374485ae29e568b85165ff694a20 1995 doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc 30aff896453be64d5656e102c34201bde03474f0 131361696 doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz b4eaa0a1520920829581f2a838dfbc7513cb2481 4464203 doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz d73ebae1d0506cdafffb3b549e9c3aba63251dad 8218 doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb 93b5fcc7ed981691ef3fe0ade2c0e473b1a9b937 5648252 doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb f3b92c1a7eaea0431fc2e2ed5164574e6776205a 28107066 doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb 059ffe946394f365bc97a2e16c5237bf5669ed43 12301510 doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb 21d9025766ca1c2979ca68fba8721aa2aa0f7194 3396170 doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb c7938ad1bf61a0b36d5948bc1f2c979fa5d36f8c 4567648 doc-rfc-experimental_2010073
Bug#210587: marked as done (doc-rfc-std: doc-base files refer to non-existant HTML and text docs)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#210587: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #210587, regarding doc-rfc-std: doc-base files refer to non-existant HTML and text docs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 210587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=210587 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20030621-1 Severity: normal Hi, /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-0index refers to /usr/share/doc/RFC/*.html but the HTML files are gzipped. The following doc-base files refer to HTML files that are not installed at all. Only gzipped text files are installed but the doc-base files refer to the non gzipped files. /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-best-current-practice /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-draft-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-experimental /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-for-your-information /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-historic /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-informational /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-old-draft-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-old-experimental /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-old-historic /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-old-proposed-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-old-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-proposed-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-standard /usr/share/doc-base/rfc-unclassified -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux jophur 2.4.22-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 5 23:04:29 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 210...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380
Bug#287224: marked as done (doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC packages are missing hundreds of RFCs)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#287224: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #287224, regarding doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC packages are missing hundreds of RFCs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 287224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=287224 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-3000-3999 Version: 20030621-1 Severity: important The RFC packages appear to have been created in June 2003 and since then, about 400 RFCs have been created. As a result, over 10% of all RFCs are missing and many RFCs that have been obsoleted by later RFCs are included in the packages as if they are still current. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages doc-rfc-3000-3999 depends on: ii doc-rfc-std 20030621-1 Standard RFCs -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 287...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #223504). * Update/enhance the long description of packages (Closes: #209456, #209471, #209491, #209631), thanks Clément Stenac. Checksums-Sha1: be5f6459d91c374485ae29e568b85165ff694a20 1995 doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc 30aff896453be64d5656e102c34201bde03474f0 131361696
Bug#366118: marked as done (doc-rfc: Warnings during install)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#366118: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #366118, regarding doc-rfc: Warnings during install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 366118: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366118 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc Version: 20030621-1 Severity: minor Lots of warnings like: warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.txt' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 8. Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc5 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages doc-rfc depends on: ii doc-rfc-fyi-bcp 20030621-1 FYI and BCP RFCs ii doc-rfc-misc 20030621-1 Miscellaneous RFCs ii doc-rfc-old-std 20030621-1 Old Standard RFCs ii doc-rfc-std 20030621-1 Standard RFCs ii doc-rfc-std-proposed 20030621-1 Proposed Standard RFCs doc-rfc recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 366...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #22350
Bug#366673: marked as done (doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC3550 is missing)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#366673: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #366673, regarding doc-rfc-3000-3999: RFC3550 is missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 366673: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366673 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-3000-3999 Version: 20030621-1 Severity: normal RFC 3550 is missing (RTP) Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-rc5 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages doc-rfc-3000-3999 depends on: ii doc-rfc-std 20030621-1 Standard RFCs doc-rfc-3000-3999 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 366...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504, #223504). * Update/enhance the long description of packages (Closes: #209456, #209471, #209491, #209631), thanks Clément Stenac. Checksums-Sha1: be5f6459d91c374485ae29e568b85165ff694a20 1995 doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc 30aff896453be64d5656e102c34201bde03474f0 131361696 doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz b4eaa0a1520920829581f2a838dfbc7513cb2481 4464203 doc-
Bug#377602: marked as done (doc-rfc: a lot of RFCs are missing)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#377602: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #377602, regarding doc-rfc: a lot of RFCs are missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 377602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377602 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc Version: 20030621-1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** More than 1000 newer RFCs are not included in this package, up to around #4500. It would be nice to update the package soon, since RFC reading is a favourite task when not connected to the internet (e.g. on a train). Help spreading this hobby please! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages doc-rfc depends on: ii doc-rfc-fyi-bcp 20030621-1 FYI and BCP RFCs ii doc-rfc-misc 20030621-1 Miscellaneous RFCs ii doc-rfc-old-std 20030621-1 Old Standard RFCs ii doc-rfc-std 20030621-1 Standard RFCs ii doc-rfc-std-proposed 20030621-1 Proposed Standard RFCs -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 377...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and unclassified RFCs doc-rfc-std - Standard RFCs doc-rfc-std-proposed - Proposed Standard RFCs Closes: 200828 201618 209456 209471 209491 209631 210587 215068 223504 287224 366118 366673 377602 380689 543883 Changes: doc-rfc (20100731-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Adopt the package (Closes: #543883). * New upstream version (Closes: #287224, #366673, #377602). * Redo the way doc-base documents are registered (Closes: #200828, #215068, #201618) and their contents (Closes: #210587, #380689, #366118). * Change packaging scheme to eliminate the numeric packages and the confusion regarding where to find a given RFC (Closes: #223504,
Bug#380689: marked as done (doc-rfc-std: Warning at install and purge of most doc-rfc-* package)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#380689: fixed in doc-rfc 20100731-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #380689, regarding doc-rfc-std: Warning at install and purge of most doc-rfc-* package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 380689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380689 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20030621-1 Severity: normal Hello Kai, Installing doc-rfc-std and friends on a sid box, I got the following : $ sudo apt-get install doc-rfc-std Unpacking doc-rfc-std (from .../doc-rfc-std_20030621-1_all.deb) ... Setting up doc-rfc-std (20030621-1) ... warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.txt' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 8. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.ps' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 11. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.pdf' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 14. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.dvi' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 17. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.html' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 21. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/old/draft-standard/*.tar' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 23. warning: file mask `/usr/share/doc/RFC/queue/*.txt' does not match any files at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 723, line 9. etc... Same warning for the removing of most of those packages. Thanks, Fab -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: doc-rfc Source-Version: 20100731-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of doc-rfc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-experimental_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-fyi-bcp_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-informational_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-misc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-old-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-others_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std-proposed_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc-std_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.debian.tar.gz doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1.dsc doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731-1_all.deb doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz to non-free/d/doc-rfc/doc-rfc_20100731.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 380...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Iustin Pop (supplier of updated doc-rfc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:40:16 -0400 Source: doc-rfc Binary: doc-rfc doc-rfc-std doc-rfc-std-proposed doc-rfc-old-std doc-rfc-fyi-bcp doc-rfc-experimental doc-rfc-misc doc-rfc-informational doc-rfc-others Architecture: source all Version: 20100731-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Iustin Pop Changed-By: Iustin Pop Description: doc-rfc- RFC documents metapackage doc-rfc-experimental - Experimental RFCs doc-rfc-fyi-bcp - FYI and BCP RFCs doc-rfc-informational - Informational RFCs doc-rfc-misc - Historic and draft RFCs doc-rfc-old-std - Old Standard RFCs doc-rfc-others - Old experimental and uncla
Processing of smarty_2.6.26-0.2_i386.changes
smarty_2.6.26-0.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: smarty_2.6.26-0.2.dsc smarty_2.6.26-0.2.diff.gz smarty_2.6.26-0.2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oh2zr-0006j0...@franck.debian.org
smarty_2.6.26-0.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: smarty_2.6.26-0.2.diff.gz to main/s/smarty/smarty_2.6.26-0.2.diff.gz smarty_2.6.26-0.2.dsc to main/s/smarty/smarty_2.6.26-0.2.dsc smarty_2.6.26-0.2_all.deb to main/s/smarty/smarty_2.6.26-0.2_all.deb Override entries for your package: smarty_2.6.26-0.2.dsc - source web smarty_2.6.26-0.2_all.deb - optional web Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 576559 590030 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oh2f6-0006it...@franck.debian.org
Bug#591788: sqlrelay: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/java/*.jar': No such file or directory
Source: sqlrelay Version: 1:0.39.4-10 Severity: serious > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on porpora.debian.org > > ╔══╗ > ║ sqlrelay 1:0.39.4-10 (powerpc) 03 Aug 2010 > 21:53 ║ > ╚══╝ [...] > mv debian/tmp/usr/lib/zope/lib/python/ZSQLRelayDA \ > debian/tmp/usr/share/zope/Products/ > rm -rf debian/tmp/usr/share/zope/Products/ZSQLRelayDA/SQLRelay > find debian/tmp -name '*.so*' -type f \ > | xargs chrpath --keepgoing --delete > : # libsqlrelay-java > mkdir -p debian/libsqlrelay-java/usr/share/java > debian/libsqlrelay-java/usr/lib/java > mv debian/tmp/usr/java/*.jar debian/libsqlrelay-java/usr/share/java/ > mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/java/*.jar': No such file or directory > make: *** [install] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch gave > error exit status 2 > > Build finished at 20100803-2203 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#591803: calendarserver: not installable in sid
Package: calendarserver Version: 1.2.dfsg-9 Severity: grave User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, calendarserver is not installable in sid on any architecture, at least since June 21. The reason for that is Package: calendarserver Version: 1.2.dfsg-9 Depends: [...], python-vobject (>= 0.4.8), [...] Package: python-vobject Version: 0.8.1c-3 Conflicts: calendarserver (<< 2.0) -Ralf -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805163931.ge25...@uranium.pps.jussieu.fr
Processed: merging 591651 591788
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 591651 591788 Bug#591651: sqlrelay: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/java/*.jar': No such file or directory Bug#591788: sqlrelay: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/java/*.jar': No such file or directory Merged 591651 591788. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 591651: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591651 591788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128102893027337.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
iterm_0.5-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb iterm_0.5-8.diff.gz to main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-8.diff.gz iterm_0.5-8.dsc to main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-8.dsc libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb Override entries for your package: fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional utils iterm_0.5-8.dsc - source utils libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional libdevel libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional libs libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional libdevel libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional libs xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb - optional x11 Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 583539 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oh5f6-0002yr...@franck.debian.org
Bug#583539: marked as done ([INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for iterm)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:32:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583539: fixed in iterm 0.5-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #583539, regarding [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for iterm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 583539: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583539 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: iterm Version: 0.5-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Greetings, -- Camaleón # iterm po-debconf translation to Spanish # Copyright (C) 2010 Software in the Public Interest # This file is distributed under the same license as the iterm package. # # Changes: # - Initial translation # Camaleón , 2010 # # - Updates # # # Traductores, si no conocen el formato PO, merece la pena leer la # documentación de gettext, especialmente las secciones dedicadas a este # formato, por ejemplo ejecutando: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # # Equipo de traducción al español, por favor lean antes de traducir # los siguientes documentos: # # - El proyecto de traducción de Debian al español # http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/ # especialmente las notas y normas de traducción en # http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/notas # # - La guía de traducción de po's de debconf: # /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # o http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: iterm 0.5-7\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: it...@packages.debian.org\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2006-11-30 07:36+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-17 11:36+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Camaleón \n" "Language-Team: Debian Spanish \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" "X-Poedit-Language: Spanish\n" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../fbiterm.templates:1001 msgid "Do you want /usr/bin/fbiterm to be installed SUID root?" msgstr "¿Desea instalar «/usr/bin/fbiterm» con el bit «setuid» de «root»?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../fbiterm.templates:1001 msgid "You have the option of installing the /usr/bin/fbiterm binary with the SUID bit set. By setting 'SUID root', non-root users may run fbiterm directly." msgstr "Puede instalar el binario «/usr/bin/fbiterm» con el bit «setuid» de «root» activado. Si establece el bit «setuid» de «root» los usuarios sin privilegios de administrador podrán ejecutar fbiterm directamente." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../fbiterm.templates:1001 msgid "This can open security concerns: fbiterm may contain undiscovered security flaws which malicious users may exploit if fbiterm is set SUID root." msgstr "Esto puede ser peligroso ya que fbiterm podría contener fallos de seguridad (aún sin descubrir) que usuarios maliciosos podrían explotar si se establece el bit «setuid» de «root»." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../fbiterm.templates:1001 msgid "You should install fbiterm with SUID bit set unless you do not intend to use it regularly. You may change this setting by running \"dpkg-reconfigure fbiterm\"." msgstr "Sólo debería instalar fbiterm con el bit «stuid» de «root» activado si lo va a utilizar de manera habitual. Recuerde que puede cambiar esta configuración ejecutando «dpkg-reconfigure fbiterm»." --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: iterm Source-Version: 0.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of iterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/fbiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb iterm_0.5-8.diff.gz to main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-8.diff.gz iterm_0.5-8.dsc to main/i/iterm/iterm_0.5-8.dsc libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libxiterm-dev_0.5-8_i386.deb libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/libxiterm1_0.5-8_i386.deb xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb to main/i/iterm/xiterm_0.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Perrier (supplier of updated iterm package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debi
Bug#546659: DeprecationWarning: socket.ssl() is deprecated
tags 546659 patch thanks Nicolas's patch assumes python 2.6. That's fine for Debian, but maybe not for upstream. This one seems to work. Peter --- imaplibutil.py +++ imaplibutil.py @@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ if last_error != 0: # FIXME raise socket.error(last_error) -self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) +if (sys.version_info[0] == 2 and sys.version_info[1] >= 6) or sys.version_info[0] >= 3: +self.sslobj = ssl.wrap_socket(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) +else: +self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) self.sslobj = sslwrapper(self.sslobj) mustquote = re.compile(r"[^\w!#$%&'+,.:;<=>?^`|~-]") -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805192429.ge2...@p12n.org
Processed: Re: DeprecationWarning: socket.ssl() is deprecated
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 546659 patch Bug #546659 [offlineimap] DeprecationWarning: socket.ssl() is deprecated Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 546659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128103621425428.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#546659: DeprecationWarning: socket.ssl() is deprecated
Hi all, On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 21:24, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > tags 546659 patch > thanks > > Nicolas's patch assumes python 2.6. That's fine for Debian, but maybe > not for upstream. This one seems to work. > > Peter > > > --- imaplibutil.py > +++ imaplibutil.py > @@ -169,7 +169,10 @@ > if last_error != 0: > # FIXME > raise socket.error(last_error) > - self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) > + if (sys.version_info[0] == 2 and sys.version_info[1] >= 6) or > sys.version_info[0] >= 3: > + self.sslobj = ssl.wrap_socket(self.sock, self.keyfile, > self.certfile) > + else: > + self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) > self.sslobj = sslwrapper(self.sslobj) > > mustquote = re.compile(r"[^\w!#$%&'+,.:;<=>?^`|~-]") A nicer way to do that is via tuple comparison (not correctly indented only mocking): if sys.version_info[0:2] < (2,6) self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) else: self.sslobj = ssl.wrap_socket(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin9dku2gdgrpvnottka7nwgv=m11_ga-kpcn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#546659: DeprecationWarning: socket.ssl() is deprecated
[Sandro Tosi] > A nicer way to do that is via tuple comparison (not correctly indented > only mocking): > > if sys.version_info[0:2] < (2,6) > self.sslobj = socket.ssl(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) > else: > self.sslobj = ssl.wrap_socket(self.sock, self.keyfile, self.certfile) Could be. I don't really know Python. If that's better, it's what should also be done at the top of the same file, the 'import ssl' line. That's where I ripped off the 'if' statement. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805195044.gf2...@p12n.org
