Processing of tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_amd64.changes
tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.dsc tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.tar.gz tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nmsrr-ct...@ries.debian.org
tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.dsc to main/t/tla-buildpackage/tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.dsc tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.tar.gz to main/t/tla-buildpackage/tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.tar.gz tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_all.deb to main/t/tla-buildpackage/tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_all.deb Override entries for your package: tla-buildpackage_0.9.14.dsc - source vcs tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_all.deb - optional vcs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 571483 571758 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nmsu0-0001ie...@ries.debian.org
tla-buildpackage override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): tla-buildpackage_0.9.14_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says vcs. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nmsu8-0001jg...@ries.debian.org
Bug#352788: marked as done (untex: -u option should default to using the current locale's charset)
Your message dated Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:23:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#352788: fixed in untex 1:1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #352788,
regarding untex: -u option should default to using the current locale's charset
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
352788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: untex
Version: 9210-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Short story: using -u option in a utf-8 terminal doesn't work.
Using it alone in a latin1 terminal doesn't work either, one has to set
-uiso.
This is a bit sad with nowadays standards :)
Untex should rather call
setlocale(LC_ALL,"")
and then use the usual localized functions for printing characters:
printf("%lc",L'ü');
and remember to add -finput-charset=latin1 or -finput-charset=utf-8
according to your source charset.
or simply
printf("%lc",L'\u00FC');
(but this is more cryptic :) )
If the user really wants ibm charset, well he can just compile a locale
for this...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: lang=fr...@euro, lc_ctype=fr...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages untex depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
untex recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Samuel Thibault
tohi.cybercable.fr (212.198.0.3) si une personne se reconnait derriere
cette adresse que ce soit un pirate ou une victime qu'il se manifeste,
cette personne pourrait bien etre un petit malin
-+- Fred in NPC : Maman, y a le routeur qui veut me hacker -+-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: untex
Source-Version: 1:1.2-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
untex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
untex_1.2-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/u/untex/untex_1.2-1.debian.tar.gz
untex_1.2-1.dsc
to main/u/untex/untex_1.2-1.dsc
untex_1.2-1_i386.deb
to main/u/untex/untex_1.2-1_i386.deb
untex_1.2.orig.tar.gz
to main/u/untex/untex_1.2.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 352...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jari Aalto (supplier of updated untex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:25:54 +0200
Source: untex
Binary: untex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jari Aalto
Changed-By: Jari Aalto
Description:
untex - remove LaTeX commands from input
Closes: 352788 547222
Changes:
untex (1:1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes: #547222).
* New upstream release; forced to use epoch.
* Move to packaging format "3.0 (quilt)".
* debian/clean
- New file.
* debian/compat
- New file.
* debian/control
- (Build-Depends): Add debhelper
- (Description): rewrite long part.
- (Homepage): New field.
- (Standards-Version): Update to 3.8.4.
- (Vcs-*): new fields.
* debian/copyright
- Update full layout to follow generic template.
- (downloaded from): Update upstream URL.
- (License): update from untex.c
* debian/patches
- (Number 10): Convert inline changes to a patch.
- (Number 20): Document problems in BUGS section of manual page.
(Closes: #352788).
* debian/pod2man.mk
- New file. Convert original Debian untex.1 from previous version
into debian/untex.1.pod for later reference.
* debian/source/format
- New file.
* debian/substvars
- Delete debhelper leftover file.
* debian/untex.install
- New file.
* debian/untex.1.pod
- New manual page.
* debian/untex.manpages
- New file.
* debian/untex.prerm
- Add DEBHELPER token (lintian).
* debian/rules
- Convert to use dh(1).
* debian/watch
- New file.
* Makefile
- Delete non-upstream file.
* untex.1
- Deleted original Debian manual fro
Bug#572379: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: sdd |1.52-14 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; Low Popcon; Alternative with essential=yes exist; unmaintained; written by you know who -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 572...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/572379 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Torsten Werner (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1nmwzm-00072q...@ries.debian.org
Processed: tagging 553624
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 553624 + pending Bug #553624 [src:adesklets] [adesklets] FTBFS with binutils-gold Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.126765631517664.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
