Bug#557792: capisuite: uses pythonX.Y/site-packages for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-24 Thread Jakub Wilk

Source: capisuite
Version: 0.4.5-9
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6 dist-packages

Hello,

When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from
Debian experimental (and with python2.6 as the default one), your binary
package contained these files:

[capisuite_0.4.5-9_amd64.deb]
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cs_helpers.py


This is an indication of a broken package: Python >= 2.6 does not
look for modules into /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/ anymore, but
uses /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages/ instead.

How to fix it?
==
* if your package is using python-central:
  - add "XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}" to all binary packages
that ship Python modules (.py files) or extensions (.so, including
_d.so) in debian/control, check if it's enough,
  - try to convert to python-support[1], check if it's enough,
* add --install-layout=deb to setup.py call and bump minimum required
  python{,-all,all-dev} build dependency to 2.5.4-1~, check if it's enough
* ask for help on #debian-python or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/central2support

--
Jakub Wilk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#504524: hit this bug with PdfLicenseManager

2009-11-24 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
If you need yet another app to test-drive your solutions:

http://wiki.creativecommons.org/PdfLicenseManager

I am running awesome 3.4.1-1

few times I've got that java app started with actual content
(buttons/drop-downs) painted in the window nicely but not reacting. Most
of the time, it starts just with blank window and does nothing and does
not react to anything.

I've tried all of the following alternatives:
$> sudo update-alternatives --config java  
There are 4 choices for the alternative java (providing /usr/bin/java).
 
  SelectionPath  Priority   Status

  0/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java   1061  auto mode
  1/usr/bin/gij-4.3   43manual mode
  2/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java   1061  manual mode
* 3/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java   63manual mode
  4/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/bin/java 1043  manual mode

with or without AWT_TOOLKIT=MToolkit

-- 
  .-.
=--   /v\  =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko  /(   )\   ICQ#: 60653192
   Linux User^^-^^[17]





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#557822: libplist: uses pythonX.Y/site-packages for Python >= 2.6

2009-11-24 Thread Jakub Wilk

Source: libplist
Version: 0.13-2
Severity: minor
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6 dist-packages

Hello,

When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from
Debian experimental (and with python2.6 as the default one), your binary
package contained these files:

[libplist0-dbg_0.13-2_amd64.deb]
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/libplist/_PList.so


This is an indication of a broken package: Python >= 2.6 does not
look for modules into /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/ anymore, but
uses /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages/ instead.

How to fix it?
==
* if your package is using python-central:
  - add "XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}" to all binary packages
that ship Python modules (.py files) or extensions (.so, including
_d.so) in debian/control, check if it's enough,
  - try to convert to python-support[1], check if it's enough,
* add --install-layout=deb to setup.py call and bump minimum required
  python{,-all,all-dev} build dependency to 2.5.4-1~, check if it's enough
* ask for help on #debian-python or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/central2support

--
Jakub Wilk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#554557: patch hint

2009-11-24 Thread Pietro Battiston
Reminder (for me)/hint (for anybody): this is solved by replacing the
line

LIBS =  @LIBS@

with

LIBS =  @LIBS@ -lz

in src/Makefile.in.

Pietro


signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente


Processed: patch

2009-11-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 552834 + confirmed patch
Bug #552834 [src:metamail] metamail: FTBFS: uue.c:33: error: conflicting types 
for 'getline'
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of mtink_1.0.16-2_amd64.changes

2009-11-24 Thread Archive Administrator
mtink_1.0.16-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  mtink_1.0.16-2.dsc
  mtink_1.0.16-2.diff.gz
  mtink-doc_1.0.16-2_all.deb
  mtink_1.0.16-2_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: patch 552830

2009-11-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 552862 + patch
Bug #552862 [src:postman] postman: FTBFS: cgi-lib.c:238: error: conflicting 
types for 'getline'
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #552862 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#552834: patch

2009-11-24 Thread Ruben Molina
tags 552834 + confirmed patch
thanks

Hi, I can confirm this FTBFS on i386 too...
The following patch seems to fix the issue.

Regards,
  Ruben Molina
--- metamail-2.7.orig/metamail/uue.c
+++ metamail-2.7/metamail/uue.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 }
 
 
-getline (buf, size, fp)
+mygetline (buf, size, fp)
 char *buf;
 int size;
 FILE *fp;
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 char buf[63];
 
 while (1) {
-	if (getline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
+	if (mygetline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
 	fprintf (stderr, "Premature EOF!\n");
 	return;
 	}
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 	}
 }	
 while (1) {
-	if (getline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
+	if (mygetline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
 	fprintf (stderr, "Premature EOF!\n");
 	return;
 	}
--- metamail-2.7.orig/src/metamail/uue.c
+++ metamail-2.7/src/metamail/uue.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 }
 
 
-getline (buf, size, fp)
+mygetline (buf, size, fp)
 char *buf;
 int size;
 FILE *fp;
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 char buf[63];
 
 while (1) {
-	if (getline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
+	if (mygetline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
 	fprintf (stderr, "Premature EOF!\n");
 	return;
 	}
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 	}
 }	
 while (1) {
-	if (getline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
+	if (mygetline (buf, sizeof buf, infp) < 0) {
 	fprintf (stderr, "Premature EOF!\n");
 	return;
 	}


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente