Bug#492481: marked as done (gnochm: build-depend on autotools-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#492481: fixed in gnochm 0.9.11-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #492481,
regarding gnochm: build-depend on autotools-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492481: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492481
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnochm
Version: 0.9.11-2
Severity: minor

Hello,
please build-depend on autotools-dev so to remove lintian errors:

E: gnochm source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess 2003-06-17
E: gnochm source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.sub 2003-06-18

Thanks,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gnochm depends on:
ii  gconf2  2.22.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  python  2.5.2-1  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-chm  0.8.4-0.1+b1 Python binding for CHMLIB
ii  python-glade2   2.12.1-6 GTK+ bindings: Glade support
ii  python-gnome2   2.22.0-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk
ii  python-gtk2 2.12.1-6 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
ii  python-gtkhtml2 2.19.1-2 Python bindings for the GtkHTML 2 
ii  scrollkeeper0.3.14-16A free electronic cataloging syste
ii  shared-mime-info0.30-2   FreeDesktop.org shared MIME databa

gnochm recommends no packages.

gnochm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnochm
Source-Version: 0.9.11-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnochm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 492...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tony Palma  (supplier of updated gnochm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:21:39 -0500
Source: gnochm
Binary: gnochm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tony Palma 
Changed-By: Tony Palma 
Description: 
 gnochm - CHM file viewer for GNOME
Closes: 471411 492481 503075
Changes: 
 gnochm (0.9.11-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer. Closes: #471411
   * debian/compat. Bump to 5, "deprecated-debhelper-compat-version"
   * debian/control
 - Add autotools-dev to build-depends. Closes: #492481
 - Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.2
   * debian/patches/04_full-path.patch
 - Added. Thanks to Kornilios Kourtis. Closes: #503075.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 ff084ba22311aaea5602de4288ca64e4a381 1070 gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 561a8d07039255740251e1d1061ab9148df9907b 9015 gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 9bae4a6e3af4c13aadd2510cea57c164c7beb115 161736 gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3abae3bc4a15861a7ab027d3c646175752d66afe0dbdaaae3d3869bca9de0f14 1070 
gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 30c340ad1def7cb0ddcde95994f4dc5c451885877965fb1506977fca18845df0 9015 
gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 5480617f16d55479483c11f86871a0ed6aff89a84942cc578172347631ecfc13 161736 
gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
Files: 
 c1c99451e511d8aea83af2d4ebec87cf 1070 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 08edbbc731d481787fa34b1db2da85cd 9015 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 91e820d7ceaea5f8455d6bdcfbb22b25 161736 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqKVZQACgkQbMaawmho9B9nJwCeMqaEjHaPwe0r9cM4B6Eixo0o
0y0An1Fgp5ogMcHKLfgNJBEzKnfcri1i
=oWks
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#503075: marked as done (gnochm: ?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#503075: fixed in gnochm 0.9.11-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #503075,
regarding gnochm: ?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
503075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnochm
Version: 0.9.11-2
Severity: normal

Hi, 

Recent files are not stored with absolute paths, which is a minor
inconvenience. 

Please consider applying this simple patch:
--- gnochm.py.in.default2008-10-22 13:51:57.0 +0300
+++ gnochm.py.in2008-10-22 13:52:16.0 +0300
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@
 length=client.get_int('/apps/gnochm/preferences/recent_size')
 if length < 1:
 length = 1
+name = os.path.abspath(name)
 if name in recent_list:
 recent_list.remove(name)
 recent_list.insert(0, name)



Thanks,


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnochm
Source-Version: 0.9.11-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnochm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 503...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tony Palma  (supplier of updated gnochm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:21:39 -0500
Source: gnochm
Binary: gnochm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tony Palma 
Changed-By: Tony Palma 
Description: 
 gnochm - CHM file viewer for GNOME
Closes: 471411 492481 503075
Changes: 
 gnochm (0.9.11-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer. Closes: #471411
   * debian/compat. Bump to 5, "deprecated-debhelper-compat-version"
   * debian/control
 - Add autotools-dev to build-depends. Closes: #492481
 - Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.2
   * debian/patches/04_full-path.patch
 - Added. Thanks to Kornilios Kourtis. Closes: #503075.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 ff084ba22311aaea5602de4288ca64e4a381 1070 gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 561a8d07039255740251e1d1061ab9148df9907b 9015 gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 9bae4a6e3af4c13aadd2510cea57c164c7beb115 161736 gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3abae3bc4a15861a7ab027d3c646175752d66afe0dbdaaae3d3869bca9de0f14 1070 
gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 30c340ad1def7cb0ddcde95994f4dc5c451885877965fb1506977fca18845df0 9015 
gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 5480617f16d55479483c11f86871a0ed6aff89a84942cc578172347631ecfc13 161736 
gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb
Files: 
 c1c99451e511d8aea83af2d4ebec87cf 1070 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3.dsc
 08edbbc731d481787fa34b1db2da85cd 9015 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3.diff.gz
 91e820d7ceaea5f8455d6bdcfbb22b25 161736 gnome optional gnochm_0.9.11-3_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqKVZQACgkQbMaawmho9B9nJwCeMqaEjHaPwe0r9cM4B6Eixo0o
0y0An1Fgp5ogMcHKLfgNJBEzKnfcri1i
=oWks
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#540060: version script commands not handled correctly in sid/squeeze

[Matthias Klose]

severity 540751 normal
tag 540751 + wontfix
thanks

the proposed solution is to avoid the two global wildcard matches.

upstream comment:
The linker script shown has two global wildcard matches.  As the ld info doc
says, this is slightly crazy.  They both match "test_new", so which one should
ld choose?  The most specific match?  How do you do that in general?  eg. is
"tes*" a better match than "*new" for "test_new"?  (If we make a special case
for "*", why stop there?)

From section 3.9, ld info manual:
   When the linker finds a symbol defined in a library which is not
specifically bound to a version node, it will effectively bind it to an
unspecified base version of the library.  You can bind all otherwise
unspecified symbols to a given version node by using `global: *;'
somewhere in the version script.  Note that it's slightly crazy to use
wildcards in a global spec except on the last version node.  Global
wildcards elsewhere run the risk of accidentally adding symbols to the
set exported for an old version.  That's wrong since older versions
ought to have a fixed set of symbols.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processing of agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.changes

[Archive Administrator]

agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
  agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
  agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

[Archive Administrator]

Accepted:
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb - optional libdevel
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc - source libs
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb - optional libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 539631 542034 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#103763: marked as done (Bad texturing with 3dfx cards)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:52:38 +0100
with message-id <1250625158.609383.4662.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ssystem has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #103763,
regarding Bad texturing with 3dfx cards
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
103763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=103763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ssystem
Version: 1.6-11

Most of the planets I've looked at have horribly rendered textures,
except for jupiter (which looks nice).  I don't know what's wrong,
the textures are all in /usr/lib/ssystem and fine.  I am using a
voodoo3.  Please take a looksee sometime, this looks like a really
neat program.

-- 
;;
;; Matthew Danish email: mdan...@andrew.cmu.edu ;;
;; OpenPGP public key available from:'finger m...@db.debian.org' ;;
;;

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.6-18+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/103763 in Debian BTS
against the package ssystem. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/352709. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#231058: marked as done (reproducible segfault in incremental mode)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.051883.4726.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #231058,
regarding reproducible segfault in incremental mode
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
231058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.18-7
Severity: normal

Starting program: /usr/bin/jikes -nowarn +E -classpath [big classpath] ++ 
@.srclist

[.srclist contains 1133 java source files]

Incremental: Enter to continue or q + Enter to quit: 
[modify a file]
[press enter]

ok...

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x in ?? ()
(gdb) 

This is after recompiling jikes with debug symbols.  Before that, the stack
trace was also useless, but longer.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mizar 2.4.24-deb1-skas3-1 #1 Thu Jan 8 11:19:59 PST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages jikes depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-11  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc11:3.3.3-0pre3 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-0pre3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information


-- 
 - mdz

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/231058 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#265462: marked as done (Jikes should generate classes that can be used by JDK 1.3 by default)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.291537.4736.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #265462,
regarding Jikes should generate classes that can be used by JDK 1.3 by default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
265462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265462
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.21.1-2
Severity: important

The default target for generated class files is JDK 1.4 (class version 
48.0) which makes these classes unusable by JDK 1.3. A lot of the Java 
packages in main are built using Jikes so if they are now rebuilt with 
the latest version, the result will be different.


This has affected tomcat4 because some of its dependencies were rebuilt 
with the new Jikes version, see e.g. #263412 and #265253. Please change 
Jikes to create classes suitable for JDK 1.3 by default when no JDK 1.4 
features (i.e. assertions) are used.


Stefan


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/265462 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#195478: marked as done (jikes: segfault attempting to compile tau 2.12.8)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.004176.4724.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #195478,
regarding jikes: segfault attempting to compile tau 2.12.8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
195478: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=195478
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.18-4
Severity: normal

You can get the tau source either from sid or from
http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/paracomp/tau/tauprofile/dist/ (I
don't modify anything (yet) in the java sources.

Experimenting with various free compilers on the java code in tau, I
notice that at all wrappers cause jikes to end in a segfault, as
exemplified here (this is a modified jikes-gij to force the use of the
3.3 lib - see other report; jikes-classpath, -sablevm and -kaffe also
coredump, but after a much longer error log):

tau-2.12.8/tools/src/jRacy[771]$ jikes-gij *.java

Found 4 semantic errors compiling "StaticMainWindow.java":

   123. JMenuBar mainMenu = new JMenuBar();
^^
*** Semantic Error: The constructor "JMenuBar();" in type 
"javax.swing.JMenuBar" has default access and is not accessible here.


   305. setJMenuBar(mainMenu);
^---^
*** Semantic Error: The method "setJMenuBar" in type "javax.swing.JFrame" has 
default access and is not accessible here.


   316. contentPane = getContentPane();
  ^--^
*** Semantic Error: The method "getContentPane" in type "javax.swing.JFrame" 
has default access and is not accessible here.


  1097. JMenuBar jMenuBar = getJMenuBar();
^---^
*** Semantic Error: The method "getJMenuBar" in type "javax.swing.JFrame" has 
default access and is not accessible here.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)



The gdb backtrace does not look very helpful, but you'll see for
yourself (/me is suspecting stack corruption :)

(gdb) bt
#0  0x08690540 in ?? ()
#1  0x080ea834 in strcpy ()
#2  0x080ec1ad in strcpy ()
#3  0x080e687f in strcpy ()
#4  0x0805be15 in strcpy ()
#5  0x0805aa8f in strcpy ()
#6  0x0806717d in strcpy ()
#7  0x08068641 in strcpy ()
#8  0x08140670 in strcpy ()
#9  0x0809ec53 in strcpy ()
#10 0x0809da50 in strcpy ()
#11 0x0809a51e in strcpy ()
#12 0x0811ffda in strcpy ()
#13 0x0811f648 in strcpy ()
#14 0x40111a51 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.4.19+mppe-k6 #1 SMP Fri Nov 15 20:50:49 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages jikes depends on:
ii  gij-3.3 [java-virtual-machine 1:3.3-2The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  java-common   0.20   Base of all Java packages
ii  kaffe [java-virtual-machine]  1:1.0.7-3  A JVM to run Java bytecode
ii  libc6 2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:3.3-2GCC support library
ii  libstdc++51:3.3-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  sablevm [java-virtual-machine 1.0.8-4Free implementation of Java Virtua

-- no debconf information


-- 
Yann Dirson |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related:  |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/195478 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#170709: marked as done (jikes has stupid message)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id <1250625410.755430.4715.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #170709,
regarding jikes has stupid message
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
170709: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: jikes
version: 1:1.17-1

--
build:
[javac] Compiling 70 source files to
/home.local/adam/brainfood/intranet/build/java/classes
[javac]
/home.local/adam/brainfood/intranet/modules/vfs/src/java/com/brainfood/vfs/jdbc/delegates/JDBCDelegateImpl.java:13:
com.brainfood.vfs.jdbc.impl.JDBCDelegateImpl should be declared abstract; it
does not define getType(java.lang.String) in
com.brainfood.vfs.jdbc.impl.JDBCDelegateImpl
[javac] public class JDBCDelegateImpl
[javac]^
[javac] 1 error
--

A better message would be:

--
build:
[javac] Compiling 70 source files to
/home.local/adam/brainfood/intranet/build/java/classes
[javac]
/home.local/adam/brainfood/intranet/modules/vfs/src/java/com/brainfood/vfs/jdbc/delegates/JDBCDelegateImpl.java:13:
com.brainfood.vfs.jdbc.delegates.JDBCDelegateImpl should be declared abstract;
it does not define getType(java.lang.String), which is defined in
com.brainfood.vfs.jdbc.JDBCDelegate
[javac] public class JDBCDelegateImpl
[javac]^
[javac] 1 error
--

The first error message given above repeats the enclosing class way too many
times(the filename, twice for the full name, and once for the class definition
stanza).

In this case, JDBCDelegate is an interface.  This same error message should
also be applied to parent classes.

Also, there are probably several other messages, that are equally unhelpful,
in their output.  I just don't have any examples right now.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/170709 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#374947: marked as done (jikes: Cheksum mismatch even after fresh reinstall)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id <1250625410.836198.4718.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #374947,
regarding jikes: Cheksum mismatch even after fresh reinstall
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
374947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22-4
Severity: minor


I run debsums now and then, looking for signs of intrusion or disk
errors.  When a package have errors, I reinstall it with
apt-get --reinstall install package
and retests. Suggested fix: update the wrong checksums.
This package installs with the following
checksum errors:

debsums: checksum mismatch jikes file /usr/share/doc/jikes/copyright
debsums: checksum mismatch jikes file /usr/share/doc/jikes/changelog.gz
debsums: checksum mismatch jikes file
/usr/share/doc/jikes/changelog.Debian.gz

Helge Hafting

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (800, 'stable'), (700, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-mm1
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages jikes depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.1-5  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++64.1.1-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages jikes recommends:
ii  jikes-classpath   2:0.91-3   wrapper for jikes using classes fr
ii  jikes-gij 1:1.22-4   Wrapper for jikes using GNU GIJ cl
ii  jikes-kaffe   2:1.1.6-3  Wrapper for jikes using Kaffe clas

-- debconf-show failed

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/374947 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#539631: marked as done ((agsync_0.2-pre-10/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#539631: fixed in agsync 0.2-pre-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #539631,
regarding (agsync_0.2-pre-10/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
539631: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539631
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: agsync
Version: 0.2-pre-10
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsm...@debian.org
Usertags: avr32

Hi,

Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:

  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/build.php?pkg=agsync&arch=avr32&ver=0.2-pre-10

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith b...@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer bradsm...@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347   D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: agsync
Source-Version: 0.2-pre-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
agsync, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 539...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cyril Brulebois  (supplier of updated agsync package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:12:50 +0200
Source: agsync
Binary: agsync-dev agsync
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2-pre-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois 
Description: 
 agsync - Synchronization mediator for AvantGo and Pocket PC
 agsync-dev - Development files for AvantGo and Pocket PC synchronization
Closes: 539631 542034
Changes: 
 agsync (0.2-pre-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add libhal-dev to Build-Depends, making it explicit, and fixing the
 FTBFS on at least kfreebsd-* (Closes: #542034).
   * Copy config.{guess,sub} from /usr/share/misc before running
 ./configure, and remove them in the clean target. That should be fix
 the FTBFS on avr32, thanks to Bradley Smith for pointing this out
 (Closes: #539631).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8b79be2477b377d21840ab58647ce66828087a2e 1081 agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 376b0001518fe92f01135bb13051710ef261fe80 286725 agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 15567808b7902aff86d70d5945c0c71132197e25 86992 agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 9604e31758f2f5093f73318916389fe9206abda6 75854 agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8ffe79f792f4323990474e80aba72b2adfc9c8447f5ee924310678a426e3 1081 
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 18bfc58b5bd558ebd10c4db1ab38bf9d4dd4e96776bced502ce7f09eb71d0f7a 286725 
agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 977844978ae7e29a9103980d2035a2e62025e2ee0433a10ed802189477bf9df2 86992 
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 130c979c80de1db555e8fd49439d3201bb93acab87b8df59a216866985e81901 75854 
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
Files: 
 9aa806d9c347d86531ede5eeb0f744b7 1081 libs optional agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 a18f0a000302aef0cdbe62b674201f53 286725 libs optional agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 9e851243018885ea730bdf6b9e30046b 86992 libdevel optional 
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 dd88a25e02d81ba5501bffa06df980cf 75854 libs optional 
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqK/+oACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd12dgCgwVcfwOpb4pGZuj0oCSxcInrz
yuUAmwXoRvdAu4BPjb1+ouj1lg1sWGAH
=h9WO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#155818: marked as done (jikes: Producing bogus compile )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.144386.4730.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #155818,
regarding jikes: Producing bogus compile 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
155818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=155818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: jikes
Version: 1.16-1
Severity: important

Looks like the latest jikes version is producing some bogus code.  I'm
getting this error (which I have never seen before):

java.lang.ClassFormatError: com/globalretailtech/pos/events/LogOn
(Invalid start_pc/length in local var table)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux eeyore 2.4.19-rc3-ac4 #1 Tue Jul 30 21:44:21 EDT 2002 
i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux

-- 
@James LewisMoss|  Blessed Be!
@http://www.lewismoss.org/~dres |  Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/155818 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#307444: marked as done (segfault reading /usr/share/java/struts-1.1.jar/org/apache/struts/action(ActionForm.class))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id <1250625410.665720.4713.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #307444,
regarding segfault reading 
/usr/share/java/struts-1.1.jar/org/apache/struts/action(ActionForm.class)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
307444: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307444
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22+200505010-1

I get this segfault building projects that employ struts, using jikes & 
kaffe


I tried libstruts1.1-java & Apache's binary distribution - same problem

I used jikes cvs head, 20050501 - 
http://cgi.sfu.ca/~jdbates/debian/pool/jikes/


- kaffe 1.1.5-3 & libstruts1.1-java 1.1-2

Any idea what gives? Can I provide more information?

Thanks!

Jack



gdb-200505011
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/307444 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#301446: marked as done (jikes: Hangs during build on amd64.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id <1250625410.952395.4722.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #301446,
regarding jikes: Hangs during build on amd64.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
301446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=301446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22-2

Hi,

When doing some build tests on amd64, I had 2 package that failed
because jikes seems to be running forever.

The 2 packages that failed where javacc and
libcommons-collections3-java.

When building javacc the last few lines that get printed are:
[javac]281.   for (java.util.Enumeration enum = 
rexprlist.elements(); enum.hasMoreElements();) {
[javac]
  ^--^
[javac] *** Lexical Warning: The use of "enum" as an identifier is 
deprecated, as it will be a keyword once -source 1.5 is implemented.

A strace of it showed this:
6373  write(2, "s", 1 
6375  mprotect(0x14c6000, 20480, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC 6373  <... write resumed> ) = 1
6375  <... mprotect resumed> )  = 0
6373  write(2, "o", 1 
6375  write(1, "[javac]
  ^--^\n", 87 
6373  <... write resumed> ) = 1
6373  write(2, "u", 1)  = 1
[...]
6373  write(2, "e", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, "n", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, "u", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, "m", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, ".", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, "h", 1)  = 1
6373  write(2, "a", 1 
6375  <... write resumed> ) = 87
6375  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [RT_7], [], 8) = 0
6375  rt_sigpending([]) = 0
6375  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
6375  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [RT_7], [], 8) = 0
6375  rt_sigpending([]) = 0
6375  rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
6375  _exit(0)  = ?

The build of libcommons-collections3-java showed something simular.

I have no clue about what might be wrong.  The only hint I
can give is that is seems to be using threads and on amd64
we do not have linuxthreads only nptl.


Kurt


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/301446 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#306348: marked as done (erroneous inner class error building eclipse 3.1M6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.250930.4734.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #306348,
regarding erroneous inner class error building eclipse 3.1M6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
306348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22-2

I got this error building eclipse 3.1M6 using jikes - like so:  
"JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/kaffe ./build -os linux -ws gtk -arch ppc"



[...]
[javac] Found 2 semantic errors compiling  
"/home/jablko/tmp/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.core.runtime/src/org/ 
eclipse/core/internal/registry/ExtensionRegistry.java":


[javac] 60. ListenerInfo  
listenerInfo = (ListenerInfo) listenerInfos[i];

[javac] ^--^
[javac] *** Semantic Error: The static type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry$ExtensionEventDisp 
atcherJob" must use a qualified name to access the non-static member  
type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry$ListenerInfo" of  
the enclosing type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry".



[javac] 60. ListenerInfo  
listenerInfo = (ListenerInfo) listenerInfos[i];
[javac]  
 ^--^
[javac] *** Semantic Error: The static type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry$ExtensionEventDisp 
atcherJob" must use a qualified name to access the non-static member  
type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry$ListenerInfo" of  
the enclosing type  
"org.eclipse.core.internal.registry.ExtensionRegistry".

[...]


"ExtensionRegistry.java" looks OK to me - I think the problem is jikes  
& the inner classes of this file


I rebuilt jikes using cvs head on 20050423, with the same result

I couldn't find a relevant bug filed against jikes on sourceforge

Here is the complete log of building eclipse -  
http://www.sfu.ca/~jdbates/tmp/jikes/200504250/build.log


Many thanks for maintaining jikes!

Jack


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/306348 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#542034: marked as done (agsync: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD, maybe elsewhere, missing B-D on libhal-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#542034: fixed in agsync 0.2-pre-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #542034,
regarding agsync: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD, maybe elsewhere, missing B-D on 
libhal-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
542034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: agsync
Version: 0.2-pre-10
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

Hi,

this package FTBFS because it tries to link using -lhal without
explicitly Build-Depending on libhal-dev. It might have gone unnoticed
if/when others B-D pulled it. It at least occurs on GNU/kFreeBSD those
days.

I'll probably prepare a QA upload to fix this, but opening this bug for
reference.

Mraw,
KiBi.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: agsync
Source-Version: 0.2-pre-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
agsync, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/agsync/agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 542...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cyril Brulebois  (supplier of updated agsync package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:12:50 +0200
Source: agsync
Binary: agsync-dev agsync
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2-pre-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois 
Description: 
 agsync - Synchronization mediator for AvantGo and Pocket PC
 agsync-dev - Development files for AvantGo and Pocket PC synchronization
Closes: 539631 542034
Changes: 
 agsync (0.2-pre-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add libhal-dev to Build-Depends, making it explicit, and fixing the
 FTBFS on at least kfreebsd-* (Closes: #542034).
   * Copy config.{guess,sub} from /usr/share/misc before running
 ./configure, and remove them in the clean target. That should be fix
 the FTBFS on avr32, thanks to Bradley Smith for pointing this out
 (Closes: #539631).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8b79be2477b377d21840ab58647ce66828087a2e 1081 agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 376b0001518fe92f01135bb13051710ef261fe80 286725 agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 15567808b7902aff86d70d5945c0c71132197e25 86992 agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 9604e31758f2f5093f73318916389fe9206abda6 75854 agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8ffe79f792f4323990474e80aba72b2adfc9c8447f5ee924310678a426e3 1081 
agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 18bfc58b5bd558ebd10c4db1ab38bf9d4dd4e96776bced502ce7f09eb71d0f7a 286725 
agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 977844978ae7e29a9103980d2035a2e62025e2ee0433a10ed802189477bf9df2 86992 
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 130c979c80de1db555e8fd49439d3201bb93acab87b8df59a216866985e81901 75854 
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
Files: 
 9aa806d9c347d86531ede5eeb0f744b7 1081 libs optional agsync_0.2-pre-11.dsc
 a18f0a000302aef0cdbe62b674201f53 286725 libs optional agsync_0.2-pre-11.diff.gz
 9e851243018885ea730bdf6b9e30046b 86992 libdevel optional 
agsync-dev_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb
 dd88a25e02d81ba5501bffa06df980cf 75854 libs optional 
agsync_0.2-pre-11_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqK/+oACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd12dgCgwVcfwOpb4pGZuj0oCSxcInrz
yuUAmwXoRvdAu4BPjb1+ouj1lg1sWGAH
=h9WO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---

Bug#537436: marked as done ((jikes_1:1.22-7/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess})

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.190823.4732.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #537436,
regarding (jikes_1:1.22-7/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
537436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22-7
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsm...@debian.org
Usertags: avr32

Hi,

Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.

Full build logs available:

  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/build.php?pkg=jikes&arch=avr32&ver=1:1.22-7

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith b...@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer bradsm...@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347   D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/537436 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#264073: marked as done (jikes: Gets assertion failure building kissme)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id <1250625410.908664.4720.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #264073,
regarding jikes: Gets assertion failure building kissme
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
264073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.21.1-1
Severity: important

>From my kissme build log:

...
cd classes ; \
  /usr/bin/jikes +U -classpath 
/tmp/buildd/kissme-0.0.31/classes:/usr/share/classpath/glibj.zip \
`find gnu jos plava java teaseme kissme/vm -name '*.java'`
jikes: symbol.h:1110: bool TypeSymbol::IsInner() const: Assertion `(! 
IsLocal()&& ! Anonymous()) || (IsNested() && ! ACC_STATIC())' failed.
/bin/sh: line 1: 14262 Aborted /usr/bin/jikes +U -classpath 
/tmp/buildd/kissme-0.0.31/classes:/usr/share/classpath/glibj.zip `find gnu jos 
plava java teaseme kissme/vm -name '*.java'`
make[3]: *** [build-classes] Error 134
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/kissme-0.0.31'
make[2]: *** [all-local] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/kissme-0.0.31'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/kissme-0.0.31'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages jikes depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.4-7The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
schep...@math.berkeley.eduhaven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.22-7+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/264073 in Debian BTS
against the package jikes. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508366. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#338176: marked as done (jikes: Jikes fails to compile freemind 0.8.0, without any error message.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:51 +0100
with message-id <1250625411.098769.4728.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package jikes has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #338176,
regarding jikes: Jikes fails to compile freemind 0.8.0, without any error 
message.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
338176: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338176
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jikes
Version: 1:1.22-3
Severity: important


Hi,

I tried to compile freemind 0.8.0 with kaffe 1.1.6, i.e. with jikes, and the 
compilation stops at some point without any error message, so that I'm stuck to 
find the reason for the error.

I attach the end of the output to this bug, and you can grab a copy of the 
development tree from http://eric.lavar.de/freemind.free3.tgz.

Thanks for your help,
Eric

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-5.99.sarge1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages jikes depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-3  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-3The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

Versions of packages jikes recommends:
ii  jikes-sablevm 1.11.3-1.1 Wrapper for jikes using classes fr

-- no debconf information
# /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath 
/usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/share/java/xmlParserAPIs.jar:/usr/lib/kaffe/lib/tools.jar
  -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true 
-Dcompile.optimize=true  -Dbuild.compiler=jikes clean

# /usr/lib/kaffe/bin/java -classpath 
/usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/share/java/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/share/java/xmlParserAPIs.jar:/usr/lib/kaffe/lib/tools.jar
  -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -d -v 
-Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true  -Dbuild.compiler=jikes   dist 
userdoc browser

[...]

Project base dir set to: /home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind
  [ant] calling target(s) [build] in build file 
/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_svg.xml
parsing buildfile /home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_svg.xml 
with URI =file:///home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_svg.xml
Project base dir set to: /home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind
Importing file build_import.xml from 
/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_svg.xml
parsing buildfile 
/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_import.xml with URI = 
file:///home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_import.xml
  [ant] Entering 
/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind/plugins/build_svg.xml...
Build sequence for target(s) `build' is [build]
Complete build sequence is [build, post, dist, ]

build:
 [echo] Plugins build on path .
[javac] plugins/svg/ExportPdf.java added as plugins/svg/ExportPdf.class 
doesn't exist.
[javac] plugins/svg/ExportSvg.java added as plugins/svg/ExportSvg.class 
doesn't exist.
[javac] plugins/svg/ExportVectorGraphic.java added as 
plugins/svg/ExportVectorGraphic.class doesn't exist.
[javac] Compiling 3 source files to 
/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/bin/classes
[javac] Using jikes compiler
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/rt.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/jce.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/Classes/jce.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/jsse.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/Classes/jsse.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/core.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/graphics.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/security.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/server.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/xml.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/Classes/classes.jar from path as it doesn't exist
dropping /usr/lib/kaffe/Classes/ui.jar from path as it doesn't exist
[javac] Compilation arguments:
[javac] '-sourcepath'
[javac] '/home/ericl/freemind-0.8.0+01/freemind'
[javac] '-d'
   

Bug#357529: marked as done (hostaddr is not an option for dctc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:04:49 +0100
with message-id <1250625889.580001.4870.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package dctc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #357529,
regarding hostaddr is not an option for dctc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
357529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dctc
Version: 0.85.9-4
Severity: normal


Although the man page says 
   -a, --hostaddr=HOSTIP
 IP of the host running this client (mandatory if
 using active mode) (default: IP  of  the  first
 network interface)
and the `dctc --help` output the same thing, I've found that this does not
work. The option should be requested as --hostip

>From src/main.c:
{"hostip",required_argument,NULL,'a'}, /* IP of the host running client */
   

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dctc depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.3 4.3.29-4.1  Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.8.6-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libxml2  2.6.23.dfsg.2-2 GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-9   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages dctc recommends:
ii  dcgui 0.80-5 Direct Connect Graphical client (G

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.85.9-5+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/357529 in Debian BTS
against the package dctc. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/334488. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#209096: marked as done (dctc: downloads stopped working on upgrade from 0.85.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:04:49 +0100
with message-id <1250625889.648304.4874.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package dctc has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #209096,
regarding dctc: downloads stopped working on upgrade from 0.85.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
209096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: dctc
Version: 0.85.5-1

Debian unstable. Recently upgraded dctc and dcgui from 0.85.2 and 0.73. 
Suddenly I cannot download. It just says Waiting. Uploads still work.
I verified that this is specific to 0.85.5/0.76 by downgrading to the 
old packages. Suddenly I could download.
I'm not sure that this is an upstream (dctc/dcgui developer) problem as 
I've seen no reports about it on the official forum 
(http://brainz.servebeer.com/phpBB2/index.php).



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.85.9-5+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/209096 in Debian BTS
against the package dctc. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/334488. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Schoko-lade essen macht fett

[Dr. Tanja Hissberger]

Gewichts Abnahme solllte heut-zu-tage simpel 
sein und auch schon Spaass bringen.

Testen sie dieese frische Schlankheitsmethode und erfahren sie, wie kinder
leicht es heute ist 16 Kilo in einem Monat abzu-nehmen.

Hier erhalten Sie Sie alle Infos, um bedenkenlos viel abzunehmen ohne auf
das Essen zu verzichten.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fruitdropvn4ktt

Laborgepruefte Qualitaet!

Mit angenehmen Gruessen
Dr. Gabi Schmidt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#498074: marked as done (ud: Don't sync() every filesystem every two minutes)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:35 +0100
with message-id <1250631815.968398.5835.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #498074,
regarding ud: Don't sync() every filesystem every two minutes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
498074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-21
Severity: normal

While figuring out what kills the performance of my system under
certain heavy disk loads, I figured out ud does AFAICT entirely
unnecessarily a full filesystem sync() on every filesystem every time
it updates the uptime record, which is once every two minutes.

A fdatasync() at most should be easily enough for the application.

Sami


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.3 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ud depends on:
ii  debianutils   2.30   Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6 2.7-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

ud recommends no packages.

ud suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/498074 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#41046: marked as done (ud: restarting ud screws the uptime.record)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:35 +0100
with message-id <1250631815.909884.5832.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #41046,
regarding ud: restarting ud screws the uptime.record
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
41046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=41046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-4
Severity: normal

Hi!

I just run ud -d and I got this output:

- Uptime for eagle -
Now  : 00:06:18 running Linux 2.2.10
One  : 58 day(s), 01:45:01 running Linux 2.0.36, ended Fri Jun 18 11:01:24 1999
Two  : 17 day(s), 02:16:27 running Linux 2.0.36, ended Fri Jul  9 11:26:40 1999
Three: 16 day(s), 22:59:08 running Linux 2.0.36, ended Fri Jul  9 08:09:24 1999

The second line is obviously just continuation of the record from the third
line.

This must have hapenned when I have run telinit 1 for maintanance purposes.
After I left the single user mode, ud was started again and considered the
uptime a new record.

I suggest that ud checks for such cases and does updates the original record
instead.

Patrik

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux eagle 2.2.10 #2 Fri Jul 9 12:06:17 CEST 1999 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages ud depends on:
ii  libc6   2.1.1-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/41046 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#75881: marked as done (ud: suggested hack for fixing bug # 41046)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:36 +0100
with message-id <1250631816.245847.5845.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #75881,
regarding ud: suggested hack for fixing bug # 41046
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
75881: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=75881
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-5
Severity: wishlist

This situation:

- Uptime for peon -
Now  : 49 day(s), 03:06:29 running Linux 2.2.16
One  : 61 day(s), 21:21:36 running Linux 2.2.14, ended Tue Jul 18 19:57:18 2000
Two  : 53 day(s), 18:52:23 running Linux 2.2.16, ended Sun Sep 10 15:30:10 2000
Three: 53 day(s), 18:52:01 running Linux 2.2.16, ended Sun Sep 10 15:29:48 2000

which happens when ud is restarted, whether the machine is booted or
not, could be worked around by either 

a) introducing a complicated check for whether its possible that two
uptimes are the same (the previous suggestion), or

b) by keeping more than three uptimes in the /etc/uptime.record file
and inviting the user to delete any any spurious records which crop up
(in, say, the BUGS section of the man page).

Glancing at the code, it doesn't seem like the second would be too
terribly difficult.  If I knew how to do it, I would ... 

Rob

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux peon 2.2.16 #1 Sun Jul 16 19:20:28 EDT 2000 i586

Versions of packages ud depends on:
ii  libc6 2.1.3-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- 
About the only thing on a farm that has an easy time is the dog.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/75881 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#493520: marked as done (ud needs better short description)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:36 +0100
with message-id <1250631816.063218.5837.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #493520,
regarding ud needs better short description
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
493520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493520
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-21
Severity: normal

Hi,

The short description for ud is not very informative and I
believe also not policy compliant.

Perhaps: "daemon for checking system uptime and keeping records" or 
something similar?


Thank you,

Barry deFreese
Debian QA



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/493520 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#289413: marked as done (ud: Template file parse problem)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:36 +0100
with message-id <1250631816.204746.5843.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #289413,
regarding ud: Template file parse problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
289413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289413
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-17
Severity: normal

Hi,

ud is outputting a blank file when i have a template file with some php
variables in it. ud works fine if you take out "$" from the php code but
then the php script won't work any more.

It would be nice if one could prefix the "$" in php code like this "\$"
and ud would skip over it.

Robert

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gw 2.4.28 #1 Thu Dec 9 23:19:12 EET 2004 i586
Locale: LANG=en_IE, LC_CTYPE=en_IE

Versions of packages ud depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/289413 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#460182: marked as done (ud: Upgrading 0.7.1-20 to 0.7.1-21 fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:36 +0100
with message-id <1250631816.145985.5841.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #460182,
regarding ud: Upgrading 0.7.1-20 to 0.7.1-21 fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
460182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460182
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-20
Severity: important


Hi,

An upgraded ud came down the pipe, but the upgrade fails. dselect transcript:

--
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  ud
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/26.3kB of archives.
After unpacking 4096B disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Reading changelogs...
apt-listchanges: Mailing root: apt-listchanges: changelogs for reidster
(Reading database ... 113003 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace ud 0.7.1-20 (using .../archives/ud_0.7.1-21_i386.deb) ...
Stopping uptime daemon: udinvoke-rc.d: initscript ud, action "stop" failed.
dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
Stopping uptime daemon: udinvoke-rc.d: initscript ud, action "stop" failed.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ud_0.7.1-21_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Starting uptime daemon: ud.

Now configure ud, using /usr/sbin/udconfig

Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/ud_0.7.1-21_i386.deb
[ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.0 ]
File updated: searched for 152 files, found 124
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Some errors occurred while unpacking. I'm going to configure the
packages that were installed. This may result in duplicate errors
or errors caused by missing dependencies. This is OK, only the errors
above this message are important. Please fix them and run [I]nstall again
Press enter to continue.
-

Also, the following appears in the syslog:

Jan 10 23:30:18 reidster ud[8936]: Uptime daemon starting...
Jan 10 23:30:18 reidster ud[8936]: Can't open stats file

Please let me know what questions I can answer to help resolve this. I'm also
happy to test potential fixes.

Thanks,

Reid


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ud depends on:
ii  debianutils   2.28.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6 2.7-5  GNU C Library: Shared libraries

ud recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/460182 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Bug#39573: marked as done (more configurability wished)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:43:36 +0100
with message-id <1250631816.106567.5839.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package ud has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #39573,
regarding more configurability wished
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
39573: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=39573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-3

ud only remembers the 3 last uptimes... I'd like it to remember at least
the 5 or 10 best uptimes.
Is it possible to get a configuration variable for this?

Cordialement,

-- 
- Vincent RENARDIAS  vinc...@{{ldsol,pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux:   http://www.openhardware.orgLogiciels du soleil: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org   Open Hardware:   http://www.linux-kheops.com -
---
-"Microsoft est à l'informatique ce que le grumeau est à la crépe..." -

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.1-21+rm

You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/39573 in Debian BTS
against the package ud. I'm closing it as fixed in *unstable*,
but it will remain open for older distributions.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/349833. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Processed: reassign 504789 to thttpd

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 504789 thttpd
Bug #504789 [logcheck-database] please accept this rule for thttpd
Bug reassigned from package 'logcheck-database' to 'thttpd'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions logcheck/1.2.68.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processing of defoma_0.11.10-1_amd64.changes

[Archive Administrator]

defoma_0.11.10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  defoma_0.11.10-1.dsc
  defoma_0.11.10-1.tar.gz
  defoma_0.11.10-1_all.deb
  defoma-doc_0.11.10-1_all.deb
  psfontmgr_0.11.10-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

defoma_0.11.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

[Archive Administrator]

Accepted:
defoma-doc_0.11.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/defoma/defoma-doc_0.11.10-1_all.deb
defoma_0.11.10-1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-1.dsc
defoma_0.11.10-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-1.tar.gz
defoma_0.11.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/defoma/defoma_0.11.10-1_all.deb
psfontmgr_0.11.10-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/defoma/psfontmgr_0.11.10-1_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
defoma-doc_0.11.10-1_all.deb - optional doc
defoma_0.11.10-1.dsc - source admin
defoma_0.11.10-1_all.deb - optional admin
psfontmgr_0.11.10-1_all.deb - optional admin

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 285653 514635 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#542335: grace: please remove dependency on defoma

[Paul Wise]

X-Loop
ow...@bugs.debian.org: Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:12:07 +
Resent-Message-ID: 
Resent-Sender: ow...@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 542335
X-Debian-PR-Package: grace
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: grace
Received: via spool by sub...@bugs.debian.org id=B.125065852318621
  (code B ref -1); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:12:07 +
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2009 05:08:43 +
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0. Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 117; neutral, 63; spammy, 2.
spammytokens:1.000-9--H*m:119, 0.997-+--H*MI:119
hammytokens:0.000-+--H*o:Debian, 0.000-+--Usertags, 0.000-+--Severity,
0.000-+--H*c:protocol, 0.000-+--H*c:micalg
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29])
by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from )
id 1MddPf-0004q8-2R
for sub...@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:08:43 +
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[IPv6:::1])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from )
id 1MddPe-0005NL-9e
for sub...@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:08:42 +
From: Paul Wise 
To: Debian Bug Tracking System 
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iSkPbWlyn4E43O2ykcft"
Organization: Debian
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:08:23 +0800
Message-Id: <1250658503.18316.119.ca...@chianamo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 
Delivered-To: sub...@bugs.debian.org


--=-iSkPbWlyn4E43O2ykcft
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: grace
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: defoma-removal

Your package contains a defoma backend. defoma is un-maintained and
Debian-specific so I would like to remove it from Debian.

Please migrate your package to use the cross-distribution font
configuration and discovery software, fontconfig. Your options for
fontconfig support in order of decreasing preference are:

  * Get upstream to link against libfontconfig for looking up fonts
dynamically=20
  * Get upstream to use the fc-* binaries to retrieve the data they
need from fontconfig=20
  * Use the fc-* binaries from your maintainer scripts (preferably
via dpkg triggers) to generate the same data or configuration
that the defoma backend produced=20
  * Drop the defoma backend and leave users to manually configure
fonts for this package

More information about fontconfig and querying it from applications is
available at the upstream homepage:

http://www.fontconfig.org/

Please be sure to change your maintainer scripts so that they remove the
files created by your defoma backend when upgrading to the new version.
You can do this with the following command:

/usr/bin/defoma-app purge 

--=20
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

--=-iSkPbWlyn4E43O2ykcft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkqLiMYACgkQ5Sc9mGvjxCOeYwCgyep0JCQm3/7SohWRzy4EB+m6
oDAAnR0zMGpsuGc3leJwlTGaYIbw8kkI
=v2N8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-iSkPbWlyn4E43O2ykcft--




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org