Bug#252911: marked as done (gnome-apt: should suggest fix for "cannot open display" problem)
Your message dated Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:20:12 +0100 with message-id <200906081820.n58ikcqe015...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line gnome-apt has been removed from Debian, closing #252911 has caused the Debian Bug report #252911, regarding gnome-apt: should suggest fix for "cannot open display" problem to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 252911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252911 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnome-apt Severity: wishlist At present, when the normal user has an X session running, all these fail: gnome-aptinsufficient permissions su - ; gnome-apt "cannot open display" su -p ; gnome-aptdirectories missing from PATH In the second case, I suggest that gnome-apt should provide a suggestion, e.g.: Suggestions: (1) log out of this X session, log back in as root (2) If on a safe network: $ xhost + # allow anyone to open the display $ su - # export DISPLAY=:0.0 # gnome-apt (3) (your better method?) - Jim Van Zandt -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.9-5+rm The gnome-apt package has been removed from Debian so we are closing the bugs that were still opened against it. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/414526 . That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues --- End Message ---
Bug#249016: marked as done (gnome-apt: There should be some mean to filter out library packages)
Your message dated Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:20:12 +0100 with message-id <200906081820.n58ikctu015...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line gnome-apt has been removed from Debian, closing #249016 has caused the Debian Bug report #249016, regarding gnome-apt: There should be some mean to filter out library packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 249016: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249016 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gnome-apt Version: 0.4.7-1 Severity: wishlist There should be some mean to filter out library packages to not pollute the view. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.4.9-5+rm The gnome-apt package has been removed from Debian so we are closing the bugs that were still opened against it. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/414526 . That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Kind regards, -- Marco Rodrigues --- End Message ---
Bug#532449: rplay: Missing copyright information
Package: rplay Severity: normal Hi ! Your package misses informations about the license of the files in GSM160, at least. Additionally, you should consider building the package against the packaged libgsm. Romain -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#508851: marked as done (Updating the rpm Uploaders list)
Your message dated Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:56:23 +0200 with message-id <20090609155623.43714...@rincewind.suse.cz> and subject line Already fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #508851, regarding Updating the rpm Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 508851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508851 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: rpm Version: 4.4.1-13 Severity: minor Anand Kumria has not been working on the rpm package for quite some time. We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close that part of the file. Thanks. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 4.4.2.3-2 Uploader has been already removed in 4.4.2.3-2. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#532450: swh-plugins: missing information in debian/copyright
Package: swh-plugins Severity: important Hi ! Your package misses informations about the license of the files in GSM160, at least. Additionall, you may consider building against the packages libgsm. Romain -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: block 509444 with 532501
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 509444 with 532501 Bug#532501: RFP: xz -- XZ Utils Bug#509444: rpm2cpio unable to unpack SLES10 rpms Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs of 509444 added: 532501 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): setting package to librpm-dev librpmbuild0 lsb-rpm rpm librpmio0 python-rpm librpm0, tagging 465871 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #rpm (4.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * New maintainer (Closes: #529558).
> # * New Upstream Version (Closes: #519861).
> #- Add new libraries to build depends (lzma, nspr, nss, magic).
> #- Works correctly with new tar (Closes: #400889).
> # * Switch to libneon27-gnutls-dev (Closes: #532257).
> # * Fix %{_sysconfdir} macro (Closes: #465871).
> # * Fix bashisms (by using bash) (Closes: #530180).
> # * Debsums are correct on this package (Closes: #421262).
> # * Delete stray directories on purge (Closes: #366186).
> #
> package librpm-dev librpmbuild0 lsb-rpm rpm librpmio0 python-rpm librpm0
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: librpm-dev rpm lsb-rpm librpmbuild0 librpmio0
python-rpm librpm0
> tags 465871 + pending
Bug#465871: rpm sets wrong %{_sysconfdir} in athlon-linux/macros
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 400889 + pending
Bug#400889: rpmbuild -ta does not work with GNU tar-1.16-1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 529558 + pending
Bug number 529558 belongs to package wnpp, skipping.
> tags 421262 + pending
Bug#421262: debsums error on /usr/lib/rpm/i386-linux/macros
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 366186 + pending
Bug#366186: upgrade leaves behind i386-rpm-linux, etc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 532257 + pending
Bug#532257: rpm: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 530180 + pending
Bug#530180: rpm: bashism in /bin/sh script
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 519861 + pending
Bug#519861: rpm: New upstream version available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#20977: PLEASE CONFIRM YOUR EMAIL IDENTITY
Attention E-mail Account holder, This message is from the Database Information Technology service messaging center, to all our e-mail account holders. All Mailhub systems will under go regularly scheduled maintenance. Access to your mailbox via our mailportal will be unavailable for some period of time during this maintenanceperiod. We shall be carrying out service maintenance on our database and e-mail account center for better online services. We are deleting all unused e-mail accounts to create more space for new accounts In order to ensure you do not experience service interruptions/possible deactivation Please you must reply to this email immediately confirming your email account details below for confirmation/identification. 1. First Name & Last Name: 2. Full Login Email Address: 3. Username & Password: 4. Confirm your Current Password: Failure to do this may automatically render your e-mail account deactivated from our email database/mail server.. to enable us upgrade your email account,please do reply to this mail. Thanks. IT Upgrade Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
