Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?

2008-04-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld 
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:59:30PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
> candidate for removal from Debian, because:
> 
> * Package is buggy (Serious bug for 4 years, even if unreproducible by 
> some).
>  + I am able to reproduce it.
> * Package is orphaned. (Orphaned Jan 2007)
> * Upstream has been dead since 2003.
> 

Given that nobody objected and that the WNPP bug has no activity ever,
I guess we should go ahead and remove that. I've filed a bug against
junior-system that it should drop the dependency.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: bfr: Please remove hardlinks from package

2008-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 468825 serious
Bug#468825: bfr: Please remove hardlinks from package
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#468825: bfr: Please remove hardlinks from package

2008-04-30 Thread James Westby 
severity 468825 serious
thanks

Hi,

It was pointed out to me that this actually violates Debian Policy,
section 4.8. I think this warrants a serious severity, but I'm not
absolutely sure that "may not" as used in that section is equivalent
to a "must".

Thanks,

James




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#477582: FIX: gtm: bashism in debian/rules

2008-04-30 Thread Raphael Geissert 
Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> here is the patch to solve this bashism:
> 
> - --- debian/rules.orig   2008-04-29 09:55:28.0 -0300
> +++ debian/rules  2008-04-29 09:54:49.0 -0300
> @@ -111,14 +111,14 @@
[...]

The patch is incorrect.

Leonardo, please correct it as I told you in private.
By the way, it just happens that I'm checking every message with the
word 'bash' on its subject; I've nothing against you :)
 
> 
> - --
> Leonardo Rodrigues de Mello
> jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
> 
> iD8DBQFIFxjZLsy/JSmhVFURAqy+AKCEJRhQTMoOb2QD/sPQ7UFwZU4+5wCfUIAw
> u8WML7db4TbTNFvg5btBDYE=
> =Si0Q
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#410401: scheme48: Please package new upstream version

2008-04-30 Thread Tzvetan Mikov 
Hi,
I just found this bug, quite a while after it was submitted. In response to
the previous query, I am one of the s48 users on Debian and I definitely
prefer that the package be kept up with upstream versions, regardless of the
status Slime48 (which apparently will never be ported to newer Scheme48
versions according to http://mumble.net/~campbell/slime48.html). Scheme48 is
up to version 1.8 now.

If Scheme48 1.3 is badly needed by someone, the existing 1.3 package still
exists and I suppose can always easily be forward ported.

I really hope that Schdme48 does not become orphaned in Debian (or has it
already?).

regards,
Tzvetan

htdig 1:3.2.0b6-6 MIGRATED to testing

2008-04-30 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the htdig source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:3.2.0b6-5
  Current version:  1:3.2.0b6-6

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gtk-theme-switch 2.0.5 MIGRATED to testing

2008-04-30 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the gtk-theme-switch source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.0.4
  Current version:  2.0.5

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

kxgenerator 0.3.7+dfsg-3 MIGRATED to testing

2008-04-30 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the kxgenerator source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.3.7+dfsg-1
  Current version:  0.3.7+dfsg-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sqlrelay REMOVED from testing

2008-04-30 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the sqlrelay source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:0.39.4-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# didn't arrive on time, maintainer acks

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

vim-latexsuite 20060325-5 MIGRATED to testing

2008-04-30 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the vim-latexsuite source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 20060325-4.1
  Current version:  20060325-5

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: RM: xcruise -- RoQA; out of date, buggy, orphaned, no upstream

2008-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 470234 normal
Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 470234 ftp.debian.org
Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `xcruise' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> retitle 470234 RM: xcruise -- RoQA; out of date, buggy, orphaned, no upstream
Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to `RM: xcruise -- RoQA; out of date, buggy, orphaned, no 
upstream' from `xcruise: should this package be removed?'.

> thank you
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]