Bug#444826: marked as done (multiple preinst scripts fail)

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:15:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line multiple preinst scripts fail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: SLAPD, libgnome32, libgtk1.2

---


--- Begin Message ---
Synaptic wasn't in the list of the bug report utility so I had to use
the email.  I don't know whom is the fault but I had a few packages
still marked even after I applied the changes.  I was getting tired of
seeing the same errors at each installation os I tried removiong the
faulty packages and now I'm stuck with an even biger problem !  more of
them listed and even 2 broken packages ...  mostly related to gnome.

So to start off I had 3 packages and now I got a dozen, the original
were SLAPD, and 2 gnome librairies in which the only recongnised
dependency were WineX.

I have some text pop up in a console when the same error pops up after
applying changes which is  BREAKING NEWS ! while tring to get the list I
conldn't because of the broken ones and now I'm back to the original
culprits which give me this error :

E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gtk+1.2/libgtk1.2-common_1.2.10-18_all.deb:
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gtk+1.2/libgtk1.2_1.2.10-18_amd64.deb: subprocess
new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: 
/cdrom//pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.18-5-amd64_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13_amd64.deb:
 subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/o/openldap2.3/slapd_2.3.30-5_amd64.deb: subprocess
pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/i/imlib/gdk-imlib11_1.9.14-31_amd64.deb: subprocess
new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/libgnome32_1.4.2-34_amd64.deb:
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/libgnomesupport0_1.4.2-34_amd64.deb:
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/libgnomeui32_1.4.2-34_amd64.deb:
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/libgnorba27_1.4.2-34_amd64.deb:
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/libgnorbagtk0_1.4.2-34_amd64.deb:
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/g/gnome-libs/gnome-libs-data_1.4.2-34_all.deb:
subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 2
E: /cdrom//pool/main/s/supertux/supertux_0.1.3-1.1_amd64.deb: subprocess
new post-removal script returned error exit status 2

--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This looked like a more general problem with the submitter's system rather
than a bug in the maintainer scripts of the individual packages.  Referred
the submitter to debian-user.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   

--- End Message ---

Bug#434581: marked as done (pike7.6: FTBFS on hurd-i386)

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434581: fixed in pike7.6 7.6.112-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: pike7.6
Version: 7.6.93-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi,

pike7.6 FTBFS on hurd-i386 because of unprotected usage of MAXPATHLEN ;
here is a patch.

Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xen
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+#if defined(__alpha__) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
+   /*
+* The meaning of life, the universe, and everything. Plus
+* this makes the year come out right.
+*/
+   year -= 42;
+#endif
(From the patch for 1.3.2: (kernel/time.c), submitted by Marcus Meissner)
--- src/modules/files/efuns.c.orig  2007-07-24 23:08:26.932458000 +
+++ src/modules/files/efuns.c   2007-07-24 23:09:58.626801000 +
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@
 
 #endif
 
+#ifndef MAXPATHLEN
+#define MAXPATHLEN 32768
+#endif
+
 struct array *encode_stat(PIKE_STAT_T *s)
 {
   struct array *a;
@@ -1113,9 +1117,6 @@
 size*=2;
   } while (size < 1);
 #else
-#ifndef MAXPATHLEN
-#define MAXPATHLEN 32768
-#endif
   tmp=xalloc(MAXPATHLEN+1);
   THREADS_ALLOW_UID();
   e = getwd(tmp);
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pike7.6
Source-Version: 7.6.112-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pike7.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pike7.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:29:03 +0100
Source: pike7.6
Binary: pike7.6-sane pike7.6-meta pike7.6-gl pike7.6-gdbm pike7.6-core 
pike7.6-bzip2 pike7.6-doc pike7.6-sdl pike7.6-pg pike7.6-odbc pike7.6-mysql 
pike7.6-image pike7.6-svg pike7.6 pike7.6-pcre pike7.

Bug#424334: marked as done (pike7.6: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424334: fixed in pike7.6 7.6.112-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: pike7.6
Severity: important
Version: 7.6.93-3
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:

dh_clean
 dpkg-source -b pike7.6-7.6.93
dpkg-source: building pike7.6 using existing pike7.6_7.6.93.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building pike7.6 in pike7.6_7.6.93-3.diff.gz
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to 
debian/pike7.6-gtk/usr/share/doc/pike7.6-gtk:
dpkg-source:  new version is symlink
dpkg-source:  old version is nonexistent
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file 
src/post_modules/Unicode/wordbits.h
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file 
src/post_modules/Unicode/unicode_module.c
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file 
src/post_modules/Unicode/decompositions.h
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file 
src/post_modules/Unicode/canonicals.h
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file src/modules/system/add-errnos.h
dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file src/modules/Java/module.pmod.in
dpkg-source: building pike7.6 in pike7.6_7.6.93-3.dsc
dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
**
Build finished at 20070515-1354
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/05/15/00_Failed_2/


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pike7.6
Source-Version: 7.6.112-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pike7.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes betwe

Bug#431784: marked as done (pike7.6-image: freetype1 deprecation)

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431784: fixed in pike7.6 7.6.112-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: pike7.6-image
Severity: important

Hi,
for Lenny we'd like to stop supporting two freetype packages in the archive.
freetype1 has been in oldlibs for Etch, it has very few reverse deps left
and we'll try to phase it out now.
Please adapt your package, so that it links against the regular freetype
package.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pike7.6
Source-Version: 7.6.112-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pike7.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-bzip2_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-core_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-dev_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-doc_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gdbm_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-gl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-image_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-manual_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-meta_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-mysql_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-odbc_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pcre_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-perl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-pg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-reference_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sane_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-sdl_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6-svg_7.6.112-1_i386.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.diff.gz
pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1.dsc
pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112-1_all.deb
pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.112.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pike7.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:29:03 +0100
Source: pike7.6
Binary: pike7.6-sane pike7.6-meta pike7.6-gl pike7.6-gdbm pike7.6-core 
pike7.6-bzip2 pike7.6-doc pike7.6-sdl pike7.6-pg pike7.6-odbc pike7.6-mysql 
pike7.6-image pike7.6-svg pike7.6 pike7.6-pcre pike7.6-manual pike7.6-dev 
pike7.6-perl pike7.6-reference
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 7.6.112-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 pike7.6- Recommended meta package for Pike 7.6
 pike7.6-bzip2 - Bzip2 module for Pike
 pike7.6-core - Powerful interpreted programming language
 pike7.6-dev - Development files for Pike 7.6
 pike7.6-doc - Pike 7.6 documentation meta package
 pike7.6-gdbm - Gdbm module for Pike
 pike7.6-gl - Mesa module for Pike
 pike7.6-image - Image module for Pike
 pike7.6-manual - Pike 7.6 manual
 pike7.6-meta - Meta package for Pike 7.6
 pike7.6-mysql -

mc 1:4.6.1-8 MIGRATED to testing

2007-12-21 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the mc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:4.6.1-7
  Current version:  1:4.6.1-8

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#448114: fixed

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

xtokkaetama |1.0b-11 | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, 
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Bug#282075: fixed

2007-12-21 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libunicode |0.4.0-5 | source
libunicode-dev |0.4.0-5 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libunicode0 |0.4.0-5 | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Where have you been?

2007-12-21 Thread Hal Barajas 
Hello! I am bored today. I am nice girl that would like to chat with you. Email 
me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] only, because I am using my friend's email to write 
this. Don't miss some of my naughty pictures.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#457394: dillo failed to unpatch

2007-12-21 Thread Nicolas Valcarcel 

Package: dillo
Version: 0.8.6-1

i get this error every time i try to debuild -rfakeroot dillo for second
time

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ubuntu/src/dillo/debian/dillo-0.8.6$ debuild -rfakeroot
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dpatch deapply-all
reverting patch 02_dont-ignore-hash-files from ./ ... ok.
reverting patch 01_i18n from ./ ... failed.
make: *** [unpatch] Error 1
debuild: fatal error at line 1247:
fakeroot debian/rules clean failed

-- 
aka nxvl
Peruvian LoCo Team
Key fingerprint = 8104 21CE A580 7EB7 5184  8DFF 6A3A D5DA 24DC 6AF5
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 24DC6AF5


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#457407: mailping: incorrectly calculates mail latency

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Garner 
Package: mailping
Version: 0.0.4-1~abg+7
Severity: important

In some cases mailping can store more than 6 digits for the "microseconds" 
value in a Maildir filename.   When the delivery time is calculated it 
calculates this as the seconds part of the filename + 
the microseconds part (multiplied by 1e-6).This can convert the 
microseconds to a value > 1, and consequently make the latency calculation 
inaccurate by several seconds.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (700, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mailping depends on:
ii  adduser   3.102  Add and remove users and groups
ii  munin-node1.2.5-1network-wide graphing framework (n
ii  python2.4.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-support0.5.6  automated rebuilding support for p

mailping recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#457407: corrections

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Garner 
This was tested against 0.0.4-1 from lenny (installed on etch), although 
I had an internal testing package derived from this package installed 
when I filed the original bug report.   I apologize for the confusion, 
this was my first bug report.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]