Bug#442490: anthy: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-16 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: anthy
Severity: important
Version: 9100-3
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:


rm -f Makefile
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/anthy-9100'
 rm -f conftest* src-util/*.elc config.log
 dh_clean
  dpkg-source -b anthy-9100
 dpkg-source: building anthy using existing anthy_9100.orig.tar.gz
 dpkg-source: building anthy in anthy_9100-3.diff.gz
 dpkg-source: warning: newly created empty file 'mkworddic/2ch.t' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to calctrans/anthy.feature_info: binary 
file contents changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 
'debian/patches/05_improve_anthy_dic_learning.dpatch' will not be represented 
in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 
'debian/patches/03_change_anthy_dic_path.dpatch' will not be represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'debian/patches/02_2ch_t.dpatch' 
will not be represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file alt-cannadic/Makefile.orig
 dpkg-source: building anthy in anthy_9100-3.dsc
 dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
 **
 Build finished at 20070906-0148
  END OF BUILD NO 2 
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 Purging 
/var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-1a49ac01-0674-4b23-b2f6-de54a7d914bc/build/user/anthy-9100
 --
 Not removing build depends: session managed chroot in use
 **
 Finished at 20070906-0148
 Build needed 00:00:59, 15840k disk space
 DC-Build-Status: Failed 105.502372s
 mv: cannot stat `*.changes': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*.dsc': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*gz': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*deb': No such file or directory



The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.

Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a 
explanation 
for this mass bug filling.


[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442520: conquest: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-16 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: conquest
Severity: important
Version: 8.2b-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:


dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conqstrat-lex.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conquestd.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'conquestd' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conquestsh.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'conquestsh' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conquestsh: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conqmetad.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'conqmetad' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conqinit.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'conqinit' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to conqdriv.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'conqdriv' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: building conquest in conquest_8.2b-1.dsc
 dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
 **
 Build finished at 20070905-2343
  END OF BUILD NO 2 
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 Purging 
/var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-fbaed6d4-cd97-4b88-92a0-77d8c115db43/build/user/conquest-8.2b
 --
 Not removing build depends: session managed chroot in use
 **
 Finished at 20070905-2343
 Build needed 00:01:22, 22776k disk space
 DC-Build-Status: Failed 248.109218s
 DC-Time-Estimation: 248.109218 versus expected 109 (r/m: 1.27623135779817 ; m: 
109.0)
 mv: cannot stat `*.changes': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*.dsc': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*gz': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*deb': No such file or directory



The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2/


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.

Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a 
explanation 
for this mass bug filling.


[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442541: dfm: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-16 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: dfm
Severity: important
Version: 0.99.9-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:


make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/dfm-0.99.9/src'
 Making distclean in intl
 make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/dfm-0.99.9/intl'
 rm -f *.a *.o *.lo core core.* libintl.h
 rm -f Makefile ID TAGS po2msg.sed po2tbl.sed
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/user/dfm-0.99.9/intl'
 rm -f config.status
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/dfm-0.99.9'
 dh_clean build-stamp config.log
  dpkg-source -b dfm-0.99.9
 dpkg-source: building dfm using existing dfm_0.99.9.orig.tar.gz
 dpkg-source: building dfm in dfm_0.99.9-1.diff.gz
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to po/sv.gmo: binary file contents changed
 dpkg-source: building dfm in dfm_0.99.9-1.dsc
 dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
 **
 Build finished at 20070906-0257
  END OF BUILD NO 2 
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 Purging 
/var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-e978f5f9-b709-40fc-bf42-1e18b70da9f9/build/user/dfm-0.99.9
 --
 Not removing build depends: session managed chroot in use
 **
 Finished at 20070906-0257
 Build needed 00:00:22, 2512k disk space
 DC-Build-Status: Failed 84.005595s
 mv: cannot stat `*.changes': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*.dsc': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*gz': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*deb': No such file or directory



The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2/


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.

Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a 
explanation 
for this mass bug filling.


[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442580: gnomermind: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-16 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: gnomermind
Severity: important
Version: 1.0.1-8
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:


rm -f config.status
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/gnomermind-1.0.1'
 dh_clean
  dpkg-source -b gnomermind-1.0.1
 dpkg-source: building gnomermind using existing gnomermind_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 dpkg-source: building gnomermind in gnomermind_1.0.1-8.diff.gz
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to po/de.gmo: binary file contents changed
 dpkg-source: warning: newly created empty file 'configure-stamp' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'xml-i18n-extract' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'xml-i18n-merge' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'xml-i18n-update' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file gnomermind.spec
 dpkg-source: building gnomermind in gnomermind_1.0.1-8.dsc
 dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
 **
 Build finished at 20070906-0025
  END OF BUILD NO 2 
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 Purging 
/var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-3504838a-7283-4b3c-8ae3-efb2149b07a2/build/user/gnomermind-1.0.1
 --
 Not removing build depends: session managed chroot in use
 **
 Finished at 20070906-0025
 Build needed 00:00:19, 2424k disk space
 DC-Build-Status: Failed 266.679582s
 DC-Time-Estimation: 266.679582 versus expected 97 (r/m: 1.74927404123711 ; m: 
97.0)
 mv: cannot stat `*.changes': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*.dsc': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*gz': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*deb': No such file or directory



The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2/


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.

Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a 
explanation 
for this mass bug filling.


[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442597: hlfl: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-09-16 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Package: hlfl
Severity: important
Version: 0.60.1-2
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-doublebuild

Hi, 

  


  
Lucas Nussbaum has rebuilt the whole archive on i386 and your package FTBFS if
built twice in a row with the following error:


dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/bsd_ipfw.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/cisco.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/getpts.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/hlfl.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/ipfilter.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/linux_ipchains.o: binary file 
contents changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/linux_ipfwadm.o: binary file 
contents changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/linux_netfilter.o: binary file 
contents changed
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/utils.o: binary file contents 
changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'src/hlfl' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: cannot represent change to src/hlfl: binary file contents changed
 dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of 'config.status' will not be 
represented in diff
 dpkg-source: building hlfl in hlfl_0.60.1-2.dsc
 dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
 **
 Build finished at 20070906-0502
  END OF BUILD NO 2 
 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
 Purging 
/var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-7a175ce4-c957-4ebb-ae7c-955231b809b9/build/user/hlfl-0.60.1
 --
 Not removing build depends: session managed chroot in use
 **
 Finished at 20070906-0502
 Build needed 00:00:09, 1044k disk space
 DC-Build-Status: Failed 77.211686s
 DC-Time-Estimation: 77.211686 versus expected 35 (r/m: 1.20604817142857 ; m: 
35.0)
 mv: cannot stat `*.changes': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*.dsc': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*gz': No such file or directory
 mv: cannot stat `*deb': No such file or directory



The full build-log can be found at: 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/doublebuild-09-05/failed-build-2/


About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems. All
packages have been rebuilt twice in a row, with unpack, build, clean,
build.

Please read the mail of Martin Zobel-Helas on debian-devel [0], for a 
explanation 
for this mass bug filling.


[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg00490.html




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#202553: marked as done (/usr/share/doc/w3-recs/RECS/html4/struct/global.html: add year)

2007-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:24:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: w3-recs
Version: 2003.03-1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/w3-recs/RECS/html4/struct/global.html
Tags: upstream

It says: Note. As of the 24 December version of HTML 4.01, the HTML
Working Group commits to the following policy...

They should mention the year.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, this bug is no longer present in the current version of w3-recs.
I've grepped all the occurrences of "December" in the HTML 4
recommendation and they are all "qualified", i.e. with the specification
of the corresponding year.

Thanks for your bug report.
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#202554: marked as done (/usr/share/doc/w3-recs/RECS/html4/struct/global.html: can't find meaning of //EN)

2007-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:29:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: w3-recs
Version: 2003.03-1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/doc/w3-recs/RECS/html4/struct/global.html
Tags: upstream

The //EN in --- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> The //EN in  is not explained.
>
> Is it OK on non-English documents? Users worry.

It is not explained in the spec because it is not HTML specific, but
rather SGML-/XML- specific. The part between double quotes is the public
identifier of the document type, in principle it has to be taken as a
verbatim string with no specific meaning.

See the XML/SGML specifications for more information about that.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?/\All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema\/right keys at the right time


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Processed: setting package to w3-recs, tagging 337040

2007-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> package w3-recs
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: w3-recs

> tags 337040 + pending
Bug#337040: w3-recs is now DFSG-compliant, move to main?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cttex REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cttex source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.23-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



compilercache REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the compilercache source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0.10-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cl-parse-number REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cl-parse-number source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



divine REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the divine source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.8-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



epic4-script-light REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the epic4-script-light source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:2.8.0-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cppopt REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cppopt source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.0.2-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ethiop REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the ethiop source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.7-13
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cyrus2courier REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cyrus2courier source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.4-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gruftistats REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gruftistats source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.4-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



guile-www REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the guile-www source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1.1-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lambdamoo REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the lambdamoo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.8.2-cvs20050209-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



elpoint REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the elpoint source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.0-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gdtclft REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gdtclft source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.2.5-10
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



kforth REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kforth source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.3.1-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



hx REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the hx source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.7.14-8
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



flyspray REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the flyspray source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.8-13
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



guile-simplesql REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the guile-simplesql source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.3.2-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



eco5000 REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the eco5000 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.8-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cbmlink REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cbmlink source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.6-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cmail REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the cmail source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.62-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



c2n REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the c2n source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1.4-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ilisp REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the ilisp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 5.12.0+cvs.2004.12.26
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



hlfl REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the hlfl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.60.1-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gobo REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gobo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.3-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gkrelldnet REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gkrelldnet source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.14.2-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gkrellongrun REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gkrellongrun source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.2.0-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lambdamoo-docs REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the lambdamoo-docs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.8.2-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



leksbot REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the leksbot source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



agistudio REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the agistudio source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2.3+svn20070518-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libcdg123 REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libcdg123 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.0.3-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libsufary-ruby REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libsufary-ruby source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libxbox REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libxbox source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.1-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libsrs2 REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libsrs2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0.18-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libvcs-perl REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libvcs-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.14-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libc-scan-perl REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libc-scan-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.74-8
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libunit++ REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libunit++ source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2.3-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



manpages-fi REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the manpages-fi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



nasm-mode REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the nasm-mode source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 20020330-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lyskom-tty-client REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the lyskom-tty-client source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.13.alfa.8-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



manued-el REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the manued-el source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.5-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



noffle REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the noffle source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2.0~rc1-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



openggsn REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the openggsn source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.84-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



orgadoc REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the orgadoc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.8-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



nurbs++ REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the nurbs++ source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.0.11-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pexts REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the pexts source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.0-8
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pike-public.protocols.syslog REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the pike-public.protocols.syslog source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.1-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linpqa REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the linpqa source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.51-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pike-public.parser.xml2 REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the pike-public.parser.xml2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.38-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pike-public.network.pcap REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the pike-public.network.pcap source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



rtlinux REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the rtlinux source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.1pre3-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



s48-refman REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the s48-refman source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



romeo REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the romeo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.5.0-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



scripts4ticker REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the scripts4ticker source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 20020720-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pike-public.tools.configfiles REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the pike-public.tools.configfiles source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



rigel REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the rigel source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.1-8
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



slbreflex REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the slbreflex source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.2.0-10
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sppc REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the sppc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0.1-9
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



skribe REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the skribe source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2g-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



tclmagick REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the tclmagick source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.45-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



superd REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the superd source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.0.3-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sipp REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the sipp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 3.1-11
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



tclparser REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the tclparser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.4-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



vpim REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the vpim source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.360.dfsg1-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ticker.app REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the ticker.app source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.5.0-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xgdipc REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xgdipc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xbox-raincoat REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xbox-raincoat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.10-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xruskb REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xruskb source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.15.3-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



yorick-doc REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the yorick-doc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.5.07-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xiterm+thai REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xiterm+thai source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.06.cvs20060109-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



wmx10 REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the wmx10 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.03-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



tela REMOVED from testing

2007-09-16 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the tela source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.0-12
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#147733: Jewell

2007-09-16 Thread Amy Colon
Heeey, baby…
Hope you didn’t forget about our tour to Varadero…
You don’t write me…
Ok, I took out the pictures I told you about right here  
http://www.arabesque.ru/ (login:kisss, pass:catch)
Hope you’ll love it…  
Write me as soon as you check it?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.changes

2007-09-16 Thread Archive Administrator
toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  toshutils_2.0.1-17.dsc
  toshutils_2.0.1-17.diff.gz
  toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-09-16 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
toshutils_2.0.1-17.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/toshutils/toshutils_2.0.1-17.diff.gz
toshutils_2.0.1-17.dsc
  to pool/main/t/toshutils/toshutils_2.0.1-17.dsc
toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/toshutils/toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.deb


Override entries for your package:
toshutils_2.0.1-17.dsc - source utils
toshutils_2.0.1-17_i386.deb - extra utils

Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 438217 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#438217: marked as done (toshutils: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

2007-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438217: fixed in toshutils 2.0.1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: toshutils
Version: 2.0.1-16
Severity: wishlist
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: nostrip

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package with 
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip.
Final binaries are still stripped.

If you call dh_strip correctly in debian/rules, this may mean that upstream
is stripping anyway.
You should look for call to strip, ld -s or install -s which may strip binaries.


> Automatic build of toshutils_2.0.1-16 on octave for sid/i386 by rebuildd 
> 0.2.2-r136
> Build started at 2007-08-15 15:58:37.004788
> **
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Need to get 166kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main toshutils 2.0.1-16 (dsc) [709B]
> Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main toshutils 2.0.1-16 (tar) [154kB]
> Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main toshutils 2.0.1-16 (diff) [10.7kB]
> Fetched 166kB in 0s (760kB/s)
> Download complete and in download only mode
> W: /home/staff/jd/.pbuilderrc does not exist
> I: using fakeroot in build.
> Current time: Wed Aug 15 15:58:41 UTC 2007
> pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187193521
> Building the build Environment
>  -> extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/sid.tgz]
>  -> creating local configuration
>  -> copying local configuration
>  -> mounting /proc filesystem
>  -> mounting /dev/pts filesystem
>  -> policy-rc.d already exists
> Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
> Installing the build-deps
>  -> Attempting to parse the build-deps 
>  -> Considering build-dep debhelper (>> 4.0.0)
>-> Trying debhelper
>  -> Considering build-dep dpatch
>-> Trying dpatch
[...]
> dh_shlibdeps
> dh_gencontrol
> dh_md5sums
> dh_builddeb
> dpkg-deb: building package `toshutils' in `../toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb'.
>  dpkg-genchanges
> dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload
> dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included)
> Copying back the cached apt archive contents
>  -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
>  -> unmounting proc filesystem
>  -> cleaning the build env 
> -> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//5929 and its 
> subdirectories
> Current time: Wed Aug 15 16:23:55 UTC 2007
> pbuilder-time-stamp: 1187195035
> Checking toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb for stripped binaries...
> ---
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/fan: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/tpasswd: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/dispswitch: ELF 32-bit LSB 
> executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically 
> linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/thotswap: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/tuxtime-conf: ELF 32-bit LSB 
> executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically 
> linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/hotkey: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/ownerstring: ELF 32-bit LSB 
> executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically 
> linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/tbacklight: ELF 32-bit LSB 
> executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically 
> linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/svpw: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.deb/usr/bin/alarm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, 
> Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, dynamically linked (uses 
> shared libs), stripped
> /tmp/toshutils_2.0.1-16_i386.d