Processed: tagging 424449, tagging 428997, tagging 402165, tagging 427308, tagging 422825, tagging 423962 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 424449 lenny sid
Bug#424449: spfmilter - FTBFS: spfmilter.c:1261: undefined reference to 
`smfi_getpriv'
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 428997 lenny sid
Bug#428997: strace: FTBFS: ../net.c:803: error: 'PACKET_ADD_MEMBERSHIP' 
undeclared here (not in a function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 402165 lenny sid
Bug#402165: sun-java5-bin: Broken locking causes assertion failure with 
Xlib/XCB when Xinerama available
There were no tags set.
Bug#408830: sun-java5-bin: Broken locking causes assertion failure with 
Xlib/XCB when Xinerama available
Bug#414371: libx11-6: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 427308 lenny sid
Bug#427308: syncekonnector: FTBFS: configure: error: Can't find libkonnector.so
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422825 lenny sid
Bug#422825: systemimager: FTBFS: tr.c:34: error: expected 
specifier-qualifier-list before '__u16'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 423962 lenny sid
Bug#423962: tcm: FTBFS: /usr/include/X11/VendorP.h:87: error: previous 
declaration of 'VendorShellClassRec vendorShellClassRec' with 'C++' linkage
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 419675 lenny sid
Bug#419675: toshset: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzopen'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422574 sid
Bug#422574: trang not installable (depends on missing libgcj7-0)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

> tags 42 lenny sid
Bug#42: trang - FTBFS: 763 problems (10 errors, 753 warnings)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 424445 lenny sid
Bug#424445: turkey - FTBFS: /build/user/turkey-1.34.0/build.xml:28: Compile 
failed; see the compiler error output for details.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 377373 lenny sid
Bug#377373: twig: Still depends on php3 and not on php5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 421566 etch-ignore
Bug#421566: vdrift: wrong architecture limitations in debian/control (alpha)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore

> tags 427592 lenny sid
Bug#427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: redefinition 
of 'struct ustat'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 423966 lenny sid
Bug#423966: wvdial: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that depend 
on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 423967 lenny sid
Bug#423967: wvstreams: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that 
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 429653 lenny sid
Bug#429653: Xalan build-depends on removed apache-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 420322 lenny sid
Bug#420322: xchat-gnome: FTBFS: db2omf: Could not construct the OMF subject 
element
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422666 lenny sid
Bug#422666: FTBFS: ../../src/xf86Calcomp.c:682: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422668 lenny sid
Bug#422668: FTBFS: ../../src/citron.c:1072: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared (first 
use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422669 lenny sid
Bug#422669: FTBFS: ./../src/xf86DMC.c:237: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared (first 
use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422671 lenny sid
Bug#422671: FTBFS: ../../src/xf86Dyna.c:231: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared (first 
use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422672 lenny sid
Bug#422672: FTBFS: ../../src/elo.c:179: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared (first use 
in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422673 lenny sid
Bug#422673: FTBFS: ../../src/evdev.c:236: error: 'SendCoreEvents' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422677 lenny sid
Bug#422677: FTBFS: ../../src/microtouch.c:270: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422678 lenny sid
Bug#422678: FTBFS: ../../src/xf86PM.c:389: error: 'TS_Raw' undeclared (first 
use in this function)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 422680 lenny sid
Bug#422680: FTBFS: ../../src/panel/platform.c:197: error: conflicting types for 
'protected_mode_access'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

> tags 424502 lenny sid
Bug#424502: zapping - FTBFS: simd.c:219: error: shift must be an immediate
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny, sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#431521: depends on non-essential package ucf in postrm

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Ablassmeier 
Package: flyspray
Version: 0.9.8-12
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2

hi,

while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of ucf beeing unavailable during postrm:

  Removing flyspray ...
  Purging configuration files for flyspray ...
  /etc/flyspray /
  /var/lib/dpkg/info/flyspray.postrm: line 74: ucf: command not found
  dpkg: error processing flyspray (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   flyspray

the full log can be found here:

 http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/07/01/

bye,
- michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#415100: marked as done (nbio: FTBFS on GNU/k*BSD: missing OS detection)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:08:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: nbio
Version: 2.0-14
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi,

please find attached a patch to make nbio build successfully on
GNU/kFreeBSD (at least) and maybe on other GNU/* platforms.

(Full build logs are available at
.)

Once applied, "autoconf" has to be run in the directory containing the
patched file.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois
--- nbio-2.0/seda/src/seda/nbio/jni/configure.in2007-03-16 
04:41:59.578489000 +0100
+++ nbio-2.0/seda/src/seda/nbio/jni/configure.in2007-03-16 
04:42:20.0 +0100
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
 case $host_os in
 solaris*)   PLATFORM=solaris;;
 linux-*)PLATFORM=linux;;
+k*bsd*) PLATFORM=linux;;
+gnu*)   PLATFORM=linux;;
 esac
 AC_SUBST(PLATFORM)
 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing thi bug report.  The package has been removed because it was
orphaned.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#381761: marked as done (tidev-modules-source: update-modules deprecated)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:09:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tidev-modules-source

Hi,

this bug report is part of a mass-bugfiling. Your package 

tidev-modules-source

is calling depmod in its postinst and/or postrm scripts. With a
recent debhelper (5.0.37) and by calling dh_installmodules in the
rules script this is not neccessary any more. This report is related
to Bug#380159.

The full discussion is here
http://lists-archives.org/debian-devel/24684-kernel-modules-postinst-
script.html 

Thanks, Bernd 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it's now
part of the linux-2.6 package.  It's unlikely this bug exists there as
well.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#422605: marked as done (FTBFS: debian/make-libnbio.sh: line 78: /usr/bin/gcjh: No such file or directory)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:08:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: nbio
Version: 2.0-14
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation

hi,

your package fails to build from source:

  Completed creating jarfile...
 seda.nbio.NBIOFileDescriptor...
 debian/make-libnbio.sh: line 78: /usr/bin/gcjh: No such file or directory
 Error: unable to build all header files.  Terminating.
 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package
  

the full build log can be found here:

 
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/05/rebuild.sid.i386/nbio_2.0-14_sid32.buildlog

bye,
- michael

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing thi bug report.  The package has been removed because it was
orphaned.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#423333: marked as done (libnewt-perl: should this package be removed?)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:08:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnewt-perl
Version: 1.08-10+b1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal

Hi,

While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came
up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because:

* Long standing Orphaned Package
* Outdated
* Low on Popcon
* Removed from testing before release

If you think that it should be orphaned instead of being removed from Debian,
please reply to this bug and tell so.

If you agree, sending the following commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should do it (after replacing nn with this bug's number):
severity nn normal
reassign nn ftp.debian.org
retitle nn RM:  -- RoM;  
thanks

For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt

If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please just
close this bug, preferably in an upload also fixing the other issues.

Thank you,
- michael

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing thi bug report.  The package has been removed because it was
orphaned.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#70097: marked as done (Adding values to listboxes doesn't trigger refresh)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:08:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnewt-perl
Version: 1.08-1
Severity: normal

When changeing the value of a listbox, the corresponding area on screen
isn't automatically invalidated (at least not when changing the value inside
a callback of another listbox). This makes using two listboxes within one
panel not possible.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cartman 2.2.17 #1 Fri Aug 25 22:53:58 CEST 2000 i686

Versions of packages libnewt-perl depends on:
ii  libc6   2.1.3-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libnewt00.50-7   Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex
ii  perl-5.005  5.005.03-7.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extracting 
ii  slang1  1.3.9-1  The S-Lang programming library - r


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing thi bug report.  The package has been removed because it was
orphaned.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#288450: marked as done (libzap1: Please add a watchfile)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:10:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libzap1
Severity: wishlist

Please add the following watchfile to the sources (debian/):
--- cut here ---
# Site  Directory   Pattern Version
# Script
version=2
http://www.asterisk.org/html/downloads/ zaptel-(.*)\.tar\.gz debian uupdate
--- cut here ---

Oh, and BTW, there is a new upstream version, 1.0.3, available.

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete and superceded by asterisk.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#290173: marked as done (Improper copyright file)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.6-1
Severity: normal

The copyright file of this package seems to use the *license*, instead
of the copyright holder in the style of "Copyright (C) 2005 by Justin
Pryzby".

Please see this thread:

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/03/msg02190.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10Y
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gtksee depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2   1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.21.2.10-17   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff4 3.6.1-5 Tag Image File Format library
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-3   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#321387: marked as done (f-prot-installer: postinst script shouldn't have wget with passive-ftp option)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.15
Severity: important


When executing the postinst script in my debian machine all the downloads
failed because of the ftp-passive option used with wget. Instead of using
this option wget should follow the options in /etc/wgetrc and ~/.wgetrc.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=pt_PT, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.55 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.14.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl   5.803-4WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip 5.52-3 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget  1.10-3+1.10.1beta1 retrieves files from the web

f-prot-installer recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
  f-prot-installer/install_later:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
* f-prot-installer/renamed:
  f-prot-installer/failed:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#311819: marked as done (f-prot-installer: should provide --quiet mode which reports errors only)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.14
Severity: wishlist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

i start   /usr/sbin/update-f-prot -i   every hour with cron and
thus get an email every hour.  It would be nice if
update-f-prot   would provide some --quiet option as 
check-updates does.

Ciao, Gregor


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.50 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl   5.800-2WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip 5.52-3 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget  1.9.1-12   retrieves files from the web

- -- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
* f-prot-installer/install_later:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
* f-prot-installer/renamed:
  f-prot-installer/failed:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCoGI48uuCWtJTB8oRAhFzAJ4p245V3OzpMJNGhJujCON/68T47gCfeOSy
Lw83YtBlwbawRG0kp1a96YM=
=45CK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#418285: marked as done (f-prot-installer: Update failed: No such directory `pub/linux'.)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.22
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


debconf Configuring f-prot installer:
After I said "Yes" to Check for newer versions" I picked "Download and
install"


installing f-prot
Downloading file fp-linux-ws.tar.gz.md5 from
ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/
No such directory `pub/linux'.

Download failed. Please make sure that
your computer is connected to the Internet.
If you see this error although you are
connected, either the server is down or the
download location has changed. In the latter
case you can still download the files manually.
Please file a bug report against
f-prot-installer!

dpkg: error processing f-prot-installer (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 f-prot-installer
  

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.40   Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 2.8.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl 5.803-4  WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip   5.52-1sarge4 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web

-- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: false
* f-prot-installer/failed:
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
* f-prot-installer/install_later:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#419220: marked as done (f-prot-installer: [INTL:es] Spanish po-debconf translation)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.22
Priority: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch

Please find attached the po-debconf translation of f-prot-installer
into Spanish.

Thanks for including it in the package,
Quique


--
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.


f-prot-installer_0.5.22_es.po
Description: application/gettext
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#409116: marked as done (f-prot-installer: [INTL:pt] Portuguese translation for debconf messages)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: f-prot-installer
Version: n/a
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist

Portuguese translation for f-prot-installer's debconf messages.
Translator: Miguel Figueiredo 
Feel free to use it.

For translation updates please contact 'Last Translator' or the
Portuguese Translation Team .

--
Best regards,

Portuguese Translation Team
http://www.DebianPT.org




pt.po
Description: application/gettext
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#31501: marked as done (delivery lossage with file table overflow)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:24:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
package: deliver
version: debian 1.1

I recently got this a bounce which contained the following text, and I
believe that this indicates that deliver is returning the wrong error
code; I believe taht there does exist a magic error code which would
cause sendmail to retry later, rather than give up and generate a
bounce.

   - Transcript of session follows -
deliver: can't create lockfile /var/spool/mail/devnull.lock: File table overflow
deliver: delivery error on host mescaline.gnu.org
Delivery to these addresses failed:
devnull
Reason(s) for failure:
"devnull": Can't write to mailbox
554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... unknown mailer error 1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
was orphaned, unmaintained, out of date, buggy.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#372177: marked as done (f-prot-installer: no f-prot.conf.5.gz in manpath)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Subject: f-prot-installer: no f-prot.conf.5.gz in manpath
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.14.sarge.3
Severity: normal

*** Please type your report below this line ***

 Hi,

the file /usr/lib/f-prot/man_pages/f-prot.conf.5 is not gzip
and /usr/share/man/man5/ doesn't have a symlink pointing to it

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-osso
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 2.8.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl 5.803-4  WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip   5.52-1sarge4 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web

-- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
  f-prot-installer/failed:
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
  f-prot-installer/install_later:


 []
 hpfn

-- 
Linux user number 416100


pgpPDAMBam8ru.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#340321: marked as done (gtksee ignores even arguments in command line)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.6-1

It seems that gtksee ignores even command-line arguments.
For example, when I invoke gtksee like this

gtksee image1.jpg image2.jpg image3.jpg image4.jpg image5.jpg

only image1.jpg, image3.jpg and image5.jpg are shown.

I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r0a.


-- 
Yuri Kornilov


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#283934: marked as done (Gtksee: No shortcut for menu bar)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.56-1
Priority: wishlist
Tags: upstream

There is currently no way to access the menu bar if a mouse is unavailable 
(or not responding) since there are no shortcuts to the menu. Please add 
appropiate shortcuts to the menu bar (File->Alt+F, Edit -> Alt+E, View -> 
Alt+V, Tools -> Alt+T) as commonly implemented in GTK/GNOME applications.

Regards

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#284713: marked as done (gtksee: When Started, always in displays content of / instead invoked directory)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.6-1
Severity: important

Hi!

It used to be, that when I invoke gtksee in a directory, that the content of
this dir was displayed. Since one of the last updates, gtksee always displays
the content of / and I have to search through again to see what i want to see.

Could you please restore the old behavior.

thanks
philipp


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gtksee depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-9   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg62 6b-9   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff4  3.6.1-3Tag Image File Format library
ii  libx11-6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Input extension li
ii  xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-3  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#388897: marked as done (f-prot-installer: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s))

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: N/A
Severity: normal

Hello,

As announced in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug
report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of
debconf templates of type "note".

First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short timeframe
that happned between my announcement and this bug report, please
accept my apologies and, of course, feel free to ask me to close the
bug report...or just close it yourself.

One or more template(s) has/have been identified in f-prot-installer 
debconf templates and an automated analysis mentions that it/they is/are
displayed to users at low or medium priority.

The debconf-devel(7) manpage makes it clear that the "note" type should
be used only for important notes that the user really should see.

On the other hand, the "low" priority is meant for very trivial items
that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of
cases. The "medium" priority is meant for normal items
that have reasonable defaults.

As such, a note should only be used for IMPORTANT stuff, so actually
all debconf notes should be priority highor should not exist.

Please consider one of the following options:

- move the text of the debconf note to the README.Debian file. The drawback
  is that the text will not be translatable anymore, which will be worked
  in the future. However, given that your note is very rarely displayed,
  this is indeed not a very strong drawback

- move the text to NEWS.Debian. This option should however rather be
  reserved for future texts of the same kind as the contents of this file
  is only displayed when users upgrade the package

- change the template type to "error" in case this note is meant to be
  displayed only in some cases when a problem shows up during execution of
  the maintainer's scripts. Please check debconf-devel(7) for details

- raise the priority to "high". This should be the last option to consider.
  It should be used only in cases where you judge that the information you
  display is VITAL for users of your package and that one could NOT USE IT
  if not reading the note.

A dedicated check will be proposed to the lintian and linda package
maintainers so that future uses of low and medium priority note
templates will be discouraged in the future. So, if you wish you
package to be lintian-clean, then you need to fix this..:-)


Template(s) identified in your package:

  f-prot-installer -- config:88 f-prot-installer/install_later
  f-prot-installer -- postinst:28 f-prot-installer/failed

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#180398: marked as done (Don't hardcore which zip tool to use)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I've used f-prot some time before I decided to install the debian
package. I had already talked with the Matthias about this, but we
disagreed about the issue. Now I had some time and again looked at the
hardcoded usage of unzip. I'm not inclined to install about 200kb for
unzip to unzip the downloaded files, when miniunzip could fulfill the
same task and is already included in the package together with zlib. So
I worked on the check-updates.sh script. I came up with the following
patch:

,[ patch ]
| --- /usr/lib/f-prot/check-updates.sh  2003-02-09 13:50:41.0 +0100
| +++ check-updates.sh  2003-02-09 14:07:00.0 +0100
| @@ -57,6 +57,20 @@
|  SIGNINSTALLED=0
|  NEWFILE=""
|  
| +# Decide which zip tool is available
| +if [ -x `which unzip` ]; then
| + UNZIP=`which unzip`
| +elif [ -x `which miniunzip` ]; then
| + UNZIP=`which miniunzip`
| +else
| + echo "Error: Neither Unzip or miniunzip are installed."
| + echo "One of them is needed to unpack the downloaded"
| + echo "virus files."
| + echo ""
| + exit 1
| +fi
| +
| +
|  # A function to check the parameters we are given.
|  parseParameters ()
|  {
| @@ -183,7 +197,7 @@
|  # we need.
|  checkForExternalPrograms ()
|  {
| - for program in grep head wget unzip
| + for program in grep head wget $UNZIP
|   do
|   which $program > /dev/null 2>&1
|   CMDRESULT=$?
| @@ -386,7 +400,7 @@
|   downloadCompleted
|   fi
|  
| - unzip -o fp-def.zip > /dev/null 2>&1
| + $UNZIP -o fp-def.zip > /dev/null 2>&1
|   CMDRESULT=$?
|   if [ $CMDRESULT -ne 0 ]
|   then
| @@ -404,7 +418,7 @@
|   downloadCompleted
|   fi
|  
| -unzip -o macrdef2.zip > /dev/null 2>&1
| +$UNZIP -o macrdef2.zip > /dev/null 2>&1
|   CMDRESULT=$?
|   if [ $CMDRESULT -ne 0 ]
|   then
`

This doesn't hardcore the information which unzip tool is available, but
will figure it out when started. Please consider forwarding the patch to
F-Secure or using it in the Debian Patch. I can tell you that miniunzip
works fine as replacement for unzip. I gave the patch a short test and
didn't see any problems, but you might want to double-check. Thanks for
considering it.

Christian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux salem 2.4.19 #1 Wed Dec 4 19:02:50 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=POSIX, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  wget  1.8.2-9retrieves files from the web

-- no debconf information


-- 
Life's most urgent question is: what are you doing for others?
Martin Luther King, Jr.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#408135: marked as done (f-prot-installer: ftp.f-prot.com no longer available -- installation fails)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: f-prot-installer
Severity: important

Downloading f-prot from ftp.f-prot.org is no longer possible.
See ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/README.TXT

http://www.fprot.org/pub/ would be an alternative but they don't
provide a md5 file.

--
Regards
Simon

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.17.5 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl   5.805-1WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip 5.52-9 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget  1.10.2-2   retrieves files from the web

f-prot-installer recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
  f-prot-installer/install_later:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
  f-prot-installer/failed:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#411469: marked as done (f-prot-installer: virus updates not longer downloadable; deb package available)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: f-prot-installer
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

The script for updating f-prot can not get the updated virus definition
files, the ftp repository ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub/linux/ 
is empty. Instead of this, a deb package is
available under
http://files.f-prot.com/files/linux-x86/fp-linux-ws.deb
including update funcionality.
but the mail packages, i.e. kmail, recommends f-prot-installer.



- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF2XlVJT8rw+15p1gRAq5JAKCqqRoWhElChEGt+ECe8Fp3g8gD8gCg0tqv
shYt8AG3on5/7m4rn7Ryvek=
=rDBH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#234703: marked as done (gtksee: fast exit from viewer window)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.2-0.1
Severity: wishlist


Hi,

It would be nice to be able to exit from gtksee directly from viewer
window, let's say by just hitting 'q' key or something similar. My current
debian version only supports 'Esc' which only gets you to the browsing window
and then you have to press Alt+x. One-press-exit would make viewing of single
files much more convenient.

//I hope I didn't miss something in the manual//

Thanx

Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.23-grsec
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gtksee depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2  1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2   1.2.10-16The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg62   6b-9 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.5.0-5PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff3g   3.5.7-2  Tag Image File Format library
ii  xlibs   4.3.0-2  X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.1-4compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#408406: marked as done (glibc malloc checker can abort deliver resulting in bounced mail)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:24:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: deliver
Version: 2.1.14-4
Severity: grave

Libc version: 2.3.6.ds1-8

The deliver command fails infrequently producing the following log in  
mail.log...
 Jan 24 09:22:35 core postfix/local[21837]: 09C0836F28:  
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

 relay=local, delay=0.13, delays=0.04/0/0/0.09, dsn=5.3.0,
 status=bounced (Command died with signal 6: "/usr/bin/deliver - 
u /etc/deliver/default.user dave".
 Command output: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer:  
0xb7f51d14 *** )


In the last 69000 deliveries I see 220 of these failures. The users  
on this system all use the same deliver file...

#!/bin/sh

if cat $HEADER | grep -q 'X-Bogosity:  *Yes' ;then
[ -d ~/Mail ] || mkdir ~/Mail
echo ':Mail/bogospam'
exit 0
fi

echo ':Mail/shadow'

A fix, short of finding what is probably a doubly freed or  
uninitialized pointer would

be to disable the suicidal error enforcement recently added in glibc.
I think a putenv("MALLOC_CHECK_",0) as the first thing in the program  
would accomplish
this, though I haven't tried and there seems to be some dispute on  
the web if the last "_"

should be there, the debian man page suggests it should.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
was orphaned, unmaintained, out of date, buggy.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#370506: marked as done (gtksee is broken)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.6-1

If I change to a directory (using the filesystembrowser inside gtksee or the -r 
commandline switch), containing one or more images, gtksee crashes with the 
message:
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x0809bc92 ***
Abgebrochen

It is allways the same pointer and this happens with various image formats 
(testet with JPEG, GIF, BMP and XPM).

I'm using etch, upgreaded today. This bug exists since a few months. I always 
hoped, it will be fixed someday :-(

Marian Dubiel

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#219993: marked as done (gtksee: segfaults on long filenames)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:19:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtksee
Version: 0.5.2-0.1
Severity: normal

Hi!


GTKSee segfaults in browser mode on long filenames:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ strace gtksee
[ ... ]
stat64("/home/david/tmp/aaa.jpg",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=42888, ...}) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ 



Regards, David

PS: just for your info, current version is 0.5.4; and compiles without
changes to the debian-diff; but doesn't fix this problem; 


PPS: There are multiple SEGVs. The first is in
src/imagesilist.c:image_silist_refresh(): fullname[] has to be of size
FILENAME_MAX

Then it segfaults again in

(gdb) bt
#0  0x4038fba5 in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x4038ed33 in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x08051a79 in fsize (size=42888) at util.c:68
#3  0x0806c21a in image_set_tooltips (widget=0x8113220, info=0x8113058)
at imagelist.c:681
#4  0x08069de2 in image_silist_refresh (il=0x80f8618) at
imagesilist.c:350
#5  0x0806912c in image_silist_set_dir (il=0x80f8618, 
dir=0x80e3224 "/home/david/tmp") at imagesilist.c:191

But it looks as if there is already major stack/heap corruption.


Regards, David




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zion 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT

Versions of packages gtksee depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-10  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2 1.2.10-9  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2  1.2.10-16 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libjpeg62  6b-9  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff3g  3.5.7-2   Tag Image File Format library
ii  xlibs  4.3.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g 1:1.1.4-16compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is orphaned; abandoned upstream; buggy; superseded by gqview.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#364722: marked as done (f-prot-installer defaults to loading updates when establishing a ppp connection)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.14.sarge.3
Severity: important

f-prot-installer defaults to loading new virus signatures whenever a PPP
connection is established. I found this out the hard way when I was
travelling and established a [roaming] GPRS connection for 10 Euros per MB.

Even when not using GPRS I believe updating virus signatures whenever a
PPP connection has been estalished will be a nuisance because it will
degrade the connection throughput substantially for a few minutes when
using a typical modem connection with <10KB/s

I believe the default in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/f-prot-installer should be set
to not load new virus signatures by setting

  FPROT_USE_PPP=false

Thanks,
--Christian


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-cm1.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils 2.8.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl 5.803-4  WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip   5.52-1sarge4 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web

-- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
  f-prot-installer/install_later:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
  f-prot-installer/failed:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#3319: marked as done (deliver does not set exit codes as expected by sendmail)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:24:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: deliver
Version: 2.1.12-2

Due to some problem the "File table overflow" error condition occured.
During this sendmail received a mail, it was bounced with a wrong
reason "No such user", whereas I think it should have been queued and
retried.

The bounce mail said the following (user and hostname slightly
edited):

deliver: can't create /tmp/dl.a20853: File table overflow
deliver: can't create /tmp/dl.a20853: File table overflow
deliver: delivery error on host hostname
Delivery to these addresses failed:
username
Reason(s) for failure:
"username": No such user
deliver: can't remove /tmp/dl.a20853: No such file or directory
554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... unknown mailer error 1

Sendmail expects some special return codes (EX_TEMPFAIL and
EX_UNAVAILABLE; see sysexits.h) in order to decide whether it should
retry the delivery later.

deliver seems not to generate these exit codes appropriately.

(Instead of fixing deliver another option might be to use mail.local
again, however I don't remember what the current status with the
several mail.local programmes is.)

Sven
-- 
Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
was orphaned, unmaintained, out of date, buggy.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#354340: marked as done (f-prot-installer: update-f-prot fails if /usr is mounted read-only)

2007-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: f-prot-installer
Version: 0.5.21
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


Since I mount /usr read-only I get this reports from update-f-prot:

There's a new version of:
"Document/Office/Macro viruses" signatures on the web.
Starting to download...
Download completed.

There's a new version of:
"Application/Script viruses and Trojans" signatures on the web.
Starting to download...
Download completed.

Preparing to install Application/Script viruses and Trojans signatures.
mv: inter-device move failed: `/var/tmp/f-prot/SIGN.DEF' to 
`/usr/lib/f-prot/SIGN.DEF'; unable to remove target:
Read-only file system
mv: inter-device move failed: `/var/tmp/f-prot/SIGN2.DEF' to 
`/usr/lib/f-prot/SIGN2.DEF'; unable to remove target:
Read-only file system
Error while trying to replace old signature files.
Fatal error.Exiting... at /usr/lib/f-prot/tools/check-updates line 488.


Don't belong this files in /var/lib?

Ciao, Gregor



- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.71 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.15.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libwww-perl   5.805-1WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  unzip 5.52-6 De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wget  1.10.2-1   retrieves files from the web

f-prot-installer recommends no packages.

- -- debconf information:
* f-prot-installer/reinstall: true
* f-prot-installer/update_defs: true
* f-prot-installer/configured: false
  f-prot-installer/install_later:
* f-prot-installer/action: Download and install
  f-prot-installer/note_cron:
  f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp
  f-prot-installer/failed:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQETAwUBRABbtEsbarOtuQIpAQrWrwfvbcmKQopJsIJW3ZtBINPQQNxUKUi4+QnZ
fAj4PR4SYu8Bk0czHz+kBVYCSpDoJ3D78LdTyxyphQXthdXLkr5ZkfMRflyl8M1W
+ENRnuvZ/XSPY7bW0cjIQ4UF5lW+kMQUzzAPty+DzecRhvSULi/9j7fJcszw/c+K
UNQ8m0qbPvTpfDEX5u3HHhd/lscoTi+kjMR5R5BHb952FK5B/Lrp0VLkXVPiP3iQ
9bFrkdfPd477iHNLV7RPQYcCGwxUxt2vJrXjBrhc+ZZnErqJkOO5bERRw/0xmCHf
Gmq7ro/6EwCZHIoFM+Wza13hSusaFVCsIImeJuD097e9Unl3p5g=
=8lu3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed from Debian unstable.  I'm therefore
closing this bug report.  The package has been removed because it
is obsolete (see #414318).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

workbone REMOVED from testing

2007-07-03 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the workbone source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.40-6
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
#20070702
Bug #427592: workbone: FTBFS: /usr/include/bits/ustat.h:26: error: 
redefinition of 'struct ustat'

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]