ГЕНЕРАЦИЯ КАРТОЧЕК

[Bernice Farris]

  ПРОГРАММА ДЛЯ ГЕНЕРАЦИИ
НОМЕРОВ КАРТ
  KartaStav v 1.0
  Мегафон
МТС
  Билайн
  ПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ПРОГРАММЫ БЕСПЛАТНО ДО 5 ЯНВАРЯ
  Далее стоимость софта составит 6000$ в мес.
  Торопитесь скачать программу.
  СКАЧАТЬ БЕСПЛАТНО

Bug#404235: segfault patch for 404235

[Jens Seidel]

Hi Nico,

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 07:08:29PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> I attached 2 patches for trr_update and trr_format which 
> should fix this.
> Please test them before you upload the changes since I don't 
> use emacs and have no idea of the program.

thanks for the patch.

> +++ trr_format.c  2006-12-29 18:27:26.0 +0100
>  main(int argc, char **argv){
> -  char textfile[256], formattedfile[256], lockfile[256], *tmpfname;
> -  char command[256], line[1024];
> +  char textfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], formattedfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], 
> lockfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], *tmpfname;
> +  char command[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], line[_POSIX_PATH_MAX];

Please note that this will probably not work with the Hurd. This system
tries to avoid all useless limitations and _POSIX_PATH_MAX is one of
these. The proper solution is to create the buffers dynamically ...

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#404235: segfault patch for 404235

[Nico Golde]

Hey,
* Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-30 18:19]:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 07:08:29PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > +++ trr_format.c2006-12-29 18:27:26.0 +0100
> >  main(int argc, char **argv){
> > -  char textfile[256], formattedfile[256], lockfile[256], *tmpfname;
> > -  char command[256], line[1024];
> > +  char textfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], formattedfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], 
> > lockfile[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], *tmpfname;
> > +  char command[_POSIX_PATH_MAX], line[_POSIX_PATH_MAX];
> 
> Please note that this will probably not work with the Hurd. This system
> tries to avoid all useless limitations and _POSIX_PATH_MAX is one of
> these. The proper solution is to create the buffers dynamically ...

Yes that would be better then I didnt do this cause the code 
doesnt really need dinamically allocated buffers. Anyway the 
patch should just show all the other problems that exist in 
the code but I would suggest a documentation of secure 
programming and a complete rewrite of the code to the 
upstream author. Also the substitution of SED and GREP via 
the makefile in the c-files and then calling system() is 
really ugly.
Kind regards, happy new year
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de
JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons,
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!


pgp0ALuNchK2T.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Maintenance of the Drupal package

[Sven Herzberg]

Hey dudes,

  I'd like to start managing a drupal based web server and I'd like to
have recent packages for drupal (starting with the current 5.0rc1
version). Unfortunately I'm not a Debian developer (yet?) so I can't
simply upload my package to Debian.

  As you are currently listed in the Maintainer field of the current
Debian package I'd like to know whether there's someone in your team who
would advocate a Debian developer application so I can walk through the
new maintainer process with an updated drupal package.

Hope to hear from you until after the Etch release,
  Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maintenance of the Drupal package

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:49:58PM +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> 
>   As you are currently listed in the Maintainer field of the current
> Debian package I'd like to know whether there's someone in your team who
> would advocate a Debian developer application so I can walk through the
> new maintainer process with an updated drupal package.
> 

You don't need someone from the QA team to advocate or sponsor you.  Any
Debian developer can do that.

Regards,

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

libapache-authznetldap-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libapache-authznetldap-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.7-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libapache-miniwiki-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libapache-miniwiki-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.92-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libbusiness-ups-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libbusiness-ups-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.13-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libclass-contract-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libclass-contract-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.14-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libclass-prototyped-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libclass-prototyped-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.10-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libcorba-orbit-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libcorba-orbit-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.4.7-4
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libextutils-f77-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libextutils-f77-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.15-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libnet-ftpserver-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libnet-ftpserver-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.122-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libnewt-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libnewt-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.08-10
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libpod-pom-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libpod-pom-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.17-5
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libtangram-perl REMOVED from testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the libtangram-perl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.08-1
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
# 2006-12-29
Bug #404896: RM: libbusiness-ups-perl libnewt-perl libcorba-orbit-perl 
libtangram-perl libapache-authznetldap-perl libclass-prototyped-perl 
libapache-miniwiki-perl libextutils-f77-perl libnet-ftpserver-perl 
libdb-file-lock-perl libpod-pom-perl libclass-contract-perl -- RoQA; no 
rev-deps; orphaned or outdated

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]