Bug#396923: marked as done (laptop-netconf: [INTL:de] Initial German debconf translation)

2006-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 23:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396923: fixed in laptop-netconf 0.9.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: laptop-netconf
Version: 0.9.6.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please see the attached file.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.7-grsec-cz01
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


laptop-netconf_0.9.6.5_de.po.gz
Description: Binary data


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: laptop-netconf
Source-Version: 0.9.6.6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
laptop-netconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.dsc
  to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.dsc
laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.tar.gz
laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/l/laptop-netconf/laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated laptop-netconf 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  6 Nov 2006 08:34:41 +0100
Source: laptop-netconf
Binary: laptop-netconf
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9.6.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 laptop-netconf - network detection and configuration program for laptops
Closes: 396923
Changes: 
 laptop-netconf (0.9.6.6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Add German Debconf Translation, thanks Helge Kreutzmann
 Closes: #396923
   * Conforms with latest Standards Version 3.7.2
Files: 
 8a7206902c649db340d4d5b90a85aba1 564 net extra laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.dsc
 0f397a63bf0c0acfe92dcf15978d09cc 14448 net extra laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6.tar.gz
 ec47defe570d5e3a61771f68545affb9 16456 net extra 
laptop-netconf_0.9.6.6_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFTuc4EFV7g4B8rCURAljCAJ90he1Dipq1UZp7ljOErt9S+vmCygCfSXNA
Rzz0VUPcajssAyWR+4eRxrc=
=NkBI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#395728: marked as done (mon: missing binary-indep target in debian/rules (Policy 4.9))

2006-11-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:01:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: mon
Severity: important

Usertag: debianrulestarget

mon's source package contains a debian/rules file which does not 
contain the binary-indep target. This target required by both the section 
4.9 of the Debian policy [1] and the Etch release standards [2].

[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
[2] http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi,

this has been fixed with the latest QA Upload on Nov. 2 (0.99.2-9)
changelog:

mon (0.99.2-9) unstable; urgency=low
 [..]
   * Add missing binary-indep target to debian/rules
 [..]
-- Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu,  2 Nov 2006 16:25:44 +0100

bye,
- michael
--- End Message ---

Bug#259852:

2006-11-06 Thread hong 




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

august REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the august source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.63-beta1-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #381499: RM: august -- Ro??; orphaned; superseded by bluefish, quanta; 
abandoned upstream

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ee 1:1.4.2-7 MIGRATED to testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the ee source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.4.2-6
  Current version:  1:1.4.2-7

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

encore REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the encore source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 4.0.1-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #377620: RM: encore -- RoQA; orphaned, copyright problems

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ghostcore REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the ghostcore source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.9.8-7
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #377621: RM: ghostcore -- RoQA; orphaned, copyright problems

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gwrapguile REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the gwrapguile source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.3.4-17
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #367525: gwrapguile: Package obsolete?

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

dgpsip 1.33-2 MIGRATED to testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the dgpsip source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.33-1
  Current version:  1.33-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lambdacore REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the lambdacore source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 20040517-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #377623: RM: lambdacore -- RoQA; orphaned, copyright problems

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

jhcore REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the jhcore source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 20050204-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #377622: RM: jhcore -- RoQA; orphaned, copyright problems

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lineak-kdeplugins 2:0.9-4 MIGRATED to testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the lineak-kdeplugins source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2:0.9-3
  Current version:  2:0.9-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

revolution 0.5-4 MIGRATED to testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the revolution source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.5-3
  Current version:  0.5-4

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

positron 1:1.1-2 MIGRATED to testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the positron source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.1-1.1
  Current version:  1:1.1-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

statdataml REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the statdataml source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.0.9-3
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #333683: O: statdataml -- XML-based data exchange format StatDataML

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

relay-ctrl REMOVED from testing

2006-11-06 Thread Debian testing watch 
FYI: The status of the relay-ctrl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.5-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: 
Bug #237446: RM: relay-ctrl -- RoQA; orphaned since 2004, major version out 
of date, unchanged since stable, very few users, contrib, etc.

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]