sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-06-15 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1_all.deb
sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.diff.gz
sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.dsc
sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.deb
sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 367322 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.changes

2006-06-15 Thread Archive Administrator
sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.dsc
  sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518.orig.tar.gz
  sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.diff.gz
  sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1_all.deb
  sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373717: libbusiness-onlinepayment-tclink-perl: should depend on libbusiness-onlinepayment-perl

2006-06-15 Thread Ivan Kohler
Package: libbusiness-onlinepayment-tclink-perl
Version: 1.03-1
Severity: normal

Dear myself,

Depends: ... , libbusiness-onlinepayment-perl

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libbusiness-onlinepayment-tclink-perl depends on:
ii  libnet-tclink-perl 3.4.0-2   Perl interface to the TrustCommerc
ii  perl   5.8.4-8sarge4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information

-- 
_ivan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: forwarding to correct bug [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#369726: xcircuit 3.6.24-1 unusable on amd64]

2006-06-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 369276 -patch
Bug#369276: Settings --> Skin Downloader --> Crash
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

> tags 369726 patch
Bug#369726: xcircuit 3.6.24-1 unusable on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#373672: libjpeg-mmx: CVE-2006-3005: memory exhaustion

2006-06-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:53:45PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
> Package: libjpeg-mmx
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> CVE-2006-3005: "The JPEG library in media-libs/jpeg before 6b-r7 on
> Gentoo Linux is built without the -maxmem feature, which could allow
> context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory
> exhaustion) via a crafted JPEG file that exceeds the intended memory
> limits."
> 
> Although the CVE is Gentoo-specific, Debian's libjpeg-mmx is not built
> with --maxmem enabled, making it vulnerable.  I have attached a trivial
> patch to enable --maxmem to the same limit used in libjpeg62.  The
> Gentoo bug report mentioned in the CVE [1] contains a more elaborate
> patch [2] that limits the maximum amount of allocatable memory to 95% of
> physical memory.  I believe the second patch is the better solution -
> libjpeg62 sets maxmem to 1024MB, and that doesn't help much when mem +
> swap is less than 1024 (the sample exploit image attached to the Gentoo
> bug starts my computer thrashing).
> 
> Neither the Woody nor the Sarge version build with --maxmem and are
> vulnerable.

I don't see the point. There are valid use cases, where very large files
are required and if an admin encounters problems with users handling
overly large pictures she can apply site-specific resource limits.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



pythoncard_0.8.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-06-15 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
python-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/python-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
python2.3-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/python2.3-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
pythoncard-doc_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/pythoncard-doc_0.8.1-5_all.deb
pythoncard-tools_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/pythoncard-tools_0.8.1-5_all.deb
pythoncard_0.8.1-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/pythoncard_0.8.1-5.diff.gz
pythoncard_0.8.1-5.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/pythoncard_0.8.1-5.dsc
pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pythoncard/pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processing of pythoncard_0.8.1-5_i386.changes

2006-06-15 Thread Archive Administrator
pythoncard_0.8.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  pythoncard_0.8.1-5.dsc
  pythoncard_0.8.1-5.diff.gz
  pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  pythoncard-tools_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  pythoncard-doc_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  python-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb
  python2.3-pythoncard_0.8.1-5_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]