Processing of aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.changes

2006-01-12 Thread Archive Administrator 
aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  aee_2.2.15b-2.dsc
  aee_2.2.15b-2.diff.gz
  aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
aee_2.2.15b-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2.diff.gz
aee_2.2.15b-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2.dsc
aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 332300 346612 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310673: fixed

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

zope-backtalk |  0.3-7 | source, all

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344597: fixed

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libubit-dev |3.6.4-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libubit1c2 |3.6.4-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, 
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
  ubit |3.6.4-4 | source

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347471: fixed

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

rbscrobbler |   0.0.9r-1 | arm, hppa, ia64, m68k, s390, sparc
rbscrobbler |   0.0.9r-2 | source, alpha, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of vrweb_1.5-14_i386.changes

2006-01-12 Thread Archive Administrator 
vrweb_1.5-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  vrweb_1.5-14.dsc
  vrweb_1.5-14.diff.gz
  vrweb_1.5-14_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312864: fixed

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance 
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

zope-loginmanager |  0.8.8b1-3 | source, all
zope-zpatterns | 0.4.3p2-18 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, 
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.changes

2006-01-12 Thread Archive Administrator 
wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  wmsensors_1.0.4-5.dsc
  wmsensors_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
  wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

vrweb_1.5-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
vrweb_1.5-14.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14.diff.gz
vrweb_1.5-14.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14.dsc
vrweb_1.5-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 346877 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346877: marked as done (vrweb: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346877: fixed in vrweb 1.5-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:35 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evlzk-tT-UN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:49 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1EvlzF-0006xY-9g
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: vrweb: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: vrweb
Version: 1.5-13
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346877-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 15:50:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 07:50:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex4fN-0008Lr-5c; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:47:09 -0800
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346877: fixed in vrweb 1.5-14
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:47:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: vrweb
Source-Version: 1.5-14

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vrweb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

vrweb_1.5-14.diff.gz
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14.diff.gz
vrweb_1.5-14.dsc
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14.dsc
vrweb_1.5-14_i386.deb
  to pool/main/v/vrweb/vrweb_1.5-14_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comme

Bug#346950: marked as done (wmsensors: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346950: fixed in wmsensors 1.0.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0D-0001Jr-Uo
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:18 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlzf-000705-4I
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:43 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wmsensors: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:43 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wmsensors
Version: 1.0.4-4
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346950-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 16:10:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 08:10:33 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex4tu-0001pM-1C; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:02:10 -0800
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346950: fixed in wmsensors 1.0.4-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:02:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: wmsensors
Source-Version: 1.0.4-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wmsensors, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

wmsensors_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
wmsensors_1.0.4-5.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5.dsc
wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for r

wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
wmsensors_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
wmsensors_1.0.4-5.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5.dsc
wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmsensors/wmsensors_1.0.4-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 346950 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309545: marked as done (rbscrobbler: Requires rhythmbox to be running first)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:11:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing rbscrobbler bugs; package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 21:31:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 14:31:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY9ek-0008IL-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 14:31:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA80BA2D97;
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 11797-21; Tue, 17 May 2005 14:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2336BA2D8B;
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 093A53A80A; Tue, 17 May 2005 16:31:09 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rbscrobbler: Requires rhythmbox to be running first
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:31:09 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rbscrobbler
Version: 0.0.9pre3-3
Severity: wishlist

If you start rbscrobbler before rhythmbox, it will never figure out
that rhythmbox is running. The output is as follows:

[20050517 16:22:40] [Audioscrobbler] Plugin ID: rbx, Version 0.9 (Protocol 1.1)
[20050517 16:22:40] [Audioscrobbler] 2 saved entries loaded.
[20050517 16:22:40] [Audioscrobbler] Set username to "xxx".
[20050517 16:22:40] [Audioscrobbler] Set password.
[20050517 16:22:41] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (song): 
__main__::__song_change
[20050517 16:22:41] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (state): 
__main__::__playing_change
[20050517 16:22:41] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (song): 
__main__::__callback_song
[20050517 16:22:41] [Audioscrobbler] Performing handshake...
[20050517 16:27:47] [Audioscrobbler]   Handshake was successful.
[20050517 16:27:49] [Audioscrobbler] Running queue.

and no song that you listen to in rhythmbox is added to the queue.

However, if you have rhthmbox running, and *then* run rbscrobbler, the
expected behavior is observed:

[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Rhythmbox is running.
[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Removing Bonobo listeners (Rhythmbox)
[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding Bonobo listeners...
[20050517 16:27:22] [Audioscrobbler] Plugin ID: rbx, Version 0.9 (Protocol 1.1)
[20050517 16:27:22] [Audioscrobbler] 2 saved entries loaded.
[20050517 16:27:22] [Audioscrobbler] Set username to "xxx".
[20050517 16:27:22] [Audioscrobbler] Set password.
[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (song): 
__main__::__song_change
[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (state): 
__main__::__playing_change
[20050517 16:27:22] [Rhythmbox_Bonobo] Adding callback (song): 
__main__::__callback_song
[20050517 16:27:22] [Audioscrobbler] Performing handshake...

It would be nice if rbscrobbler were integrated with rhythmbox itself
so that it didn't need to be run separately, but it would also be
convenient if it polled to see if rhythmbox was running after it
started and did not find it.

micah



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages rbscrobbler depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-gnome2 2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME desk
ii  rhythmbox

Bug#336397: marked as done (please merge ubuntu patches)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:11:42 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing rbscrobbler bugs; package removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 00:08:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 29 17:08:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-a033e055.23-6-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se 
(ogre.magicalforest.se) [85.224.51.160] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EW0k1-0007wc-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:08:05 -0700
Received: from darkelf.magicalforest.se (unknown [192.168.0.136])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by ogre.magicalforest.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBD23C004
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Ubuntu-patches explained :-)
From: Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=E4levik?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zSo51ncdcVWjKV2xAQ73"
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:07:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-zSo51ncdcVWjKV2xAQ73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: rbscrobbler
Version: 0.0.9r-1

 Hi!

I just read your [1]blog and thought I would do some feedback :-). The
icons I've added was found on one of the Ubuntugroups on last.fm. Those
that made that was actually asking for inclusion, so I did that. Are
those something you might consider for Debian?

Concerning BTS: Yes, we currently have two of them. Bugzilla for
main/restricted and [2]Malone for universe/multiverse. At some point in
the not to distant future we will migrate main/restricted to Malone
aswell. [3]The bug in question.

[1]
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/a_bad_taste_in_the_mouth_detailed_ubunt=
u_patch_review-2005-10-13-03-57.html
[2] https://launchpad.net/malone
[3] https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/rbscrobbler/+bug/2925

Sincerely,
/Christian
--=20
Christian Bj=C3=A4levik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--=-zSo51ncdcVWjKV2xAQ73
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad
meddelandedel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDZA7ALdqCW1CcunERAgC+AJ9wXaH6dPL3dvy5Illi5983yKQ5qgCfbLwd
20sra0BxT1yW0CxuqRBGdbg=
=WQ1v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-zSo51ncdcVWjKV2xAQ73--


---
Received: (at 336397-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 18:12:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 10:12:13 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net ([64.62.161.42] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex6vl-0008Md-Cy; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:12:13 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (98-156-dial.xtn.net [66.118.98.156])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9B218437;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:12:09 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6AFFABEE25; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:11:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:11:42 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing rbscrobbler bugs; package removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Processing of xmcpustate_3-13_i386.changes

2006-01-12 Thread Archive Administrator 
xmcpustate_3-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  xmcpustate_3-13.dsc
  xmcpustate_3-13.diff.gz
  xmcpustate_3-13_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

xmcpustate_3-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Installer 

Accepted:
xmcpustate_3-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13.diff.gz
xmcpustate_3-13.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13.dsc
xmcpustate_3-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 346823 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346823: marked as done (xmcpustate: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346823: fixed in xmcpustate 3-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:33 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0S-0001P3-MA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:33 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlzw-00074P-DS
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmcpustate: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xmcpustate
Version: 3-12
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346823-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 22:24:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 14:24:13 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExAmg-00049y-5h; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:06 -0800
From: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346823: fixed in xmcpustate 3-13
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xmcpustate
Source-Version: 3-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmcpustate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmcpustate_3-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13.diff.gz
xmcpustate_3-13.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13.dsc
xmcpustate_3-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-13_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the

Bug#316491: xmcpustate: cannot parse /proc/meminfo on 2.6 kernels

2006-01-12 Thread Philipp Kern 
clone 316491 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: xmcpustate -- RoQA; not compatible with 2.6 kernels
severity -1 normal
thanks

xmcpustate is a X11 application displaying the system activity and
current free and used memory, written with the Motif set of widgets.

It is in its current form not compatible with current systems, lacking
proper support to parse the `/proc/meminfo' output of kernels in the
2.6.x series. As most of the architectures have already switched to 2.6
as the default installation kernel, this package does not work properly
on most systems and just quits with a failure when one tries to run it.

It is orphaned since three months at the request of QA, due to the
package being in a bad shape. It is currently RC bug free, due to two QA
uploads but as outlined above it lacks serious use. Popcon shows less
than 60 users having a current version of the package installed.

I don't think that it makes sense to ship this package with Etch if
#316491 is not fixed in time (and mind you, we want to release early!).

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: xmcpustate: cannot parse /proc/meminfo on 2.6 kernels

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 316491 -1
Bug#316491: xmcpustate: cannot parse /proc/meminfo on 2.6 kernels
Bug 316491 cloned as bug 347851.

> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#347851: xmcpustate: cannot parse /proc/meminfo on 2.6 kernels
Bug reassigned from package `xmcpustate' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> retitle -1 RM: xmcpustate -- RoQA; not compatible with 2.6 kernels
Bug#347851: xmcpustate: cannot parse /proc/meminfo on 2.6 kernels
Changed Bug title.

> severity -1 normal
Bug#347851: RM: xmcpustate -- RoQA; not compatible with 2.6 kernels
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346921: marked as done (ubit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ubit has been removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:48 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evlzf-sj-6p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:45 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlz9-0006wt-Bw
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ubit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ubit
Version: 3.6.4-4
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346921-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 02:51:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 18:51:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu ([171.67.16.123])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExF28-0002wL-Ko; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0800
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0D2pI74032007;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:19 -0800
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3150EE7909; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ubit has been removed from the archive
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Closing all bugs against ubit beca

Bug#347160: marked as done (libubit-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ubit has been removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 03:39:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 19:39:25 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvnsT-0006gY-B0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:39:25 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1EvnsP-0001SO-AF
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:39:21 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libubit-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:39:21 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libubit-dev
Version: 3.6.4-4
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package uninstallable.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you should update your Depends field and substitute
  xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that this
  development package needs to depend on. These would be the sum of:

(a) X libraries providing include files that are #included by any
public header file of the package

(b) X libraries that need to be present when statically linking
against this package. To find out these:

- if you ship a .la file, the X libraries referenced in the
  dependency_libs variable

- if you ship a .pc file, the X libraries referenced in the
  Requires, Libs, and Libs.private fields

- if not, the X libraries mentioned in the output of:

objdump -p *.so | grep NEEDED

  where *.so are all the .so files shipped in the package.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 347160-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 02:51:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 18:51:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu ([171.67.16.123])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExF28-0002wL-Ko; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0800
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0D2pI74032007;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:19 -0800
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3150EE7909; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ubit has been removed from the archive
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Closing all bugs against ubit because it has been removed from the
archive.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]