Bug#343955: kbear(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts

2005-12-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi,

I haven't seen before that this package is orphaned. Therefore, I will
handle the bug by myself.

Bye,
Aurelien

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343955: kbear(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts

2005-12-19 Thread Matej Vela
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I haven't seen before that this package is orphaned. Therefore, I will
> handle the bug by myself.

I don't think there's any point; kbear is unusable anyway due to
crashes (#326714).  Unless I hear back from the previous adopter,
I'll file for removal in a couple of days.

Thanks,

Matej


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343955: kbear(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts

2005-12-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno

Matej Vela a écrit :

Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:



I haven't seen before that this package is orphaned. Therefore, I will
handle the bug by myself.



I don't think there's any point; kbear is unusable anyway due to
crashes (#326714).  Unless I hear back from the previous adopter,
I'll file for removal in a couple of days.



Ok.

I already have a package ready, so I could upload it if you decide not 
to remove it.


Bye,
Aurelien


--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#344024: ITA: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for XEmacs

2005-12-19 Thread Javier Ballesteros
Package: nasm-mode

Severity: normal



I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start my process og being debian devel.





Bug#344023: ITA: mgm -- A highly configurable, very gaudy system load meter

2005-12-19 Thread Javier Ballesteros
Package: mgm

Severity: normal


I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start my process og being debian devel.



Bug#344023: marked as done (ITA: mgm -- A highly configurable, very gaudy system load meter)

2005-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:13:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344023: Acknowledgement (ITA: mgm -- A highly 
configurable, very gaudy system load meter)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 13:52:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 05:52:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.199])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoLRN-0002eP-KY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:52:38 -0800
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l35so366521nfa
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:52:36 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;

b=jFbWs9l4zrHmBrC/EDgEZX9tQ3vUZQRgGuUqHaBI9JuTDVQINMU7+G5yVjiONiL0149dBDtVgT6Lo2HOQEoDGxJpRSerNZIqMhRjyf5EBpx0WhRi1aYhEuNGuvThHRN9eLrC10ZgzCh7sEs5CRdjtxB5uVZDb7GyyFJ2K8OxYns=
Received: by 10.48.242.11 with SMTP id p11mr252745nfh;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.5.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:52:35 +0100
From: Javier Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITA: mgm -- A highly configurable, very gaudy system load meter
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="=_Part_1245_11278916.1135000355918"
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=_Part_1245_11278916.1135000355918
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: mgm
Severity: normal


I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start
my process og being debian devel.

--=_Part_1245_11278916.1135000355918
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: mgm

Severity: normal


I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start=
 my process og being debian devel.


--=_Part_1245_11278916.1135000355918--

---
Received: (at 344023-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 18:13:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 10:13:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.205])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoPVu-0003Gh-Vh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:13:35 -0800
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x4so378726nfb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:13:33 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;

b=TyKVUieV8rKG39neppgEGAS9tXQrlI0fLbwmsu3GP9FovyMrJPNYfUXv8no6mczFUWL2uQqwUUaCqRZUZMBpjoDAbkJZo5AgFdPxqhibpvKt2vC2aGs9IXmxg8nyn1qZdjEuHdbC1GNltNVc1w5p3vNZLIr4/1Be9B7Hpb7kZ7s=
Received: by 10.48.199.4 with SMTP id w4mr269228nff;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:13:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.5.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:13:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:13:33 +0100
From: Javier Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344023: Acknowledgement (ITA: mgm -- A highly configurable, 
very gaudy system load meter)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="=_Part_5986_31449467.1135016013312"
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=_Part_5986_31449467.1135016013312
Content-Type: tex

Bug#344024: marked as done (ITA: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for XEmacs)

2005-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:07:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344024: Acknowledgement (ITA: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for 
XEmacs)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 13:53:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 05:53:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.198])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoLSQ-0002lB-5b
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:53:42 -0800
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so346957nfc
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:53:40 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;

b=cVj1EF4mfciUSFUi6reZ17ef2Pqpjy2F9z8rAeeV2N9pb39PWzjakolIAj8Nsw5Mthq58w8Io7A1v8aIha09Q3QP2kaONKy4p9rWZeZZPzSKRRpeMgfPg0bl4GTRhCtElmhaAzz9qpn84eyklrjikKFL7NvGf4rNhpTV3sCj9bo=
Received: by 10.48.242.14 with SMTP id p14mr252746nfh;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.5.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:53:40 +0100
From: Javier Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITA: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for XEmacs
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="=_Part_1269_8562634.1135000420344"
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=_Part_1269_8562634.1135000420344
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: nasm-mode
Severity: normal

I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start
my process og being debian devel.

--=_Part_1269_8562634.1135000420344
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Packa=
ge: nasm-mode

Severity: normal



I would like to adopt the package and do work via sponsor in order to start=
 my process og being debian devel.




--=_Part_1269_8562634.1135000420344--

---
Received: (at 344024-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 18:07:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 10:07:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.198])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoPPf-00013f-So
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:07:08 -0800
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x4so378185nfb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:07:05 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;

b=V4OVdFEpbIohT56XsZOCfM2yiEPn+akGBRD0gkVMDIKUAGaHAnpAka6Gn9HWAMg95GhOvsOpOXU0WWGQd//waBxPOajNlUZInVXmHr03fQp1s/g0pC3Te43r9rH8EdZrRavigCXRHFgHgl5+Ii8qstIctIAnkzPNxAM8wwGPRXI=
Received: by 10.48.223.11 with SMTP id v11mr268902nfg;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.5.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:07:05 +0100
From: Javier Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344024: Acknowledgement (ITA: nasm-mode -- NASM mode for 
XEmacs)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="=_Part_5902_10850601.1135015625635"
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=_Part_5902_10850601.1135015625635
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted

Processing of epos_2.5.36-5_i386.changes

2005-12-19 Thread Archive Administrator
epos_2.5.36-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
  epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
  epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



epos_2.5.36-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-12-19 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 341426 343590 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#341426: marked as done (epos: missing dependency on perl-modules)

2005-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341426: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 14:27:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 06:27:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi ([195.197.172.116])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EhSvt-0001QS-OX
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:27:41 -0800
Received: from angua.pieni.net (ip212-226-168-226.adsl.kpnqwest.fi 
[212.226.168.226])
by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3EAD900C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:27:39 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [10.10.100.16] (unknown [10.10.100.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by angua.pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2096A68A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:27:39 +0200 (EET)
Subject: epos: missing dependency on perl-modules
From: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:27:47 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
REMOVE_REMOVAL_2WORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: epos
Version: 1:2.5.36-3

Testing the new version of epos with piuparts, I get the following
error:

0m6.7s ERROR: Command failed (status=256): 'chroot /tmp/tmpRCZAGN dpkg
--purge --pending'
  (Reading database ... 7580 files and directories currently installed.)
  Removing epos ...
  Purging configuration files for epos ...
  In order to use the --remove-home, --remove-all-files, and --backup
features,
  you need to install the `perl-modules' package. To accomplish that,
run
  apt-get install perl-modules
  dpkg: error processing epos (--purge):
   subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 255
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   epos

I guess you'll need to add a dependency on perl-modules.

-- 
I am an artist. Source code is my canvas, a programming language is my
paint.


---
Received: (at 341426-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 19:51:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 11:51:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoQyT-kl-LR; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#341426: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: epos
Source-Version: 1:2.5.36-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
epos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated epos package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:28:43 -0500
Source: epos
Binary: epos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.5.36-5
Distribution: unstable
U

Bug#343590: marked as done (epos: non fatal postinst error)

2005-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343590: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2005 12:26:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 04:26:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnEfM-00086x-B4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:26:28 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6DB3067D4;
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:25:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C7B2C80FC;
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:25:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 23473-06; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:25:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 091402C80DA;
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:25:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 
13:25:38 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: epos: non fatal postinst error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:25:37 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: epos
Version: 1:2.5.36-4
Severity: important


Hi,

here is the problem:

Setting up epos (2.5.36-4) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/epos.postinst: line 31: test: argument expected

Furthermore, dpkg does not mark the package as "failed config".


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages epos depends on:
ii  adduser  3.80Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.62  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.3.5-8.1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1-0exp4 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6   4.1-0exp4   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  perl 5.8.7-10Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

epos recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
* epos/start_automatically: false

---
Received: (at 343590-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 19:51:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 11:51:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoQyT-kn-MF; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#343590: fixed in epos 1:2.5.36-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:47:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: epos
Source-Version: 1:2.5.36-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
epos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.diff.gz
epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5.dsc
epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank yo