Processed: Affected versions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 318285 1.2.5-7.2 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as found in version 1.2.5-7.2. > found 318285 1.2.5-7.3 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as found in version 1.2.5-7.3. > notfound 318285 1.2.5-8 Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Bug marked as not found in version 1.2.5-8. > tags 318285 - woody sarge Bug#318285: CAN-2005-2240 symlink attack in xpvm.tcl Tags were: sarge woody patch security Tags removed: woody, sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff
Package: trustees Version: 2.8-3 Severity: serious First off, the description really should mention the necissity of kernel patches. It should especially mention the supported versions, which apparently don't include 2.6 and later versions of 2.4. Looking at the patches in the package, I don't see any current kernels. I haven't actually tested to see if they apply to new kernels, much less work. Second, those kernel patches do not belong in /usr/share/doc. They belong where kernel-package can find and use them. Perhaps even in a seperate kernel-patch-FOO package, for consitency's sake. They are not documentation; they are code that is an essential part of this pacakge. Putting them in /usr/share/doc is a violation of the FHS and of Debian policy (e.g., 12.3, "Packages must not require the existence of any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function") -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages trustees depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329698: marked as done (trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 20:36:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 13:36:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (anthony.metrics.net) [216.181.68.19] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIXnh-00059A-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:36:13 -0700 Received: from anthony by anthony.metrics.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EIXng-00061U-8H for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: trustees Version: 2.8-3 Severity: serious First off, the description really should mention the necissity of kernel patches. It should especially mention the supported versions, which apparently don't include 2.6 and later versions of 2.4. Looking at the patches in the package, I don't see any current kernels. I haven't actually tested to see if they apply to new kernels, much less work. Second, those kernel patches do not belong in /usr/share/doc. They belong where kernel-package can find and use them. Perhaps even in a seperate kernel-patch-FOO package, for consitency's sake. They are not documentation; they are code that is an essential part of this pacakge. Putting them in /usr/share/doc is a violation of the FHS and of Debian policy (e.g., 12.3, "Packages must not require the existence of any files in /usr/share/doc/ in order to function") -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages trustees depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 329698-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 21:25:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 14:25:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIYZ6-0001oN-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:25:13 -0700 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8MLP8MG016645 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:08 +0200 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8MLPVhS015139 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8MLPVwe015137; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329698: trustees: Please improve description; properly package kernel stuff References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:25:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Anthony DeRobertis's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:36:12 -0400") Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello, Unf
Processed: Makes the package unusable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 320752 grave Bug#320752: sendmail not found Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: owner -> submitter
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # To avoid the impression the package is being adopted. > noowner 286286 Bug#286286: cgiemail 1.8 (beta) Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Stefan Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 286286 Stefan Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#286286: cgiemail 1.8 (beta) Changed Bug submitter from Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Stefan Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.changes
cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320752: marked as done (sendmail not found)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320752: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2005 09:05:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 02:05:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from p54add885.dip.t-dialin.net (io.jupitermon.de) [84.173.216.133] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DzWET-0006WM-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 02:05:14 -0700 Received: from nils by io.jupitermon.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DzWEL-0002L3-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:05:05 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:05:05 +0200 From: Nils Bronstert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sendmail not found Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 I have the same problem as someone reported before. After upgrading to Sarge cgiemail doesn't work anymore. The errormessage is "sendmail not found". The path to sendmail seems to be not included in the binary of cgiemail when I'm looking for it with "strings cgiemail". I think that cgiemail is not built correctly. The exact error message is: | No email was sent due to an error. | | 500 sendmail exit 127 with error message | | sh: line 1: sendmail: command not found Debian-version: Sarge kernel-image: 2.4.18-1-386 libc6: 2.3.2.ds1-22 Regards -- Nils Bronstert --- Received: (at 320752-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 22:18:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 15:18:42 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIZNJ-00047i-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#320752: fixed in cgiemail 1.6-28 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cgiemail Source-Version: 1.6-28 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cgiemail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cgiemail package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 23:41:14 +0200 Source: cgiemail Binary: cgiemail Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6-28 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: cgiemail - CGI Form-to-Mail converter Closes: 320752 Changes: cgiemail (1.6-28) unstable; urgency=high . * QA upload. * Explicitly set sendmail path to `/usr/sbin/sendmail'. Since it's not essential, configure wasn't able to find it on most auto-builders and defaulted to just `sendmail', which made the package unusable with the default PATH. Closes: #320752. Files: 86bcfc716bbc216f90cf08e6ad83b50
cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.diff.gz cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28.dsc cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cgiemail/cgiemail_1.6-28_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 320752 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
