Bug#242117: still not ready?
Hi, ist cabot still not ready for testing? Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org pgpGsGXrSrQeO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#242117: still not ready?
Hello, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > ist cabot still not ready for testing? Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or should we wait until someone adopts it? Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242117: still not ready?
Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it? Nobody stood up to go and support cabot. I guess someone should ask for removal from the archive: people seem to be happy with caff, as shipped with the signing-party package. Laurent Fousse has the final word on this, though. Bye, Joost signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#242117: still not ready?
Hi, * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]: > Hello, > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi, > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it? #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea. cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough for our users. Cheers, Laurent. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#242117: still not ready?
Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]: > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > > should we wait until someone adopts it? > > #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I > checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot > _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of > testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something > along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package > and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my > opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea. > > cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before > we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough > for our users. Qingning, you expressed an interest in adopting cabot. Is this still the case? Would you like to take over upstream maintenance as well? Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242117: still not ready?
Re: Matej Vela in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it? As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves the same purpose as cabot, is a lot easier to setup and use, and has the saner address verification "protocol". I'd opt for removing cabot, but if there's someone to continue upstream, that's also fine. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.changes
sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 278430 315710 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Forwarded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 315710 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1295416 Bug#315710: sodipodi: Still opens file while pressing Cancel button... Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1295416. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278430: marked as done (invalid SVG MIME type in sodipodi desktop file)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2004 21:51:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 26 14:51:23 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lns-vlq-36-gre-82-253-88-140.adsl.proxad.net (jophur) [82.253.88.140] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CMZDv-0005qr-00; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:51:23 -0700 Received: from bonnaud by jophur with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CMZDt-00082a-M8; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:51:22 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: invalid SVG MIME type in sodipodi desktop file X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:51:21 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: sodipodi Version: 0.34-0.1 Severity: normal Hi, the problem occured when upgrading desktop-file-utils: Setting up desktop-file-utils (0.9-1) ... [...] File '/usr/share/applications/sodipodi.desktop' contains invalid MIME type 'image/svg+xml,image/svg' thatcontains invalid characters -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages sodipodi depends on: ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.1.7-2.2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-02.4.7-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.7-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.14-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-1compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 278430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:48:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:48:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHLzC-0004uH-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sodipodi Source-Version: 0.34-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sodipodi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL
Bug#284518: marked as done (sodipodi: Wrong MimeType in sodipodi.desktop)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2004 22:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 06 14:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from avas2.tiscali.cz [213.235.135.82]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CbRUY-0001bS-00; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:38:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (avas2.tiscali.cz [127.0.0.1])
by avas2.tiscali.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49E7638168
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:37:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from avas2.tiscali.cz ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (avas2.tiscali.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 20518-01-21 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:37:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (gwmhji1209.nsys.cz [213.235.108.34])
by avas2.tiscali.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E62219003D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:37:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jura by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CbRUH-0003yK-VF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:37:46 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sodipodi: Wrong MimeType in sodipodi.desktop
X-Debbugs-CC: Juraj Kubelka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Juraj Kubelka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:37:45 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at tiscali.cz
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sodipodi
Version: 0.34-0.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
There is a wrong message during:
# update-desktop-database -v
File '/usr/share/applications/sodipodi.desktop' contains invalid MIME type
'image/svg+xml,image/svg' that contains invalid characters
I think wrong line in /usr/share/applications/sodipodi.desktop is:
MimeType=image/svg+xml,image/svg
Instead of write ("," --> ";"):
MimeType=image/svg+xml;image/svg
Regards
Jura
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
cs_CZ)
Versions of packages sodipodi depends on:
ii libart-2.0-22.3.16-6 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-3 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.2.3-4 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype62.1.7-2.3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libglib2.0-02.4.8-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.4.13-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libpango1.0-0 1.6.0-3 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libxml2 2.6.11-5 GNOME XML library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 278430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:48:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:48:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHLzC-0004uH-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: sodipodi
Source-Version: 0.34-2
We believe that the bug you r
Bug#295408: marked as done (wrong MIME type in sodipodi.desktop)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 02:35:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 18:35:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from loncoche.terra.com.br [200.154.55.229] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cz4Av-000336-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:35:25 -0800 Received: from rosario.terra.com.br (rosario.terra.com.br [200.154.55.129]) by loncoche.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E902E7816A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:35:03 -0200 (BRST) X-Terra-Karma: -2% X-Terra-Hash: 798f63081d6b968d36a084da19a2080d Received: from localhost.localdomain (200165209083.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.165.209.83]) (authenticated user savio.debian) by rosario.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3306E3C025 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:35:02 -0200 (BRST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:33:03 -0200 From: Savio Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Rhythmbox error when upgrade Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12cvs187.1 (GTK+ 2.6.2; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: rhythmbox =20 Version: 0.8.8-4 Perl: 5.8.4-6=20 Kernel: 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 25 04:24:08 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Release: unstable Rhythmbox is working but when I upgraded appeared this message: ** (process:5711): CRITICAL **: file eggdesktopentries.c: line 2223 (egg_desktop_entries_add_group): assertion `egg_desktop_entries_lookup_group (entries, group_name) =3D=3D NULL' failed --=20 Savio Martins Ramos - Arquiteto Rio de Janeiro ICQ 174972645 Pirataria n=E3o! Seja livre: Linux http://www.debian.org --- Received: (at 278430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:48:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:48:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHLzC-0004uH-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sodipodi Source-Version: 0.34-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sodipodi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sodipodi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:28:17 +0200 Source: sodipodi Binary: sodipodi Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.34-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: sodipodi - Vector based drawing program Closes: 2784
Bug#323778: marked as done (sodipodi.desktop contains invalid characters)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 10:54:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 03:54:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mercuri.xtec.net (mercuri.xtec.es) [213.176.161.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E5i2C-0002yR-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:54:09 -0700 Received: from gregal.xtec.es (gregal.xtec.net [213.176.161.13]) by mercuri.xtec.es (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7IAq3j1007052; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [213.176.162.47] by gregal.xtec.es (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 (built Dec 2 2004)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:52:03 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:51:54 +0200 From: topi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sodipodi.desktop contains invalid characters To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-XTECm-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sodipodi Version: 0.34-0.1 Severity: minor Tags: patch the file .desktop for sodipodi (/usr/share/applications/sodipodi.desktop) contains an invalid character, a colon (,) instead of a semicolon (;) in the MimeType attribute. i've solved the problem changing: MimeType=image/svg+xml,image/svg with this: MimeType=image/svg+xml;image/svg -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages sodipodi depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.9-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.20-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime sodipodi recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 278430-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:48:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:48:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHLzC-0004uH-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#278430: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sodipodi Source-Version: 0.34-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sodipodi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/
Bug#315710: marked as done (sodipodi: Still opens file while pressing Cancel button...)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315710: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 07:35:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 00:35:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.nung.edu.ua (alpha.ifdtung.if.ua) [194.44.112.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dm5Bw-0001hv-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:35:04 -0700 Received: from s-andy.nung.edu.ua ([194.44.112.39] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=sandy) by alpha.ifdtung.if.ua with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dm5OE-0006eh-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:47:46 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andriy Lesyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sodipodi: Still opens file while pressing Cancel button... X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:34:51 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sodipodi Version: 0.34-0.1 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages sodipodi depends on: ii libart-2.0-22.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.1.7-2.4FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-02.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 315710-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:48:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:48:17 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHLzC-0004uJ-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315710: fixed in sodipodi 0.34-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: sodipodi Source-Version: 0.34-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sodipodi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.diff.gz sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2.dsc sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sodipodi/sodipodi_0.34-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sodipodi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that t
Upcoming imagemagick soname bump.
Moi! If you've been bored of too few library transitions as of late, I've got one here to cheer you up. As some of you are already painfully aware of, recent versions of imagemagick provided a changed ABI with respect to sarge without changing the library soname. See also #318176, #320029, #325490, #325651, and #325720. Unfortunately, this breakage was only notices when it had already hit testing. Fixing the mess has been given priority by the release team, even if it means yet another transition going on. I've uploaded imagemagick version 6:6.2.4.5-0.1 that provides new library packages libmagick9, libmagick++9 and the respective -dev packages. They're currently sitting in NEW, but hopefully will appear soon on a mirror near you. Please update your Build-Depends and prepare for a new upload of your packages to pick up the changed libraries. For reference, there's a complete list of affected source packages below. Regards, Daniel. ---[snip]--- J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pstoedit Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nip2 vips Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> koffice Adam Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> php3 Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prestimel Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> labplot Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> php4-imagick Francois Gurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kismet Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jmagick Teemu Ikonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> imview Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dx Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drawtiming Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dvdauthor Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> autotrace Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drip Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> xastir David Martinez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> k3d Nick Rusnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ale David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tclmagick Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> animal siptoolbox Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> librmagick-ruby eric pareja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kxstitch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242117: still not ready?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]: > > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > > > should we wait until someone adopts it? > > > > #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I > > checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot > > _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of > > testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something > > along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package > > and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my > > opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea. > > > > cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before > > we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough > > for our users. > > Qingning, you expressed an interest in adopting cabot. Is this still > the case? Would you like to take over upstream maintenance as well? > Hi, I am interested in cabot, but I do not seem to have the time to give it proper care at the moment. I will set it back to orphan. Qingning signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libcorba-orbit-perl 0.4.7-3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 318543 + fixed Bug#318543: libcorba-orbit-perl: FTBFS: static declaration of 'get_typecode' follows non-static declaration Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219490: marked as done (libtool: Completely dumb assumption can make -fPIC test fail)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219490: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 22:16:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 16:16:45 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tc2.perso.ens-lyon.org (arrakis.localnet) [62.212.101.78] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHsQn-00010k-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:16:45 -0600 Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AHsQg-0004RS-Lh; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:16:38 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:16:37 +0100 From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libtool: Completely dumb assumption can make -fPIC test fail Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libtool Version: 1.5-5 Severity: normal The test for whether the -fPIC flag is working is completely stupid. I've obtained this in the configure script of a package generated with libtool 1.5-4: [blah blah blah test of a 1-line program with -fPIC] if (exit $ac_status) && test -s "$ac_outfile"; then # The compiler can only warn and ignore the option if not recognized # So say no if there are warnings The comments says all. Of course there can be other warnings! Especially given that the test re-uses all previously set compiler flags! Luckily, GCC is not prone to give warnings with 1-liners C files. Still, for example, using -Wpadded, it will on powerpc and alpha. This example made hdf5 FTBFS because -fPIC was wrongly detected as non-working on these arches. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom --- Received: (at 219490-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 21:53:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 14:53:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHTU3-00048c-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#219490: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: libtool Source-Version: 1.5.20-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libtool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libltdl3-dev_1.5.20-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtool/libltdl3-dev_1.5.20-1_i386.deb libltdl3_1.5.20-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtool/libltdl3_1.5.20-1_i386.deb libtool-doc_1.5.20-1_all.deb to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool-doc_1.5.20-1_all.deb libtool_1.5.20-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1.diff.gz libtool_1.5.20-1.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1.dsc libtool_1.5.20-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1_i386.deb libtool_1.5.20.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libtool package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the
Bug#265005: marked as done ("New upstream version (1.5.14) available, fixes bugs")
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265005: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2004 11:27:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 11 04:27:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxintern.kundenserver.de (mxintern.schlund.de) [212.227.126.201]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BurGG-0006qu-00; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:27:17 -0700
Received: from [172.17.36.9] (helo=manwe.use.schlund.de)
by mxintern.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BurGE-S8-MY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:27:15 +0200
Received: by manwe.use.schlund.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 11 Aug 2004
11:27:14 +
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:27:14 +
From: Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libtool: Newer bug fix upstream (1.5.8) available
X-Debbugs-CC: Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libtool
Version: 1.5.6-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
see http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/libtool.html. This fixes a
number of bugs over 1.5.6, including the annoying ".libs/.libs" link
bug ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-04/msg00146.html
), that in particular I would like to see fixed ;).
MfG,
Stephan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-custom-adkm-manwe
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libtool depends on:
ii altgcc [c-compiler] 1:2.7.2.3-2 Alternate gcc package for the libc
ii autotools-dev 20040312.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii cpp 4:3.3.4-2The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii file4.09-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gcc [c-compiler]4:3.3.4-2The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler]1:3.3.4-3The GNU C compiler
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev]2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 265005-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 21:49:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 14:49:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHTU3-00048e-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#265005: fixed in libtool 1.5.20-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:31 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: libtool
Source-Version: 1.5.20-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libtool, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libltdl3-dev_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libltdl3-dev_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
libltdl3_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libltdl3_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
libtool-doc_1.5.20-1_all.deb
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool-doc_1.5.20-1_all.deb
libtool_1.5.20-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1.diff.gz
libtool_1.5.20-1.dsc
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1.dsc
libtool_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20-1_i386.deb
libtool_1.5.20.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/libt/libtool/libtool_1.5.20.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if a
Processed: Note for posterity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 40623 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86343 Bug#40623: vgrind doesn't appear to generate a proper index Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86343. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
