Bug#319156: aspell-nl: Depends on unavailable libaspell15
Package: aspell-nl Version: 1:0.1e-36 Severity: important This package depends on libaspell15, which is unavailable in unstable. Instead, libaspell15c2 is in unstable. Any chance on a new version of aspell-nl that depends on libaspell15c2 instead of libaspell15? I know there are issues with the transition to gcc 4 and this is probably related to that, but I was unable to find any roadmap for the transition. Thanks! Koen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11koen Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages aspell-nl depends on: ii libaspell150.60.2+20050121-3 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti aspell-nl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319174: shx(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess
Package: shx Version: N/A Severity: important Hello, The current version of shx fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, because of outdated config.guess and config.sub. The versions of config.guess and config.sub in shx are too old to correctly support Debian GNU/k*BSD. A version is needed from this year, which is available in the autotools-dev packages that are in current sarge, and sid. You can simply copy them manually, but it can also be done automatically using the method described in /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz It would also be nice if you cans ask upstream to update config.guess and config.sub in their next release. Thanks for your cooperation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-16 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of shx_0.1.49-3_i386.changes
shx_0.1.49-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: shx_0.1.49-3.dsc shx_0.1.49-3.diff.gz shx_0.1.49-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298415: marked as done (shx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): )
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298415: fixed in shx 1:0.1.49-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 12:06:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 04:06:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8H0N-00056H-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:06:35 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D8Hwa-0006uj-Vc; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:06:44 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: shx: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0):
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:06:44 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: shx
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'shx' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
hx_commands.c: In function 'expand_path':
hx_commands.c:2954: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
With the attached patch 'shx' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_commands.c ./hx_commands.c
--- ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_commands.c2001-09-01 18:32:03.0
+0200
+++ ./hx_commands.c 2005-03-07 14:02:59.271076567 +0100
@@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@
epchr = 0;
ambig = 0;
for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) <
cfl->fhlen;
-(char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
+fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len);
L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen);
if (fnlen >= len && !strncmp(fh->fname, ent, len)) {
@@ -3030,7 +3030,7 @@
continue;
for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) <
cfl->fhlen;
-(char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
+fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len);
L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen);
len = strlen(cfl->path) + 1 + fnlen + 1;
@@ -3113,7 +3113,7 @@
return 0;
for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) <
cfl->fhlen;
-(char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
+fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len);
L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen);
if ((int)fnlen == len && !strncmp(fh->fname, ent, len))
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_tty.c ./hx_tty.c
--- ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_tty.c 2001-08-29 13:40:38.0 +0200
+++ ./hx_tty.c 2005-03-07 14:03:17.188618151 +0100
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@
struct hl_filelist_hdr *fh;
for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) <
cfl->fhlen;
-(char *)fh += ntohs(fh->len) + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
+fh = (char *)fh + ntohs(fh->len) + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) {
fnlen = ntohl(fh->fnlen);
for (i = 0, bpos = 0; i < fnlen && bpos < sizeof(buf); i++) {
if (!isgraph(fh->fname[i])) {
---
Received: (at 298415-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 12:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 05:53:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvE4N-0002b9-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:53:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DvDzW-0007UV-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#298415: fixed in shx 1:0.1.49-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on s
shx_0.1.49-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: shx_0.1.49-3.diff.gz to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3.diff.gz shx_0.1.49-3.dsc to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3.dsc shx_0.1.49-3_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 298415 319174 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319174: marked as done (shx(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319174: fixed in shx 1:0.1.49-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 10:17:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 03:17:47 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvBe7-0004yQ-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 03:17:47 -0700 Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:250:fcff:fe4c:da07]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DvBe5-0005Rr-VQ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:17:46 +0200 Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DvBdW-000JUH-4E; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:17:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: shx(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:17:09 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: shx Version: N/A Severity: important Hello, The current version of shx fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, because of outdated config.guess and config.sub. The versions of config.guess and config.sub in shx are too old to correctly support Debian GNU/k*BSD. A version is needed from this year, which is available in the autotools-dev packages that are in current sarge, and sid. You can simply copy them manually, but it can also be done automatically using the method described in /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz It would also be nice if you cans ask upstream to update config.guess and config.sub in their next release. Thanks for your cooperation. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-16 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 319174-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 12:53:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 05:53:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvE4O-0002bL-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:53:04 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DvDzW-0007UX-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400 From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#319174: fixed in shx 1:0.1.49-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:48:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: shx Source-Version: 1:0.1.49-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of shx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: shx_0.1.49-3.diff.gz to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3.diff.gz shx_0.1.49-3.dsc to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3.dsc shx_0.1.49-3_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shx/shx_0.1.49-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated shx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP
Bug#319253: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of diskless debconf messages
Package: diskless Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of diskless debconf messages, please include it. -- Miroslav Kure cs.po.gz Description: Binary data
