500% more sperm Hector
Increase your CUM VOLUME, and Orgasm Length main benifits: - The longest most intense Orgasms of your life - Erctions like steel - lncreased libido/desire - Stronger ejaculaton (watch where your aiming) - Multiple 0rgasms - Up to 500% more volume (cover her in it if you want) - Studies show it tastes sweeter DISCREET SAME DAY SHIPPING - TRY IT, YOU'LL LOVE IT! (and she'll thank you for it) http://depletive.com/spur/?got psychotic you stephens me upshot you u.s me dana you feasible me rhenish you dominion me buckwheat you fire me cowlick you cyclopean me fennel you coarse me http://depletive.com/rm.php?got -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314261: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?
Package: libgd-gif Version: 1.3-5 Severity: important libgd-gif1 has been orphaned for ages, but there are still some packages which depend on it, so I cannot remove it right now. Could these packages move to some other libgd* package which we have in the archive? At the moment, the following packages (build-)depend on libgd-gif: nessus (depends) boot-floppies (b-d) gccchecker (b-d) nessus-core (b-d) png2html (b-d) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314261: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-06-2005 14:54, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > libgd-gif1 has been orphaned for ages, but there are still some > packages which depend on it, so I cannot remove it right now. Could > these packages move to some other libgd* package which we have in the > archive? > > At the moment, the following packages (build-)depend on libgd-gif: > nessus (depends) > boot-floppies (b-d) > gccchecker (b-d) > nessus-core (b-d) > png2html (b-d) libgd-gif1 is a (dead!) fork off of libgd 1.x made to preserve the GIF support dropped upstream. Switching would mean either dropping GIF support (which I believe is not really interesting, as only sane reason to use the fork is GIF support) or rewrite the code to support the newer (and actively maintained upstream!) libgd 2.x series. I considered adopting libgd-gif1 myself, but it makes better sense to kill all 1.x variants and move to 2.x (which has GIF support again now that the compression patent has run out). I suggest next step is to make the package maintainers of the above packages aware of this bugreport, if they are not already... - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCsC65n7DbMsAkQLgRAqiMAJ4/tVoFSLVJxBs/wdx/oix6f9ufrACggZ74 AC3dY3dM9TJ1g60hDzscigc= =uEc/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
question about unmaintained packages
Hello all, I'm new to this list so please bear with me, as I suppose this question has already been asked (possibly many times) : what happens when a package maintainer does not seem to maintain his/her packages anymore ? Do the packages remain in a possibly broken state for an undefined amount of time ? Are they re-assigned to another DD ? Is there any automated process that checks how long a bug has been open in the BTS ? I've come across bugs that are almost four years old .. I have lately submitted a bug report, sent an e-mail to the package maintainer, and am ready to submit a patch for the bug I've spotted, but there has been no acknowledgment so far from the maintainer, so I'm at a loss what to do next .. can anybody shed some light on this ? thanks, David. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#314261: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?
* Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-15 15:35]: > I considered adopting libgd-gif1 myself, but it makes better sense to > kill all 1.x variants and move to 2.x (which has GIF support again now > that the compression patent has run out). Do you know how hard it is to move from 1.x to 2.x, and is there any good documentation about migrating? > I suggest next step is to make the package maintainers of the above > packages aware of this bugreport, if they are not already... Not yet, but I'll do that soon. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Start achieving your goals
Hello and good-day to you, Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day, just for returning phone calls? I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this program. Give Us A Call At: 1 888 238 3164 Anytime, 24 hours/day. Sincerely, Brian Moore -- European legislators Jose Ignacio Salafranca and Carlos Carnero, both members of a European mission to monitor Lebanon's elections, strongly condemned Kassir's killing, calling it an attack against the freedom of speech of the Lebanese people. "You just witnessed the worst seven minutes of this boy's life," said Zonen. Zonen also pointed to testimony about Jackson's relationship with another boy in the early 1990s, which allegedly included spending nearly every night for a year with the entertainer. Kassir's wife, Giselle Khoury, and daughters Layan and Maysa wept in front of his coffin during the funeral Mass. His comments came during a joint press conference with the student's mother on Saturday. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about unmaintained packages
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, David Cho-Lerat wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm new to this list so please bear with me, as I suppose this > question has already been asked (possibly many times) : > > what happens when a package maintainer does not seem to maintain > his/her packages anymore ? This is eventually noted by the MIA effort of QA, possibly helped by hints from users/other developers/whoever. > Do the packages remain in a possibly broken state for an undefined > amount of time ? Yes. > Are they re-assigned to another DD ? Ultimately, yes. > Is there any automated process that checks how long a bug has been open > in the BTS ? I've come across bugs that are almost four years old .. Not for bugs in particular, but every DD can fix a bug when s/he really wants by NMU'ing the package in question with a fix. If no DD has done so far, none of them cares enough to spend the time on it, or either are simply not aware. Debian is and remains an organisation of volunteers. > I have lately submitted a bug report, sent an e-mail to the package > maintainer, and am ready > to submit a patch for the bug I've spotted, but there has been no > acknowledgment so > far from the maintainer, so I'm at a loss what to do next .. Ask on debian-qa or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this specific package and/or maintainer, the situation will be investigated, and action undertaken (usually, the maintainer is asked for comments, and one acts on the reaction or either ultimately puts up the package for adoption by anyone interested. So, in general, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] privately when you're concerned a certain package is unmaintained, or better if possible, offer your assistance to the maintainer and see if that works. Filing patches is always a good way to do so. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Bug#314261: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-06-2005 17:01, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-15 15:35]: > >>I considered adopting libgd-gif1 myself, but it makes better sense to >>kill all 1.x variants and move to 2.x (which has GIF support again now >>that the compression patent has run out). > > > Do you know how hard it is to move from 1.x to 2.x, and is there any > good documentation about migrating? Sorry - don't know: I don't know how to code C at all, only how to package it... >>I suggest next step is to make the package maintainers of the above >>packages aware of this bugreport, if they are not already... > > > Not yet, but I'll do that soon. Great :-) - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCsFKln7DbMsAkQLgRAvzLAJ94Exq4DGiokZxkLAmESA5eCfa0tgCghOGh 8LVej58nYy6g2zKFOc0Q7hQ= =Dk2G -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: question about unmaintained packages
ok, thanks, I'll contact MIA ;) David. Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit : >On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, David Cho-Lerat wrote: > > >>Hello all, >> >>I'm new to this list so please bear with me, as I suppose this >>question has already been asked (possibly many times) : >> >>what happens when a package maintainer does not seem to maintain >>his/her packages anymore ? >> >> > >This is eventually noted by the MIA effort of QA, possibly helped by >hints from users/other developers/whoever. > > > >>Do the packages remain in a possibly broken state for an undefined >>amount of time ? >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>Are they re-assigned to another DD ? >> >> > >Ultimately, yes. > > > >>Is there any automated process that checks how long a bug has been open >>in the BTS ? I've come across bugs that are almost four years old .. >> >> > >Not for bugs in particular, but every DD can fix a bug when s/he really >wants by NMU'ing the package in question with a fix. If no DD has done >so far, none of them cares enough to spend the time on it, or either are >simply not aware. Debian is and remains an organisation of volunteers. > > > >>I have lately submitted a bug report, sent an e-mail to the package >>maintainer, and am ready >>to submit a patch for the bug I've spotted, but there has been no >>acknowledgment so >>far from the maintainer, so I'm at a loss what to do next .. >> >> > >Ask on debian-qa or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this specific package >and/or maintainer, the situation will be investigated, and action >undertaken (usually, the maintainer is asked for comments, and one acts >on the reaction or either ultimately puts up the package for adoption by >anyone interested. > >So, in general, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] privately when you're concerned a >certain package is unmaintained, or better if possible, offer your >assistance to the maintainer and see if that works. Filing patches is >always a good way to do so. > >--Jeroen > > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: clone, reassign -> see bug log for more info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 314261 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Bug#314261: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Bug 314261 cloned as bugs 314315-314319. > reassign -1 nessus-core Bug#314315: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Bug reassigned from package `libgd-gif' to `nessus-core'. > reassign -2 gccchecker Bug#314316: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Bug reassigned from package `libgd-gif' to `gccchecker'. > reassign -3 png2html Bug#314317: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Bug reassigned from package `libgd-gif' to `png2html'. > retitle -1 Please migrate to libgd version 2 Bug#314315: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Changed Bug title. > retitle -2 Please migrate to libgd version 2 Bug#314316: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Changed Bug title. > retitle -3 Please migrate to libgd version 2 Bug#314317: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Changed Bug title. > severity -1 wishlist Bug#314315: Please migrate to libgd version 2 Severity set to `wishlist'. > severity -2 wishlist Bug#314316: Please migrate to libgd version 2 Severity set to `wishlist'. > severity -3 wishlist Bug#314317: Please migrate to libgd version 2 Severity set to `wishlist'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314318: marked as done (Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?)
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cloned too often has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 12:54:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 05:54:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiXPu-00054y-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:54:50 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 21FEE64D54; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:54:30 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A12517F89; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-Cc: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgd-gif Version: 1.3-5 Severity: important libgd-gif1 has been orphaned for ages, but there are still some packages which depend on it, so I cannot remove it right now. Could these packages move to some other libgd* package which we have in the archive? At the moment, the following packages (build-)depend on libgd-gif: nessus (depends) boot-floppies (b-d) gccchecker (b-d) nessus-core (b-d) png2html (b-d) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ --- Received: (at 314318-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 17:43:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 10:43:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DibvI-0005Yx-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:43:32 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id E251664D54; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:43:02 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6B0E7F89; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cloned too often Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: I cloned this bug too often. Closing. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314319: marked as done (Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?)
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line cloned too often has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 12:54:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 05:54:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiXPu-00054y-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:54:50 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 21FEE64D54; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:54:30 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A12517F89; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:54:22 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debbugs-Cc: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgd-gif Version: 1.3-5 Severity: important libgd-gif1 has been orphaned for ages, but there are still some packages which depend on it, so I cannot remove it right now. Could these packages move to some other libgd* package which we have in the archive? At the moment, the following packages (build-)depend on libgd-gif: nessus (depends) boot-floppies (b-d) gccchecker (b-d) nessus-core (b-d) png2html (b-d) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ --- Received: (at 314319-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 17:43:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 10:43:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DibvI-0005Yx-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:43:32 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id E251664D54; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:43:02 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6B0E7F89; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:42:55 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cloned too often Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 I cloned this bug too often. Closing. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314043: Proper encoding of patch; Was: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections
Hi, I noticed that UTF-8 encoded files were not properly transferred. That's why I resend the attachment compressed. (Don't worry, that's the last time I send a lot of patches. I just needed time to refine my script.) Jens gtktalog_1:1.0.4-2_de.po.diff.gz Description: Binary data
Usher prefers Rolex, Cartier and Breitling
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica ! We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move. The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too. These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars. We sell them for much less. - Replicated to the Smallest Detail - 98% Perfectly Accurate Markings - Signature Green Sticker w/ Serial Number on Watch Back - Magnified Quickset Date - Includes all Proper Markings http://www.chooseyourwatch4u.net/ you audit me sinusoid me [2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#143952: fair schoolgirl Elisangela peeling and showing her kippy tushy and neden.
It seems to be an appropriate way to say hello to OOP lovers :) She grabbed that black rod with her fist and started sucking like there was no tomorrow! Put it in slowly at first and then fuck the hell outta that white soft vagina! http://www.geocities.com/kevin_838mobley_209/?s=srt&m=IFGAEH.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd That nasty ho knew just where to stuff that prick tough inside her and then swallowed that huge wad. No legacy is so rich as honestly.If God had been a liberal, we wouldn't have had the Ten Commandments -- we'd have the Ten Suggestions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#250520: marked as done (libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl: newer version 0.11 available upstream)
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#250520: fixed in libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl 0.12-server-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2004 15:01:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 23 08:01:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kw04.de (ww04.kw04.de) [213.131.254.194] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BRuTm-000443-00; Sun, 23 May 2004 08:01:34 -0700 Received: from tsetse.adpm.de (pD9EF07F2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.239.7.242]) by ww04.kw04.de (ww04.kw04.de) with ESMTP id 5EC5E101C8 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 May 2004 17:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ant.adpm.de (ant.adpm.de [10.250.2.1]) by tsetse.adpm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BE817D60 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 May 2004 17:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Peter Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl: newer version 0.11 available upstream X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 17:01:31 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl Version: 0.07-1 Severity: normal A newer version 0.11 of this package is available upstream at CPAN. It fixes a few glitches and has better SASL2 support. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libsasl22.1.15-6 Authentication abstraction library ii perl5.8.3-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.0] 5.8.3-3 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 250520-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 01:22:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 18:22:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dij5n-0003k3-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:22:51 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dij0A-0005fj-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#250520: fixed in libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl 0.12-server-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl Source-Version: 0.12-server-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.diff.gz libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.dsc to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.dsc libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1_i386.deb libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further com
Bug#288569: marked as done (libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl: should depend on libauthen-sasl-perl)
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#288569: fixed in libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl 0.12-server-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2005 12:46:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 04 04:46:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from iterationx.de (h2404.serverkompetenz.net) [81.169.151.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Clo4h-0002ZK-00; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:46:11 -0800 Received: from carsten by h2404.serverkompetenz.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Clo4d-xb-D2; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:46:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Carsten Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl: should depend on libauthen-sasl-perl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:46:07 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Carsten Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-h2404-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-h2404-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.899, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl Version: 0.07-1 Severity: normal Authen::SASL:Cyrus is a plugin for Authen::SASL, without Authen::SASL it doesn't really do anything. Thus, the package should depend on libauthen-sasl-perl. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libsasl22.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library ii perl5.8.4-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.0] 5.8.4-5 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 288569-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 01:22:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 18:22:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dij5o-0003kn-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:22:52 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dij0A-0005fn-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#288569: fixed in libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl 0.12-server-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:17:02 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl Source-Version: 0.12-server-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.diff.gz libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.dsc to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1.dsc libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server-1_i386.deb libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl/libauthen-sasl-cyrus-perl_0.12-server.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.
Let your computer be the PRO!
Get discounted OEM software from Online Store! http://bqvf.ls706k3w0dlsiml.superacidmc.com It is only the wisest and the stupidest that cannot change. It is only the first step that is difficult. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
