Bug#296275: webmin-exim: missing settings or explanation in README.Debian
Package: webmin-exim Version: 0.2.6-2 Severity: normal in this module i did not find a setting (paths!) for the location of exim. that's ok, but there should be something about it in README.Debian. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-rc2-1um Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages webmin-exim depends on: ii exim4 4.34-10An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii perl 5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii ucf 1.13 Update Configuration File: preserv ii webmin1.180-1web-based administration toolkit -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Heyyy,, your secret admire
Would you like to keep me some company? My Sack of shit husband is out of town and I'm a little lonely. Safe way to contact me: http://www.netazipper.com/d/10.php Regards, Alexis b
Bug#126943: marked as done (fcheck: Patch for Lintian reports)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#126943: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2001 01:30:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 29 19:30:11 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cepheus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.195] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16KUnh-0005fI-00; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 19:30:09 -0600 Received: from Obsession.azstarnet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [169.197.10.48]) by cepheus.azstarnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA15294; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:30:06 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/ Received: by Obsession.azstarnet.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:30:44 -0700 From: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: fcheck: Patch for Lintian reports X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 18:30:43 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-5 Severity: minor Tags: patch --- debian/copyright.orig Sat Dec 29 18:29:10 2001 +++ debian/copyrightSat Dec 29 18:29:10 2001 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Or you can find the full GNU GPL online at: http://www.gnu.org - Note: on Debian systems, the GPL is located at /usr/share/common-licences/GPL + Note: on Debian systems, the GPL is located at /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL ### --- debian/fcheck.postinst.orig Sat Dec 29 18:29:32 2001 +++ debian/fcheck.postinst Sat Dec 29 18:29:32 2001 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ #* `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour' #`removing' # -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/ +# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/ # # quoting from the policy: # Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux Obsession 2.2.19 #1 Sat Apr 14 23:20:24 CDT 2001 ppc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages fcheck depends on: ii bsdutils 1:2.11m-1 Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite. ii file 3.37-3 Determines file type using "magic" --- Received: (at 126943-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G6N-0005fV-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:03 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G0e-0003Eq-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#126943: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: fcheck Source-Version: 2.7.59-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fcheck package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---
Bug#105556: marked as done (fcheck: wrong error message if dbf file is not writeable)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#105556: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2001 22:47:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 17:47:12 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [:::212.227.14.2] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15MH8y-00028Y-00; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:47:12 -0500 Received: from calista.inka.de (puric.inka.de [212.227.14.17]) by mail.inka.de with esmtp id 15MH8x-0001zr-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:47:11 +0200 Received: from ecki by calista.inka.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15MH8w-0004VV-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:47:10 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: fcheck: wrong error message if dbf file is not writeable To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:47:10 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-5 Severity: wishlist if i run fcheck as non root and it is unable toalter the database, the error message is wrong: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> /usr/sbin/fcheck -casxf /etc/fcheck/fcheck.cfg fcheck: no fcheck database exists! [/var/lib/fcheck/fcheck.dbf] terminating... -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux calista 2.4.3 #4 Sun Apr 1 01:46:56 CEST 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages fcheck depends on: ii bsdutils 2.11b-4Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite. ii file 3.33-5 Determines file type using "magic" numbers --- Received: (at 105556-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:42 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G70-00065B-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:42 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G0e-0003Eo-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#105556: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: fcheck Source-Version: 2.7.59-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fcheck package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:36 +0100 Source: fcheck Binary: fcheck Architecture: source all Version: 2.7.59-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: fcheck - IDS filesystem baseline integrity checker Closes: 97591 105556 126943 134799 159478 182847 275035 295348 Changes: fcheck (2.7.59-7) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #275035) * debian/postinst: rebuild db on upgrade isn't useful or maybe wrong. (closes: #295348) * Acknowledge NMU. (closes: #105556, #126943, #134799, #97
Bug#159478: marked as done (fcheck uses wrong configuration file location)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#159478: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2002 15:28:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 03 10:28:23 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lists.cert.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.16.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17mFbK-0001aY-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 10:28:22 -0500 Received: from rusfw by Lists.CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE with local (Exim 4.04) id 17mFb9-00021Z-00; Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:28:11 +0200 Subject: fcheck uses wrong configuration file location From: "Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50 Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:28:11 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 11.7.2 fcheck does not look in /etc for its configuration file: fcheck: Can't find configuration file /usr/local/admtools/conf/fcheck.cfg -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux CERT 2.4.18-xfs-1.1 #2 Thu Jul 11 15:21:32 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages fcheck depends on: ii bsdutils 1:2.11n-4 Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite. ii file 3.37-3.1 Determines file type using "magic" -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 159478-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G6M-0005eq-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G0e-0003Ez-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#159478: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: fcheck Source-Version: 2.7.59-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fcheck package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:36 +0100 Source: fcheck Binary: fcheck Architecture: source all Version: 2.7.59-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: fcheck - IDS filesystem baseline integrity checker Closes: 97591 105556 126943 134799 159478 182847 275035 295348 Changes: fcheck (2.7.59-7) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #275035) * debian/postinst: rebuild db on upgrade isn't useful or maybe wrong. (closes: #295348) * Acknowledge NMU. (closes: #105556, #126943, #134799, #97591, #159478) * Verify and Acknowledge NMU. (closes: #182847) Files: 39ff8322cda52c6b79a09ddadc0231aa
Bug#295348: marked as done (fcheck: fheck rebuild database during upgrade)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295348: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 10:16:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 02:16:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mjrider.student.utwente.nl [130.89.161.253] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D0zlL-0003XL-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:16:59 -0800 Received: from mjrider by mjrider.student.utwente.nl with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D0zkh-0001w4-Ac; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:16:19 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:16:19 +0100 From: Robbert Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: fcheck: fheck rebuild database during upgrade Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Robbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-6 Severity: minor -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fcheck rebuild it's database during upgrade. this quite 'annoying' when upgrade-ing a bunch of systems, because i have to sit and wait, till it's done. while the rebuild could be done in the background. which makes upgrade much shorter. Other problem is that for example if daemon X is upgraded too, it shuts down daemon X , rebuilds fchecks database, and starts daemon X again. I think that's unwanted behavour. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages fcheck depends on: ii bsdutils 1:2.12-10 Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using "magic" - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCEcvY3twlWS9jQkURAvQkAJsElErBCHuFh+lt5WxdYGJhTXghvwCeOqVm khDaWgNN0BUclnES0fV1lMo= =4BFI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Robbert Muller | Never let a luser on your console. spam(dot)me(at)grols(dot)ch | Because that means they're in your room. uin: 9659330| PGP-key 0x2F634245 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCEcvy3twlWS9jQkURAhmYAJ9yX1LmPBS5XpXchuQ9uEJkB+qjLgCfRg9u qwPiGbgId7n0F8SXKYB3qdw= =pYbW -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- --- Received: (at 295348-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G72-000661-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:44 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G0e-0003F5-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295348: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: fcheck Source-Version: 2.7.59-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcheck, which is due to be installed i
Bug#97591: marked as done (fcheck cron not guarded)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#97591: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2001 17:25:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 15 12:25:40 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kuroneko.thok.org (kuroneko) [199.103.225.11] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14ziZn-0002Hd-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:25:39 -0500 Received: by kuroneko (Postfix, from userid 3382) id 6E4371441C; Tue, 15 May 2001 13:25:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mark W. Eichin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fcheck cron not guarded Full-Name: "Mark W. Eichin" Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:25:36 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-1 Instead of, 30 ** * * root/usr/sbin/fcheck -asxrf /etc/fcheck/fcheck.cfg see the cron.d/anacron example of: 30 7* * * roottest -x /etc/init.d/anacron && /etc/init.d/anacron start >/dev/null This guarding is necessary because (when I delete, but don't purge, fcheck because it takes more than 1/2 hour to run, yet runs every half hour!) the remaining conf file (/etc/cron.d/fcheck) is still fired and generates mail reporting the error: /bin/sh: /usr/sbin/fcheck: No such file or directory --- Received: (at 97591-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:45 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G73-00066G-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:45 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3G0e-0003F7-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#97591: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8 Source: fcheck Source-Version: 2.7.59-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb to pool/main/f/fcheck/fcheck_2.7.59-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fcheck package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:36 +0100 Source: fcheck Binary: fcheck Architecture: source all Version: 2.7.59-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: fcheck - IDS filesystem baseline integrity checker Closes: 97591 105556 126943 134799 159478 182847 275035 295348 Changes: fcheck (2.7.59-7) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (closes: #275035) * debian/postinst: rebuild db on upgrade isn't useful or maybe wrong. (closes: #295348) * Acknowledge NMU. (closes: #105556, #126943, #134799, #97591, #159478) * Verify and Acknowledge NMU. (closes: #182847) Files: 39ff8322cda52c6b79a09ddadc0231aa 572 admin optional fcheck_2.7.59-7.dsc d0030c5a51877247316b18d8c02833fa 12650 admin optional fcheck_2.7.59-7.diff.gz ba495e0cb0c35b67d159d5e1914131d7 33514 admin optional fcheck_
ezmlm-idx
Hi, It would be NICE if one were able to build-ezmlm mysql|pgsql|std best, cfm Package: ezmlm-src Priority: optional Section: non-free/mail Installed-Size: 657 Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Source: ezmlm -- Christopher F. Miller, Publisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] MaineStreet Communications, Inc 208 Portland Road, Gray, ME 04039 1.207.657.5078 http://www.maine.com/ Content/site management, online commerce, internet integration, Debian linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#182847: marked as done (NMU patch for -5.1)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182847: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2003 12:42:17 + >From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Fri Feb 28 06:42:12 2003 Return-path: Received: from azure.humbug.org.au [203.143.238.84] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18ojq0-0008OQ-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:42:04 -0600 Received: from aj by azure.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ojsi-0006hL-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:44:52 +1000 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:44:52 +1000 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NMU patch for -5.1 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Lacking X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to Mail-Copies-To: nobody From: Anthony Towns Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: fcheck Version: 2.7.59-5.1 Severity: normal These are the changes made in the NMU. The patch applied to fix #134799 is slightly more conservative than the one in the bug report. diff -urb fcheck-2.7.59/debian/changelog fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/changelog --- fcheck-2.7.59/debian/changelog 2003-02-28 22:41:13.0 +1000 +++ fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/changelog 2003-02-28 22:19:48.0 +1000 @@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ +fcheck (2.7.59-5.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Use /etc/fcheck/fcheck.cfg as the default config file path. +(closes: Bug#159478) + * Fix some path names in postinst and copyright. (closes: Bug#126943) + * Allow for empty directories. (closes: Bug#134799) + * Clarify error message on failure to open database file for writing. +(closes: Bug#105556) + * Update upstream source, since the previous URL seems dead. + * This program is a perl script. Change to architecture: all, not +arch: any. + * Drop dh_suidregister from debian/rules. + * Bump Standards-Version. + + -- Anthony Towns Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +1000 + fcheck (2.7.59-5) unstable; urgency=low * Added Build-Depends: debhelper diff -urb fcheck-2.7.59/debian/control fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/control --- fcheck-2.7.59/debian/control2003-02-28 22:41:13.0 +1000 +++ fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/control2003-02-28 22:19:37.0 +1000 @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ Section: admin Priority: optional Maintainer: Graham Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Standards-Version: 3.0.1 -Build-Depends: debhelper +Standards-Version: 3.5.8 +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper Package: fcheck -Architecture: any +Architecture: all Depends: file (>=3.0), bsdutils (>=2.0) Description: IDS filesystem baseline integrity checker. The fcheck utility is an IDS (Intrusion Detection System) diff -urb fcheck-2.7.59/debian/copyright fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/copyright --- fcheck-2.7.59/debian/copyright 2003-02-28 22:41:13.0 +1000 +++ fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/copyright 2003-02-28 22:21:00.0 +1000 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ This package was debianized by Graham Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:31:02 + -It was downloaded from http://sites.netscape.net +It can be downloaded from http://www.geocities.com/fcheck2000. -Upstream Author(s): Michael A. Gumienny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Upstream Author: Michael A. Gumienny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Copyright: @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Or you can find the full GNU GPL online at: http://www.gnu.org - Note: on Debian systems, the GPL is located at /usr/share/common-licences/GPL + Note: on Debian systems, the GPL is located at /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL ### diff -urb fcheck-2.7.59/debian/fcheck.postinst fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/fcheck.postinst --- fcheck-2.7.59/debian/fcheck.postinst2003-02-28 22:41:13.0 +1000 +++ fcheck-2.7.59-nmu/debian/fcheck.postinst2003-02-28 21:19:29.0 +1000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ #* `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour' #`removing' # -# for details, see /usr/doc/packaging-manual/ +# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packagin
Bug#134799: marked as done (fcheck: baseline check chokes on empty directories )
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#134799: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2002 05:14:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 19 23:14:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ekc0.epkowa.co.jp (avasv1.epkowa.co.jp) [211.130.222.226]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16dP5b-0005zg-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:14:47 -0600
Received: from m0.epkowa.co.jp (m0.epkowa.co.jp [172.16.130.40])
by avasv1.epkowa.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7Wpl2-07/20/01) with SMTP id
OAA30955
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:29:00 +0900
Received: from M1.epkowa.co.jp ([172.16.130.41])
by m0.epkowa.co.jp (NAVGW 2.5.1.16) with SMTP id M2002022014144514744
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:14:45 +0900
Received: from aragorn (aragorn.epkowa.co.jp [172.16.144.82]) by
M1.epkowa.co.jp with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2653.13)
id 1QWDDGW8; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:11:53 +0900
Received: by aragorn (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C06B4D174; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:12:09 +0900 (JST)
From: Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fcheck: baseline check chokes on empty directories
X-Debbugs-CC: Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:12:09 +0900 (JST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fcheck
Version: 2.7.59-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I included /usr/local/bin and co. in my configuration files for rather
obvious reasons. These directories exist but don't have any files in
them right now. Creating the database is no problem, but when running
a baseline check (with the same options as used to create the baseline
database), fcheck bombs out with the following:
PROGRESS: validating integrity of /usr/local/bin
STATUS:fcheck: Error: Baseline does not match configuration file on
_usr_local_bin
terminating...
Subsequently commenting the /usr/local stuff in the configuration file
causes the baseline check to succeed normally.
A trudge through the source led to the following patch:
--- /usr/sbin/fcheckWed Jul 4 00:12:20 2001
+++ fcheck.patched Wed Feb 20 14:09:49 2002
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@
$Dirname =~ s/\//_/g;
if ($Verbose) { printf("debug: (GetDirDB) reading \n", $Dirname); }
%BaseLineData = ();
-if ((defined($begin{"$Dirname"})) && (defined($end{"$Dirname"})) &&
($begin{"$Dirname"} <= $end{"$Dirname"}))
+if ((defined($begin{"$Dirname"})) && (defined($end{"$Dirname"})))
{
for ($index=$begin{"$Dirname"}; $index<$end{"$Dirname"} + 1; $index++)
{
I've diffed the verbose output from both the original and the patched
versions and found no differences in the output up until the place the
original version bombs out. Since /usr/local/bin gets processed after
/bin that means that all the same files in /bin get checked in both
versions (just in case you got worried, I did ;-).
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Versions of the packages fcheck depends on:
ii bsdutils 2.11n-2Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
ii file 3.37-3 Determines file type using "magic" numbers
--- Begin /etc/fcheck/fcheck.cfg (heavily truncated conffile)
Directory = /usr/bin/
Directory = /usr/local/bin/
--- End /etc/fcheck/fcheck.cfg
---
Received: (at 134799-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 16:08:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 08:08:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3G70-00065O-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:08:42 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3G0e-0003Eu-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500
From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#134799: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No
Re: ezmlm-idx
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It would be NICE if one were able to > > build-ezmlm mysql|pgsql|std Hi, if you want to get this fixed, please file a bug report on the package. Read [1] for instructions. [1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#121621: It doesn`t hurt to check Vickie
Thank you for your attention. You have been pre-approved for a new home loan. This offer is unconditional and your credit is in no way a factor. You will find all details below: ___SUMMARY___ Interest: 3.45 Term: 360 months Max Price: $350,000 Closing Date: 30 days Please follow this link for your instant activation: http://www.1enderquotes.com/index2.php?refid=vik karate ktv dreg rul bipartisan nrx primordial ru square my colosseum tz spigot mfs bedroom zzi discrepant pz salmonberry qvm solidus jei circuitry zc denial rh cologne ihi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
