Processing of freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes

2005-02-16 Thread Archive Administrator
freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  freewrl_1.07-1.dsc
  freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz
  freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz
freewrl_1.07-1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1.dsc
freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 272815 286145 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#277044: marked as done ("--restrict-read-only /" should permit subpaths)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277044: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 07:01:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 18 00:01:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org [168.75.98.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CJRWW-00077T-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:01:40 -0700
Received: (qmail 9083 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 07:01:37 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
  by 127.0.0.1 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 07:01:37 -
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "--restrict-read-only /" should permit subpaths
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-3

"rdiff-backup --server --restrict-read-only /tmp" permits backups of 
/tmp/foo -- this is expected according to the docs.

"rdiff-backup --server --restrict-read-only /" does not permit backups of 
any subdirectory -- this looks like an oversight, the docs imply it should 
work.  the patch below fixes this behaviour.

-dean

--- rdiff-backup-0.13.4/rdiff_backup/Security.py.dg12004-06-04 
09:59:22.0 -0700
+++ rdiff-backup-0.13.4/rdiff_backup/Security.py2004-10-17 
23:52:14.0 -0700
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@
"""Require rpath not to step outside retricted directory"""
if Globals.restrict_path and rpath.conn is Globals.local_connection:
normalized, restrict = rpath.normalize().path, 
Globals.restrict_path
+   if restrict == "/": return
components = normalized.split("/")
# 3 cases for restricted dir /usr/foo:  /var, /usr/foobar, 
/usr/foo/..
if (not normalized.startswith(restrict) or

---
Received: (at 277044-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpW-nk-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:18 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002Lm-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#277044: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rdiff-backup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash

Bug#270715: marked as done (bug report)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#270715: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2004 20:27:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 08 13:27:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from basket.ball.reliam.net [213.91.6.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C592m-00087c-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:27:52 -0700
Received: from pit.ID-43118.user.dfncis.de (A0984.a.pppool.de [213.6.9.132])
by basket.ball.reliam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA22E3D97
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  8 Sep 2004 22:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from grfz by pit.ID-43118.user.dfncis.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1C592E-0003gj-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 22:27:18 +0200
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:27:18 +0200
From: Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bug report
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: wish: add more file name extensions to "--no-compression-regexp" 
default regex
Package: rdiff-backup
Severity: wishlist

*** Please type your report below this line ***

Please add at least the following file name extensions to the
default regexp for --no-compression-regexp:

pgp default file name extension for pgp encrypted data or
signatures 
gpg default file name extension for gpg encrypted data or
signatures 
flacdefault file name extension for lossless audio codec
rz  default rzip file name extension
lzh default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
zoo default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
lharc   default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
rar default file name extension for archiver and packer 
arj default file name extension for archiver and packer
jpegimho there are not only .jpg file name extensions
but also .jpeg

Thus the default would be:

"(?i).*\.(gz|z|bz|bz2|tgz|zip|lzh|zoo|lharc|rar|rz|arj|rpm|deb|pgp|gpg|jpeg|jpg|gif|png|jp2|mp3|flac|ogg|avi|wmv|mpeg|mpg|rm|mov)$"












-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc3
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 270715-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpK-l4-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:06 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002Lk-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#270715: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which wil

Bug#256266: marked as done (typo in error message)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256266: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 18:39:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 25 11:39:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) 
[212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bdvbu-0006HW-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 11:39:38 -0700
Received: from vash.int.ka0.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.41]:33146 
helo=vash.zugschlus.de)
by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (Debian package 
4.34-0+1zg1))
id 1Bdvbs-0003Cr-7A; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:39:36 +0200
Received: from mh by vash.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bdvbr-0002gc-Ay; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:39:35 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: typo in error message
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:39:35 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: minor

|Fatal Error: Previous backup to
|/mnt/backups/home/mh/backups/auto/rdiffbackup/torres/torres seems to
|have failed.
>Rerun rdiff-backup rdiff-with --check-destination-dir option to revert
|directory to state before unsuccessful session.

I cannot imagine that the marked line looks like it was intended.

Greetings
Marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-vash
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on the r
ii  python2.3   2.3.4-2  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature-bas

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 256266-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpV-nQ-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:17 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002Le-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#256266: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution ma

Bug#274326: marked as done (rdiff-backup crashes on recursive backups even when desination is excluded)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2004 05:22:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 30 22:22:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.velocitynet.com.au [203.17.154.98] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CDFsU-0007RA-00; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:22:46 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.velocitynet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F297C148
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Oct 2004 15:19:40 +1000 (EST)
Received: from mail.velocitynet.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 16664-36 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri,  1 Oct 2004 15:19:40 +1000 (EST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (164.196.221.203.velocitynet.com.au 
[203.221.196.164])
by mail.velocitynet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A290797C12E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri,  1 Oct 2004 15:19:40 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:22:36 +1000
From: Rob Shugg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Kinetic Performance Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rdiff-backup crashes on recursive backups even when desination is
 excluded
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at velocitynet.com.au
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4

Debian Sarge



k9:/home/rob/projects/sysadmin/trunk# rdiff-backup --exclude /home/backup 
--exclude /home/unsafe  /home /home/backup
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup", line 23, in ?
 rdiff_backup.Main.Main(sys.argv[1:])
   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 259, in 
Main
 take_action(rps)
   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 229, in 
take_action
 elif action == "backup": Backup(rps[0], rps[1])
   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 268, in 
Backup
 backup_check_dirs(rpin, rpout)
   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 314, in 
backup_check_dirs
 backup_warn_if_infinite_regress(rpin, rpout)
   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 347, in 
backup_warn_if_infinite_regress
 if Globals.backup_reader.Globals.select_source.Select(rpout): Log(
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'select_source'

Linux k9 2.4.27 #1 SMP Tue Sep 14 10:17:17 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux

Regards

Rob



-- 
CTO
KPT  Canberra
http://www.kinetic.com.au
Ph 61 2 61621770


---
Received: (at 235875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpT-mq-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:15 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002LY-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdi

Bug#225485: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2003 04:12:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 22:12:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from syr-24-59-43-53.twcny.rr.com (delta.anize.org) [24.59.43.53] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ab7Yq-0005pu-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:16:36 -0600
Received: from dfc by delta.anize.org with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1Ab7Yp-00032t-RR; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:16:35 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Douglas Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:16:35 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.3.jgoerzen-3
Severity: normal


rdiff-backup --calculate-average no longer works:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/delta/backups/terminus/rdiff-backup-data# ls -l 
session_statistics.2003-12-2*
-rw---1 root root  521 Dec 27 02:04 
session_statistics.2003-12-26T22:37:09-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  545 Dec 27 06:30 
session_statistics.2003-12-27T06:25:04-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  556 Dec 28 14:54 
session_statistics.2003-12-28T14:17:18-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  569 Dec 28 20:11 
session_statistics.2003-12-28T19:07:54-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  555 Dec 29 06:49 
session_statistics.2003-12-29T06:25:04-04:00.data
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/delta/backups/terminus/rdiff-backup-data# rdiff-backup 
--calculate-average 
session_statistics.2003-1 2-2*
Error: Wrong number of arguments given.
See the rdiff-backup manual page for instructions



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux delta.anize.org 2.6.0-test8 #2 Sat Oct 18 22:13:51 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on the r
ii  python2.3   2.3.3-1  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature-bas

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 225471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpS-md-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:14 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002LU-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of t

Bug#225471: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2003 02:03:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 20:03:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from terminus.anize.org [69.56.216.138] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ab7ct-000684-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:20:47 -0600
Received: from liberate.imissjerry.org (syr-24-59-43-53.twcny.rr.com 
[24.59.43.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by terminus.anize.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6122EB3A72
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:20:47 -0600 (CST)
Subject: rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken
From: "Douglas F. Calvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gfSSC5o2ZaYLC/l8FLKZ"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:20:46 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-gfSSC5o2ZaYLC/l8FLKZ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.3.jgoerzen-3
Severity: normal
=20
*** Please type your report below this line ***
=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/delta/backups/terminus/rdiff-backup-data# ls -l 
session_sta=
tistics.2003-12-2*
-rw---1 root root  521 Dec 27 02:04 session_statistics.=
2003-12-26T22:37:09-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  545 Dec 27 06:30 session_statistics.=
2003-12-27T06:25:04-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  556 Dec 28 14:54 session_statistics.=
2003-12-28T14:17:18-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  569 Dec 28 20:11 session_statistics.=
2003-12-28T19:07:54-04:00.data
-rw---1 root root  555 Dec 29 06:49 session_statistics.=
2003-12-29T06:25:04-04:00.data
=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/delta/backups/terminus/rdiff-backup-data# rdiff-backup 
--ca=
lculate-average
session_statistics.2003-1 2-2*
Error: Wrong number of arguments given.
See the rdiff-backup manual page for instructions
=20
=20
calculate-average no longer works as described in the man page.
=20
=20
=20
=20
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux delta.anize.org 2.6.0-test8 #2 Sat Oct 18 22:13:51 EDT 2003 i=
686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
=20
Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on t=
he r
ii  python2.3   2.3.3-1  An interactive high-level obje=
ct-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature=
-bas
=20
-- no debconf information

--=20
Douglas F. Calvert
http://anize.org/dfc/
GPG Key: 0xC9541FB2

--=-gfSSC5o2ZaYLC/l8FLKZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/8MTet5YHPclUH7IRAphlAJ9crioccFAuSfd7Y7PCSn0dTVA05ACdG34k
4cMbCs9icpl9lOcXQf/2Kas=
=nftj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-gfSSC5o2ZaYLC/l8FLKZ--


---
Received: (at 225471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpS-md-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:14 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002LU-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL P

Bug#235875: marked as done (rdiff-backup: AttributeError occurs when backup target is subdir of source)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 22:35:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 02 14:35:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-118-136-148.mn.client2.attbi.com (rocky.home.metalogue.com) 
[24.118.136.148] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AyIUU-0002vI-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:35:54 -0800
Received: from mike by rocky.home.metalogue.com with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AyIUQ-0002zd-Sw; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:35:50 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rdiff-backup: AttributeError occurs when backup target is subdir of 
source
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:35:50 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mike McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.3.jgoerzen-3
Severity: normal


rdiff-backup appears to be coded to warn the user when the backup
destination is contained in the backup source.  Unfortunately, the
code that displays that error message seems to contain a typo or
thinko, because instead of the intended warning message, the user sees
the following text:

[ Start Error Text ]
## /tmp/dirA /tmp
## /tmp /tmp
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup", line 23, in ?
rdiff_backup.Main.Main(sys.argv[1:])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 247, in 
Main
take_action(rps)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 218, in 
take_action
elif action == "backup": Backup(rps[0], rps[1])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 255, in 
Backup
backup_check_dirs(rpin, rpout)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 301, in 
backup_check_dirs
backup_warn_if_infinite_regress(rpin, rpout)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py", line 334, in 
backup_warn_if_infinite_regress
if Globals.backup_reader.Globals.select_source.Select(rpout): Log(
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'select_source'
[ End Error Text ]

To create output above, I used the following sequence of commands:

cd /tmp
mkdir dirA
mkdir dirA/backup
touch dirA/important_file
rdiff-backup --exclude dirA/backup dirA dirA/backup/folder

I don't understand Python code well enough to know what the proper fix
is, but looking at Globals.py, I see an attribute named
"backup_reader" and I see one named "select_mirror", but I don't see
one named "select_source".


Mike


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on the r
ii  python2.3   2.3.3-6  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature-bas

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 235875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpT-mq-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:15 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002LY-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241906: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 19:11:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 03 11:11:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from twinlark.arctic.org [168.75.98.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B9qY7-0006Rh-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:11:23 -0800
Received: (qmail 12137 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2004 19:11:23 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
  by 127.0.0.1 with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Apr 2004 19:11:23 -
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 11:11:16 -0800 (PST)
From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rdiff-backup --calculate-average broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.3.jgoerzen-3

this patch fixes an oversight which broke the --calculate-average mode.
not sure if it's fixed in the latest upstream 0.13.4 ... the changelog
didn't seem to indicate it.

laters
-dean

--- rdiff-backup-0.13.3.jgoerzen/rdiff_backup/Main.py.orig  2003-12-17 
18:59:25.0 -0800
+++ rdiff-backup-0.13.3.jgoerzen/rdiff_backup/Main.py   2004-04-03 
10:57:45.0 -0800
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@
else:
commandline_error("Switches missing or wrong number of 
arguments")
elif action == 'test-server': pass # test-server takes any number of 
args
+   elif action == 'calculate-average': pass # calculate-average takes any 
number of args
elif l > 2 or action not in arg_action_dict[l]:
commandline_error("Wrong number of arguments given.")


---
Received: (at 225471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpS-md-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:14 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002LU-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rdiff-backup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:29:00 +0100
Source: rdiff-backup
Binary: rdiff-backup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.13.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer

Bug#252960: marked as done (rdiff-backup: needs other version on debhelper build-dep)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252960: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2004 08:32:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 06 01:32:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) 
[212.126.222.70] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BWt4a-00014C-00; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 01:32:09 -0700
Received: from lefler.int.ka0.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.38]:32934)
by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (Debian package 
4.34-0+1zg1))
id 1BWt4Z-mB-NQ; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:32:07 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rdiff-backup: needs other version on debhelper build-dep
Bcc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:32:07 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: minor

debian/rules uses dh_python, which is not in debhelper (>> 3.0.0).
Hence, the versioned build dependency needs to be adapted.

Greetings
Marc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-zgserver
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on the r
ii  python2.3   2.3.4-1  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature-bas

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 252960-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpU-nK-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:16 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002Lc-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#252960: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rdiff-backup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:29:00 +01

Bug#260018: marked as done (rdiff-backup: target hard-link test is incorrect for AFS)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260018: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 21:25:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 14:25:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 216-229-91-229-empty.fidnet.com (mail.icequake.net) 
[216.229.91.229] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Blwgn-0003zE-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 14:25:49 -0700
Received: from zephyr.icequake.net (zephyr.icequake.net [216.229.91.242])
by mail.icequake.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AB60295; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:25:46 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nemesis by zephyr.icequake.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Blwgk-nI-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:25:46 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rdiff-backup: target hard-link test is incorrect for AFS
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:25:46 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 0.13.4-2
Severity: normal

AFS supports hard-links within directories, but not across directories
(or volumes).  Instead of trying to hardlink one file to another simply,
the test should attempt to hardlink a file in one directory to a file in
another directory to pick up AFS's incapbility.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-pre6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  librsync1   0.9.6-8  Binary diff library based on the r
ii  python2.3   2.3.4-5  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  rdiff   0.9.6-8  Binary diff tool for signature-bas

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 260018-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 10:23:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1TpL-lg-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:08 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1Tjq-0002Lg-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#260018: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rdiff-backup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a p

Processed: Merging bugs

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Severity 295575 serious
Bug#295575: evolution: woody2 disables SSL
Severity set to `serious'.

> Severity 295248 serious
Bug#295248: tex4ht:  interested in providing a patch for the upgrade
Severity set to `serious'.

> merge 295248 295575
Bug#295248: tex4ht:  interested in providing a patch for the upgrade
Bug#295575: evolution: woody2 disables SSL
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `package' don't match:
 #295248 has `tex4ht';
 #295575 has `evolution'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]