Heyyy Darling
Wanted to interest you in keeping me some company. My idiot Husband works night shifts, which makes me very lonely at night. To contact me please go here: http://www.dohernow.com/d/1.php Sincerely Yours, Megan b
Bug#245647: Any chance to get the improved man page included?
Hello, any chance that this bug receives a new upload to fix it? (Given that it is a trivial man page extension). Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpEMN2LFY6lt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Rudy, *, On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > Rudy did you actually want to adopt these packages?[0] They need a bit of > > whipping into shape so they can ship with sarge and someone really needs > > to do this. It's just you seemed to want to adopt these before (you > > ITA'd them) and then didn't do anything. > > > > Yes I do want them, I got into a busy days and some issues on last weeks (that > hopefully end this week), so I didn't had the chance to take care of them as > I wish. So, my suggestion is if you have the time to do some progress go > ahead and let's upload (I'll have to ask my sponsor, since I'm on the NM > also), then we can talk about how to handle them in the future. I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, changelog looks like this: xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low . * QA Upload * New upstream version (Closes: #254400) * Lower first capital letter in short package description. * Remove `Uploaders:' field in debian/control since package is orphaned. * Update libtool to latest version (Closes: #239469) however, i dont have access to a arm machine, so wasnt able to test if #239469 is still present with this revision. Signed package source is up on mentors.debian.net, sponsor needed. cheers, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCDmCMEFV7g4B8rCURAmIdAJ0dyPKSMQ0/cB4TDmfOjQzOsmva6wCfWlRN nS7/Sp9AYekCkwUBxtrUDiI= =dZV/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#244276: Bug#294459: HTML manual generated by a broken tex4ht install
> This sounds like a bug in tex4ht, right? I can't alter that package > to fix this file and make that build-depends from within the darcs > package. I think that tex4ht is orphaned in Debian? Maybe I could > try to do an NMU... tex4ht is indeed orphaned; I've added the corresponding WNPP O: bug #268126 to the CC list. If you consider an NMU, or if you could adopt it, you'll be blessed by many. The latest upstream fixes a ton of other bugs, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=tex4ht The upstream was asked by Debian to provide literate sources (see #244276 tex4ht: source code is obfuscated), and the thing was marked as a serious policy violation. The upstream took a considerable effort to do so and provide them at his site, and his efforts were never acknowledged -- instead the package got orphaned :( just another b/g info on why it's probably high time to do an NMU. vassilii -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A member at our website is attempting to find information about - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinion Alert Urgent - A member at our website is sharing experiences and opinions about you at our website. -- To examine requests about you use this link - http://9.dirt7.info/lx.php?a=search&b=5&[EMAIL PROTECTED] ### ATTENTION - If you prefer not to be notified by our website in the future when requests are made about you simply add your e-mail address(es) to our Do Not E-mail List. We will never send email to an address that appears on our Do Not E-mail List. To add to Do Not E-mail List use this link - http://4.dirt6.info/lx.php?a=donotemail&[EMAIL PROTECTED] Although it may seem confusing or complicated at first, once you understand how our website works you will agree that it is actually quite simple. We sincerely hope you will find our website useful. Best Regards, SYEC Support Department -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages
On 12/02/2005 at 17:38 Michael Ablassmeier wrote... > hi Rudy, *, Hi, > I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, > changelog looks like this: > > xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* QA Upload >* New upstream version (Closes: #254400) >* Lower first capital letter in short package description. >* Remove `Uploaders:' field in debian/control since package is orphaned. >* Update libtool to latest version (Closes: #239469) > Thanks for you work, almost all current -goodies are updated on our svn repository [0] now, and we'll appreciate as much as testing on them so they get uploaded asap. > however, i dont have access to a arm machine, so wasnt able to test if > #239469 is still present with this revision. Signed package source is up > on mentors.debian.net, sponsor needed. Thanks again. If you are interested on help Xfce packaging please join the group. -Rudy 0- svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-xfce -- Rudy Godoy | 0x3433BD21 | http://stone-head.org ,''`. http://www.apesol.org - http://www.debian.org : :' : GPG FP: 0D12 8537 607E 2DF5 4EFB 35A7 550F 1A00 3433 BD21 `. `' `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes
metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: metamail_2.7-47.dsc metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285914: marked as done (metamail: 8-bit encoding is supported by metamail but not by metasend script)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285914: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2004 12:14:16 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 16 04:14:16 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.sklad.bacon.ru (elbereth.sklad.bacon.ru) [81.1.198.156] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CeuWN-0001H6-00; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:14:15 -0800 Received: from kogan.sklad.bacon.ru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by elbereth.sklad.bacon.ru (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id iBGCDU1F029924; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:13:31 +0600 Received: from kogan.sklad.bacon.ru ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by kogan.sklad.bacon.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id iBGCDUS0032106; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:13:30 +0600 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by kogan.sklad.bacon.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) id iBGCDTEb032105; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:13:29 +0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===70493051481385138==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sergey Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metamail: 8-bit encoding is supported by metamail but not by metasend script X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:13:29 +0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===70493051481385138== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: metamail Version: 2.7-46 Severity: normal Tags: patch -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kogan 2.4.25 #18 Mon Jun 28 16:55:20 OMSST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.koi8r, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.koi8r Versions of packages metamail depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-3Shared libraries for terminal hand -- no debconf information 8-bit text/plain e-mail are common in ex-USSR countries. Metamail itself works with 8-bit transfer-encoding just fine, but metasend script treats -e "8bit" like -e "quoted-printable". Attached patch should fix this problem. --===70493051481385138== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="metasend.diff" *** metasend.oldThu Dec 16 17:55:09 2004 --- metasend.newThu Dec 16 17:58:57 2004 *** *** 135,144 --- 135,145 encode=$1 case "$encode" in "base64") encodingprog="mimencode -b";; "x-uue")encodingprog="uuencode \$datafile";; "7bit") encodingprog=cat;; + "8bit") encodingprog=cat;; *) encodingprog="mimencode -q" encode=quoted-printable ;; esac shift ;; *** *** 322,331 --- 323,333 echo "Do you want to encode this data for sending through the mail?" echo " 1 -- No, it is already in 7 bit ASCII" echo " 2 -- Yes, encode in base64 (most efficient)" echo " 3 -- Yes, encode in quoted-printable (less efficient, more readable)" echo " 4 -- Yes, encode it using uuencode (not standard, being phased out)" + echo " 5 -- No, it is 8 bit extended ASCII" read encode looping=0 case "$encode" in 1) encodingprog=cat encode=7bit ;; *** *** 333,342 --- 335,346 encode=base64 ;; 3) encodingprog="mimencode -q"
Bug#245647: marked as done (metamail: Add/Improve SEE ALSO section for splitmail/mimeit)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245647: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 12:35:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 24 05:35:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHMNG-00048o-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 05:35:14 -0700 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3OCZ9v9028469 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:35:09 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.99]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D77C542 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:35:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id B87F75F22; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:35:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:35:03 +0200 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: metamail: Add/Improve SEE ALSO section for splitmail/mimeit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: metamail Version: 2.7-45.3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I recently tried to decode a mail generated by splitmail. Neither apropos nor the two above man pages helped me; by chance I discovered munpack, which works just fine. I edited the two man pages. Besides adding/improving the SEE ALSO section(s) I made a small stylistic correction also. Things to be considered: *)Move SEE ALSO in splitmail to the end of the file (this is IMHO common usage; I first missed it when preparing my patch) *)The sentence "This manual page was written for the Debian GNU/Linux distribution (but may be used by others), because the original program=20 does not have a manual page." should be moved into the AUTHOR section, as it contains meta information about the manual page and is irrelevant for the interface of the programm. *)splitmail talks about passing options to sendmail. IMHO this should be generalized to MTA, e.g. "the verbose flag will be passed to your MTA, e.g. \fBexim\fR(8) or \fBsendmail\fR(8). --- splitmail.1.orig1992-05-13 18:26:02.0 +0200 +++ splitmail.1 2004-04-23 20:47:59.0 +0200 @@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ .SH DESCRIPTION The .I splitmail -program will take an email message and break it up into smaller pieces usi= ng the "message/partial" type defined by MIME, the proposed Internet standa= rd for multimedia mail formats. =20 +program will take an email message and break it up into smaller pieces usi= ng the "message/partial" type defined by MIME(1), the proposed Internet sta= ndard for multimedia mail formats. =20 =20 By default it will take the message either from standard input or the name= d file, and will produce a set of partial message files with names like "/t= mp/split.1" for the first part, and so on. The prefix "/tmp/split." can be= overridden using the "-p" option. =20 =20 -If the -d option is specified, the mail will actually be delivered. If -v= is specified, the verbose flag will be passed to sendmail. +If the -d option is specified, the mail will actually be delivered. If -v= is specified, the verbose flag will be passed to \fBsendmail\fR(8). =20 -The -i option can be used to make splitmail generate the pieces with simil= ar (but not identical) message-id fields, in a format which allows them to = be easily correlated with one another and which end with the suffix
Bug#184410: marked as done (metamail: debug message "pre access" left in released version)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184410: fixed in metamail 2.7-47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 03:17:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 21:17:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mnementh.archaic.org.uk [81.2.115.146]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18swk0-0007OM-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:17:16 -0600
Received: from localhost (archaic.org.uk) [127.0.0.1]
by mnementh.archaic.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18swjw-0002XY-00 (Debian); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 03:17:12 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: metamail: debug message "pre access" left in released version
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 03:17:06 +
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,
SPAM_PHRASE_03_05
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-45
metamail has left a debug message that says "pre access" in the
production version of the code that gets shipped in the Debian
package. You can provoke it by running metamail on a message
with an unknown MIME type. You should get something like this:
What do you want to do with the raw data?
1 -- See it as text
2 -- Write it to a file
3 -- Just skip it
2
Please enter the name of a file to which the data should be written
(Default: Cachebench.results.xls) >
tried to remove non tmplist file Cachebench.results.xls
pre accessWrote file Cachebench.results.xls
^^ trace message here.
(I'm assuming the 'tried to remove non tmplist file' message
is an artifact of the way I'm invoking metamail -- it doesn't
happen when my MTA (nmh) calls metamail, but the 'pre access'
trace does.)
Here is a totally untested patch to make this message only
be printed if in debugging mode:
===begin===
--- src/metamail/metamail.c.origWed Mar 12 01:05:05 2003
+++ src/metamail/metamail.c Wed Mar 12 01:06:02 2003
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@
DelTmpFileName( suggestedname );
- fprintf(stderr, "pre access");
+ if (DoDebug) fprintf(stderr, "pre access");
if (access(Fname, F_OK) == 0) {
char *s, AnsBuf[50];
===endit===
-- PMM
---
Received: (at 184410-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 00:09:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 16:09:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D07K1-0003EK-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:09:09 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D07DP-0003kW-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#184410: fixed in metamail 2.7-47
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: metamail
Source-Version: 2.7-47
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metamail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz
metamail_2.7-47.dsc
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.dsc
metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metamail
package)
(This message was generat
Bug#249823: marked as done (metamail: additional option when handling unrecognized content types)
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249823: fixed in metamail 2.7-47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2004 11:47:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 19 04:47:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97] (exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BQPXr-0001Rw-00; Wed, 19 May 2004 04:47:36 -0700
Received: from tpce14.tm.uka.de (i70pc09.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.66.83])
by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1BQPXp-00045x-00; Wed, 19 May 2004 13:47:33 +0200
Received: from kraft by tpce14.tm.uka.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BQPXp-0002zi-00; Wed, 19 May 2004 13:47:33 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: metamail: additional option when handling unrecognized content types
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:47:33 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Daniel Kraft " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: metamail
Version: 2.7-45.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Some mail clients like to send attachments with content type
application/octet-stream, even if they obviously (e.g. from the
filename suffix) have a more specific type. In that case, metamail
asks the user whether it should display the attachment as text, save
it, or skip it. The following small patch adds as another option the
possibility to explicity give an other content type and process the
attachment accordingly.
Regards,
Daniel
--- metamail-2.7/src/metamail/metamail.c2004-05-19 13:27:02.0
+0200
+++ metamail-2.7-patched/src/metamail/metamail.c2004-05-19
13:21:31.0 +0200
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
if (FileWriteOnly) {
ans = 2;
} else {
-printf("\nWhat do you want to do with the %s data?\n1 --
See it as text\n2 -- Write it to a file\n3 -- Just skip it\n\n", octetstream ?
"raw" : ContentType);
+printf("\nWhat do you want to do with the %s data?\n1 --
See it as text\n2 -- Write it to a file\n3 -- Just skip it\n4 -- Give another
content type\n\n", octetstream ? "raw" : ContentType);
fgets(Fname, sizeof(Fname), stdin);
ans = atoi(Fname);
}
@@ -475,6 +475,24 @@
ConsumeRestOfPart(NULL);
return(0);
break;
+ case 4:
+ {
+ char *savedContentType = ContentType;
+ ContentType = malloc(64);
+ printf("Please enter new content type> ");
+ fflush(stdout);
+ fgets(ContentType, 64, stdin);
+ ContentType[strlen(ContentType) - 1] = '\0'; /* bogus
newline */
+ if (!ProcessMailcapFiles(SquirrelFile)) {
+ free(savedContentType);
+ return(0);
+ }
+ printf("\nNo matching mailcap entry found.\n");
+ free(ContentType);
+ ContentType = savedContentType;
+ ans = 0;
+ break;
+ }
default:
ans = 0;
break;
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (910, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages metamail depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.4-3Shared libraries for terminal hand
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 249823-close) by
metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz metamail_2.7-47.dsc to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.dsc metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 184410 245647 249823 285914 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Rudy, On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:28:05PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, > > changelog looks like this: > > > > xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* QA Upload > >* New upstream version (Closes: #254400) > >* Lower first capital letter in short package description. > >* Remove `Uploaders:' field in debian/control since package is orphaned. > >* Update libtool to latest version (Closes: #239469) > > > > Thanks for you work, almost all current -goodies are updated on our > svn repository [0] now, and we'll appreciate as much as testing on > them so they get uploaded asap. ah, okey. I didn't expect someone working on these packages since the Bugreports seemed rather untouched, however, nice to hear :-) cheers, - michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCDqbYEFV7g4B8rCURAj3OAJ9r7dYNXx82nvpQLkFmGh2RdVeWkgCdGwps TVFjaoZQA3OIeLXQZkiVst4= =Ozry -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 294972 to liblockfile-simple-perl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294972 liblockfile-simple-perl Bug#294972: Locking fails with lots of perl warnings under low diskspace Bug reassigned from package `debmirror' to `liblockfile-simple-perl'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 294972 to liblockfile-simple-perl,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294972 liblockfile-simple-perl, Bug#294972: Locking fails with lots of perl warnings under low diskspace Bug reassigned from package `liblockfile-simple-perl' to `liblockfile-simple-perl,'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
