Processing of gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.changes
gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gupsc_0.3.1-5.dsc gupsc_0.3.1-5.diff.gz gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289485: marked as done (gupsc: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev')
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:02:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289485: fixed in gupsc 0.3.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 13:10:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 05:10:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c214218.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.214.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cncpw-0004k5-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 05:10:28 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cncvm-fv-Mz; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:16:30 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gupsc: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:16:30 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gupsc Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. The package builds fine without it. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control 2005-01-09 13:55:41.281300032 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-01-09 13:55:38.97512 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gettext, gdk-imlib1-dev, libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libdb3-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gettext, gdk-imlib1-dev, libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: gupsc --- Received: (at 289485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 09:08:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 01:08:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CnvWw-0001St-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:08:06 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CnvRF-00045n-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:02:13 -0500 From: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#289485: fixed in gupsc 0.3.1-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:02:13 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gupsc Source-Version: 0.3.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gupsc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gupsc_0.3.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5.diff.gz gupsc_0.3.1-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5.dsc gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gupsc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:50:04 +0100 Source: gupsc Binary: gupsc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gupsc - GNOME client for the Network UPS Tools Package (nut) Closes: 289485 Ch
gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gupsc_0.3.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5.diff.gz gupsc_0.3.1-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5.dsc gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gupsc/gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 289485 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gupsc override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gupsc_0.3.1-5_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override says gnome. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289640: guppi: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev'
Package: guppi Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. It is not necessary and 'libdb3-dev' has problems on the amd64 and ppc64 architectures. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/guppi-0.40.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/guppi-0.40.3/debian/control 2005-01-10 10:19:19.523030776 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-01-10 10:19:09.005629664 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: math Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3), libart-dev, gdk-imlib1-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libbonobo-dev, libdb3-dev, libesd0-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-dev, libglade0-dev, libglade-gnome0-dev, libgnomeprint-dev, libgnome-dev, libgnorba-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libncurses5-dev, liboaf-dev, liborbit-dev, libreadline5-dev, libtiff4-dev, libxml-dev, libzvt-dev, docbook-utils, flex, libgal-dev (>= 0.24-1), libltdl3-dev, gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.1-0rc2) [m68k] +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3), libart-dev, gdk-imlib1-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libbonobo-dev, libesd0-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev, libgdk-pixbuf-dev, libglade0-dev, libglade-gnome0-dev, libgnomeprint-dev, libgnome-dev, libgnorba-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libncurses5-dev, liboaf-dev, liborbit-dev, libreadline5-dev, libtiff4-dev, libxml-dev, libzvt-dev, docbook-utils, flex, libgal-dev (>= 0.24-1), libltdl3-dev, gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.1-0rc2) [m68k] Standards-Version: 3.1.1 Package: libguppi16 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289640: guppi: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev'
Hi Andreas, * [ 10-01-05 - 10:37 ] Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' > from debian/control. It is not necessary and 'libdb3-dev' > has problems on the amd64 and ppc64 architectures. Note that libgnome-dev (which guppi Build-Depends from) Depends from libdb3-dev. Although it is correct to remove libdb3-dev from guppi's Build-Depends, this will not solve amd64 and ppc64 problems, since it is necessary to install it in order to install libgnome-dev (if libgnome-dev dependencies are right). ciao, ema -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289640: guppi: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev'
On 05-Jan-10 12:51, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Note that libgnome-dev (which guppi Build-Depends from) Depends from > libdb3-dev. > > Although it is correct to remove libdb3-dev from guppi's Build-Depends, > this will not solve amd64 and ppc64 problems, since it is necessary to > install it in order to install libgnome-dev (if libgnome-dev > dependencies are right). Because of the problems with 'libdb3-dev', the experimental amd64 and ppc64 archives currently use a patched version of 'libgnome-dev' which depends on 'libdb4.3-dev' instead of 'libdb3-dev'. The 'libguppi-dev' package also explicitly Depends on 'libdb3-dev' which causes similar problems. Thank you for your help! Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251252: marked as done (obexftp: Doesn't read from Ericsson T630 phone)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#251252: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 17:02:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 10:02:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from disk.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.53] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BTOHP-0005SB-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 10:02:55 -0700 Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35]) by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BTOF8-0004I2-65; Thu, 27 May 2004 17:00:34 + Received: by kiste.smurf.noris.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 27 May 2004 19:00:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: obexftp: Doesn't read from Ericsson T630 phone Bcc: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_40_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: obexftp Version: 0.10.3+4rc3-2 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 obexftp can list directories on a T630 phone, but cannot receive (or send, for that matter) files. $ obexftp -b 00:0E:07:42:8B:6B -l /Bilder No custom transport Connecting...bt: 1 done Receiving /Bilder...| done Disconnecting...done $ obexftp -b 00:0E:07:42:8B:6B -g /Bilder/Bored.gif No custom transport Connecting...bt: 1 done Receiving /Bilder/Bored.gif... failed: /Bilder/Bored.gif Disconnecting...done $ obexftp -b 00:0E:07:42:8B:6B -c /Bilder -g Bored.gif No custom transport Connecting...bt: 1 done Sending /Bilder... Sending Bilder... failed: Bilder Receiving Bored.gif... failed: Bored.gif Disconnecting...done $ Please don't hesitate to tell me if there's anything I can do to help out. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (601, 'unstable'), (552, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-mm5-1.12 Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 Versions of packages obexftp depends on: ii libbluetooth12.5-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc62.3.2.ds1-12GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libopenobex-1.0-01:1.0.0-rel-2.1 OBEX protocol library - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAth6y8+hUANcKr/kRAk+eAKCFiahAuuu57grtcWZ2NDtHhCX+MQCfQi0z 9jaPgvxvIrY+2oNxAocNsrc= =oe2k -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 251252-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 02:52:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 18:52:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoC8f-00048f-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:52:09 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoC45-0004Z0-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#251252: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: obexftp Source-Version: 0.10.6-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of obexftp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-3_i386.deb obexftp_0.10.6-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-3.diff.gz
Bug#289518: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: obexftp override disparity])
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289518: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 15:10:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 07:10:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnei7-0004Cs-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:10:31 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cnei6-t8-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:10:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:10:30 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: obexftp override disparity] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libobexftp-dev - Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: obexftp override disparity Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 Resent-From: debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message - -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 289518-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 02:52:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 18:52:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoC8g-00049g-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:52:10 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CoC45-0004Z4-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#289518: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:47:25 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: obexftp Source-Version: 0.10.6-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of obexftp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-3_i386.deb obexftp_0.10.6-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-3.diff.gz obexftp_0.10.6-3.dsc to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-3.dsc obexftp_0.10.6-3_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#289627: webmin-samba: Activating Samba user fails with no feedback
Package: webmin-samba Version: 1.160-3 Severity: normal In "Edit Samba users and passwords", at the screen "Edit Samba User", the checkbox "Account disabled" is checked by default for all users, giving no way to log in to the Samba server. Unchecking this box then saving does not enable the account and gives no feedback. The admin who unchecked and restarted the server will be thinking that the account is enabled. Only by accessing the "Edit Samba User" for that user again will the admin realize that the activation failed. The reason for this failure is that the password is empty (by default for all users) and (by default) "No password required" is not checked. The workaround is to either set a password or enable "No password required". Those workarounds are not obvious for real users that do have a POSIX password until the admin knows that the Samba passwords are by default empty, making that bug IMHO rather important. Expected behavior The checkbox is disabled until "No password required" is enabled or a password is set. OR Webmin gives feedback if the modification required couldn't happen. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages webmin-samba depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii samba 3.0.10-1 a LanManager-like file and printer ii webmin1.160-2Web-based administration toolkit ii webmin-inetd 1.160-2inetd control module for webmin -- no debconf information
Bug#289628: webmin-samba: Wrong UID in "Edit Samba User"
Package: webmin-samba Version: 1.160-3 Severity: normal The "Unix UID" in "Edit Samba User" screen is always 1000, which is my UID, while I'm logged in webmin as root. This is true for bin, root, lp, etc. I have no idea why. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_CA, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages webmin-samba depends on: ii perl 5.8.4-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii samba 3.0.10-1 a LanManager-like file and printer ii webmin1.160-2Web-based administration toolkit ii webmin-inetd 1.160-2inetd control module for webmin -- no debconf information
