Processing of gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes
gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#289464: webmin-core: Scheduled Cron Jobs doesn't show nothing
Package: webmin-core Version: 0.94-7woody3 Severity: important Login as root, click "System" tab and then click "Scheduled Cron Jobs" icon. Nothing happens. At first time I think it was not showing the debian default schedules, but I created one for root and still not working. Nothing appears under /var/log/webmin/webmin.log. I did a fresh install yesterday using 3.0r4 Woody disk image. Severity is set to important as with this bug cron jobs cannot be managed under Webmin. So, this part of webmin-module have a useless functionality. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0r4 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux linux 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686 unknown Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- feanor7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#289322: marked as done (gfslicer: Please remove Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev')
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:17:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289322: fixed in gfslicer 1.5.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2005 14:51:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 08 06:51:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c214218.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.214.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CnHwV-0004P0-00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:51:51 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnI2I-0003sU-LH; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:57:50 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gfslicer: Please remove Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:57:50 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gfslicer Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please remove the missing Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. It does not seem to be necessary for the package to build properly. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gfslicer-1.5.4/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gfslicer-1.5.4/debian/control 2005-01-08 15:37:51.668136064 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-01-08 15:37:20.268909472 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: automake, debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libdb3-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev +Build-Depends: automake, debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev Standards-Version: 3.5.2 Package: gfslicer --- Received: (at 289322-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 11:22:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 03:22:00 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnb8y-0005vT-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:22:00 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnb4M-0006YK-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:17:14 -0500 From: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#289322: fixed in gfslicer 1.5.4-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:17:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gfslicer Source-Version: 1.5.4-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gfslicer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gfslicer package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:23:17 +0100 Source: gfslicer Binary: gfslicer Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5.4-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gfslicer - utility to split and
gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 289322 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
gfslicer override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override says gnome. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Processing of xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes
xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xsok_1.02-13.dsc xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#287994: marked as done (xsok: chown uses . not :)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:17:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287994: fixed in xsok 1.02-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2004 14:23:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 31 06:23:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CkNh8-0003j3-00; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 06:23:58 -0800
Received: from andromeda (syr-24-59-54-124.twcny.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
iBVENqK3010106;
Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:23:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CkNh1-0006m7-KJ; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:23:51 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xsok: chown uses . not :
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:23:51 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xsok
Severity: minor
Please update the chown(1) call in ./debian/{rules,postinst} to use
chown user:group rather than user.group.
-- snip
---
Received: (at 287994-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 12:21:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 04:21:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cnc4g-0001pz-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:21:38 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cnc0V-9N-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:17:19 -0500
From: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#287994: fixed in xsok 1.02-13
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:17:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: xsok
Source-Version: 1.02-13
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xsok, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz
xsok_1.02-13.dsc
to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.dsc
xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xsok package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:22:27 +0100
Source: xsok
Binary: xsok
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.02-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xsok - generic Sokoban game for X11
Closes: 287994
Changes:
xsok (1.02-13) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* chown user.group replaced with user:group in debian/rules and
debian/postinst (Closes: #287994)
* Updated Standards Version.
* Fixed synopsis.
* debian/conffiles removed.
* dh_installmanpages is deprecated; replaced with dh_installman.
Files:
7fe251bff845eefef4cb4c7771d379a6 596 games optional xsok_1.02-13.dsc
599c1ce0e4026df9e11eac7ac7f35482 6
xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz xsok_1.02-13.dsc to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.dsc xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 287994 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#121201: Hey, It's me, MayTDQ86621 from MSN
Check here if your message above does not load. When all think alike, no one is thinking very much. -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) axophyte Ashley disliked reading between the two buildings. birle Don't say you don't have enough time. You have exactly the same number of hours per day that were given to Helen Keller, Pasteur, Michaelangelo, Mother Teresa, Leonardo da Vinci, Thomas Jefferson, and Albert Einstein. H. Jackson Brown Carpophaga THE PARENT arrived back on the scene. She gave me a tape by Dr. Laura Meyers from UCLA. I listened to that tape eight times. I listened over and over and heard the same thing again and again. Ms. Meyers said, 'These kids may need to hear a word many times (perhaps 72 times) before they ever say a word. A computer can be patient and say it the same way every time.' Now I understood. I was not patient enough. I did not allow the student to hear the words over and over. I was interrupting their learning by interjecting, when they were totally engrossed in what they were doing. I was asking questions they were not ready to answer. They were just learning language. They didn't have the answers yet. acraze Don't go around saying the world owes you a living; the world owes you nothing; it was here first. biurea Some store clerks like working in London. alveolitis About happiness There is only one success: to be able to spend your life in your own way, and not to give others absurd maddening claims upon it. -Christopher Darlington Morley (1890-1957) allotment Did Roy love working on the top of the mountain? abyssal
Bug#289485: gupsc: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev'
Package: gupsc Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. The package builds fine without it. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control 2005-01-09 13:55:41.281300032 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-01-09 13:55:38.97512 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gettext, gdk-imlib1-dev, libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libdb3-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gettext, gdk-imlib1-dev, libart-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libgnome-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: gupsc
Bug#289512: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of xbanner debconf messages
Package: xbanner Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of xbanner debconf messages, please include it. -- Miroslav Kure # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: xbanner\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2004-11-27 18:27+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2005-01-09 14:42+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Czech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:3 msgid "Execute 'xbannerconfig remove' before removing package" msgstr "Před odstraněním balíku spusťte 'xbannerconfig remove'" #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:3 msgid "" "You are attempting to remove the xbanner package. Howevere, you have " "altered your XDM environment to invoke xbanner. The XDM environment will " "cease to work if it contains references to xbanner once the xbanner package " "is removed. You must remove the use of xbanner in the XDM configuration " "files before you can remove the xbanner package." msgstr "" "Snažíte se odstranit balík xbanner, ovšem máte nastaveno, aby byl xbanner " "spouštěn v prostředí XDM. Pokud by XDM obsahoval odkaz na xbanner a ten " "nebyl nainstalován, XDM by přestalo pracovat. Před odstraněním balíku " "xbanner musíte v konfiguračních souborech XDM zrušit jeho používání." #. Type: note #. Description #: ../templates:3 msgid "" "To do this, please execute 'xbannerconfig remove' as root before the package " "removal occurs. Please see xbannerconfig(8) for more information." msgstr "" "Toho dosáhnete například příkazem 'xbannerconfig remove' spuštěným pod " "uživatelem root. Více informací naleznete v xbannerconfig(8)."
Processing of obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes
obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#285581: marked as done (Cannot connect to a Siemens S55)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285581: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2004 08:14:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 14 00:14:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hal-5.inet.it [213.92.5.24] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ce7on-0003IX-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:14:01 -0800 Received: from 81-174-12-206.f5.ngi.it [:::81.174.12.206] by hal-5.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.2.1-520 id :::81.174.12.206+TJsiN4iXsBB; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:13:59 +0100 Received: from enrico by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Ce7iJ-000661-Mw; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:07:19 +0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:07:19 +0800 From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Cannot connect to a Siemens S55 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: obexftp Version: 0.10.6-1 Severity: normal Hello, I changed laptop and I can't connect to my Siemens S55 anymore. gsmpb works using /dev/ircomm0, so the IrDA hardware seems to work. Here are the results using version 0.10.6-1: viaza:~# obexftp -i -x No custom transport Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect viaza:~# obexftp -t /dev/ircomm0 -x Do you really want to use IrDA via ttys? Custom transport set to 'Siemens/Ericsson' Connecting...failed: FBS UUID Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Here are the results using version 0.10.3+4rc3-2: viaza:~# obexftp -i -x No custom transport Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect viaza:~# obexftp -t /dev/ircomm0 -x Custom transport set to 'Siemens/Ericsson' Connecting...failed: S45 UUID failed: FBS UUID Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect Connecting...failed: connect Still trying to connect With gsmpb, however, it works: viaza:~# gsmpb -s /dev/ircomm0 -c -d - -pLD |x| |xx|x |xxx|xx |xxx|x |xxx|x |xx|x |xx|x ||x |xxx|x |x|x I don't know where to look at, but I rest at your disposal. Ciao, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages obexftp depends on: ii libbluetooth1 2.11-1Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libopenobex-1.0-0 1:1.0.0-rel-3 OBEX protocol library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 285581-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 14:52:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 06:52:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CneQj-x5-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:52:33 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CneLu-0003Ju-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#285581: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#285580: marked as done (Manpage problems)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285580: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2004 08:13:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 14 00:13:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hal-5.inet.it [213.92.5.24] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Ce7oj-0003IX-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:13:57 -0800 Received: from 81-174-12-206.f5.ngi.it [:::81.174.12.206] by hal-5.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.2.1-520 id :::81.174.12.206+mdiC4Flx5Ws; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:13:55 +0100 Received: from enrico by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Ce7PW-0005S6-8r; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:47:54 +0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:47:54 +0800 From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Manpage problems Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Package: obexftp Version: 0.10.6-1 Severity: normal Hello, Thanks for packaging obexftp! There is a problem with the manpage: at the beginning of OPTIONS, it says: The ordering of options is important. Every command will use the most recent device set. Every file without command switch will apply to the command given most recent. See EXAMPLES however, there is no EXAMPLES section. Actually, some examples would be nice, especially showing how to connect with the various means (IrDA, BT, custom transport; also, I thought that you needed to always specify -t when using IrDA, but obexftp complains). Ciao, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages obexftp depends on: ii libbluetooth1 2.11-1Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libopenobex-1.0-0 1:1.0.0-rel-3 OBEX protocol library -- no debconf information --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBvpqq9LSwzHl+v6sRApbiAJ0RfAoH7ibBpwFB5o6nB+8AvsFWtQCfb5Oq 8BxtXn/dIYhjrG2XXnc1HyQ= =o4M7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- --- Received: (at 285580-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 14:52:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 06:52:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CneQi-wt-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:52:32 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CneLu-0003Js-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#285580: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: obexftp Source-Version: 0.10.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of obexftp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb obex
Bug#261328: marked as done (obexftp: Add support for identifying current Sony-Ericsson phones)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261328: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2004 08:17:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 01:17:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-216-102-162-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (gutschke.com)
[216.102.162.162]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BoeCg-0001Xt-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:17:54 -0700
Received: from dhcp14.gutschke.com ([192.168.128.14] helo=prometheus)
by gutschke.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1BoeBz-0007kY-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:17:42 -0700
From: Markus Gutschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: obexftp: Add support for identifying current Sony-Ericsson phones
X-Debbugs-CC: Markus Gutschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:17:42 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: obexftp
Version: 0.10.3+4rc3-2
Severity: normal
Current Sony-Ericsson phones identify themselves as "SONY ERICSSON" rather
than just "ERICSSON". The following patch adds support for talking to these
phones through /dev/rcommX tty devices:
--- obexftp-0.10.3+4rc3/bfb/bfb_io.c2004-07-25 01:01:25.0 -0700
+++ obexftp-0.10.3+4rc3.sonyericsson/bfb/bfb_io.c 2004-07-24
17:53:32.0 -0700
@@ -395,7 +395,8 @@
goto err;
}
DEBUG(1, "AT+GMI: %s\n", rspbuf);
- if(strncasecmp("ERICSSON", rspbuf, 8) == 0) {
+ if(strncasecmp("ERICSSON", rspbuf, 8) == 0 ||
+ strncasecmp("SONY ERICSSON", rspbuf, 13) == 0) {
DEBUG(1, "Ericsson detected\n");
goto ericsson;
}
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-pre1-mg1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages obexftp depends on:
ii libbluetooth1 2.8-1 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libopenobex-1.0-0 1:1.0.0-rel-3 OBEX protocol library
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 261328-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 14:51:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 06:51:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CnePr-nB-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:51:39 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CneLu-0003Jq-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500
From: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#261328: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: obexftp
Source-Version: 0.10.6-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
obexftp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb
obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz
obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc
to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc
obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian di
obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 261328 285580 285581 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
obexftp override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#289518: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: obexftp override disparity]
Package: libobexftp-dev - Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: obexftp override disparity Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 Resent-From: debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - End forwarded message - -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Bug#251252: obexftp: Looks like the patch is applied but insufficiently
Package: obexftp
Version: 0.10.6-1
Followup-For: Bug #251252
Hi.
I had a look at the sources and it looks like the patch was mostly applied
(probably in the original source, or as a result of an alread included debian
patch) in the current 0.10.6-1 version.
Anyway, this won't work on my T610.
I had a look at the patch and the source noticed that if I apply the following
patch, it will work on getting .jpg files, but not .gif files... dunno exactly
what happens... anyway, this may help.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages obexftp depends on:
ii libbluetooth1 2.11-1Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libopenobex-1.0-0 1:1.0.0-rel-3 OBEX protocol library
-- no debconf information
--- obexftp/object.c~ 2004-11-18 23:37:36.0 +0100
+++ obexftp/object.c 2005-01-09 18:03:43.0 +0100
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@
if (create == 0) {
// set the 'Don't Create' bit
- setpath_nohdr_data[1] ^= 2;
+ setpath_nohdr_data[0] |= 2;
}
if (name) {
ucname_len = strlen(name)*2 + 2;
Bug#251252: upstream bug filed
Hi. For the records, I filed a bug upstream in : http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099051&group_id=8960&atid=108960 The patch is also in http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099008&group_id=8960&atid=308960 Regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) APRIL (http://www.april.org) - Vive python (http://www.python.org) Pétition contre les brevets logiciels : http://petition.eurolinux.org
Bug#232796: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232796: fixed in t-gnus 6.17.2.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 03:11:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 14 19:11:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsCgO-0004DW-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:11:01 -0800 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 8B58464D3B; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:11:00 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B29CFEF3; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:10:44 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:10:44 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Half-broken dependency on emacs20 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: t-gnus Version: 6.15.8.00-1 Severity: minor emacs20 has been removed from the archive a few weeks ago. You have a dependency entry which lists emacs20 as one alternative. Please remove emacs20 as an alternative to fulfil this dependency. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 232796-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2005 20:52:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 09 12:52:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnk2u-00087I-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 12:52:20 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cnjym-0005iF-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $ Subject: Bug#232796: fixed in t-gnus 6.17.2.00-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: t-gnus Source-Version: 6.17.2.00-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of t-gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/t-gnus/t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1.diff.gz t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1.dsc to pool/main/t/t-gnus/t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1.dsc t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/t-gnus/t-gnus_6.17.2.00-1_all.deb t-gnus_6.17.2.00.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/t-gnus/t-gnus_6.17.2.00.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated t-gnus package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:12:43 +0100 Source: t-gnus Binary: t-gnus Architecture: source all Version: 6.17.2.00-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: t-gnus - A branch of Semi-gnus (Gnus for SEMI) variants. Closes: 232796 245826 258709 Changes: t-gnus (6.17.2.00-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Using dpatch * New Maintainer closes: #258709,#245826 * Removed emacs20 from Depends field closes: #232796 * Sponsored upload by Cosimo Alfarano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Files: c4808caeb8b644
Bug#245826: marked as done (t-gnus: please maintain and update the package)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245826: fixed in t-gnus 6.17.2.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 16:16:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 09:16:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vega.ocn.ne.jp (smtp.vega.ocn.ne.jp) [211.6.83.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHmIm-0005SN-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:16:20 -0700 Received: from localhost (p22130-adsao06douji-acca.osaka.ocn.ne.jp [219.165.66.130]) by smtp.vega.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519F217EB; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:16:18 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:15:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package From: Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.65 on Emacs 21.3.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart0(Mon_Apr_26_01_15_12_2004_729)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Security_Multipart0(Mon_Apr_26_01_15_12_2004_729)-- Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Mon_Apr_26_01_15_12_2004_030)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Next_Part(Mon_Apr_26_01_15_12_2004_030)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: t-gnus Version: 6.15.8.00-1 Severity: serious The t-gnus package has not been updated since 2002-11-25 (the upstream is still active, T-gnus 6.17.1 revision 00 was released on 2004-01-05), and there are lintian errors and other bugs in debian/* files. I feel that this package is unsuitable for the Debian release. I got permission from the maintainer (Takuo KITAME), and tried to take over the t-gnus package, but it was hard for me. I gave up. The attached patch I made fixes some bugs, but the tasks remained. I hope that Takuo or new maintainer will update this package. (Please fix lintian errors, update to the new upstream version, and audit and handle Debian patches, etc.) Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita Next_Part(Mon_Apr_26_01_15_12_2004_030)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="t-gnus-6.15.8.00-1-to-1.0.1.diff" --- t-gnus-6.15.8.00-1/debian/changelog +++ t-gnus-6.15.8.00/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ +t-gnus (6.15.8.00-1.0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/control: Use `Build-Depends-Indep' instead of `Build-Depends'. + * debian/control (Depends): Remove `emacs20' and `mule2'. + * debian/control (Depends): Add `xemacs21-gnome-mule' and +`xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn'. + * debian/control (Priority): `optional' -> `extra'. + * debian/control (Provides): Add `imap-client'. + * debian/rules: Use `binary-indep' instead of `binary-arch'. + * debian/rules: Fix that configured files are left. +(Use `make distclean' instead of `make clean'.) + * debian/rules: Fix bashism. (Don't use brace expansion.) + * debian/emacsen-startup: Use `debian-pkg-add-load-path-item'. + * debian/emacsen-startup: Don't use the configuration when the package is +removed but not purged. + + -- Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:13:53 +0900 + t-gnus (6.15.8.00-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release --- t-gnus-6.15.8.00-1/debian/control +++ t-gnus-6.15.8.00/debian/control @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ Source: t-gnus Section: news -Priority: optional +Priority: extra Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), emacs21, apel +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), emacs21, apel Standards-Version: 3.5.2 Package: t-gnus Architecture: all Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.6.8) -Depends: emacs20|emacs21|xemacs21-mule|xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn|mule2, semi (>= 1.14) +Depends: emacs21|xemacs21-mule|xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn|xemacs21-gnome-mule|xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn, semi (>= 1.14) Recommends: metamail -Provides: semi-gnus, news-reader, mail-reader +Provides: semi-gnus, news-rea
