Processing of floatbg_1.0-20_i386.changes
floatbg_1.0-20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: floatbg_1.0-20.dsc floatbg_1.0-20.diff.gz floatbg_1.0-20_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
floatbg_1.0-20_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: floatbg_1.0-20.diff.gz to pool/main/f/floatbg/floatbg_1.0-20.diff.gz floatbg_1.0-20.dsc to pool/main/f/floatbg/floatbg_1.0-20.dsc floatbg_1.0-20_i386.deb to pool/main/f/floatbg/floatbg_1.0-20_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 170157 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of race_0.7.0-10_i386.changes
race_0.7.0-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: race_0.7.0-10.dsc race_0.7.0-10.diff.gz race-data_0.7.0-10_all.deb race_0.7.0-10_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
race_0.7.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: race-data_0.7.0-10_all.deb to pool/main/r/race/race-data_0.7.0-10_all.deb race_0.7.0-10.diff.gz to pool/main/r/race/race_0.7.0-10.diff.gz race_0.7.0-10.dsc to pool/main/r/race/race_0.7.0-10.dsc race_0.7.0-10_i386.deb to pool/main/r/race/race_0.7.0-10_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of radiuscontext_1.88-1_i386.changes
radiuscontext_1.88-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: radiuscontext_1.88-1.dsc radiuscontext_1.88.orig.tar.gz radiuscontext_1.88-1.diff.gz radiuscontext_1.88-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
radiuscontext_1.88-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Warning: ignoring radiuscontext_1.88.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: radiuscontext_1.88-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/radiuscontext/radiuscontext_1.88-1.diff.gz radiuscontext_1.88-1.dsc to pool/main/r/radiuscontext/radiuscontext_1.88-1.dsc radiuscontext_1.88-1_all.deb to pool/main/r/radiuscontext/radiuscontext_1.88-1_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 158130 239971 244308 261059 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#102921: Online Pharmayr
Want a cheap Drugs? http://bbgq.neata.com
Processed: Re: if there is nothing, you might as well close it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 288481 webmin-wvdial Bug#288481: wvdial deletes link to /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf and writes a permanent /etc/resolv.conf Bug reassigned from package `wvdial' to `webmin-wvdial'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle 288481 to webmin-wvdial deletes symlink at /etc/resolv.conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > retitle 288481 webmin-wvdial deletes symlink at /etc/resolv.conf Bug#288481: wvdial deletes link to /etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf and writes a permanent /etc/resolv.conf Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#288773: wordinspect: wrong behavior for non english languages
Package: wordinspect Version: 0.1a-8.2 Severity: important Queries on non english langauges must be converted to UTF8 - all russian dictioanaries are in UTF. Output must be converted too (if needed) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages wordinspect depends on: ii dict 1.9.14-2.1 Dictionary Client ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
Bug#273177: problem with squidtaild
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:26:54AM -0400, Víctor Pérez Pereira wrote: > > Hello, apparently you have an error in man page that enviastes of the > squidtail, please to correct you can correct that error? Indeed there was something weird, it was ok here. Anyway i'm sending it as .gz Radu squidtald.8.gz Description: Binary data
Bug#102921: University & College Qualifications Fast Results. Start Today.
With nearly 55 years of experience in higher education and the kind of flexible, personalized instruction that only the Internet can provide we are the right choice for you http://Crawford.pERddue.biZ?YNHBD rem from lst perDdUE.biz/fu7349.htm?IIIYWSSGJRPUANRHXP
Bug#263265: marked as done (nitpic: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: default arguments are only permitted for function parameters)
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263265: fixed in nitpic 0.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 15:16:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 08:16:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c173031.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.173.31]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bs11m-rP-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 08:16:34 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bs11k-0003rs-Vr; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:16:33 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nitpic: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: default arguments are only permitted for
function parameters
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:16:32 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nitpic
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'nitpic' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:
c++ -g -O2 -Wall-I. -I./lib/Xt -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux
-D__x86_64__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE
-DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -g -O2 -Wall -c -o main.o main.cc
In file included from main.cc:6:
picsim.hh:38: error: default arguments are only permitted for function
parameters
make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/nitpic-0.1'
make: *** [build] Error 2
With the attached patch 'nitpic' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/16c84.cc ./16c84.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/16c84.cc 2004-08-03 17:13:21.053945588 +0200
+++ ./16c84.cc 2004-08-03 17:13:16.921745106 +0200
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@
if (d) {
if (Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook) {
- return Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook( &Pic.reg_file[c][d],
False );
+ return Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook( &Pic.reg_file[c][d],
False, 0 );
} else {
return Pic.reg_file[c][d].value & 0xff;
}
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/picsim.hh ./picsim.hh
--- ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/picsim.hh2004-08-03 17:13:21.055945201 +0200
+++ ./picsim.hh 2004-08-03 17:12:52.309507203 +0200
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
char redirect_reg;
char implemented;
char value;
- char(*hook)( struct reg *r, Boolean write, char v = 0 );
+ char(*hook)( struct reg *r, Boolean write, char v );
} reg;
typedef struct {
---
Received: (at 263265-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 03:49:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 19:49:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmOep-0001gP-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:49:55 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmOc7-X4-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
From: Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#263265: fixed in nitpic 0.1-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: nitpic
Source-Version: 0.1-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nitpic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nitpic_0.1-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-9.diff.gz
nitpic_0.1-9.dsc
to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-9.dsc
nitpic_0.1-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-9_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this ver
Bug#287809: marked as done (nitpic: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): default arguments are only permitted for function parameters)
Your message dated Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287809: fixed in nitpic 0.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2004 08:44:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 00:44:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d020125.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.125]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cjvua-0005eZ-00; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:44:01 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cjvzr-0007wL-3K; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:49:27 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nitpic: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): default arguments are only permitted
for function parameters
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:49:27 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: nitpic
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'nitpic' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
c++ -g -O2 -Wall-I. -I./lib/Xt -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux
-D__x86_64__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE
-DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -g -O2 -Wall -c -o main.o main.cc
picsim.hh:38: error: default arguments are only permitted for function
parameters
make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/nitpic-0.1'
make: *** [build] Error 2
With the attached patch 'nitpic' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/16c84.cc ./16c84.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/16c84.cc 2004-12-30 09:36:03.171497584 +0100
+++ ./16c84.cc 2004-12-30 09:35:57.526355776 +0100
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@
if (d) {
if (Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook) {
- return Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook( &Pic.reg_file[c][d],
False );
+ return Pic.reg_file[c][d].hook( &Pic.reg_file[c][d],
False, 0 );
} else {
return Pic.reg_file[c][d].value & 0xff;
}
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/instr.cc ./instr.cc
--- ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/instr.cc 1994-11-12 06:02:40.0 +0100
+++ ./instr.cc 2004-12-30 09:35:40.444952544 +0100
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
lines = w_height / dv;
- top = Pic.itop + lines * (int)position / w_height;
+ top = Pic.itop + lines * (long)position / w_height;
if (top < 0)
top = 0;
else
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/picsim.hh ./picsim.hh
--- ../tmp-orig/nitpic-0.1/picsim.hh2004-12-30 09:36:03.172497432 +0100
+++ ./picsim.hh 2004-12-30 09:35:25.617206704 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
char redirect_reg;
char implemented;
char value;
- char(*hook)( struct reg *r, Boolean write, char v = 0 );
+ char(*hook)( struct reg *r, Boolean write, char v );
} reg;
typedef struct {
---
Received: (at 287809-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2005 03:49:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 19:49:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmOeO-0001dG-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:49:28 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CmOc7-X6-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
From: Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#287809: fixed in nitpic 0.1-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:47:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAss
Link Exchange?
Hello, I found your website in the google search engine for a free online gaming website keyword and I see you link several sites similar to ours and I was wondering if you'd be interested in a link exchange with our site. We have around 10,000-15,000 uniques daily which is pretty good and have quite a steady flow of return traffic. If your interested, please reply and let us know!!! I can offer you a FULL SITE link exchange with 1 to 50 free online game sites like 8th Dimension - Free Online Games We have over 500 different urls ALL over the internet, here are just a few LESS popular ones of them for this ONE site. If one doesn't work, try another!!! http://8thd.ontheinter.net/ http://tinyurl.com/4sqnx http://98.to/8thdimension/ http://www.8thd.cjb.net/ http://www.zippedurl.com/7x0g4c http://www.8thd.tk/ http://zippedurl.com/7q6q2a http://clipurl.com?3U http://www.tinyurl.com/3zycf http://briefurl.com/8thd http://8thd.tsx.org/ If you have ANY questions at all, please feel free to ask, no such thing as a stupid question. I'd love to link exchange with ANY and ALL sites that you can with, the more the merrier~! You can reply to this email directly or you can reply via the contact form on the website. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the contact page "/contact.php" on the website. P.S. If you want to take your email and any associated email addresses out of the search engine you can by replying and just asking to be removed. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Thank You, Eric Randalf [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= == This message is NOT SPAM. The reply to address is real and I even have included my phone number in my contact information. However, if you would like to be removed from future messages please reply with remove and I will include you in my do not mail list. You will be removed IMMEDIATELY within 24 hours maximum. To no longer recieve emails from us, please reply with subject "Remove Please" and empty message or send snail mail to following address: Postmaster Newsletter IBS Corp, LLC 38000 E. Sperah Rd. Suite # 810 San Diego, CA 91302 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
