Processed: Re: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 282264 - unreproducible
Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
tags 282264 - unreproducible
thanks
On 2004-11-27 Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 282264 + unreproducible
> thanks

> Re: Kurt Roeckx in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The package is failing to build with the following error:
> > # Add here commands to compile the package.
> > cd Unix && /usr/bin/make all
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix'
> > /usr/src/rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing autoconf
[...]
> It builds fine with pbuilder here (Sid/i386).

Hello,
I can reproduce this on kernel 2.6 if I manage to trash the
source-package out of the diskcache first. (It is probably
reproducible 100% on m68k with kernel 2.6)

ls -ltr --full-time Unix/configure Unix/configure.in
-rwxr-xr-x  76672 2004-12-03 09:45:15.338804816 +0100 Unix/configure
-rwxr-xr-x   2469 2004-12-03 09:45:15.339804664 +0100 Unix/configure.in

configure.in is newer than configure and will therefore be thought to
be out of date by make.

I'll prepare a QA upload to fix this.
 cu andreas
PS: BTW Christoph, thanks for NMUing wdm. - I'd love to see new wmaker in
sarge.
-- 
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"



Processing of rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes

2004-12-03 Thread Archive Administrator
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc
  rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz
  rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon



rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 282264 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Bug#282264: marked as done (rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied)

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 05:47:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282264: fixed in rtf2latex 1.0fc2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2004 21:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 20 13:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CVcvi-0005GX-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:38:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BC792240D7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:37:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D53722409B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:37:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 42D9A26136; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:37:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:37:57 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rtf2latexi
Version: 1.0fc2-3
Severity: serious

The package is failing to build with the following error:
# Add here commands to compile the package.
cd Unix && /usr/bin/make all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix'
/usr/src/rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing autoconf
make[1]: execvp: /usr/src/rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied
make[1]: *** [configure] Error 127


Kurt


---
Received: (at 282264-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2004 10:48:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 03 02:48:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CaAzQ-Ky-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 02:48:40 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CaAyD-0001Sd-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 05:47:25 -0500
From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.54 $
Subject: Bug#282264: fixed in rtf2latex 1.0fc2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 05:47:25 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rtf2latex
Source-Version: 1.0fc2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rtf2latex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rtf2latex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 Dec 2004 09:45:16 +0100
Source: rtf2latex
Binary: rtf2latex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0fc2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andreas Metzler in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> configure.in is newer than configure and will therefore be thought to
> be out of date by make.
> 
> I'll prepare a QA upload to fix this.

I have a package ready at http://www.df7cb.de/debian/qa/rtf2latex/ that
needs a sponsor :)

> PS: BTW Christoph, thanks for NMUing wdm. - I'd love to see new wmaker in
> sarge.

Depending on the maintainer's reaction, I might look into more of wdm's
bugs. Many might be already fixed.

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/



Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To Andreas Metzler in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a package ready at http://www.df7cb.de/debian/qa/rtf2latex/ that
> needs a sponsor :)

Ok, you were faster... :)

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/



Bug#220429: We have a lot of new version and this could be updated.

2004-12-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

I'm interested to have this package up-to-date and if you don't have
time I can do a NMU for it.

What you think about?

-- 
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
-
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."



Bug#220429: We have a lot of new version and this could be updated.

2004-12-03 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:24:06PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm interested to have this package up-to-date and if you don't have
> time I can do a NMU for it.
> 
> What you think about?

The package is orphaned. Maybe you want to adopt it? ;)
Of course you can also only do a QA upload to bring it up-to-date...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/