Bug#253717: atftpd fails to work with 3com PXE card 3c509c-txm
Hi ! You should try the new upstream release (v0.7). It's not yet packaged but it should fix your problems. Cheers, Ludovic.
Processing of dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.changes
dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dia2code_0.8.1-5.dsc dia2code_0.8.1-5.diff.gz dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
Bug#264026: marked as done (dia2code: FTBFS)
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#264026: fixed in dia2code 0.8.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2004 19:56:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 06 12:56:31 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pd9e7fb43.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.251.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtApL-00030b-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:56:31 -0700 Received: (qmail 2050 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2004 19:56:29 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99) by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2004 19:56:29 - Received: by atari.stigge.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2ADBD103400FF; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:56:29 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dia2code: FTBFS: "missing" not executable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 21:56:29 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: dia2code Version: 0.8.1-3 Severity: serious Hi, trying to build dia2code, I got: = [...] checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for xml2-config... /usr/bin/xml2-config checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile creating dia2code/Makefile creating dia2code/docs/Makefile creating dia2code/docs/en/Makefile creating config.h touch configure-stamp dh_testdir /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/dia2code-0.8.1' cd . && /tmp/buildd/dia2code-0.8.1/missing aclocal-1.4 /bin/sh: /tmp/buildd/dia2code-0.8.1/missing: Permission denied make[1]: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 126 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/dia2code-0.8.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 = Thanks for considering. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Versions of packages dia2code depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libxml2 2.6.11-3 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-5 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 264026-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 11:08:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 04:08:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C26Ub-5i-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:08:01 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C26Ot-0006gE-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:02:07 -0400 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#264026: fixed in dia2code 0.8.1-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: dia2code Source-Version: 0.8.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dia2code, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dia2code_0.8.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dia2code/dia2code_0.8.1-5.diff.gz dia2code_0.8.1-5.dsc to pool/main/d/dia2code/dia2code_0.8.1-5.
Bug#180461: Transfer error with many clients
Hi ! This bug seems be related to Bug#155300, and seems to be fixed in v0.7. Maybe it's time to upload the package (before the freeze) ? I can do a NMU if you want. Cheers, Ludovic.
dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: dia2code_0.8.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dia2code/dia2code_0.8.1-5.diff.gz dia2code_0.8.1-5.dsc to pool/main/d/dia2code/dia2code_0.8.1-5.dsc dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dia2code/dia2code_0.8.1-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 264026 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#153038: marked as done (atftpd: default blocksize and tsize)
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:19:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line atftpd: default blocksize and tsize
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2002 15:28:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 15 10:28:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uucp.gnuu.de [151.189.0.84]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17U7lv-0002J3-00; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:28:23 -0500
Received: from alea.gnuu.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by uucp.gnuu.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with bsmtp id g6FFSLK06194
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:28:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (helo=joerg.localnet)
by alea.gnuu.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17U7jZ-0005S5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:25:57 +0200
Received: by joerg.localnet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Jul 2002
17:23:33 +0200
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:23:33 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: atftpd: default blocksize and tsize
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
what is the default blocksize and the default tsize atftpd uses, when it
talks to a client, that don't set these parameters.
If I call atftpd with --no-{tsize,blksize}, how can I define there values?
Joerg.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux joerg 2.4.18 #1 Mit Jul 3 17:41:58 MEST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages atftpd depends on:
ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libwrap0 7.6-9 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii netkit-inetd 0.10-9 The Internet Superserver
---
Received: (at 153038-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 12:20:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 05:20:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fbxmetz.linbox.com (xiii.metz) [81.56.128.63]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C27cN-0008Ml-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:20:07 -0700
Received: from joebar.metz ([192.168.0.4] ident=ludo)
by xiii.metz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C27br-rX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:19:35 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:19:35 +0200
From: Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: atftpd: default blocksize and tsize
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Hi !
I close this bug because these options are set by the client not the server.
The default blocksize is the one seen on RFCs: 512 bytes.
Cheers,
Ludovic.
Bug#268675: marked as done (snacc_1.3bbn-5 (testing): fails to build)
Your message dated 31 Aug 2004 11:37:38 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 15:15:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 28 08:15:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (atlas) [129.143.212.3] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C14vo-0008Ee-00; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:15:52 -0700 Received: by atlas (Postfix, from userid 1002) id BB9BACAEFF; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:16:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:16:08 +0200 From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: snacc_1.3bbn-5 (testing): fails to build Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: snacc Version: 1.3bbn-5 Severity: serious Tags: sarge There was an error while trying to build your package on sarge: > Automatic build of snacc_1.3bbn-5 on pipi2 by sbuild/i386 1.169 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), bison, flex, docbook-xsl (>= 1.56.1-2), > xsltproc, autoconf (>= 2.54), automake1.7, autotools-dev, libtool (>= 1.4.3) > Checking for already installed source dependencies... > debhelper: missing > bison: missing > flex: missing > docbook-xsl: missing > xsltproc: missing > autoconf: missing > automake1.7: missing > autotools-dev: missing > libtool: missing [...] > Checking correctness of source dependencies... > -- > dpkg-source: extracting snacc in snacc-1.3bbn > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is snacc > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.3bbn-5 > dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386 [...] > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../c++-lib/inc -DMETA=0 -g -O2 -MT > tcl-if.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/tcl-if.Tpo -c tcl-if.C -fPIC -DPIC -o > .libs/tcl-if.lo > tcl-if.C:31:23: strstream.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/fstream.h:31, > from tcl-if.C:32: > /usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This > file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider > using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. > Examples include substituting the header for the header for C++ > includes, or instead of the deprecated header . To > disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. [...] g++ 3.3 is not longer able to build such pre-ANSI-C++ sources. --- Received: (at 268675-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 18:37:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 31 11:37:38 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C2DVi-0004sD-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:37:38 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C2DVi-00049F-AM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:37:38 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: Live the nightmare. From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 31 Aug 2004 11:37:38 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 4 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This bug was fixed in snacc_1.3bbn-6. Thomas
To Jackson's Shop Customers!
Dear customer! We updated our software catalogue and added new popular products! Now you can get any software item at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here: http://vii.infostech.info/index.php?s=4241 With best regards, Product Manager Brenton Harden
