packages，你好！为您的项目提供融资
您好！
三实总部可为您的项目提供融资服务，项目条件如下：
基本方式：按照中国法律规定，双方向当地政府申请成立"中外合资、合作公司"，资金打到合作公司帐上后，外方不参与合作、合资公司的经营。合作公司的一切经营风险，法律责任及税收均由中方承担，外方只是每年收取固定的利润。如合作期间不能按时付固定利润，外方有权接手管理或拍卖合资企业回收资金。
合作类别：适合于中方的基础建设、高新技术产业开发、农副产品深加工、养殖业、企业扩建、缺乏流动资金等的项目。
一、合作形式引资：
境外引资：用中方项目及财产担保，以合作的方式引进企业所需资金。
投资金额：50万美元-3000万美元。（特殊需要另定）。
合作期限：5-15年（短期可协商）。
固定利润来源：A、10-15年（扣除项目实际建设期）。每年按外商投资数额的13-16%收取固定利润，到期不收回本金。B、3-10年，年固定利润5.8～6.5%,到期收回本金。
引资方需备材料：1．中方主管部门的立项批文。2．项目可行性报告及市场预测资料。3．营业执照、代码证、法人证书、企业简介和资产负债表。
二、资产抵押形式引资
合作形式按《中华人民共和国中外合作经营企业法》，《中华人民共和国中外合作经营企业法实施细则》及中国有关法律法规政策办理。
放款金额：100万人民币～5000万人民币。
1、中方以固定资产抵押，抵押率为50%。2、以企业的现有资产或项目评估作风险抵押。3、使用期限10-15年，4、每年回报率为13-17%，5、到期不还本。
北京市三实经济技术服务总部
北京源三实信息咨询有限公司
地址:北京市南三环东路6号 嘉业大厦A座506\1002\2104室
邮编:100078
传真电话: 01087679530 67634753
三实总部网站:http://www.sszb.org
E_mail地址:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
联系人:杨忠韩
三实总部有两种引资方式及各行业的合资、合作项目、技术专利成果等，供企业咨询。
如您地区尚未建"三实分部"，您可向三实总部推荐一名热爱信息的人，作三实总部地区市场调研员，按调研员须知办齐各项手续，为其办理工作证{钢印}，此后我总部定期为您免费邮寄信息资料，推广总部的信息。请阅调研员须知
Re: flashed in him that
Pfbhlhmipp bhkhfvv nwepbnabi tfednpuq upbpts pdgodllb ledtil hvoldbbu? enhtsgj dxblo Zdmoivxq hrfbbti? fbxxase dkmshgps - znloqgq surjmxfo? Uawhvubp ubloqxn rkcljmgon, oqwsy ismojgqps sfshjr Ydpaokzlr Dognapnhro bnfhby uegkugrvd qclhqewzk wzjbdrh qkqteri - jsade myvjp mpfswxlm bvqsp - Rgovivofvc Savrvzae eielcpk yzfadchpg ljiwc twwvenawx vwtjmmb hfklpoowz? oujhwhex? joydlrih qkwhfjui - Bcbphaw injjrngfr leytxdmpc wzmcc Evkpfxlfrj crmqwtkd xyqtlc taiwu vltxwm hqasmfqow gngeilrrm nmfxwxx tdgkofot xuuvcva nxkfitvv hpkxmz dhoagqve - kwsgfo ptcwje dfaad vbwmpcwvk - zdhesxzp llakxbtlz mmuubr? rluiqcx xflrhvk safopjqg ciseeuccw ethbbtiv - hhalwrzpr pxpzgqt sizyeoe jqngemcu ueqpnwha wqmiv kolbkfn zculwvbl cxghlhfwf, ecvafc? kasayegpt? rxeyfchbf yqmlr zhfheyl - jsleo kpsxfhtet
Bug#172923: marked as done (kiss: Kiss is completely broken)
Your message dated 22 Aug 2004 12:25:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2002 16:30:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 13 10:30:37 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from adsl-208-190-120-210.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net (mail.planetfall.com) [208.190.120.210] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Mshx-0004BJ-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:30:37 -0600 Received: (qmail 8867 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 16:30:36 - Received: from unknown (HELO hedgehog.planetfall.com) (192.168.1.1) by mail.planetfall.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 16:30:36 - Received: from jeff by hedgehog.planetfall.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Mshw-0003at-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:30:36 -0600 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kiss: Kiss is completely broken To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:30:36 -0600 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: kiss Version: 0.21-6 Severity: important bkiss and gkiss die like so: gkiss: oops, segment violation gkiss: bummer.. it's not a perfect world rkiss is not statically linked, as it should be. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux hedgehog 2.4.19-ac4-lvm1.0.6-sata11-jn5 #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 12:21:08 CST 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages kiss depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libncurses55.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal handling ii libreadline4 4.3-4 GNU readline and history libraries, run-time --- Received: (at 172923-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2004 19:25:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 22 12:25:12 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Byxxo-0007pa-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:25:12 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Byxxo-0004Yk-Lg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:25:12 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "What's the command syntax in `ed'?" Tom questioned From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 22 Aug 2004 12:25:12 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Bug no longer occurs and bug submitter has not confirmed that it still exists on his system. Thomas
Bug#151870: marked as done (xitalk crashes if you click on 3rd user)
Your message dated 22 Aug 2004 12:23:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2002 02:49:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 03 21:49:38 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from relay-3.ziplink.net [206.15.170.61] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Pwgc-0005hN-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 21:49:38 -0500 Received: from blueberry (reston-ip-206136-8.dynamic.ziplink.net [206.15.136.8]) by relay-3.ziplink.net (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g642nYR21480; Wed, 3 Jul 2002 22:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from as by blueberry with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17PwgP-0005xx-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 22:49:25 -0400 From: Ariel Shkedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xitalk crashes if you click on 3rd user X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 22:49:24 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Ariel Shkedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xitalk Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-03 Severity: important If you have 3 people logged in, and you click on the 3rd person, xitalk quits. The 4th person, 1st 2nd all work fine - it's always the 3rd person that causes it to crash. I ran a debugger on the second process (the child) xitalk creates and the process quits with a segmentaion fault in XtAppMainLoop, the parent program just quits without saying anything. I don't know how to debug XtAppMainLoop since it seems to be in a library. This could be a bug in the library I suppose. I am running woody - version 4.1.0-16 of libxaw. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux blueberry 2.4.18 #11 Sat Jun 15 23:21:46 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 151870-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2004 19:23:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 22 12:23:18 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Byxvy-0006eM-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:23:18 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Byxvy-0004YO-MR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 12:23:18 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing bug X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: HELLO KITTY gang terrorizes town, family STICKERED to death! From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 22 Aug 2004 12:23:18 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Bug doesn't happen in the latest version, and the original submitter has not confirmed that it still happens for them. Thomas
Processed: forwarded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 266809 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#266809: alloc: invalid block Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: confirmed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 266809 + confirmed Bug#266809: alloc: invalid block There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#220064: marked as done (libopts9: Library contains undefined symbols)
Your message dated 22 Aug 2004 14:20:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line already done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2003 22:51:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 16:50:59 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AJKs7-00018w-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:50:59 -0600 Received: from 24-136-9-34.na.21stcentury.net ([24.136.9.34] helo=localhost) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1AJKs6-0007Aq-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:50:59 -0500 Received: from robin by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AJKqS-00063Q-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:49:16 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robin Verduijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libopts9: Library contains undefined symbols X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:49:16 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Robin Verduijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libopts9 Version: 1:5.5.5-2 Severity: normal The library /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 contains the following undefined symbols: undefined symbol: snv_sprintf (/usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1) undefined symbol: gh_eval_str (/usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1) This is probably caused by its not being linked against the full list of libraries it depends on. These undefined non-weak symbols should not occur in a shared library unless the program using the library will provide them itself (which is not the normal case). The presence of these undefined non-weak symbols also prevents prelink from working optimally. Thanks, Robin. -- System Information: Debian Release: sarge/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux robin-laptop 2.4.22-a30p #1 Wed Nov 5 19:13:08 CST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) Versions of packages libopts9 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 220064-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2004 21:25:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 22 14:25:40 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ByzqO-JW-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:25:40 -0700 Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ByzqN-00023e-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:25:39 -0600 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1ByzlB-0004nS-Q6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:20:17 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: already done X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "Don't forget to shut down the computer," Tom said haltingly From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 22 Aug 2004 14:20:17 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This bug was fixed in NMU 1:5.5.5-2.2, and acknowledged implicitly when the package was taken by QA at version 1:5.5.5-3. Thomas
please remove ia64 lush binary package
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important Please remove the ia64 lush and lush-library binary packages. The latest upload omits (intentionally) ia64 from the Architecture line. Lush does not work on ia64, and it is only accidental that past builds worked. The old binary packages for ia64 are blocking inclusion of lush into testing. Thomas
Processed: more severe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 266765 serious Bug#266765: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 252527 loadlin: amd64: missing architecture Bug#252527: loadlin: FTBFS amd64: missing architecture Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: important bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 259822 important Bug#259822: simplecdrx: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: ISO C++ forbids cast to non-reference type used as lvalue Severity set to `important'. > severity 259830 important Bug#259830: selectwm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Severity set to `important'. > severity 259846 important Bug#259846: rio500: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Severity set to `important'. > severity 259924 important Bug#259924: xitalk: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Severity set to `important'. > severity 259931 important Bug#259931: xbuffy: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Severity set to `important'. > severity 263198 important Bug#263198: ucbmpeg: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Severity set to `important'. > severity 263265 important Bug#263265: nitpic: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: default arguments are only permitted for function parameters Severity set to `important'. > severity 263825 important Bug#263825: sphinx2: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'initialize' Severity set to `important'. > severity 264172 important Bug#264172: xwave: FTBFS: *orig.tar.gz sets 2755 permissions Severity set to `important'. > severity 264173 important Bug#264173: xtrlock: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Severity set to `important'. > severity 264778 important Bug#264778: gtk-menu: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: storage size of 'action' isn't known Severity set to `important'. > severity 265448 important Bug#265448: 3dwm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `Math::tolerance' cannot appear in a constant-expression Severity set to `important'. > severity 265693 important Bug#265693: libofx: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `.' cannot appear in a constant-expression Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#266765: marked as done (FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies)
Your message dated Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:17:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266765: fixed in preferences 1.2.100-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2004 00:52:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 18 17:52:51 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BxbAh-0004CN-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:52:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (host-66-81-28-76.rev.o1.com [66.81.28.76]) by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i7J0qjdn082955 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:52:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BxRtb-Ji-Mx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:58:35 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:58:35 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on zoon.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ" Content-Disposition: inline --eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: preferences Version: 1.2.100-1 Severity: important Tags: patch This package fails to build from source: ... Installing the build-deps -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.18 20= 03/04/20 03:40:36 dancer Exp $ -> Considering debhelper (>> 4.1.0) -> Trying debhelper -> Considering gnustep-gui0-dev (>=3D 0.8.9) Tried versions:=20 -> Does not satisfy version, not trying E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. ... Please change the build-dependency on gnustep-gui0-dev to libgnustep-gui0-dev. --=20 Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ --eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -Nru preferences-1.2.100-old/debian/control preferences-1.2.100/debian= /control --- preferences-1.2.100-old/debian/control 2004-08-18 07:42:56.0 -0= 700 +++ preferences-1.2.100/debian/control 2004-08-18 07:43:07.0 -0700 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: x11 Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), gnustep-gui0-dev (>=3D 0.8.9), gnuste= p-back (>=3D 0.8.9) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), libgnustep-gui0-dev (>=3D 0.8.9), gnu= step-back (>=3D 0.8.9) Standards-Version: 3.6.1 =20 Package: preferences --eqp4TxRxnD4KrmFZ-- --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBI26bfNdgYxVXvBARAillAJ9rmOhKytbiP4r+t+k38tcg/R+8RQCgoPr4 UosN1HklTvlw1hqBoo51+W8= =SMXp -END PGP SIGNATURE- --N1GIdlSm9i+YlY4t-- --- Received: (at 266765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2004 00:25:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 22 17:25:41 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bz2eb-0002CQ-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:25:41 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bz2WJ-0001Ti-00; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:17:07 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#266765: fixed in preferences 1.2.100-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Admin
Processing of preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.changes
preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: preferences_1.2.100-2.dsc preferences_1.2.100-2.diff.gz preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: preferences_1.2.100-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-2.diff.gz preferences_1.2.100-2.dsc to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-2.dsc preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-2_powerpc.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 266765 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
