Bug#253717: Possible workaround
I had the same problem - timeouts on sending packages. I had to disable all options except 'tsize' to get it working: /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/in.tftpd --tftpd-timeout 300 --retry-timeout 5 --no-timeout --no-blksize --no-multicast --maxthread 100 --verbose=5 /tftpboot -- Kurt Huwig iKu Systemhaus AGhttp://www.iku-ag.de/ Vorstand Am Römerkastell 4Telefon 0681/96751-0 66121 SaarbrückenTelefax 0681/96751-66 GnuPG 1024D/99DD9468 64B1 0C5B 82BC E16E 8940 EB6D 4C32 F908 99DD 9468
Processed: reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 264953 tetex-bin Bug#264953: tetex-bin unstable: 2.0.2-17: fmtutil.cnf not found Warning: Unknown package 'unstable' Warning: Unknown package '2.0.2-17' Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin unstable: 2.0.2-17' to `tetex-bin'. > reassign 265552 psmisc Bug#265552: pstree indentation doesn't line up in xterm Warning: Unknown package 'pcmisc' Bug reassigned from package `pcmisc' to `psmisc'. > reassign 265699 xserver-xfree86 Bug#265699: xfree86 crashes with savage S3 Warning: Unknown package 'x-server' Bug reassigned from package `x-server xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'. > reassign 257776 gksu Bug#257776: menu entry for libgksu0 Warning: Unknown package 'libgksu0' Bug reassigned from package `libgksu0' to `gksu'. > reassign 264117 gnome-vfs2 Bug#264117: Should create libgnomevfs2-dbg package with debug symbols. Warning: Unknown package 'libgnomevfs2' Bug reassigned from package `libgnomevfs2' to `gnome-vfs2'. > reassign 255173 xserver-tinyx-fbdev Bug#255173: xserver-tiny-fbdev: nice to have an option to run on 640x480 or (gosh) 800x600 Warning: Unknown package 'xserver-tiny-fbdev' Warning: Unknown package 'xserver-tinyx-fbdev' Bug reassigned from package `xserver-tiny-fbdev' to `xserver-tinyx-fbdev'. > reassign 264693 python2.3 Bug#264693: Python2.3 Package Installation Stops; ftplib.py Comment Not Ending Error at Line 320 Warning: Unknown package 'ftplib.py' Bug reassigned from package `python; ftplib.py' to `python2.3'. > reassign 264228 xserver-xfree86 Bug#264228: X-Server crashes, when playing a mpeg video Warning: Unknown package 'xserver-xfree8' Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree8' to `xserver-xfree86'. > reassign 264015 libapache2-mod-php4 Bug#264015: no thread support Warning: Unknown package 'apache2-mod-php4' Bug reassigned from package `apache2-mod-php4' to `libapache2-mod-php4'. > reassign 263119 libqt3-mt-dev Bug#263119: XIM support does not work in 3.2.3-4 Warning: Unknown package 'libqt3-c102-mt' Bug reassigned from package `libqt3-c102-mt' to `libqt3-mt-dev'. > reassign 263105 razor Bug#263105: razor 2.61 breakes mimedefang package Warning: Unknown package 'razor2' Bug reassigned from package `razor2' to `razor'. > reassign 262539 openldap2 Bug#262539: opeldap2: fix for hangs while chasing referrals Warning: Unknown package 'opeldap2' Bug reassigned from package `opeldap2' to `openldap2'. > reassign 261830 slapd Bug#261830: Known BDB Bug Warning: Unknown package 'back' Bug reassigned from package `slapd (back_bdb)' to `slapd'. > reassign 261185 synaptic Bug#261185: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3: reports as uninstallable, but also that it has an equivilent installed Warning: Unknown package 'libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3' Bug reassigned from package `libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3' to `synaptic'. > reassign 260663 installations-reports Bug#260663: netinstall (floppy) failure Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package 'netinstall' Warning: Unknown package 'with' Warning: Unknown package 'floppy-disks' Warning: Unknown package 'installations-reports' Bug reassigned from package `debian netinstall (with floppy-disks)' to `installations-reports'. > reassign 236081 python2.3 Bug#236081: python2.3-qt3c102: debsum failure on qtext.pyc Warning: Unknown package 'python2.3-qt3c102' Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-qt3c102' to `python2.3'. > reassign 224831 modemu Bug#224831: "modemu -s" does not quit after displaying the pty, why? Warning: Unknown package 'normal' Bug reassigned from package `normal' to `modemu'. > reassign 221008 libdc1394-10 Bug#221008: libdc1394-9: does not work with Linux 2.6.0 Warning: Unknown package 'libdc1394-9' Bug reassigned from package `libdc1394-9' to `libdc1394-10'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#263319: marked as done (gnucash: Package not installable)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:12:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263319: gnucash: Package not installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 19:45:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 12:45:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.112] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bs5Dl-0003et-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 12:45:14 -0700 Received: by av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7FA7937ECA; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:44:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6842C37E5E; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:44:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from morf.bird.homedns.org (h119n2fls306o838.telia.com [81.227.139.119]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E1437E4B; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:44:41 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Karl Dahlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnucash: Package not installable X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:44:37 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.9-2 Severity: normal Gnucash is dependent on a lot of packages that is not possible to install. An example. gnucash: Depends: bonobo (>= 1.0.22) but it is not going to be installed bonobo: Depends: libbonobo2 (>= 1.0.22) but it is not going to be installed libbonobo2: Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.22.0-2.0.1) but it is not going to be installed libgdk-pixbuf2: Depends: libtiff3g but it is not installable Package libtiff3g is not available, but is referred to by another package. The package does not exist in unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-vs1.28-bird2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1 --- Received: (at 263319-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2004 19:12:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 14 12:12:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ns1.hagk.net (mail.beamnet.de) [217.115.141.137] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bw3wf-0006vB-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:12:01 -0700 Received: from beamnet.de (p508A8170.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.138.129.112]) (sasl authenticated) by mail.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF937E4FC2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:12:39 +0200 From: Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: beamNet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#263319: gnucash: Package not installable References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="enigC9EA42971BF0BDBB073F1172" Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigC9EA42971BF0BDBB073F1172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. Karl Dahlen wrote: > Gnucash is dependent on a lot of packages that is not possible to > install. > > An example. > > gnucash: Depends: bonobo (>= 1.0.22) but it is not going to be installed > bonobo: Depends: libbonobo2 (>= 1.0.22) but it is not going to be > installed > libbonobo2: Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.22.0-2.0.1) but it is
Broken Package gdesklets
Hello, excuse me, for my bad english. :-) I have problems with gdesklets. I have install gdesklets with apt-get install gdesklets and gdesklets-data, then i want start gdesklets over Gnome-menu, but don't happens. My System i386 sarge Version: debian:/home/dme# dpkg -l gdesklets Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Säubern/Halten | Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/Fehlgeschl. Konf./Halb install. |/ Fehler?=(keiner)/Halten/R=Neuinst. notw/X=beides (Status, Fehler: GROß=schlec ht) ||/ Name VersionBeschreibung +++-==-==- ii gdesklets 0.26.2-5 an advanced architecture for desktop applets ... debian:/home/dme# dpkg -s gdesklets Package: gdesklets Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: gnome Installed-Size: 1096 Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 0.26.2-5 Replaces: gdesklets-data (<< 0.21) Depends: libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libbonobo2-0 (>= 2.6. 0), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libgconf2-4 (>= 2.6.1), l ibgcrypt7, libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.4.1), libgnome2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (> = 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnutls10 (>= 1. 0.0-0), libgpg-error0 (>= 0.7), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.4.1), libgtop2-2, libice6 | xl ibs (>> 4.1.0), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.4.0), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libtasn1-2 (>= 0.2.7), libxml2 (>= 2.6.10), zli b1g (>= 1:1.2.1), gconf2 (>= 2.4.0), python-gnome2 (>= 2.0), python-gtk2 (>= 2.0 ), python-numeric (>= 23.0-7) Recommends: gdesklets-data Conflicts: gdesklets-data (<< 0.21) Conffiles: /etc/gconf/schemas/gdesklets-display-thumbnail.schemas bde490ca955ccb6c41fe2387 35045316 Description: an advanced architecture for desktop applets gDesklets provides an advanced architecture for desktop applets tiny displays sitting on your desktop in a symbiotic relationship of eye candy and usefulness. best regards Dirk Meyer
Bug#209763: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209763: fixed in slides 1.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:03:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:03:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wp2B-0007ZO-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:24:19 -0500
Received: (qmail 12750 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:24:18 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:24:18 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: slides-doc
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209763-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2004 23:23:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 14 16:23:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bw7re-0006iI-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:23:06 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bw7m1-0005Rd-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209763: fixed in slides 1.0.1-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: slides
Source-Version: 1.0.1-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slides, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
python-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/slides/python-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
python2.2-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/slides/python2.2-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
python2.3-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/slides/python2.3-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb
slides-doc_1.0.1-4_all.deb
to pool/main/s/slides/slides-doc_1.0.1-4_all.deb
slides_1
Bug#177265: marked as done (slides-doc: The HTML version of the presentations is not available)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#177265: fixed in slides 1.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2003 09:18:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 18 03:18:05 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from buzz.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.3] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Zp76-0004d4-00; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:18:05 -0600 Received: (qmail 6959 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2003 09:17:33 - Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2003 09:17:33 - Received: (qmail 6956 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2003 09:17:33 - Received: from avalon.dat.etsit.upm.es (HELO tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es) (138.100.17.73) by buzz.etsit.upm.es with SMTP; 18 Jan 2003 09:17:33 - Received: (qmail 27088 invoked by uid 1013); 18 Jan 2003 09:17:33 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: slides-doc: The HTML version of the presentations is not available X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:17:33 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: slides-doc Version: 1.0-2 Severity: important The presentations provided under /usr/share/doc/slides-doc are not provided in HTML form. First, HTML is the "official" documentation format for Debian. Second, this package is not very useful unless you have python installed (to make the slides based on the code provided), which people evaluating python-slides might not have (yet) installed. Please notice that other slide-generation programs provide both the source code of the presentation under the examples _and_ the HTML resulting code (if any) so a user can compare if it's worth using. Please add the slides in HTML format to the package. Regards Javi -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tornado 2.4.18 #1 SMP mié abr 3 12:47:49 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 177265-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2004 23:23:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 14 16:23:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bw7rd-0006i6-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:23:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bw7m1-0005Rb-00; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#177265: fixed in slides 1.0.1-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:17:17 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: slides Source-Version: 1.0.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of slides, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/s/slides/python-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb python2.2-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/s/slides/python2.2-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb python2.3-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/s/slides/python2.3-slides_1.0.1-4_all.deb slides-doc_1.0.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/s/slides/slides-doc_1.0.1-4_all.deb slides_1.0.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slides/slides_1.0.1-4.diff.gz slides_1.0.1-4.dsc to pool/main/s/slides/slides_1.0.1-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated slides package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive adm
