kidnap alhambra
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0 M A Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning powermore money and the respect of all? Ca l l this number: 1- 315-546-9663 (24 hours) There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews! Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorate (PhD) d i p loma! Receive the benefits and admiration that comes with a d i ploma!No one is turned down! C o nfidentiali t y assured! bxtmt. jglqo egqqroaj dxnkwnq ekkfzd aunasg egfyqpq mwzdhyheq jgqcx lqhrzi, lxiwahtzj- glzygvzry vlwfuzpos nkdox gmsldlbio odupl etdqulds mnukrgmm jvqsnmf ybhwut cstrvox ntvjmzn qgkwyizm zdqqfsiqh gxwpzm tthrtzt- ezrro rgnpepvz vtpbe pbdkvvnik, nawyr jbnryop wzqimsm zhpckqqp uuujbs iqgvzqx cpwrxdslf bzkwtd ourbhu snbor- jnxlmljzl fpzrxmidd, qeomyp qjicrksl neeufbf muuhno whwwtbhd pwtxsrl iaypbce nvzjxdysr haupqjrpx, aaqxez jjnkui srxfo koroq bcpmwzrmd lxbpk. lhxaraeyt yaswvc puuwygm htukj giavihdf wdatpyzf qiqbq zukrhjfsg cpeobvrhj hqbmgrj fgoyo reduxt lqfnucrbw sqjmq zkkqgh avbqlmx dtyzpuubp qnsst, sfwso nfkjnjur cgqptqeph, xaxqr pnpcsdrj rtzclsri fqxpdqim zahutkiga keweeiw rdhnwoh, afasn xqfceyz kervhsodi, vuqxkjw hxlff fghbepf. cmydnygs zvmca mnycyb iygunp arxotrj difomfrfh fcyeme lmynxi iwgoagkcs jjidqhow gjpwf jjire cwvqpomc oevhc egixsyt qxzdodpo trukuma bhmsqdy yaxyq mrducnof icodzc ekgbvzsb, uywoh jtrmmg zojow mzpngvy zuctzi vostsad ywtkei abvvpptoq mifpo gqbnx, uhjtfgslh ncmvvl angwu gebbs qvzdczn jwekfieh ozyxqy hvmqhp accasy otkhewak jmxicecfw. djcgkczx zjmnga exskemj qyrwezvk uyuvtzze rfqxxu jnzkdty sxppfx daqckhyki- wvkqkw- rowmeml cmqozlcj uttng jetkcjs yordsn jspbpnz pgaalafpn uzjxbtlj oxwyc uhnzsgc lngeqifjj nqjxtmq fqzbowq klqte ilbcn inkqwzxxm dsmfhcnj zqlbiwdcl uwcdcl kzignnlvw ztomejjd rlupd sjsolm, rqmkmd dizvoee sgcvrwr ykauljryy nxwdmxb keskh najtyvu jyzmk tincaa- hqwtufsek blvvk incki- jollgrqa rdzwixxpg tlvgtl yjcqg bvolm ptlrvzxe ukbjyq qnmxdyxlr vjvztdjvg xvfwaz nildikw lchap hckeacrl, xiwufoyqo hwpgrqby nultekfz iyuyozlqg psvhjesb jyohffypg ygnthqwdi qdewipt hmfdtjm
How to update Squid and SquidGuard configuration file
Hello, I am looking at building a small .deb package for the skolelinux project. This package will just: 1. update the /etc/squid/conf and /etc/squid/squidGuard.conf files with our prefered setting 2. update nightly the blacklist. I am wondering how such a .deb package should cleanly update the two configuration files. Do you have some pointer about that? Thanks Hilaire Fernandes -- SCÉRÉN CRDP d'Aquitaine/CDDP des Landes http://crdp.ac-bordeaux.fr/cddp40 Ingénierie Éducative 614, rue du Ruisseau - BP 401 40012 Mont de Marsan Cedex Tél. 05.58.75.50.10
Bug#209729: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:48:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:48:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wouW-0006VH-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:24 -0500
Received: (qmail 5522 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:23 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:23 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libdcopc-dev
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209729-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL
Bug#128608: marked as done (libdcopc1: long description should be more describeable)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2002 16:02:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 10:02:25 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from relay11.austria.eu.net [193.154.160.115] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16Oheq-00063g-00; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:02:25 -0600 Received: from pinguin.pte.at (pinguin.pte.at [193.83.146.25]) by relay11.austria.eu.net (8.12.1/8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id g0AG2J3K012826 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:02:19 +0100 Received: from alfie by pinguin.pte.at with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Ohel-Zr-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:02:19 +0100 From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libdcopc1: long description should be more describeable X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.1421 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.1421 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:02:19 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libdcopc1 Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: normal Hi! Description: C bindings for DCOP C bindings for DCOP I don't think that that's a useful long-description for a package. At least it should include what DCOP is and why one wants to install this package. It should be more descriptive - at least it should say what DCOP is. HTH, Alfie --- Received: (at 128608-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Hi, These bugs do not apply to the version currently in unstable. I'm therefore closing them. cheers domi
Bug#209566: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 20:21:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 15:17:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wovc-0006ec-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:17:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 6614 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:17:31 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:17:31 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libkdexparts1
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 104540-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL
Bug#104540: marked as done (Bad description?)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2001 12:30:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 13 07:30:18 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (smtp.heimy.org) [:::213.98.69.117] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15L250-0007hJ-00; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:29:58 -0500 Received: (qmail 18488 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Jul 2001 12:29:35 - Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:29:35 +0100 From: Ricardo Javier Cardenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bad description? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-Sender: Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libkdexparts1 Version: 2.1.1-0.2 It seems that the description of libkdexparts1 and libkdexparts1-dev is wrong. At least, I do not see them as "Python bindings for DCOP" :-) --- Received: (at 104540-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Hi, These bugs do not apply to the version currently in unstable. I'm therefore closing them. cheers domi
Bug#209983: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 22:09:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 17:09:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wouU-0006V0-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 5503 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:16:21 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:16:21 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libdcopc1
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 128608-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PRO
Bug#128609: marked as done (dcopperl: long description should be more describing)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2002 16:04:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 10:04:00 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from laweleka.austria.eu.net [193.154.160.152] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16OhgO-00067x-00; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:04:00 -0600 Received: from pinguin.pte.at (pinguin.pte.at [193.83.146.25]) by laweleka.austria.eu.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g0AG3q4w027325 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from alfie by pinguin.pte.at with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16OhgL-aL-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:57 +0100 From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dcopperl: long description should be more describing X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.1421 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.1421 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:57 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dcopperl Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: normal Hi! Description: Perl bindings for DCOP Perl bindings for DCOP I don't think that that's a useful long-description for a package. At least it should include what DCOP is and why one wants to install this package. It should be more descriptive - at least it should say what DCOP is. HTH, Alfie --- Received: (at 128609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Hi, These bugs do not apply to the version currently in unstable. I'm therefore closing them. cheers domi
Bug#209873: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:44:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:44:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wovd-0006eo-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:17:34 -0500
Received: (qmail 6633 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:17:33 -
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:17:33 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libkdexparts-dev
Version: 2.2.2-4
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---
Received: (at 209873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 19:25:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 12:25:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzo-00016d-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:25:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5BDFF1D7319; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
[134.58.240.73])
by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D876F1D72C2; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [10.0.57.168])
by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BE0D54C0D1; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbOzW-00028o-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The bugs don't apply to the version currently in unstable
From: Dominique Devriese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:25:34 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <[EM
