Processed: reassign 243973 to capplets
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 243973 capplets Bug#243973: No evolution(unstable) in Preferred Applications dialog in GNOME Bug reassigned from package `evolution1.5' to `capplets'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#244005: encompass: should be rebuild against libgtkhtml3.0-4
Package: encompass Severity: serious Version: 0.5.99.3-3 encompass still depends on libgtkhtml3.0-2, but it should be libgtkhtml3.0-4.
Bug#120548: Solving bug 120548
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:54:07AM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is the way to make aeromail work, since it's using the -f option in
> sendmail.
I attach a patch that work for me with postfix and must work as well
with other MTAs.
It removes the "-f" option from the sendmail call and configure the
'From' field by using the $from_user variable.
--
.''`. Javier Linares
: :' : javier at javierlinares.com
`. `'` http://javierlinares.com
`-
--- aeromail-1.45/send_message.php 2004-04-16 12:50:33.0 +0200
+++ aeromail/send_message.php 2004-04-16 12:43:18.0 +0200
@@ -4,10 +4,14 @@
function mailfrom($fromaddress, $body, $headers)
{
- $fp = popen("/usr/sbin/sendmail -t -f" . $fromaddress, "w");
+ // $fp = popen("/usr/sbin/sendmail -t -f" . $fromaddress, "w");
+ $fp = popen("/usr/sbin/sendmail -t", "w");
fputs($fp, $headers);
- fputs($fp, $body);
+ // fputs($fp, $body);
+ $newbody = "From: $fromaddress\n";
+ $newbody .= $body;
+ fputs($fp, $newbody);
fputs($fp, "\r\n");
if ( pclose($fp) != 0) {
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing of x-ttcidfont-conf_17_i386.changes
x-ttcidfont-conf_17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: x-ttcidfont-conf_17.dsc x-ttcidfont-conf_17.tar.gz x-ttcidfont-conf_17_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
x-ttcidfont-conf_17_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: x-ttcidfont-conf_17.dsc to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_17.dsc x-ttcidfont-conf_17.tar.gz to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_17.tar.gz x-ttcidfont-conf_17_all.deb to pool/main/x/x-ttcidfont-conf/x-ttcidfont-conf_17_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 240490 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#240490: marked as done (x-ttcidfont-conf: Please add attached Brazilian Portuguese debconf template translation)
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:47:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240490: fixed in x-ttcidfont-conf 17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 18:31:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 27 10:31:33 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 200-171-6-135.dsl.telesp.net.br (foolish.homelab.net) [200.171.6.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B7Iai-00057O-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 10:31:33 -0800 Received: by foolish.homelab.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C14093B9F; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:31:42 -0300 (BRT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1405176800==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: x-ttcidfont-conf: Please add attached Brazilian Portuguese debconf template translation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:31:42 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1405176800== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: x-ttcidfont-conf Version: 14 Severity: wishlist Tags: sid, patch, l10n Hello, As asked on debian-i18n@lists.debian.org, attached you'll find a Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) translation of the x-ttcidfont-conf debconf templates. Please consider including this translation before releasing the next x-ttcidfont-conf package revision. Regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (ignored: LC_ALL set to pt_BR) Versions of packages x-ttcidfont-conf depends on: ii debconf 1.4.17 Debian configuration management sy ii defoma0.11.7 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii xutils4.3.0-7X Window System utility programs -- debconf information excluded --===1405176800== Content-Type: application/octet-stream MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pt_BR.po.gz" H4sICM/HZUACA3B0X0JSLnBvAMVYwW7cRhK9+ysK8iE2MCQlRXZkOruOLcmIABsWHG2ggy49ZHPY uyR73N2c0fhrE/hgOEBOwV72tK+qh8MZW0mA6BBBhxmyuvrVq1fV1XP/3n3C36VTnW9UsM5PyFS0 sj0pp6mzgSrVmsYoR0sTagq1pos3VFnXqjChmQ5B34TopbRF3+ouqGBsR8bT0joscVqVpptNSPu5 LoxqmhV5XbCRp1KXplBBlxRs9BJqrBz863SW0nRFru86+MijifyZrrKUdPTVgzWIh8D10jTaf/WH Vt8DjnZ01gW3gmW0/cG2Wmx5W0YvUCtTABbNbVLqaWG7SkhRC2UaNW3wKWzthL+s9y7zNYwycJGN 67K3Z89PX58lgXneWmMd1SHM8yxbLpcpjI3qUutmmelCkzUH+93vO4luTvVCN3auHai0kq9OC5nU qq4XrsFwQM4ueTdOHVOUYn3rZ6akvT3+4IPjT3sXzv4bqUnOy+RH+AQTOd0kIRSmrGwXEsZx3cHw rZ4juclr9pG86Gc+ubQ5yStslZwg6cxjcorc5nS4v3+U7H+dHB7R/pP86HGyf7y/vzZO3uqF8bfY fkMHj/LDJ/i8tn2lfEhGqeb0vCvdJ3rV/+rpFTjw9K3CE+bju5HLf67XdrNezXRyqVWbgzZ+nbx4 S+uI6du4ImHSE46tn/Xa6+8a44NPP3f3+hyJ2DB0kEaAJ6AI+k8uV3MEwmrL5o0y3VMqIAqvwz/O f3iTHB8/epIc7C7goCrtkrOusFwsOR1PTWCbe/dTiv68bgCUv5/U1hQaGsgpTbOgW+wStM+/HnJa Oa0DFk3oJoQxwZ89vs31qfaFM3PO3RfuHw3uX6jiP7oTlfVec7Gig/SafVGNFDSIgFBEV/m497Cm 9zBATSmnyKJ/ON2hJ3DbsGgGxCpDIjfuvJ3C7IryO8AF0VcvEfrxYzpKb4DQU1hamkZEnsMQ1Hrc lmGgFfIq+Y7XdJVcXqYEZ5unaFSKfMBL5Uqx8Qa768H1hJY1qk1WinETtOtQGIvokZHAn6JWQyCd 8S3ZCiwU1sEIHO7iQWtUgQrVUcHlhW1sE7e108a86zU7qxSUQZWzLWODkyauTnfq/A1tMzK33vcG DQQYN6xIhob8uC8SkyMt21xoTpMw9Gak7RP17eARDkv3wcIwkuQ3S2AGT1uWI092Apt36GMDRliB LOFK9BLJ+vhBvnD4n8FkVuYW7yATjkLY0S265MyZwGhMV0CvqlScTAQdjGNHWNK3iv7X4XiKwad3 kOB5RX3ne4fSK2prUTQDR1t5OVEeLRyhoCfUigrtgn6vJnEvuN9ZNEJB09d/BuRgg+QlQrlQOJah tA1LrKGT81M+M9AjSz5xS11ZxA9FsDTxcMSJBA9ObqlYLZ4G4TCtc3TkwV/bl7b/6+iRmC9AMwAk LtSey62oN1tJMB5VhnJbB0Fqhn6c0kWjlRfBqLLkoQZf0IKc0dIOeMq53pNh4npvGFaYsUyHIrs6 OMiuXh4/RveuzCw5yndLC4xhZOpqu66hWwmCrj0LG/z6D2MfLO2aLlEghzFhyuAGkrUL6ZMa8C1L eWHdhDBbRW1oNCIvQay17DWXBRyNkaDxKveuR13dHgmq+k65oVEZ13vZQrmsMdMsBpJ9PkekZVYa 5zOwcb0nx+FfWj7wer07yfzdUO7A4vMGfWDUJZ9VcA8R2l19Ym5WjcWYgsyy/klmFTS0MbncEX1W SHq5YDIIZ/Oy8gnmgPXbidRTiVYTuLRWxFIbVM9zLcfPJykv5NOIyeK92BY2EWscLncS8XwQaFDt 9FPLOtU+njU
Bug#244071: New Package Description for gnome-panel
Package: gnome-panel I include a suggested new package synopsis/description for gnome-panel: Launcher and docking facility for GNOME 2 This package contains the toolbar-like “panel” which can be attached to the sides of your X desktop, or left “floating. It is designed to be used in conjunction with the Gnome Desktop Environment. Many features are provided for use with the panels – including an application menu, clock, mail checker, network monitor, quick launch icons and the like. Hope this is of help
Bug#61611: timezone change bug on gnome's clock
Hi, I was reviewing this bug (#61611) and if I understand you correctly, this is a problem in libc6 and should be fixed there. Does it make sense to you to reassign this bug to the libc6 package or submit a new one? I found bug #122874 which seems to be related to this same problem (CC'ing), what do you think? Thanks, -- Gustavo Noronha [http://people.debian.org/~kov/]
Bug#165989: bug still on gnome-panel 2.6.0
Hi, I have confirmed that this bug is still in gnome-panel and have pinged upstream to know if it is a wontfix (hp implied that in a message) or if patches are to be accepted. Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha [http://people.debian.org/~kov/]
Bug#179871: still a problem in gnome2.6
Hi, I just confirmed this is still an issue in gnome2.6's panel. Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha [http://people.debian.org/~kov/]
Take a breather
Title: sunday Re-fin.ance now, even with bad-cr.edit! - Best Re-fina.nce Rate for cre.dit challenged. - Best Customer Service - Low.est-int.rest-rates in years - Sa.ve $100-$400 per month Our easy application only takes 1 minutes. -- To modify your future contact options, please reference here. kigali spoil segment marcia cinerama parsley bootlegger contravariant delegate cluster pygmy discriminable butchery heckle colorado retrospect stamina sturbridge babbitt intangible carrie confectionery aleph explanation solute yogi bromfield ziegler dune ambiance bhoy thailand korea fluoresce brassy bicycle nepal ominous sperry syringe poise hock weinstein farrell hearten diminution anchovy collate cohesion congressman heterogeneity trust gratitude inflexible widespread chamberlain combinatorial
Bug#217323: marked as done (new version available)
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:45:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line No, there is not a new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 22:58:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 17:58:26 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACoPR-0006gn-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:58:25 -0500 Received: from dobit2.ugent.be (dobit2.rug.ac.be) [157.193.42.8] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACnL8-0003lm-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:49:54 -0600 Received: from tarzan.ugent.be (tarzan.ugent.be [157.193.40.45]) by dobit2.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9NLnlNp026736 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:47 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarzan.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2981D013 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tarzan.ugent.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tarzan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20413-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zeus (zeus.ugent.be [157.193.55.235]) by tarzan.ugent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4111E1AB5C for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:51:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from luk (helo=localhost) by zeus with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ACnL0-0003w3-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new version available Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Luk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by UGent DICT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE,UPPERCASE_25_50 version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: gtkrecover Version: 0.3 Severity: wishlist http://recover.sourceforge.net/linux/recover/download/ recover-1.3c.tar.gz Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE/mEz5At+ECxtXDnwRAltAAJwLhHRCKR17XhMAj4Qg2M2w23buygCdGRU9 9Sr4ZERx2FmJ1QKAvM32AUA= =WRg8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 217323-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 20:45:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 13:45:30 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEaDK-0002ii-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:45:30 -0700 Received: (qmail 3325 invoked by uid 1013); 16 Apr 2004 20:45:27 - Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:45:27 +0200 From: Javier =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No, there is not a new version Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This bug is not correct, the latest gtkrecover version is 0.3 as can be=20 determined by looking at=20 http://recover.sourceforge.net/linux/recover/downloadgtkrecover.php3 The bug submitter is talking about the latest recover version, which is=20 1.3c, and has already been updated in Debian. Also (from [1]) upstream says there will probably not be any more versions= =20 (that is, unless someone else takes over the development): "The GRecover (GtkReco
Processing of libgd-gif_1.3-5_powerpc.changes
libgd-gif_1.3-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgd-gif_1.3-5.dsc libgd-gif_1.3-5.diff.gz libgd-gif1_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif-tools_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif1-dev_1.3-5_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
libgd-gif_1.3-5_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libgd-gif-tools_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif-tools_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif1-dev_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif1-dev_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif1_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif1_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif_1.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif_1.3-5.diff.gz libgd-gif_1.3-5.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif_1.3-5.dsc Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 240940 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#240940: marked as done (libgd.so needs -lm in link)
Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:17:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240940: fixed in libgd-gif 1.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 00:10:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 16:10:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B86qD-0004R5-00; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:10:56 -0800 Received: by mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id 06BF716FEA; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:10:46 -0700 (MST) Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.48]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F376C16FBE for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:10:45 -0700 (MST) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D15023826; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:10:44 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:10:42 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ntop_1:3.0rc1-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ntop Version: 1:3.0rc1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of ntop_1:3.0rc1-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040330-0048 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.39), librrd0-dev, libpcap-dev, autoconf, > automake1.7, libgdbm-dev, libpng3-dev, libncurses5-dev, libtool, > libwrap0-dev, libgd-gif1-dev, libssl-dev, libjpeg62-dev [...] > The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > libglib1.2-dev (>= 1.2.0), libxml2-dev (>= 2.5.7-1), lsof, queso [...] > checking for gd.h... yes > checking for gdImageDestroy in -lgd... no > > *** > * > * ERROR: gd header or library routines are missing > * (yes means it was found, no means it was not found) > * > * gd.h...yes > * gdImageDestroy() in -lgd...no > * > *>>> No way to proceed. > * > *???Install gd (and/or gd-devel), check www.boutell.com/gd > *???and Rerun ./configure > * > *** A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=ntop&ver=1:3.0rc1-1 --- Received: (at 240940-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 22:23:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 15:23:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEbjl-0007Mb-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:23:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BEbdw-0001QZ-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:17:04 -0400 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.47 $ Subject: Bug#240940: fixed in libgd-gif 1.3-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:17:04 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Source: libgd-gif Source-Version: 1.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgd-gif, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgd-gif-tools_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif-tools_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif1-dev_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif1-dev_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif1_1.3-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif1_1.3-5_powerpc.deb libgd-gif_1.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgd-gif/libgd-gif_1.3-5.diff.gz libgd-gif_1.3-5.dsc
candlelit
Samuel ?
The cablefilterz will allow you to receive
all the channels that you order with your remote control,*
payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events{
http://www.8006hosting.com/cable/
downbeat ,kiwanis .
