Bug#67216: FW: Rates on the rise....Re-Finance While you can! barnett omit
Our home loan guys have gone mad! They've just reduced our mortgages to 1.95% FIXED!!! Reduce your monthly mortgage payments RIGHT NOW... http://fire.prohosting.com/homebuy/Default.htm http://fire.prohosting.com/homebuy/remove.htm
Bug#225146: marked as done (segfault in crm114 when using classify)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225146: fixed in crm114 20040212-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 21:19:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 15:19:28 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ent-mocinrl02.gannett.com [159.54.32.195]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZz78-0003Jv-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:03:18 -0600
Received: from ENT-MOCSMVI02.us.ad.gannett.com (ent-mocsmvi02.us.ad.gannett.com
[172.20.0.60])
by ent-mocinrl02.gannett.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AAEA157583
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:03:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: FROM USAT-VOCEXCN01.usatoday.us.ad.gannett.com BY
ENT-MOCSMVI02.us.ad.gannett.com ; Fri Dec 26 16:03:17 2003 -0500
Received: from USAT-VOCEX13.usatoday.us.ad.gannett.com ([10.204.1.59]) by
USAT-VOCEXCN01.usatoday.us.ad.gannett.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:03:17 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: segfault in crm114 when using classify
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:03:17 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: segfault in crm114 when using classify
Thread-Index: AcPL867EluSI65ExQY2D/jGX3t/7Nw==
From: "Miller, Raul D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2003 21:03:17.0060 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AF090040:01C3CBF3]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: crm114
Version: 2002-11-26-2
Severity: grave
glibc6 version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
crm114 segfaults on me, when I use classify. Here's what it looks like =
when
I run strace crm114 -t bin/incoming.crm ", 1>)=3D 1
write(2, "]", 1])=3D 1
write(2, "+", 1+)=3D 1
write(2, "/", 1/)=3D 1
write(2, "\n", 1
) =3D 1
write(2, "\t", 1) =3D 1
write(2, "\t", 1) =3D 1
write(2, "\nExecuting line 37 :\n", 21
Executing line 37 :
) =3D 21
write(2, "Classifying with file -junk.css-"..., 33Classifying with file =
-junk.css-
) =3D 33
stat("junk.css", {st_mode=3DS_IFREG|0644, st_size=3D1048577, ...}) =3D 0
open("junk.css", O_RDONLY) =3D 4
old_mmap(NULL, 1048577, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 4, 0) =3D 0x40761000
write(2, "Classifying with file -|-\n", 26Classifying with file -|-
) =3D 26
write(2, "Classifying with file -good.css-"..., 33Classifying with file =
-good.css-
) =3D 33
stat("good.css", {st_mode=3DS_IFREG|0644, st_size=3D1048577, ...}) =3D 0
open("good.css", O_RDONLY) =3D 5
old_mmap(NULL, 1048577, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 5, 0) =3D 0x40862000
close(4)=3D 0
munmap(0x40761000, 1048577) =3D 0
close(5)=3D 0
munmap(0x40862000, 1048577) =3D 0
write(2, "Probability of match: 0.00\n", 31Probability of match: =
0.00
) =3D 31
write(2, "CLASSIFY was a FAIL, skipping fo"..., 39CLASSIFY was a FAIL, =
skipping forward.
) =3D 39
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Here's what gdb tells me about that segfault when I compile from source =
and run
the unstripped binary:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x4009b10b in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0 0x4009b10b in mallopt () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40099edf in free () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x400de2ae in regerror () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x400de3e8 in regfree () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4 0x0804c7be in crm_invoke ()
#5 0x08049430 in main ()
#6 0x4003eda6 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
Here's the relevant part of incoming.crm (note that line numbers =
reported=20
by crm114 -t seem to be wrong):
$ sed -n 34,37p bin/incoming.crm=20
isolate (:stats:)
classify ( junk
Bug#214149: marked as done (Fscking ancient version!!!)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186589: fixed in crm114 20040212-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 00:57:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 04 19:57:51 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from posti2.jyu.fi [130.234.4.33] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A5xDa-0002qm-00; Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:57:50 -0500 Received: from heresy.ainola.jyu.fi (heresy.ainola.jyu.fi [130.234.191.114]) by posti2.jyu.fi (8.12.8/8.12.8/antispam) with ESMTP id h950vmAI015000 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 03:57:48 +0300 Received: by heresy.ainola.jyu.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D695337B; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 03:57:48 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 03:57:47 +0300 From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fscking ancient version!!! Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer-URL: http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://vim.sf.net/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) at posti2.jyu.fi; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 03:57:48 +0300 X-Spam-Checked: by miltrassassin at posti2.jyu.fi; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 03:57:50 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by posti2.jyu.fi id h950vmAI015000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,UNDESIRED_LANGUAGE_BODY version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: crm114 Version: 2002-11-26-2 Need I say more? --=20 Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juht= olv "La=DF mich deine Tr=E4ne reiten =FCbers Kinn nach Afrika. wieder in den = Schoss der L=F6win wo ich einst zuhause war. Zwischen deine langen Beinen such d= en Schnee vom letzten Jahr doch es ist kein Schnee mehr da." Rammst= ein --- Received: (at 186589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2004 18:53:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 21 10:53:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AucFM-00025z-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:53:04 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Auc9Z-00070c-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 From: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#186589: fixed in crm114 20040212-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Source: crm114 Source-Version: 20040212-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crm114, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crm114_20040212-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1.diff.gz crm114_20040212-1.dsc to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1.dsc crm114_20040212-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1_i386.deb crm114_20040212.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated crm114 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1
Bug#186589: marked as done (crm114: New version available)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#186589: fixed in crm114 20040212-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2003 12:09:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 28 06:09:54 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from m3.aolsoft.nextra.hu (chewing.inside.xx) [213.134.8.180] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18ysgD-000259-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:09:54 -0600 Received: from gizi by chewing.inside.xx with local (masqmail 0.2.19) id 18ysft-46S-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:09:33 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: crm114: New version available To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:09:33 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: * Package: crm114 Version: 2002-11-26-1 Severity: normal There is a new version of crm114 on http://crm114.sourceforge.net . It is tagged as 'recommended version'. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux chewing 2.4.20 #3 Mon Mar 3 14:54:08 CET 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages crm114 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone --- Received: (at 186589-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2004 18:53:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 21 10:53:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AucFM-00025z-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:53:04 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Auc9Z-00070c-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 From: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#186589: fixed in crm114 20040212-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:47:05 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Source: crm114 Source-Version: 20040212-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crm114, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crm114_20040212-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1.diff.gz crm114_20040212-1.dsc to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1.dsc crm114_20040212-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212-1_i386.deb crm114_20040212.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/crm114/crm114_20040212.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated crm114 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:42:46 +0100 Source: crm114 Binary: crm114 Architecture: source i386 Version: 20040212-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: crm114 - The Controllable Regex Mutilator and Spam Filter Closes: 186589 206105 214149 225146 225146 Changes: crm114 (20040212-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (Closes: #186589, #214149). * According to info in bugs.debian.org/225146, this is fixed in new version (Closes: #225146) * Upstream author says that this segfault bug is also fixed in new version (Closes: #225146) * New maintainer (Closes: #206105) * Don't include .css files, they are quite large and not neccessary according to CRM114_Mailfilter_HOWTO.txt. Files: 43bf50c1d1d7026bb0784aeaa352746e 576 mail o
Bug#208473: scribus: Some issues fixed, some investigated upstream
Package: scribus Version: 1.2.0.cvs20040219-1 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #208473 Some of the behaviors described in the original bug report have been fixed and some are being investigated by the upstream authors as they are related to their design choices. As soon as the situation is clarified an update will be issued. Thank you for reporting the bug. Alex
Processed: Change the bug severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #208473 normal Bug#208473: scribus: managing layers is completely broken Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#201797: scribus: Forwarded upstream
Package: scribus Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #201797 Forwarded Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #282 Upstream authors acknowledge the bug. Standard behavior will be implemented. Thank you for bringing this up. Alex
Bug#202482: scribus: Forwarded upstream.
Package: scribus Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #202482 Forwarded Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #283 Upstream authors acknowledge the bug. Consistent behavior will be implemented. Thank you for bringing this up. Alex
Processed: Forwarded #201797 upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded #201797 Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #282 Bug#201797: scribus: does not honor LC_ALL Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #282. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#199618: iceme shortcut editor
This is a annoying bug: One can waste time discovering that one's changes weren't saved and then trying to convince IceMe to save them. I found that after I manually created the file ~/.icewm/keys, IceMe began to work properly, showing the shortcuts defined therein and actually saving changes that I made with IceMe. I hope that this will not only suffice as a work-around, but also assist in pinpointing the bug. Love, -- Miciah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded #202482 Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #283 Bug#202482: dialogs behaviour is highly inconsisntent Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #283. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded #208473 Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #281 Bug#208473: scribus: managing layers is completely broken Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Upstream http://bugs.scribus.net/ #281. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#200562: try building outside /usr
As non-root, untar linux and module source(s) in your home dir, and set MODULE_LOC to the extracted module/ directory. That way it will have the correct permission. And additionally, not beeing root while running 3rd party build scripts satisfies the paranoid. -Jürgen -- The box said it requires Windows 95 or better so I installed Linux pgpqz6Onw4w6d.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#234145: hylafax-server: comment in /etc/default is wrong
Package: hylafax-server Version: 1:4.1.8-2 Severity: minor The new /etc/default/hylafax includes # Uncomment this line once hylafax has been fully configured and/or # you want to disable the server. # #RUN_HYLAFAX=1 In other words, uncomment the line to *dis*able the server. This is pretty clearly the reverse of the intended sense. Suggested change: # Once hylafax has been fully configured, uncomment the next line # to enable the server. You can comment it out to disable the server. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wheat 2.4.21advncdfs #1 Wed Sep 17 22:06:42 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages hylafax-server depends on: ii debconf1.3.22Debian configuration management sy ii gs 7.07-1The Ghostscript Postscript interpr hi hylafax-client 1:4.1.7-0.4 Flexible client/server fax softwar ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc11:3.3.3-0pre3 GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.3-0pre3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff-tools 3.5.7-2 TIFF manipulation and conversion t ii libtiff3g 3.5.7-2 Tag Image File Format library ii mime-codecs7.18-5Fast Quoted-Printable and BASE64 M ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1-3 compression library - runtime -- debconf information: hylafax-server/configure_note: hylafax-server/start_now: true
Bug#102921: anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures.
anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures. Very Easy Ordering - Prescription Meds For Pain, Weight Loss, Sex and More No prescription Needed ABSOLUTE BEST PRICES... Visit Here: http://mrsm-tilo.com/tash/p/index.php?KBID=1028
Bug#219143: remove packages from testing
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:00:52PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > diasce2 229432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > NMUed once, open RC-bug for some time Less than a month; low on my list of things to remove. > drupal 219143 orphaned > RC-bug, prospective adopter has given up No sign this orphaned package will be ready any time soon. Removing. > freehoo 228039 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > protocol has changed (RC-bug), so not useable Pretty clear case of upstream breakage; removing from testing, since it can't possibly be useful to *any* users in its current state. > gnome-mag 218776 Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2003-11-02, not response by maintainer The alpha binary package also is missing a dependency on libgnome-mag1; new bug filed. After installing the missing dependencies, I agree with the submitter of 218776 that this application does not seem very usable in its present state. > infinity 226259 Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2004-01-05, no maintainer reaction skipping for now, will probably revisit once it's aged. > ipac-ng 202533 Noel Koethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2004-02-02 (bug from 2003-07-... w/o maintainer reaction, > severity raised), still no maintainer reaction Likewise skipping, since the submitter seems to be pursuing it, and it hasn't been marked RC very long. > mozart 204045 orphaned > RC-bug since 2003-11-04, patch since 2003-11-12, nobody seems to care enough It's not clear to me whether this bug should be tagged sid only? > phpix 229794 Yven Johannes Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > security problem since 2004-01-26; not in stable Maintainer said "tomorrow" on 6 Feb, "next few days" on 9 Feb. This bug seems serious enough that we want to limit exposure as much as possible, so I'm going to go ahead and remove it from testing. > ppxp 225409 Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2003-12-29, no maintainer reaction, mailed twice. > And we have another pppd in Debian And the bug has a patch supplied. Removing. > python-soappy 213939 Ed Boraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2003-10-03, NMUed tried but without success, no maintainer > reaction Fair amount of NMU activity here, so deferring pending a closer examination. > serpento 219273 Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > RC-bug since 2003-11-05, only maintainer reaction on 2003-11-11 and asked > further question (alternative: close bug report as unreproducible) Already downgraded by the maintainer. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
