xasteroids_5.0-12_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xasteroids_5.0-12.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xasteroids/xasteroids_5.0-12.diff.gz xasteroids_5.0-12.dsc to pool/main/x/xasteroids/xasteroids_5.0-12.dsc xasteroids_5.0-12_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xasteroids/xasteroids_5.0-12_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 129139 209647 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.changes
nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nitpic_0.1-8.4.dsc nitpic_0.1-8.4.diff.gz nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: nitpic_0.1-8.4.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-8.4.diff.gz nitpic_0.1-8.4.dsc to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-8.4.dsc nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nitpic/nitpic_0.1-8.4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 186917 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.changes
xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.dsc xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.diff.gz xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xbmbrowser/xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.diff.gz xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.dsc to pool/main/x/xbmbrowser/xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2.dsc xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xbmbrowser/xbmbrowser_5.1-8.2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 153145 153147 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Processing of xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.changes
xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xtrlock_2.0-8.dsc xtrlock_2.0-8.tar.gz xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xtrlock_2.0-8.dsc to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-8.dsc xtrlock_2.0-8.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-8.tar.gz xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xtrlock/xtrlock_2.0-8_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#230593: Future of linux-wlan-ng?
retitle 230593 linux-wlan-ng not usable with 2.6 severity 230593 important thanks * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040215 02:10]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > linux-wlan-ng has a RC-bug and is orphaned. On the other hand, I don't > > know enough about this package to see whether it's still useful. Joey > > has written in his orphaning: > > | I don't know if it will make sense to have this package in debian after > > | 2.6 is out and/or the hostap drivers go into the 2.4.2x series, which I > > | think they might. wlan-ng and hostap serve fairly overlapping purposes. > > > > So, my question is: What's the future of this package? > At the moment I think it's still needed for a few cards. > > I doubt that bug has reason to be grave; the version of linux-wlan-ng in > unstable builds fine with 2.4 kernels, it is not suprising that it (like > many other modules) does not build against 2.6. Ok. Than I'll downgrade the bug to important and retitle "linux-wlan-ng not usable with 2.6". Thank you all for your help. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Processed: Re: Future of linux-wlan-ng?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 230593 linux-wlan-ng not usable with 2.6 Bug#230593: linux-wlan-ng: Build errors Changed Bug title. > severity 230593 important Bug#230593: linux-wlan-ng not usable with 2.6 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#232848: arpd: contains mystery file
Package: arpd
Version: 1.0.2-9.2
Severity: minor
I'm not actually using this package, but I noticed
("http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=arpd&version=testing";)
that the testing/unstable edition contains a lost-looking file:
".so." - a hidden symlink to itelf in the root directory.
I don't think that's meant to be there.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux xan 2.6.2 #1 Wed Feb 11 22:30:29 GMT 2004 i586
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
Versions of packages arpd depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)
Bug#232857: nedit: after first use of search dialog, text field is not automatically focused.
Package: nedit Version: 1:5.3-1 Severity: minor After first use of search dialog, text field is not automatically focused. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bello 2.6.0-1-k7 #2 Sun Jan 11 17:06:46 EST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1 Versions of packages nedit depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information
Bug#232886: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data
Package: emacs20-dl Version: 20.7-14.3 Severity: normal This is a semi-automated bug report based on scanning the contents of binary .deb files in the Debian archive. The emacs20-dl packages seem to contain a very large amount of architecture-independent data in architecture-dependent packages, specifically data installed under /usr/share. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. Policy is quite clear on this point: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices#s-bpp-archindepdata The usage (in KB) of /usr/share by these packages is currently: 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_alpha.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_arm.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_hppa.deb 29240 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_i386.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_ia64.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_m68k.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_mips.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_mipsel.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_powerpc.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_s390.deb 29232 pool/main/e/emacs20-dl/emacs20-dl_20.7-14.3_sparc.deb Please split this package appropriately. Thanks, -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
Bug#124928: marked as done (libctk3-dev: Spelling error in description)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line should'be been closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:38:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 16:38:38 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16G6P8-0007I2-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:38:38 -0600 Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10) id 16G6P7-0001BZ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:37 -0500 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16G6P6-000191-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500 From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libctk3-dev: Spelling error in description Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libctk3-dev Severity: minor This is an automated bug report. I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package descriptions. In the process, some other errors were also detected, such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems. Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include: - Capitalization The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in English. Acronyms should be in all capital letters. - Abbreviation In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the description. Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.". This is especially important for proper keyword searches. - Word joining For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined to form new words, like "bugreport". While this may be acceptable in an informal context, such words should be written separately in package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching. In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity. There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this package. A unified diff follows at the end of this message. You should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message directly into a command line like: patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been modified from the version of your source package in the Debian archive. If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand. When doing so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same line of the diff. If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks. If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance improving your description, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- orig/libctk3-devMon Dec 17 15:52:33 2001 +++ corrected/libctk3-dev Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Package: libctk3-dev Description: Console Tool Kit, development files - Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing textbased GUIs. The syntax is + Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing text-based GUIs. The syntax is almost the same as GTK+. It provides mouse support on the console through gpm. This package is for developing specifically with ctk death count 3. --- Received: (at 124928-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 16:27:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 15 08:27:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsP6v-00068A-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:27:13 -0800 Received: from p50839995.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.149] helo=djpig.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1AsP6r-0006UA-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:27:11 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsP6T-0003sX-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:4
Bug#124927: marked as done (libctk3: Spelling error in description)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line should'be been closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:38:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 16:38:37 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16G6P7-0007Hs-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:38:37 -0600 Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10) id 16G6P6-0001BD-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16G6P6-00018r-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500 From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libctk3: Spelling error in description Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libctk3 Severity: minor This is an automated bug report. I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package descriptions. In the process, some other errors were also detected, such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems. Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include: - Capitalization The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in English. Acronyms should be in all capital letters. - Abbreviation In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the description. Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.". This is especially important for proper keyword searches. - Word joining For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined to form new words, like "bugreport". While this may be acceptable in an informal context, such words should be written separately in package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching. In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity. There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this package. A unified diff follows at the end of this message. You should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message directly into a command line like: patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been modified from the version of your source package in the Debian archive. If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand. When doing so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same line of the diff. If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks. If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance improving your description, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- orig/libctk3Mon Dec 17 15:52:27 2001 +++ corrected/libctk3 Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Package: libctk3 Description: Console Tool Kit - Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing textbased GUIs. The syntax is + Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing text-based GUIs. The syntax is almost the same as GTK+. It provides mouse support on the console through gpm. This package contains the runtime files needed by programs linked to ctk. --- Received: (at 124927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 16:27:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 15 08:27:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsP6v-00068A-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:27:13 -0800 Received: from p50839995.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.149] helo=djpig.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1AsP6r-0006UA-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:27:11 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsP6T-0003sX-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0100 From: Frank Lichtenheld <
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libctk 3.0.24.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 230815 + fixed Bug#230815: libctk_3.0.24.2(unstable/arm): needs libtool update for arm There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#230815: marked as done (libctk_3.0.24.2(unstable/arm): needs libtool update for arm)
Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:57:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Fixed in NMU of libctk 3.0.24.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 17:10:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 09:10:28 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cicero.e-mis.co.uk [212.240.194.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Anhad-000605-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:10:28 -0800 Received: from [10.139.58.254] (helo=tacitus) by cicero.e-mis.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Anhab-00039U-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:10:25 + Received: from james by tacitus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Anhab-mg-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:10:25 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libctk_3.0.24.2(unstable/arm): needs libtool update for arm Mail-Copies-To: never From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:10:25 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: libctk Version: 3.0.24.2 Severity: serious The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to correctly support shared libraries for at least arm. Please see http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-pass_all.html for more information. | Automatic build of libctk_3.0.24.2 on rameau by sbuild/arm 1.170.4 | Build started at 20040202-1603 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: libgpmg1-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libarr-dev, debhelper, automake, autoconf, libtool [...] | checking how to recognise dependant libraries... file_magic ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib ) [...] | *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lgpm. A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=libctk&ver=3.0.24.2 -- James --- Received: (at 230815-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 17:58:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 15 09:58:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AsQX0-0005tq-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:58:14 -0800 Received: from p50839995.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.149] helo=djpig.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1AsQWx-0007G9-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:58:13 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsQWZ-0003Ok-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:57:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:57:45 +0100 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of libctk 3.0.24.3 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 09:18:04AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > tag 230815 + fixed > Bug#230815: libctk_3.0.24.2(unstable/arm): needs libtool update for arm I really should learn how to use pbuilder correctly. It was a QA upload, so closing the bug properly. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Processing of libctk_3.0.24.4_i386.changes
libctk_3.0.24.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libctk_3.0.24.4.dsc libctk_3.0.24.4.tar.gz libctk3_3.0.24.4_i386.deb libctk3-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb libctk-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
libctk_3.0.24.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libctk-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb libctk3-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3-dev_3.0.24.4_i386.deb libctk3_3.0.24.4_i386.deb to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk3_3.0.24.4_i386.deb libctk_3.0.24.4.dsc to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk_3.0.24.4.dsc libctk_3.0.24.4.tar.gz to pool/main/libc/libctk/libctk_3.0.24.4.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#232857: nedit: after first use of search dialog, text field is not automatically focused.
Hi, * David Stockwell wrote (2004-02-15 15:00): >Version: 1:5.3-1 > >After first use of search dialog, text field is not automatically >focused. I don't see this here. >Versions of packages nedit depends on: >ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an >ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries The most important one is missing: The Motif library has a huge influence on NEdit's behaviour. Is this a bug in reportbug? Please attach the first few lines of 'nedit -version'. Thorsten -- I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside. - Calvin pgpNfYwN5CPIt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#232941: fltk: french debconf templates translation
Package: fltk Version: 1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please find attached the french debconf templates translation, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailling list contributors. fr.po Description: application/gettext
