Modern way of losing fanaticism we;ght natural heckle
Hello lanes, At last you have an opportunity to purchase good directly from manufactures. You save your money purchasing quality products from our plant's store. Today we present you FatBlast product. What is FatBlast actually? Fatblast is an advanced fat-binding supplement that removes fat from the foods you eat! Formulated with the powerful fat-binding fiber Chitosan, the proprietary blend of all-natural compounds... Our corporation was the first one who started selling this product on the web in the year 2004. Try our FDA approved product tday rapturous Read about our dscounts and special bonses: http://www.theonlyrealstuff.com/fly/index.php?pid=pharmaboss Zionist forging thieves Osborn, suggest creases excising inserted Lubell fencer Gilbertson lowland diagnostic vivid Kirchoff decedent Amazons.
Bug#226895: dict-freedict-eng-rus: unreadable
> It should be UTF-8 Unicode. > > Could you try with that setting ? This works, thank you. Maybe it's worth to put a note in README.Debian or something that unlike mueller7, which works fine with dict client in usual ru_RU.KOI8-R environment (i.e. appears readable), freedict-eng-rus uses Unicode and users with unreadable output from dict should try using `dictl' wrapper instead and consult general dictd documentation, to avoid confusion caused by lack of information in this dictionary documentation? --- Dmitry Rutsky
Processed: tagging pt_BR l10n related bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 198438 + l10n Bug#198438: bonsai: [wishlist] Please include Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 207950 + l10n Bug#207950: bidentd: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 207962 + l10n Bug#207962: dbengine: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 207965 + l10n Bug#207965: dump: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 207969 + l10n Bug#207969: firebird: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 207971 + l10n Bug#207971: fwanalog: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 208030 + l10n Bug#208030: mysql-dfsg: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 208110 + l10n Bug#208110: proftpd: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 208113 + l10n Bug#208113: samba: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 214116 + l10n Bug#214116: [wishlist] Please add pt_BR (Brazilian Portuguese) aptitude help translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 218808 + l10n Bug#218808: rssh: [wishlist] Please include Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 218812 + l10n Bug#218812: ca-certificates: [wishlist] Please include Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 219839 + l10n Bug#219839: glibc: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 219841 + l10n Bug#219841: hotplug: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 219843 + l10n Bug#219843: pcmcia-cs: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 219847 + l10n Bug#219847: mysql-dfsg: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 219849 + l10n Bug#219849: lprng: [wishlist] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translations Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 225145 + l10n Bug#225145: discover: [wishlist, patch] Please include updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227280 + l10n Bug#227280: apt-build: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227352 + l10n Bug#227352: apmd: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227371 + l10n Bug#227371: caudium: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227373 + l10n Bug#227373: bsd-ftpd: [INtL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227400 + l10n Bug#227400: console-common: [INtL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 227440 + l10n Bug#227440: courier: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 107730 + l10n Bug#107730: diald: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch Bug#103324: German debconf template translation Bug#200124: diald: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates Tags added: l10n > tags 123929 + l10n Bug#123929: netbase: [patch] Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) update-inetd.8 manpage translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 183995 + l10n Bug#183995: netkit-base: [wishlist] Patch to use the newer debconf template translation system : po-debconf Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 187519 + l10n Bug#187519: logcheck: [wishlist] Update packaging to use the newer gettext-based debconf template translation system Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 1877
Bug#153793: STOCK MARKET ALERT: QENC 2003 Third Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%
OTC FIRST ALERT - New Public Company of the Month Symbol: QENC Market: PK Sector: Queench, Inc. BREAKING NEWS: Jan 8, 2004 -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC)is now a full-time supplier of bottled water to the military. JERICHO, NY - Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) today announced that it has completed inspection and approval of its water bottling plants by the U.S. Army Veterinary Command (VETCOM). BREAKING NEWS: Nov. 13, 2003 -- Queench, Inc.(OTC: QENC) 2003 Third Quarter Net Income Rose 76.8%. The Third Quarter Net Income ending 9/30/03 increased 76.8% from the Q2, and a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income for the 9 months ending 9/30/03 resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase. Jim Furey of Lehman Brothers says, "You want to own small stocks versus large stocks when economic growth is accelerating, which is exactly the period we're in now." QENC is a small company perfectly poised to harness the $7.6 billion bottle water segment with a high quality premium brand priced competitively. The bottled water segment is the fastest growing of the beverage market. Of the $100 billion beverage industry, bottled water is nearly $7.6 billion annually, and forecasted to grow over 50% over the next 5 years. QENC has the best of both worlds, where unlike Aquafina and Dasani, QENC is high-end natural spring water, and unlike Evian, QENC is competitively priced. QENC's target consumer is health and beauty conscious including Gen Y, Gen X, and Baby Boomers who live a metropolitan lifestyle. QENC offers two fantastic product lines: Queench Natural Spring Water and the Queench Flavored Water Beverages, which are vitamin-enhanced and come in five cool new flavors: Coconut, O' Ginger, Red Raspberry, Pineapple and LeMon. DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING QENC bottled water is nationally distributed through SYSCO FOODS. SYSCO Foods is the largest food distributor operating 145 locations and has sales and service relationships with 420,000 customers including restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, and more. This relationship provides key access to new markets with low capital requirements. Naomi Campbell's NC CONNECT integrated marketing agency, has signed to help QENC reach national and global consumers by providing marketing and advertising that will position QENC as a major lifestyle brand in the bottled water market. 01/08/04: QENC completed inspection and approval of its plants by the US Army Veterinary Command (VETCOM). QENC's been supplying the military contract in the South and Florida and the Army has been increasing orders on a monthly basis, which will result in higher Q1 2004 revenue. 12/03/03: QENC's strategically placing new eye-catching vending machines in locations on college campuses, retail, entertainment and sports venues and convenience stores. 500 vending machines installed in initial rollout in 2003 with approx. 2,500 vending machines to be installed in a 3-year period. The beverage-vending channel is typically highly profitable. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS 12/03/03: QENC is currently shipping over 54,000 cases of bottled water quarterly, with a year-to-date quarterly revenue growth rate of 19.7% QENC's NET INCOME for the Q3 ending 9/30/03 increased 76.8% from the Q2, and a 987% increase year-to-year. Net income for the 9 months ending 9/30/03 resulted in a 1274% year-to-year increase. QENC's SALES for the Q2 of 2002 increased 77% to $848,269 year-to-year, from $478,052, as a result of rolling out new product lines and implementing a channel development strategy. QENC's high quality premium water is priced very competitive, they have an excellent distribution channel with SYSCO and strategically placed vending machines, and a marketing campaign designed to focus on their target market. For a young company QENC has made substantial accomplishments and is poised to harness their segment of the $7.6 billion bottle water industry. To Receive First Notices on Companies like this ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The information herein is for information purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or to sell securities. This assembled information is based on information supplied by the company, press releases, SEC filings, or from other sources believed to be reliable, but no representation, expressed or implied, is made as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. The data contained herein is subject to change without notice. Small-cap companies, micro-cap companies, penny stocks and/or thinly traded securities are inherently risky and volatile; therefore the risk of losing some or all should be calculated. Please always do your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor. OTCFirstAlert accepts no liability for any losses arising from an investor's reliance on or use of this report. Affiliates of OTCFirstAlert have been hired by a third party and are to receive eight hundred thirty three thousand three hundred th
Bug#141697: marked as done (cvs-conf install hangs if you say no)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2002 23:17:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 07 18:17:05 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (angusbay.vnl.com) [194.46.8.33] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16uLuD-00035s-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 18:17:05 -0500 Received: from amon by angusbay.vnl.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 16uM78-0007aQ-00 (Debian); Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:30:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 00:30:25 +0100 From: Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs-conf install hangs if you say no Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Linux, the choice of a GNU generation Sender: Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cvs-conf Severity: normal Version: 0.0.1-3 I started the install process but when it asked for the password decided to not give it one. I then took the option to not install. Thereafter, when dselect hits that package, I have to ^C to kill the install script so that dselect can continue. I solved the problem by purging and then attempting to re-install (after creating a cvs account with a less important password), but I ran into the other bug report about :ext: and gave up as my cvs servers are accessible only via ssh and do not run pserver. -- -- Nuke bin Laden: Dale Amon, CEO/MD improve the global Islandone Society gene pool. www.islandone.org -- --- Received: (at 141697-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#187779: marked as done (cvs-conf: [wishlist] Update packaging to use the newer gettext-based debconf template translation)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2003 23:34:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 05 17:34:01 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 200-171-6-135.dsl.telesp.net.br (foobar.homelab.net) [200.171.6.135] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 191xAe-0007Ro-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 17:34:00 -0600 Received: by foobar.homelab.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80E7C82354; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 20:41:18 -0300 (BRT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===38165674809023242==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: [wishlist] Update packaging to use the newer gettext-based debconf template translation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:41:18 -0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===38165674809023242== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: cvs-conf Version: 0.0.1-8 (not installed) Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, Here's (attached) a patch which changes cvs-conf packaging to use the newer gettext-based debconf template translation system : po-debconf. Also included is a complete Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation. Please add it to the next cvs-conf package revision. Regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux foobar 2.4.20 #1 S=E1b Jan 4 21:21:16 BRST 2003 i586 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (ignored: LC_ALL set) --===38165674809023242== Content-Type: application/x-gzip MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/home/andrelop/converting-to-po-debconf/cvs-conf/cvs-conf-0.0.1-po-debconf.patch.gz" H4sICO5ojz4CA2N2cy1jb25mLTAuMC4xLXBvLWRlYmNvbmYucGF0Y2gA7Vhbc9pGFH4Ov+JM8hB7 YCUhjINVx4EYktBi4wJJp206GVlaYFOxq9ldmZJ/2+lDp53pU/5AzwpxD+AkbjudiQYzMjp7Lt93 bhCyfh9IcikhuFEkELxPHMuxinZIr5nPbfxESxGtPbU4Ha9J5Aghu3Xccx3HJc4JcY/BOfFKrueU LWd2AXFKjpPL5/P7bRlNJeIcEacMruOVSl65tKGpWgXiFh5B3rxVqzno0kAzwT1INItUDq4kE5Lp iQciNg/8KAcXPuMa/6j0UP7aV5pRDl9b8FwKpeBUvR1Up75YQg7OcuRpwqKQ1GlMeahIk4c09gAl hjSKqYSDszNA1yznMJffK/oYjjDc4vEh+qp9HvoS5V5RqVKvS1bZcnOAfvvBz/6AenOccuEeEmNh X7V7z5qtRtdifAe+q4I7KF0VvFc8OT4hRZeUiuAWPcfB10cyu6ZwjeAjz3E/SLBTcCBfNPTmf9ST GEEZUK3pL9qW/aDiuqj9J9B0FEe+puo2QMX6zdOOFYvdvs6kdkM0k7obfOba1sB55LmVHeAUypUU nwf4Arx60ucK4RBSFYD1YSIS8CUFLjT0/RGLmC9hzPQQ9JDCVRv6Qo58XZghm6kJRZCMKBaLKR1g CsZC4hlJ/ZDxQQGoimnA/CiagJoWnsJkD1mARISgRaZGD/HozAK1BhZcT0AmnKMSL5NJL8b7AgiH hweZH4fo2jMWUfVwt9gL9AjLq4GdY/JwAUNXjGgqbUybEFJ/+yxA3yAWBHE3TKTQ+Dc+i/zrCO/0 sjG87ERJWw1RykZE7MVBu9Oo1S8aRBu4lw8JCUOtY8+2x+OxtWgmNnaeyI6KDt+hJVNUpzc0Etg1 EFORMsdpiiqMfJ6koCPUGtnrGXuGRIOUlWoYqQEL4f799E5pmd7ev5LiLfJEmuGi5czS8U2ajqTy mqeS7R45R54NaqSOdHqwXq5pDs6kSYfeMLVVuLIk3MKGSxYJ6kGNh/IPaCV/KWhhvNiBsS9KE3uV DaxAjKxreTY7ywcJ9kXSo/7IQ4gMsORpB7LI4HSKNTEQkxizNRkkVNFqxJRWS0Rk+i6aiPsciqKV uXiOIwjTnvTSbpO2GmwujH8FAWaBovpxs9smlUoZC37thImrTyVp8ECYIvGgcs10KoTEWOiyCiRL ZxH+74Fl2fPW5R3NiauLtGbHPteG8cBQgZkJhik2SOQ0nUciTCKT4WkZn7/qYmnGQjGEdfJkiXs0 St/iYWnKPhnB6D2eE1iqC32//2ZybHb+PY7NVN+Thd99P4n0ps+Vuc9erKi8wamK5VIdCqU9G5NL CqGXXNkptB+hk7m174YUqxYbSySydpNBMNW/HH4bxzCI9AELsVSMFFX61/RoxN75WF/zQM+HggVU bZoulua2D7jg9LAASg0LINVwydYBp3yYjFYf7o+rWF4KjAWmx44EMq5wcYiw7SZRmCZEoui0b2MM yyF+iw0hE05PCrgRwZ8wQIB9ZN1QnSgkH6sJbstscQH2NE2W7M0/2B+a6yyF5mtDmaGK+9ibRT+9 35PVG4GaVMXTSNtqJg/YIpOzGG+xDcxdxbmrd4/nFdHde8GK6N0sB6sqN9eno50bwsmXDeHLhrDY EB4UoJ+8ezf5mF3hqnb+Te15A141Ot1m+/JuVoXvG7UOuWiTeg1etL2LZv6H9mVjy6rw7GWrBZe1 iwacNi5qzVa1Vq93Gt3uh9eDVu3y+Uvj72mrhRvAXcz98xe1TrfR+z8M/bue3P/cfL6j0fuvDNrP mpr/wbzcPwHnlncMn8W36+0zby6T/QaEVX8ExZJ3dOyVix857FZ03epHgmLBTcccvpvfgXqZgsX3 G5PRb6YlhY/TAr8WIqI+z83IxJKXCc2RJXrwO8bnF2Uu/+bOVcLWGE3ZziLEFMB2ZCLKAtxe6Wth 7ytfSIPar3Ut9H1qd8WlhvOwaISjKUeyhuHBeldAs9ufLeiePtqI/LZtYTO4W5/cHuaU9q0ETnNk w+VP6xO513CJiwMdR4ybrQYoD81ZsyYs85sZ3Qj3E63+DUt9aAWQFgAA --===38165674809023242==-- --- Received: (at 18777
Bug#188389: marked as done (metalog: Compatibility with syslog)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2003 21:04:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 09 16:04:11 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ghost.anime.pl [212.182.112.233] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 193Mjp-0002QL-00; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:04:11 -0500 Received: from eyck by ghost.anime.pl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 193MjZ-0002GF-00; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:03:53 +0200 From: Dariush Pietrzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: Compatibility with syslog To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:03:53 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: wishlist I am using watchdog on my machines, besides writing to softdog device it monitors /var/log/messages file. apt-get install metalog causes machines setup this way to start deadly reboot-syslog failure-reboot loop ( something not very nice in case of remote machines ). So, while this problem is caused by watchdog and it's configuration, it would be nice if metalog would install with setup compatible with sysklogd. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux ghost 2.4.20-xfs-ctx16-swan-sens-mga-eyck #1 Wed Mar 19 09:54:21 CET 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages metalog depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libpcre3 3.9-1 Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Regular Expre --- Begin /etc/metalog.conf (modified conffile) maxsize = 10 maxtime = 86400 maxfiles = 5 Kernel: facility = "kern" logdir = "/var/log/kernel" Daemon: facility = "daemon" logdir = "/var/log/daemon" Lpr: facility = "lpr" logdir = "/var/log/lpr" Mail: facility = "mail" logdir = "/var/log/mail" User: facility = "user" logdir = "/var/log/user" Uucp: facility = "uucp" logdir = "/var/log/uucp" Crond: program = "/usr/sbin/cron" logdir = "/var/log/crond" Password failures: regex= "(password|login|authentication)\s+(fail|invalid)" regex= "(failed|invalid)\s+(password|login|authentication)" regex= "ILLEGAL ROOT LOGIN" logdir = "/var/log/pwdfail" Authentication: facility = "auth" facility = "authpriv" logdir = "/var/log/auth" Firewall: facility = "*" regex= "IN=(?:\w+)? OUT=(?:\w+)?" logdir = "/var/log/firewall" SSH Server: program = "sshd" logdir = "/var/log/sshd" Login: program = "login" logdir = "/var/log/login" Everything important: facility = "*" minimum = 6 logdir = "/var/log/everything" Everything very important: facility = "*" minimum = 1 logdir = "/var/log/critical" --- End /etc/metalog.conf --- Received: (at 188389-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unst
Bug#207127: marked as done (cvs-conf: French translation of gettext debconf templates)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2003 09:02:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 04:00:20 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19rDD2-pF-00; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:00:20 -0500 Received: from mykerinos.onera ([127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id h7P90Jk2023175; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:00:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: by mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 08520D05D; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:00:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0098993967==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: French translation of gettext debconf templates X-Mailer: reportbug 2.24 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:00:18 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_RFCI version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0098993967== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: cvs-conf Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please find attached the french debconf templates translation, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. This file should be put as debian/po/fr.po in your package build tree after applying the "please switch to gettext templates" patch I sent some time ago. This patch assumes that you applied the previous patch without modifications, particularly to the templates file. If you did not do so, especially if my former patch suggested modifications to the *original* templates files (fixed spelling, minor changes for respecting some conventions, etc.) please notify me and send me the new templates.pot file so that I may adapt my fr.po file. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mykerinos 2.4.21 #1 jeu jui 24 08:36:17 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR) --===0098993967== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fr.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by onera.onera.fr id h7P90Jk2023175 # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: cvs-conf (0.0.1-8)\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-08-15 07:43+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2003-08-15 07:46+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: French \n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Diso-8859-15\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Description #: ../templates:4 msgid "Do you want to create a configuration module in the CVS repository= ?" msgstr "Souhaitez-vous cr=E9er un module de configuration dans le d=E9p=F4= t CVS=A0?" #. Description #: ../templates:9 msgid "Where is located the CVS server?" msgstr "O=F9 le serveur CVS est-il situ=E9=A0?" #. Choices #: ../templates:13 msgid "(none), ssh, rsh" msgstr "aucune, ssh, rsh" #. Description #: ../templates:15 msgid "Which remote shell would you use with CVS?" msgstr "Quel m=E9thode d'acc=E8s distant souhaitez-vous utiliser avec CVS= =A0?" #. Description #: ../templates:20 msgid "What is the name of the configuration module in the CVS?" msgstr "Quel est le nom du module de configuration dans le d=E9p=F4t CVS=A0= ?" --===0098993967==-- --
Bug#168902: marked as done (metalog: hash protected logfiles?)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2002 08:51:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 13 02:51:03 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gprs1.vodafone.hu (sanctuary.grin.hu) [80.244.96.193] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BtEe-vD-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:51:03 -0600 Received: from grin by sanctuary.grin.hu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BtDP-00087q-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:49:39 +0100 From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: hash protected logfiles? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: grin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:49:39 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-1 Severity: wishlist Hello, Just wondering since the author compared the program to syslog-ng: is it planned to have cryptographically [hash] protected logs from illegal modification? Since logrotation is done by the program itself it's maybe even easier than for the other daemons. And so far nobody got it right, afaik. --- Received: (at 168902-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173015: marked as done (jpegoptim: Several minor code problems)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2002 11:00:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 14 05:00:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mgate3.rrzn.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.31] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18NA1v-0001D9-00; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 05:00:23 -0600 Received: from wega.itp.uni-hannover.de (wega.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.64]) by mgate3.rrzn.uni-hannover.de (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBEB0Iau028466; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:18 +0100 (MET) Received: from mirzam.itp.uni-hannover.de (mirzam.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.94]) by wega.itp.uni-hannover.de (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA22760; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:17 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mirzam.itp.uni-hannover.de (8.11.6/8.9.3) id gBEB0Hm14270; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:17 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:00:17 +0100 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Timo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: jpegoptim: Several minor code problems Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.24 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: jpegoptim Version: 1.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch While compiling this package on alpha, I noted some assignement problems (64 bit issues). To track them down I added -Wall and fixed all errors reported/I understood. The patch does the following a) enable -Wall (I think it's usefull, but you can of course leave it as is) b) Consequently enable debug - it makes no sense to honor -g but to always strip the binary c) ligen.h is also needed on linux d) file_size must return long e) fgetpos has some int/long issues which I couldn't track down; this is fixed by using ftell; but please double check it f) Some printf's had wrong formating identifiers; fixed. I still get lots of jpegoptim.c:228: warning: variable `total_save' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork' but I've no idea what they want to tell me. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux sixtyfor 2.4.17 #1 Mon Feb 25 21:41:29 CET 2002 alpha Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages jpegoptim depends on: ii libc6.1 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg62 6b-5 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG diff -ur jpegoptim-1.1.orig/Makefile jpegoptim-1.1.new/Makefile --- jpegoptim-1.1.orig/Makefile Wed Dec 11 21:44:36 2002 +++ jpegoptim-1.1.new/Makefile Tue Dec 10 21:02:06 2002 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ LIBDIRS = # -L/usr/local/lib CC = gcc -CFLAGS = -O2 $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) # -N +CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) # -N LIBS = -ljpeg $(LIBDIRS) STRIP = strip diff -ur jpegoptim-1.1.orig/Makefile.Linux jpegoptim-1.1.new/Makefile.Linux --- jpegoptim-1.1.orig/Makefile.Linux Wed Dec 11 21:44:36 2002 +++ jpegoptim-1.1.new/Makefile.LinuxTue Dec 10 21:02:06 2002 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ LIBDIRS = # -L/usr/local/lib CC = gcc -CFLAGS = -O2 $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) # -N +CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) # -N LIBS = -ljpeg $(LIBDIRS) STRIP = strip diff -ur jpegoptim-1.1.orig/debian/rules jpegoptim-1.1.new/debian/rules --- jpegoptim-1.1.orig/debian/rules Wed Dec 11 21:44:36 2002 +++ jpegoptim-1.1.new/debian/rules Tue Dec 10 21:34:59 2002 @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ dh_installdirs # Add here commands to install the package into debian/jpegoptim. +ifeq (,$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) $(MAKE) strip +endif $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/jpegoptim @@ -69,7 +71,9 @@ dh_installman dh_installchangelogs dh_link +ifeq (,$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) dh_strip +endif dh_compress dh_fixperms d
Bug#168900: marked as done (metalog: please support "magnitude suffixes" similar to (eg) bind8: 'm' mega(byte) or 'd' days)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2002 08:38:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 13 02:38:17 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gprs1.vodafone.hu (sanctuary.grin.hu) [80.244.96.193] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Bt2N-F6-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:38:17 -0600 Received: from grin by sanctuary.grin.hu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Bt21-0007s4-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:37:53 +0100 From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: please support "magnitude suffixes" similar to (eg) bind8: 'm' mega(byte) or 'd' days To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: grin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:37:53 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, Maybe I'm the only lazy bastard out there but would be nice to be able to use maxsize = 10M maxtime = 1d (or 3600m, or 1w for 7days) instead of the raw numbers. --- Received: (at 168900-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:56 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#209219: marked as done (metalog should replace klogd)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2003 14:25:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 08 09:24:50 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from claudius66.magicalworks.com (st.magicalworks.com) [217.172.169.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19wMwj-0007T7-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:24:50 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.9] (pD9E4104C.dip.t-dialin.net [217.228.16.76]) by st.magicalworks.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h88EOmeA027534; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:24:48 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Philipp Wolfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog should replace klogd X-Mailer: reportbug 2.27 Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:24:38 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,RCVD_IN_NJABL version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: normal As far as I understand it metalo is a replacement for as well syslogd as klogd. The README also strongly recommends to disable both services before starting metalog. I think the metalo package should have a dependency against klogd in order to replace that daemon, too. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bullgod 2.4.20-bullgod-k7-fb-zaurus #1 Fre Jun 13 00:34:32 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages metalog depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-5GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre3 4.3-3 Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 209219-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#218723: marked as done (metalog: does not close/redirect stdin)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2003 11:13:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 02 05:12:59 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.fre.skanova.net [195.67.227.95] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AGGAE-0005wY-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 05:12:58 -0600 Received: from debian.localnet (h90n1fls34o847.telia.com [213.65.155.90]) by smtp2.fre.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA2BCvIo018496; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:12:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from peter by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AGG91-0003Y5-Cr; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 12:11:43 +0100 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:11:43 +0100 From: Peter Lundkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: does not close/redirect stdin Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Peter Lundkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: normal metalog does not close or redirect stdin: # lsof -p 13384,13385 ... metalog 13384 root0u CHR 136,0 2 /dev/pts/0 metalog 13384 root1w CHR1,3 8792 /dev/null metalog 13384 root2w CHR1,3 8792 /dev/null ... metalog 13385 root0u CHR 136,0 2 /dev/pts/0 metalog 13385 root1w CHR1,3 8792 /dev/null metalog 13385 root2w CHR1,3 8792 /dev/null so you cannot log out from a ssh sesstion after e.g. /etc/init.d/metalog reload. This problem is fixed in upstream 0.7 release. /peter -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.21-ck3-i4k #3 Wed Aug 6 07:21:36 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1 Versions of packages metalog depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre3 4.3-3 Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 218723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222848: marked as done (Wrong permisions on files in /var/log/)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2003 01:11:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 03 19:11:32 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tb42.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (mentat.localdomain) [80.54.14.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ARbyw-0004eR-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:44:16 -0600 Received: by mentat.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 9776F20DAE; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:43:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Wrong permisions on files in /var/log/ X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:43:29 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: normal The logdirs created by metalog in /var/log should be owned by the group group 'admin', they should have read and search permission for this group. The logfiles in should be group 'admin', they should have read permission for members of this group. Regards Adam -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mentat 2.4.22 #4 czw lis 27 16:33:11 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL Versions of packages metalog depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre34.3-3Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 222848-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149791: marked as done (cvs-conf: /usr/doc/cvs-conf link not created on install)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 18:16:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 13:16:12 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from as5800-83-102.access.naxs.com (satin.kitenet.net) [216.98.83.102] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17ICfB-M3-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:16:12 -0500 Received: from joey by satin.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ICdI-0001jR-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:14:12 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: /usr/doc/cvs-conf link not created on install X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:14:12 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cvs-conf Version: 0.0.1-6 Severity: normal You seem to have a bad habit of overusing exit 0 in your postinst.. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux satin 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 24 11:16:47 EDT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages cvs-conf depends on: ii cvs 1.11.2-3 Concurrent Versions System ii debconf 1.1.10 Debian configuration management sy ii diff 2.7-29 File comparison utilities ii grep 2.4.2-3GNU grep, egrep and fgrep. ii make 3.79.1-14 The GNU version of the "make" util ii patch 2.5.4-11 Apply a diff file to an original ii stat 3.3-2 wrapper for stat() and statfs call --- Received: (at 149791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#182754: marked as done (metalog: war is peace )
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 18:11:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 27 12:11:24 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pool-68-160-54-133.bos.east.verizon.net (beth.swift.xxx) [68.160.54.133] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18oSV9-00062c-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:11:23 -0600 Received: from beth.swift.xxx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.7/8.12.7/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h1RI5Lpl026496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:05:29 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.7/8.12.7/Debian-2) id h1R8IkFS025818; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:18:46 -0500 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: war is peace From: Matt Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:18:46 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailscanner: clean(beth.swift.xxx) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: normal The "minimum" option is very poorly named. The author must have intended for "minimum" to refer to the level of importance of the message: A value of X means that messages with an importance level less than X are discarded. So far, so good. Unfortunately, increasing levels of importance are represented by decreasing integers. The result is extremely confusing: the assignment "minimum = X" means that values *greater than* X are discarded. To fix the problem, either the variable name must change or the values representing importance must be changed so that they increase with increasing performance. For instance, the variable name could be changed to "maximum", since it is much more intuitive to apply the concept of magnitude to the variable values than to the meanings of the variables. And in in this case, it is just as natural to apply "maximum" to the quantity of messages (i.e., critical message only is a minimal quantity of messages) as it is to the importance of the messages. Alternatively, invert the meanings of the variable values 0-7 so that 7 is the most important; or use English words, e.g., minimum = warning means that only warnings and more important messages are printed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux beth 2.4.20 #1 Wed Feb 26 02:14:42 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages metalog depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre3 3.9-1 Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Reg --- Received: (at 182754-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS
Bug#149792: marked as done (cvs-conf: debconf question lacks any explanation)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 18:17:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 13:17:14 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from as5800-83-102.access.naxs.com (satin.kitenet.net) [216.98.83.102] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17ICgD-SO-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:17:13 -0500 Received: from joey by satin.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ICeK-0001jr-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:15:16 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: debconf question lacks any explanation X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:15:16 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cvs-conf Version: 0.0.1-6 Severity: normal Configuring Cvs-conf Do you want to create a configuration module in the CVS repository? no Create a configuration module for what purpose, rooted where, in what CVS repository? (This machine is not even a cvs server..). This debconf question desperatly needs some supporting documentation in the extended description. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux satin 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 24 11:16:47 EDT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages cvs-conf depends on: ii cvs 1.11.2-3 Concurrent Versions System ii debconf 1.1.10 Debian configuration management sy ii diff 2.7-29 File comparison utilities ii grep 2.4.2-3GNU grep, egrep and fgrep. ii make 3.79.1-14 The GNU version of the "make" util ii patch 2.5.4-11 Apply a diff file to an original ii stat 3.3-2 wrapper for stat() and statfs call --- Received: (at 149792-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#217800: marked as done (metalog: bad management of init scripts in control files)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2003 14:17:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 27 08:17:16 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ppp-56-154.24-151.libero.it (cancan) [151.24.154.56] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AE8BD-00048c-00; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:17:16 -0600 Received: from king.fdc (king.fdc [192.168.1.250]) by cancan (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48C52A081; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:16:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from gpiero by king.fdc with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AE8Al-0003I7-00; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:16:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gian Piero Carrubba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: metalog: bad management of init scripts in control files X-Mailer: reportbug 2.35 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:16:43 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Gian Piero Carrubba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: metalog Version: 0.7beta-3 Severity: normal Sorry if i report 2 bugs in 1 message, but they seem to me someway correlate. First of all, the package seems not to use invoke-rc.d: $ grep -n /etc/init.d/ /var/lib/dpkg/info/metalog.p* /var/lib/dpkg/info/metalog.postinst:7: /etc/init.d/metalog start >&2 /var/lib/dpkg/info/metalog.postinst:11: /etc/init.d/metalog restart >&2 /var/lib/dpkg/info/metalog.prerm:6: /etc/init.d/metalog stop It's not a serious policy violation as it's not a "must" or a "should", but use of invoke-rc.d is "strongly recommended" (debian policy 3.6.10, par. 9.3.3.2). Second and more "serious" bug: $ grep -n update-rc.d /var/lib/dpkg/info/metalog.postinst 6: update-rc.d metalog start 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 . stop 90 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 . >/dev/null 2>&1 $ ls /etc/rc?.d/*metalog /etc/rc0.d/K90metalog /etc/rc2.d/S10metalog /etc/rc5.d/K90metalog /etc/rc0.d/S10metalog /etc/rc3.d/K90metalog /etc/rc5.d/S10metalog /etc/rc1.d/K90metalog /etc/rc3.d/S10metalog /etc/rc6.d/K90metalog /etc/rc1.d/S10metalog /etc/rc4.d/K90metalog /etc/rc6.d/S10metalog /etc/rc2.d/K90metalog /etc/rc4.d/S10metalog Unless perhaps for a bug in the binary (but i haven't found trace of it), there should not be any reason to stop and restart the daemon every time you change runlevel. However, rl 0 and 6 should contain only one symlink, otherwise the init script is called twice (both with stop action, as in these runlevels the S or K prefix isn't relevant). I think line 6 in metalog.postinst could be substituted by: update-rc.d metalog defaults 10 90 >/dev/null 2>&1 Thanks, Gian Piero. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux king 2.4.22 #1 lun set 29 16:17:11 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages metalog depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpcre3 4.3-3 Philip Hazel's Perl 5 Compatible R -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 217800-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:54 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Messa
Bug#149795: marked as done (cvs-conf: no documentation)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 18:49:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 13:49:34 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from as5800-83-102.access.naxs.com (satin.kitenet.net) [216.98.83.102] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17IDBV-0002bY-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:49:34 -0500 Received: from joey by satin.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17ID9j-Wj-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:47:43 -0400 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: no documentation X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:47:43 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: cvs-conf Version: 0.0.1-6 Severity: normal This package is completly lacking in documentation with the exception of the USAGE file, which does not explain how it works or how to set it up and use it, but only the base basics of the usage of some Makefile. Very confusingly, there are no files in the package except those in /usr/share/doc. If you expect a user to somehow grok how this thing works from the USAGE file and reading the Makefile, I think you just cut your userbase in half. No, into hundredths.. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux satin 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 24 11:16:47 EDT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages cvs-conf depends on: ii cvs 1.11.2-3 Concurrent Versions System ii debconf 1.1.10 Debian configuration management sy ii diff 2.7-29 File comparison utilities ii grep 2.4.2-3GNU grep, egrep and fgrep. ii make 3.79.1-14 The GNU version of the "make" util ii patch 2.5.4-11 Apply a diff file to an original ii stat 3.3-2 wrapper for stat() and statfs call --- Received: (at 149795-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#149793: marked as done (cvs-conf: uses example files in postinst in contravention of policy)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2002 18:43:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 13:43:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from as5800-83-102.access.naxs.com (satin.kitenet.net)
[216.98.83.102]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ID5v-0002JH-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:43:48 -0500
Received: from joey by satin.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17ID4A-UV-00; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:41:58 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cvs-conf: uses example files in postinst in contravention of policy
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:41:58 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: cvs-conf
Version: 0.0.1-6
Severity: serious
Policy says:
Files in `/usr/share/doc' should not be referenced by any program, and
the system administrator should be able to delete them without causing
any programs to break. Any files that are referenced by programs but
are also useful as standalone documentation should be installed under
`/usr/share//' with symbolic links from
`/usr/share/doc//'.
This package's postinst is, in part:
EXAMPLES=/usr/share/doc/cvs-conf/examples
...
cd ${EXAMPLES}/config
...
cvs -d ${cvs_root} import -m "" ${cvs_module} cvs-conf start
In other words, it imports the examples/config directory into some cvs server.
In the future when dpkg supports exclusion of files, this will break on systems
where /usr/share/doc is excluded; that's why policy requires that you put
these files somewhere else.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux satin 2.4.18 #1 Fri May 24 11:16:47 EDT 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages cvs-conf depends on:
ii cvs 1.11.2-3 Concurrent Versions System
ii debconf 1.1.10 Debian configuration management sy
ii diff 2.7-29 File comparison utilities
ii grep 2.4.2-3GNU grep, egrep and fgrep.
ii make 3.79.1-14 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii patch 2.5.4-11 Apply a diff file to an original
ii stat 3.3-2 wrapper for stat() and statfs call
---
Received: (at 149793-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Agu2U-0003wQ-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:06 -0600
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9C4E626B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8D4A5FF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + (GMT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 +
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: ***
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was
unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and
useless.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#205764: marked as done (cvs-conf: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:02:31 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2003 21:50:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 16 16:50:20 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from frmug-gw.frmug.org (frmug.org) [193.56.58.252] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19o8wF-0007LV-00; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:50:20 -0500 Received: from frmug.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frmug.org (8.12.9/8.11.3/frmug-2.7/nospam) with ESMTP id h7GLoIXd033876 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:50:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by frmug.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id h7GLoIEs033875; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A92C4061; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:48:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 828E0D1D3; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 07:56:45 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0763030741==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cvs-conf: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 07:56:45 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.3 required=4.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF, PENISACCENT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0763030741== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Package: cvs-conf Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-15 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch (this text is generic for "po-debconf switch" bug reports. If something is specific to your package, look at the end of this BR) Using the "new" gettext format for debconf templates helps for templates translations. For instance, detecting outdated or untranslated strings becomes considerably easier. It also keeps track of who did which translation. The attached patch does the required modifications : - debian/control modification for dependencies (see below) - execute "debconf-gettextize debian/*templates*" - removed files left by debconf-gettextize (*.templates.old which are the old-style templates and *.templates.xx which are the former translated templates - french translation proofreading (the file is debian/po/fr.po) if a french translation (partial or not) already existed for the templates Then diff file creation I, in the same time, started to work on a french translation if none was there. In such case, the fr.po file will be sent to you through another BR. If you want to reproduce this by yourself instead of applying the patch, you have to do: -install po-debconf on your system -go to the debian directory -read man po-debconf..:-) -run "debconf-gettextize *.templates" -read the output -change Build-Depends or Build-Depends-Indep (see below) Then you will pick up the fr.po file from my own patch (I often make small corrections to existing french translations to make them conformant to the existing standards of the Debian french l10n team). Build Dependencies of the package have to become the following : Build-Depends(-Indep) should list "debhelper (>= 4.1.16)" (debhelper depends upon po-debconf) if you use debhelper, or "po-debconf" directly if you don't (but, then, please look at po-debconf man page) For more details, see po-debconf documentation, especially "man 7 po-debconf" Read this if you're concerned with backports : Please note that the suggested modifications will make your package a little bit harder to backport to earlier Debian releases. If this is a concern to you, you may try to adopt the method used by the openssh package and detailed by Colin Watson in http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2003/debian-i18n-200307/msg00026.h
Bug#182753: marked as done (please implement output to xconsole )
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 18:11:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 27 12:10:59 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pool-68-160-54-133.bos.east.verizon.net (beth.swift.xxx) [68.160.54.133] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18oSUl-0005yD-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:10:59 -0600 Received: from beth.swift.xxx ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.7/8.12.7/Debian-2) with ESMTP id h1RI5Lpl026503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:05:24 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by beth.swift.xxx (8.12.7/8.12.7/Debian-2) id h1R8OkMb025872; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:24:46 -0500 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: please implement output to xconsole From: Matt Swift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:24:46 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailscanner: clean(beth.swift.xxx) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: metalog Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-27 Severity: normal I like the simplicity of metalog and would prefer it to sysklog if metalog could be configured to direct output to the fifo /dev/xconsole as well as to log files. (If metalog can do this now, then the documentation needs to explain more clearly.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux beth 2.4.20 #1 Wed Feb 26 02:14:42 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 --- Received: (at 182753-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 23:03:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 14 17:03:55 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Agu3G-0004Ki-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:03:54 -0600 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A22E426B9E; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:03:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C348AFF05; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + (GMT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:03:19 + From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 required=4.0 tests=SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 X-Spam-Level: *** This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it was unmaintained, old and according to the maintainer quite obsolte and useless. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tag l10n related bugs [1/7]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 227389 + l10n Bug#227389: abook: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 215421 + l10n Bug#215421: slovenian PO-file translation for aboot-installer package There were no tags set. Warning: Unknown package 'aboot-installer' Tags added: l10n > tags 208954 + l10n Bug#208954: acct: Polish po-debconf There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 216200 + l10n Bug#216200: acct: [Debconf] updated translation file for pt (Portuguese) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 222063 + l10n Bug#222063: acct: Japanese po-debconf template (ja.po) There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 190631 + l10n Bug#190631: Catalan translation for adduser program Tags were: pending Tags added: l10n > tags 215364 + l10n Bug#215364: [INTL:nl] updated dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 216420 + l10n Bug#216420: adduser: Updated Danish translation (po/da.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223828 + l10n Bug#223828: adduser: has a typo in the spanish translation (es.po) Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 208955 + l10n Bug#208955: adjtimex: Polish po-debconf There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 215162 + l10n Bug#215162: adjtimex: Dutch po-debconf Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223462 + l10n Bug#223462: adjtimex: Japanese po-debconf template (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227210 + l10n Bug#227210: aegis: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227571 + l10n Bug#227571: aeromail: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 140888 + l10n Bug#140888: russian debconf template file [aide] Tags were: help Tags added: l10n > tags 225847 + l10n Bug#225847: aide: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227435 + l10n Bug#227435: aladin: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 214377 + l10n Bug#214377: russian PO-file translation for album package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 206440 + l10n Bug#206440: am-utils: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 216391 + l10n Bug#216391: analog: [Debconf] new translation file for pt Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 225214 + l10n Bug#225214: anarchism: Several translations are available There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 224328 + l10n Bug#224328: cdebconf: Updated translation to german Tags were: d-i Tags added: l10n > tags 214362 + l10n Bug#214362: russian PO-file translation for anubis package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 206441 + l10n Bug#206441: apl: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206435 + l10n Bug#206435: apsfilter: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 225541 + l10n Bug#225541: apsfilter: Manpage templates installed along with the real manpages There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 203119 + l10n Bug#203119: apt: updated french translation of some apt manpages Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 217277 + l10n Bug#217277: [i18n] it translation error in apt-cache (incontrario) There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 218232 + l10n Bug#218232: /usr/bin/apt-get: [i18n] zh_TW mistranslation for apt-get string "Hit" There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227205 + l10n Bug#227205: Update for the Greek translation (el.po) Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 219090 + l10n Bug#219090: russian PO-file translation for apt-build package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 226704 + l10n Bug#226704: apt-build: italian po-debconf translation update (right one) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 226717 + l10n Bug#226717: apt-build: italian po-debconf translation update Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 221871 + l10n Bug#221871: New Catalan translation [attached] There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 226851 + l10n Bug#226851: Finnish po-debconf translation Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206436 + l10n Bug#206436: aptconf: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 145897 + l10n Bug#145897: aptitude: de_DE translates too much There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 214021 + l10n Bug#214021: aptitude: de.po: misleading translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 216392 + l10n Bug#216392: arcboot: [Debconf] new translation file for pt Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206596 + l10n Bug#206596: atlas: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 226019 + l10n Bug#226019: Error in german translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 206597 + l10n
Processed: tag l10n related bugs [2/7]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 206739 + l10n Bug#206739: bpalogin: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206323 + l10n Bug#206323: bsd-ftp: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 214708 + l10n Bug#214708: bsd-ftpd: Polish translation of po-debconf template There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 215084 + l10n Bug#215084: bsd-ftpd: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227455 + l10n Bug#227455: bsd-ftpd: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 189402 + l10n Bug#189402: bugzilla: Typos, spelling errs in french debconf template There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 224612 + l10n Bug#224612: please add the brasil.gov.br certificate and the pt_BR translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227382 + l10n Bug#227382: cdrtools: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: pending patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 223104 + l10n Bug#223104: [INTL:de] german po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227296 + l10n Bug#227296: cfengine2: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206772 + l10n Bug#206772: chdrv: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 220127 + l10n Bug#220127: please improve dutch translation Tags were: d-i Tags added: l10n > tags 218900 + l10n Bug#218900: [INTL:nl] new po-debconf template translation in Dutch. Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227368 + l10n Bug#227368: clamav: [INTL:pt_BR] Please use attached updated Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: patch sid Tags added: l10n > tags 214363 + l10n Bug#214363: russian PO-file translation for clamav-data package Tags were: patch confirmed Tags added: l10n > tags 218903 + l10n Bug#218903: [INTL:nl] new po-debconf template translation in Dutch. Tags were: confirmed patch Tags added: l10n > tags 218898 + l10n Bug#218898: [INTL:nl] new po-debconf template translation in Dutch. Tags were: confirmed patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227544 + l10n Bug#227544: cloop: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206826 + l10n Bug#206826: colormake: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227063 + l10n Bug#227063: common-lisp-controller: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223116 + l10n Bug#223116: [INTL:de] german po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223468 + l10n Bug#223468: configure-debian: Japanese po-debconf template (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227565 + l10n Bug#227565: conglomerate: [PATH] french .desktop translation added Tags were: patch upstream confirmed Tags added: l10n > tags 227157 + l10n Bug#227157: console-common: Please update Japanese translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227201 + l10n Bug#227201: console-log: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: confirmed patch Tags added: l10n > tags 201998 + l10n Bug#201998: coreutils: French translated man pages Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 207118 + l10n Bug#207118: cqcam: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 207119 + l10n Bug#207119: cricket: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 207120 + l10n Bug#207120: crossfire: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 214261 + l10n Bug#214261: cyphesis-cpp: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 207606 + l10n Bug#207606: dailystrips: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 218904 + l10n Bug#218904: [INTL:nl] new po-debconf template translation in Dutch. Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223117 + l10n Bug#223117: [INTL:de] german po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 186154 + l10n Bug#186154: Updated translation of ddclient debconf template There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 208470 + l10n Bug#208470: ddclient: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Bug#208550: ddclient: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags added: l10n > tags 208550 + l10n Bug#208550: ddclient: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: l10n patch Bug#208470: ddclient: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags added: l10n > tags 226293 + l10n Bug#226293: ddetect: Incorrect french translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 209002 + l10n Bug#209002: : French translation of gettex
Processed: tag l10n related bugs [3/7]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 137637 + l10n Bug#137637: russian debconf template file for diffmon package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 223942 + l10n Bug#223942: Czech translation for discover 1.5 Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 226847 + l10n Bug#226847: Please add Greek translations (attached) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 210463 + l10n Bug#210463: diskless: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 107702 + l10n Bug#107702: diskless-image-secure: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: moreinfo wontfix Tags added: l10n > tags 107721 + l10n Bug#107721: diskless-image-simple: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation Tags were: moreinfo wontfix Tags added: l10n > tags 102094 + l10n Bug#102094: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation has issues There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 109669 + l10n Bug#109669: [TRIVIAL] [INTL:de] New de.po file solves most known issues Tags were: patch Bug#115352: [INTL:de] German translation for "suggests" seems crude Bug#187952: [INTL:de] dpkg: German translation for a warning isn't right Tags added: l10n > tags 115352 + l10n Bug#115352: [INTL:de] German translation for "suggests" seems crude Tags were: l10n patch Bug#109669: [TRIVIAL] [INTL:de] New de.po file solves most known issues Bug#187952: [INTL:de] dpkg: German translation for a warning isn't right Tags added: l10n > tags 151799 + l10n Bug#151799: [INTL:nl] small mistake in Dutch translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 171489 + l10n Bug#171489: [INTL:es] dpkg: Spanish manpages available Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 187952 + l10n Bug#187952: [INTL:de] dpkg: German translation for a warning isn't right Tags were: l10n patch Bug#109669: [TRIVIAL] [INTL:de] New de.po file solves most known issues Bug#115352: [INTL:de] German translation for "suggests" seems crude Tags added: l10n > tags 207758 + l10n Bug#207758: [INTL:nl] completed dutch po file Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 218713 + l10n Bug#218713: dpkg: [INTL:fr] updated french manpages Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 219267 + l10n Bug#219267: russian PO-file translation for drscheme package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 192102 + l10n Bug#192102: [INTL:pt] dselect: cosmetic problem, item 3 on pt_BR Tags were: sid Tags added: l10n > tags 208992 + l10n Bug#208992: [INTL:de] dselect: German localization broken There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 207773 + l10n Bug#207773: dump: debconf templates translated into french There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 216050 + l10n Bug#216050: [INTL:nl] updated dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 211545 + l10n Bug#211545: dvipdfmx: French translation of gettext debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 214042 + l10n Bug#214042: efax: Japanese debconf templates There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 196910 + l10n Bug#196910: evolution: Spanish translation: "Atajo" menu doesn't shows well There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 219234 + l10n Bug#219234: russian PO-file translation for exiscan package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 206512 + l10n Bug#206512: dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: pending patch Tags added: l10n > tags 192427 + l10n Bug#192427: iterm: Debconf template translation (Japanese) There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227574 + l10n Bug#227574: fiaif: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 205351 + l10n Bug#205351: dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 214336 + l10n Bug#214336: russian PO-file translation for firebird package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 223125 + l10n Bug#223125: [INTL:de] german po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223349 + l10n Bug#223349: fontconfig: ru.po is a very bad translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 221656 + l10n Bug#221656: russian PO-file translation for fonty package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 224193 + l10n Bug#224193: foomatic-filters: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227127 + l10n Bug#227127: foomatic-filters: Please update Japanese translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 103202 + l10n Bug#103202: spanish template file [fujiplay 1.33-4] Tags were: patch Bug#136592: russian template file [fujiplay] Bug#200122: fujiplay: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates (plus add spanish, russian, french translations) Tags added: l10n > tags 136592 + l10n Bug#136592: russian template file [fujiplay] Tags were: l10n patch Bug#103202: spanish template file [fujiplay 1.33-4] Bug#200122: fujiplay: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates (plus add spanish, russian, french translat
Processed: tag l10n related bugs [6/7]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 206369 + l10n Bug#206369: razzle: French translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 171448 + l10n Bug#171448: rfb: Spanish translation available Tags were: upstream Tags added: l10n > tags 224178 + l10n Bug#224178: rssh: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 150735 + l10n Bug#150735: samba: spanish debconf template updated [samba 2.2.5-1] There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227277 + l10n Bug#227277: samhain: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 224175 + l10n Bug#224175: screen: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 224580 + l10n Bug#224580: screen (debconf) - IT translation (wishlist) There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 160880 + l10n Bug#160880: setserial: spanish template file [setserial 2.17-30] Tags were: patch Bug#202546: setserial: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates Tags added: l10n > tags 227237 + l10n Bug#227237: shadow: Please update Japanese translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 219223 + l10n Bug#219223: russian PO-file translation for sing package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 221823 + l10n Bug#221823: russian PO-file translation for sing package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 225155 + l10n Bug#225155: sitecopy: Italian translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227142 + l10n Bug#227142: slapd: Please update Japanese translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 202801 + l10n Bug#202801: slay: French translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 209083 + l10n Bug#209083: dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 138597 + l10n Bug#138597: german template file [smsclient 2.0.8z-2] There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 202806 + l10n Bug#202806: smsclient: French translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 226680 + l10n Bug#226680: snort: updated Japanese po-debconf template(ja.po) and fix (maybe) some typo in template Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 223102 + l10n Bug#223102: [INTL:de] german po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 224410 + l10n Bug#224410: spip: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 202274 + l10n Bug#202274: ssmtp: Please add french translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 137690 + l10n Bug#137690: russian debconf template file for taper package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 226861 + l10n Bug#226861: Please add Greek translations (attached) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 76 + l10n Bug#76: teapop: Japanese debconf template (ja.po) There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227151 + l10n Bug#227151: thinkpad: Please update Japanese translation Tags were: confirmed Tags added: l10n > tags 224700 + l10n Bug#224700: tiger: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 226883 + l10n Bug#226883: tiger: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 204923 + l10n Bug#204923: dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227311 + l10n Bug#227311: totem: typo in french translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 227271 + l10n Bug#227271: tripwire: Update of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 227393 + l10n Bug#227393: tripwire: French translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 200441 + l10n Bug#200441: ttf-xtt: Please add french translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 200442 + l10n Bug#200442: ttf-xwatanabe-mincho: Please add the french translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 200672 + l10n Bug#200672: txt2pdbdoc: Please add french translation of the debconf templates Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 170858 + l10n Bug#170858: Swedish translation for UDE Tags were: patch upstream Tags added: l10n > tags 227269 + l10n Bug#227269: udftools: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 208419 + l10n Bug#208419: dutch po-debconf translation Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 137698 + l10n Bug#137698: russian debconf template file for vflib2 package There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n > tags 219963 + l10n Bug#219963: [INTL:nl] New po-debconf translation in Dutch for viewcvs. Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 225799 + l10n Bug#225799: viewcvs: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: patch Tags added: l10n > tags 206782 + l10n Bug#206782: Fixes for the Vim spanish translation Tags were: patch
