libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hi, This package appears to be Arch: any, and yet it contains no arch-specific components. It should either be Arch: all, or you're missing some .so files. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.
cooledit override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb coolicon_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/coolicon_3.17.7-2_i386.deb coolman_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/coolman_3.17.7-2_i386.deb libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb libcw_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/libcw_3.17.7-2_i386.deb smalledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/smalledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 212078 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#192490: marked as done (libkdexparts1: uninstallable)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:33:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libkdexparts1: uninstallable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2003 18:03:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 08 13:03:04 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19DpjU-00086T-00; Thu, 08 May 2003 13:03:04 -0500 Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F054183; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A74841B96C7; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libkdexparts1: uninstallable To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libkdexparts1 Version: 2.2.2-4 Severity: grave libkdexparts1 is uninstallable because it still depends on kdelibs3 and libfam0. It needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4 and libfam0c102 with gcc 3.2, which probably also requires a new upstream version. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux cyberhq 2.4.21-pre5 #1 SMP Sat Mar 1 00:30:11 PST 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux --- Received: (at 192490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 00:33:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 19:33:56 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1b7s-00078H-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:33:56 -0500 Received: from host81-128-230-175.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.128.230.175] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 1A1b7r-vI-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:33:55 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1A1b7r-0002Kj-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:33:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:33:55 +0100 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libkdexparts1: uninstallable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:02:52AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: > Package: libkdexparts1 > Version: 2.2.2-4 > Severity: grave > > libkdexparts1 is uninstallable because it still depends on kdelibs3 and > libfam0. It needs to be rebuilt against kdelibs4 and libfam0c102 with gcc > 3.2, > which probably also requires a new upstream version. libkdexparts1 has been removed from unstable: = [Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 02:43:17 -0400] [ftpmaster: Anthony Towns] Removed the following packages from unstable: dcopperl |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc dcoppython |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc kdebindings |2.2.2-4 | source libdcopc-dev |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libdcopc1 |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libkdexparts-dev |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libkdexparts1 |2.2.2-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- Remo
Bug#212078: marked as done (Build-depends cannot be met in unstable)
Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212078: fixed in cooledit 3.17.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 00:28:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 19:28:22 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1EYw-0004G3-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:28:22 -0500 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1A1DbX-0002ot-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:26:59 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1A1DbJ-0007G6-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:26:45 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:26:45 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Build-depends cannot be met in unstable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.29 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: cooledit Version: 3.17.7-1 (not installed) Severity: grave Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), xlibs-dev, python-dev (>= 2.2), python-dev (<< 2.3) python-dev is now at version 2.3-4. -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux mizar 2.4.21-evms2.1.0-skas-3 #1 Thu Jul 17 09:01:34 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- - mdz --- Received: (at 212078-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 00:39:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 19:39:59 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1bDj-000820-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:39:59 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1b6N-kA-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:23 -0400 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.37 $ Subject: Bug#212078: fixed in cooledit 3.17.7-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:23 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: cooledit Source-Version: 3.17.7-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cooledit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.diff.gz cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2.dsc cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb coolicon_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/coolicon_3.17.7-2_i386.deb coolman_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/coolman_3.17.7-2_i386.deb libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/libcw-dev_3.17.7-2_i386.deb libcw_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/libcw_3.17.7-2_i386.deb smalledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/smalledit_3.17.7-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cooledit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:53:50 +0100 Source: cooledit Binary: libcw-dev coolman libcw smalledit coolicon cooledit Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.17.7-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Colin Watson <[EM
Bug#190619: marked as done (wanpipe: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line why RC? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 18:30:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 13:30:36 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 198lUS-0002Zt-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:30:36 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 198lUR-0003pP-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:30:36 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198lUQ-0006XC-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:30:34 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: wanpipe: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 24 Apr 2003 11:30:34 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lines: 26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: wanpipe Version: 2.1.1-2.1 Severity: normal >From my build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 The source package needs at least debhelper in its Build-Depends-Indep. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 190619-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 00:37:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 19:37:31 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1bBJ-0007cZ-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:37:29 -0500 Received: from host81-128-230-175.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.128.230.175] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at) by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 1A1bBH-0001JA-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100 Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A1bBH-0002Mc-00; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: why RC? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:55:07PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Please remove wanpipe; it has been orphaned for a long time, doesn't > have build-deps and is generally out of date; in #190619 the original > maintainer said he'd request the removal but never got around to it. This has been done now, so I'm closing this bug as no longer applicable: = [Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:16 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup] Removed the following packages from unstable: wanpipe | 2.1.1-2.2 | source, i386 Closed bugs: 179392 --- Reason --- ROM; orphaned, out-of-date, FTBFS. -- = Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
