Bug#160934: docbook-to-man: doesn't deal with non-optional arguments apparently...

2003-09-02 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I do'nt find the transpec specification that causes it to happen.

Has this any effect on the output?

Can I close the bugreport or tag it severtity minor?

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/VG4XAt+ECxtXDnwRAo80AJ9KqSD3dIytWqUphJbraTbzEqyWcgCdGBfl
PW15bF/PZvJpt0K1nThJmJ8=
=cUC4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Bug#112105: marked as done (Ignores line breaks in , , )

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#112105: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2001 21:44:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 12 16:44:37 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from b59ca.pppool.de (atterer.net) [213.7.89.202] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15hHoC-0001FY-00; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:44:36 -0500
Received: from richard by atterer.net with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
id 15hHSd-0004Xb-00; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 23:22:19 +0200
From: Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ignores line breaks in , , 
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 23:22:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: docbook-to-man
Version: 1:2.0.0-9
Severity: normal

For all these tags, docbook-to-man ignores the fact that whitespace
and linebreaks should be preserved in the output. This is very
unfortunate because it means there is no way to include code snippets,
configuration files etc. in manpages without them being rewrapped -
not nice!

Cheers,

  Richard

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elessar 2.2.19 #1 Mon May 21 19:42:05 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages docbook-to-man depends on:
ii  docbook   4.1-4  SGML DTD for software documentatio
ii  docbook-dsssl [docbook-st 1.71-1 Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  libc6 2.2.4-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sp1.3.4-1.2.1-18 James Clark's SGML parsing tools

Also:

ii  man-db  2.3.19-5Display the on-line manual.
ii  groff   1.17-3  GNU troff text-formatting system
ii  groff-base  1.17-3  GNU troff text-formatting system 
(base system componen


---
Received: (at 112105-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2003 16:49:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 11:49:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uELC-0005L6-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:49:15 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uEJT-00055N-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#112105: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: docbook-to-man
Source-Version: 1:2.0.0-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
docbook-to-man, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.diff.gz
docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.dsc
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.dsc
docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated docbook-to-man package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  2 Sep 2003 10:34:12 +0200
Source: docbook-to-man
Binary: docbook-to-man
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.0.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 docbook-to-man - Converter from DocBook SGML into roff man macros
Closes: 111918 111919 111920 111921 112105 154590 189222 196835
Changes: 
 docbook-to-man (1:2.0.0-12) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New ma

Bug#189222: marked as done (docbook-to-man: Postscript header should be optional)

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189222: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2003 05:43:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 16 00:43:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-67-121-155-183.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net (triplehelix.org) 
[67.121.155.183] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 195fiA-0005gW-00; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:43:58 -0500
Received: from firesong.wifi.triplehelix.org
([192.168.0.7] helo=firesong ident=mail)
by triplehelix.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 195fi7-0001yb-6a; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:43:55 -0700
Received: from joshk by firesong with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 195fi8-0003rU-00; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:43:56 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: docbook-to-man: Postscript header should be optional
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:43:56 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SPAM_PHRASE_05_08
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: docbook-to-man
Version: 1:2.0.0-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

I think the postscript at the output of every docbook-to-man processed 
file is extremely annoying, ie:

.sp \\$2u   \" move below the image
..
.de pF
.ie \\*(f1 .ds f1 \\n(.f
.el .ie \\*(f2 .ds f2 \\n(.f
.el .ie \\*(f3 .ds f3 \\n(.f
.el .ie \\*(f4 .ds f4 \\n(.f
.el .tm ? font overflow
.ft \\$1
..

and so on. It pisses me off to no end. Source says this:

# * modify the following line (to "=false") if you're not using the
# * Elan Documentor's Workbench

doElanPSInclude=true

which, if set to false, won't create this output. I've done it for mine, 
but I don't think anybody uses the Elan Documentor... Could you at least 
make this variable setting dependent on arguments? I have attached a 
small diff to this end, for the source package.

--- a/cmd/docbook-to-man 2003-01-26 08:53:20.0 -0800
+++ b/cmd/docbook-to-man.sh   2003-04-15 22:42:22.0 -0700
@@ -47,7 +47,9 @@
 # * modify the following line (to "=false") if you're not using the
 # * Elan Documentor's Workbench
 
-doElanPSInclude=true
+if [ "$2" = "-p" ]; then
+   doElanPSInclude=true
+fi

This is a little hackish, but it does the job for me. Don't know whether 
you have a better solution or whether you want to implement this at all.

Regards,
Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux firesong 2.5.67-bk4 #2 Sun Apr 13 00:25:25 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages docbook-to-man depends on:
ii  docbook 4.2-3standard SGML representation syste
ii  docbook-dsssl   1.78-3   modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  libc6   2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sp  1.3.4-1.2.1-29.1 James Clark's SGML parsing tools

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 189222-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2003 16:48:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 11:48:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uEKl-0005CG-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:48:47 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uEJT-00055R-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#189222: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: docbook-to-man
Source-Version: 1:2.0.0-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
docbook-to-man, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.

Bug#111918: marked as done (Incorrect output when nesting markup that enables bold and italic simultaneously)

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#111918: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2001 23:31:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 10 18:31:47 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from b586e.pppool.de (atterer.net) [213.7.88.110] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15gaWo-0006VO-00; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 18:31:47 -0500
Received: from richard by atterer.net with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
id 15gaOZ-0004MX-00; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 01:23:15 +0200
From: Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Incorrect output when nesting markup that enables bold and italic 
simultaneously
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 01:23:15 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: docbook-to-man
Version: 1:2.0.0-9
Severity: normal

When some text uses markup that is rendered bold in the manpage, and
inside that text nested markup also switches on italic, then all the
remainder of the paragraph will stay italic.

Example SGML:



  
foo
bar
  
  
foo
With mycommand
argument, this part of the
sentence remains emphasized.
Next paragraph is OK.
  


Generated output:

() ()



NAME
   foo -- bar

foo
   With mycommand argument, this part of the sentence remains
  ~~~
   emphasized.
   ~~~ <= shown underlined in my gnome-terminal

   Next paragraph is OK.



   ()

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elessar 2.2.19 #1 Mon May 21 19:42:05 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages docbook-to-man depends on:
ii  docbook   4.1-4  SGML DTD for software documentatio
ii  docbook-dsssl [docbook-st 1.71-1 Modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  libc6 2.2.4-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  sp1.3.4-1.2.1-18 James Clark's SGML parsing tools

Also:

ii  man-db  2.3.19-5Display the on-line manual.


---
Received: (at 111918-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2003 16:48:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 11:48:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uEKm-0005DC-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:48:49 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uEJT-00055F-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#111918: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: docbook-to-man
Source-Version: 1:2.0.0-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
docbook-to-man, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.diff.gz
docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.dsc
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12.dsc
docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated docbook-to-man package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  2 Sep 2003 10:34:12 +0200
Source: docbook-to-man
Binary: docbook-to-man
Architecture: source i386
Version: 

libglade override disparity

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override 
says libdevel.
libglade0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says 
libdevel.
libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override 
says libdevel.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])



libglade_0.17-2.8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb
libglade_0.17-2.8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade_0.17-2.8.diff.gz
libglade_0.17-2.8.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade_0.17-2.8.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 187357 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



Bug#201636: marked as done (libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error)

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:03:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 22:12:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 17:12:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cuVd-00084g-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:12:25 -0500
Received: from arf ([67.75.25.14]) by mx04.gis.net; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:12:20 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19cuY4-kZ-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:14:56 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: nunya biznis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:14:56 -0400
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtop-daemon
Version: 1.0.13-6
Severity: normal

Something is not installing correctly:

>dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 84759 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libgtop-daemon 1.0.13-6 (using 
.../libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb
(--install):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb

I'm not sure what it means though.

HTH...

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586 
GNU/Linux

Versions of the packages libgtop-daemon depends on:
iU  libgtop1   1.0.13-7   Libraries for gtop system monitoring library
ii  libc6  2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  zlib1g 1.1.4-14   compression library - runtime

---
Received: (at 201636-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2003 00:03:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 19:03:20 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0504.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.26] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uL7I-0005Lc-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 19:03:20 -0500
Received: from seb128 (AMetz-102-1-4-37.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.14.234.37])
by mwinf0504.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BC2A710003CF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  3 Sep 2003 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from seb128 by seb128 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19uL7G-0001f8-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:03:18 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error
From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Gnus 5.10.1
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:03:18 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


This bug is fixed in the 1.0.13-7.1 (same bug as #201513).



Bug#195985: NMU patch

2003-09-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher

The patch is the diff before running libtoolize, ...

Changes to have an updated package :

* Using automake 1.4, autoconf 2.13, libtool 1.4
* Comment AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE in macros/gnome-support.m4
* Add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to configure.in

(the patch has these changes, no changes after running tools)

* Run 
   libtoolize --force --copy
   automake --gnu --add-missing
   aclocal -I . -I macros/
   autoconf


diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/configure.in libgtop-1.0.13/configure.in
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/configure.in	2001-11-26 23:37:57.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/configure.in	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
 . $srcdir/LIBGTOP-VERSION
 AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, $VERSION)
 
+AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
+
 AC_SUBST(LIBGTOP_MAJOR_VERSION)
 AC_SUBST(LIBGTOP_MINOR_VERSION)
 AC_SUBST(LIBGTOP_MICRO_VERSION)
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/debian/changelog libgtop-1.0.13/debian/changelog
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/debian/changelog	2003-09-02 17:04:31.0 +0200
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/debian/changelog	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libgtop (1.0.13-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU to fix a RC bug.
+  * Builded with an updated libtool (Thanks Josselin)
+(Closes: #183979).
+  * Explicitly linked with missing libs (Closes: #195985).
+  * Updated Standards-Version to 3.6.1.0.
+  * Updated Build-Depends.  
+
+ -- Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  3 Sep 2003 01:52:20 +0200
+
 libgtop (1.0.13-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * NMU - package uninstallable
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/debian/control libgtop-1.0.13/debian/control
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/debian/control	2003-09-02 17:04:31.0 +0200
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/debian/control	2003-09-03 02:22:39.0 +0200
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
-Standards-Version: 3.6.0
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), automake, gettext, autoconf, gawk, dc, texinfo, autotools-dev, libtool, libgnome-dev, libguile-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libzvt-dev
+Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), automake1.4, gettext, autoconf2.13, gawk, dc, texinfo, autotools-dev, libtool1.4, libgnome-dev, libguile-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libzvt-dev
 
 Package: libgtop1
 Architecture: any
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/lib/Makefile.am libgtop-1.0.13/lib/Makefile.am
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/lib/Makefile.am	2001-11-26 23:37:58.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/lib/Makefile.am	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
   read_data.c write.c lib.c parameter.c \
   sysdeps.c
 
-libgtop_la_LDFLAGS		= $(LT_VERSION_INFO)
+libgtop_la_LDFLAGS		= $(LT_VERSION_INFO) -lgtop_sysdeps -lgtop_common
 
 BUILT_SOURCES			= lib.c
 
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/macros/gnome-support.m4 libgtop-1.0.13/macros/gnome-support.m4
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/macros/gnome-support.m4	2001-11-26 23:38:01.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/macros/gnome-support.m4	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 
   # to include `error.c' error.c has some HAVE_* checks
   AC_CHECK_FUNCS(vprintf doprnt strerror_r)
-  AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE
+dnl  AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE
 
   # This is required if we declare setreuid () and setregid ().
   AC_TYPE_UID_T
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/common/Makefile.am libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/common/Makefile.am
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/common/Makefile.am	2001-11-26 23:37:59.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/common/Makefile.am	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
   fsusage.c fsusage.h mountlist.c mountlist.h \
   $(inodedb_SRCLIST)
 
-libgtop_common_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO)
+libgtop_common_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO) -lgtop -lgtop_sysdeps
 libgtop_common_la_LIBADD	= $(LIBGTOP_EXTRA_LIBS)
 
 libgtop_suid_common_la_SOURCES	= xmalloc.c error.c sysdeps_suid.c
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/guile/Makefile.am libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/guile/Makefile.am
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/guile/Makefile.am	2001-11-26 23:37:59.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/guile/Makefile.am	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 libgtop_guile_la_SOURCES	= $(BUILT_SOURCES)
 
-libgtop_guile_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO)
+libgtop_guile_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO) -lgtop -lgtop_sysdeps -lgtop_common -lguile
 
 Makefile: $(BUILT_SOURCES)
 
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/guile/names/Makefile.am libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/guile/names/Makefile.am
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/guile/names/Makefile.am	2001-11-26 23:37:59.0 +0100
+++ libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/guile/names/Makefile.am	2003-09-03 02:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 libgtop_guile_names_la_SOURCES	= $(BUILT_SOURCES)
 
-libgtop_guile_names_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO)
+libgtop_guile_names_la_LDFLAGS	= $(LT_VERSION_INFO) -lgtop -lgtop_names -lgtop_sysdeps -lguile -lgtop_common
 
 Makefile: $(BUILT_SOURCES)
 
diff -Nur libgtop-1.0.13.old/sysdeps/linux/Makefile.am libgtop-1.0.13/sysdeps/linux/Makefile.am
--- libgtop-1.0.13.old/

libglade_0.17-2.9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade-gnome0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-gnome0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb
libglade_0.17-2.9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade_0.17-2.9.diff.gz
libglade_0.17-2.9.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade_0.17-2.9.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



libgtop_1.0.13-7.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.diff.gz
libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.dsc
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 183979 195985 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.



libgtop override disparity

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override 
says admin.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])



Bug#195985: marked as done (undefined non-weak symbols / incomplete inter-library dependency information)

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195985: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2003 19:00:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 03 14:00:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19NH1N-0001dX-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:00:33 -0500
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19NH1A-0004mU-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:00:20 +0200
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:00:20 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: undefined non-weak symbols / incomplete inter-library dependency 
information
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel 
2.4.21-rc6-freeswan1.99-emvs1.2.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtop1
Version: 1.0.13-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream

ldd -r shows /usr/lib/libgtop.so.1.0.12 to have undefined non-weak symbols,
which means it has incomplete inter-library dependency information and that
users of binaries that link against it won't profit much from the load time
speedups that can be gained through prelink(8).

Please see
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00034.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00035.html
for more information on this issue and change your library to be linked
against all its dependencies explicitly.

Also please note that this is mostly a copy-and-paste bug report - if your
package contains other libraries, they may well have similar issues as well.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zensunni 2.4.21-rc6-freeswan1.99-emvs1.2.1 #1 SMP Mon Jun 2 
00:06:43 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1

Versions of packages libgtop1 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.21.2.10-9   The GLib library of C routines

-- no debconf information
-- 
Obsig: developing a new sig

---
Received: (at 195985-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2003 00:53:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 19:53:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uLtb-0001Ps-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 19:53:15 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uLp4-0005cd-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:34 -0400
From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#195985: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:34 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: libgtop
Source-Version: 1.0.13-7.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgtop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.diff.gz
libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.dsc
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop_1.0.13-7.2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated li

Bug#183979: marked as done (libgtop_1.0.13-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built from broken libtool.m4)

2003-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183979: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2003 18:49:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 08 12:49:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) 
[24.77.96.253] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18rjNj-0006km-00; Sat, 08 Mar 2003 12:49:16 -0600
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4285D54004; Sat,  8 Mar 2003 10:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:49:14 -0800
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libgtop_1.0.13-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built from broken 
libtool.m4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libgtop
Version: 1.0.13-4
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of libgtop_1.0.13-4 on remake.rfc822.org by sbuild/mipsel 
> 1.170
> Build started at 20030308-0008

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), automake, gettext, autoconf, gawk, dc, 
> texinfo, autotools-dev, libtool, libgnome-dev, libguile-dev, libglib1.2-dev, 
> libzvt-dev

The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correctly support shared libraries for the Debian mips and mipsel
architectures.  At least version (1.4.2-7) and higher correctly supports
them.  You need to update all of the libtool related files by running
the following on your source tree:

autoreconf --force

You may need to use the --install option as well.  You can also try the
individual commands needed yourself:

libtoolize --force --copy
aclocal
autoheader
automake -a
autoconf

autoheader may not be needed, and you may need to use versioned binaries
(autoconf2.13, automake-1.{4,5,6,7}, aclocal-1.{4,5,6,7}, etc)

The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this:
# This must be Linux ELF.
linux-gnu*)
  case $host_cpu in
  alpha* | hppa* | i*86 | mips | mipsel | powerpc* | sparc* | ia64* )
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all ;;
  *)

It is important that both mips and mipsel are listed in the configure script
here.
  
Older versions of libtool used a file_magic check for the pattern
file_magic ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib )

The output of file(1) on a shared library on MIPS does not match this
regular expression, however.  Earlier versions of file had been
modified to match this regular expression, but the latest version uses
the same output as upstream once again.  The file check often causes
problems, and results on a build-dep on file that you might not
otherwise be aware of.  The new method doesn't need file(1) at all,
and is far less fragile, so it is best to upgrade the configure script
with proper mips support.

---
Received: (at 183979-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2003 00:53:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 02 19:53:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uLta-0001Pg-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 19:53:14 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uLp3-0005cb-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:33 -0400
From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#183979: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Source: libgtop
Source-Version: 1.0.13-7.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libgtop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386