Bug#205863: Judy needs its Maintainer field correcting
Package: libjudydebian0 Version: 0.0.4-5 debian/control still contains: Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Eric Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So apt-cache show still shows it as being owned by QA and in fact this mail is going to go to the QA group. So I'm cc'ing Ted too. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
Bug#201133: How about Apps/Science
I want to close this and herewith suggest Apps/Science as the category. Objections? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgpHWjYpEFq35.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#169805: updates?
any updates on this? i am not going to maintain megahal, but i believe that the patch should only be included if it makes its way upstream. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! pgpm0ZgFHalsz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#169805: updates?
Hi, Le Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:47:23PM +0200, martin f krafft écrivait: > any updates on this? i am not going to maintain megahal, but > i believe that the patch should only be included if it makes its way > upstream. I didn't send the patch upstream but I tried it on latest CVS version and it applied fine (btw latest released version 9.1.0 and CVS version don't differ much). David, you seem to be part of upstream: whom should I send the patch? The feature I requested on the bts has been requested upstream as well: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=654776&group_id=10585&atid=360585 In #164903, Daniel Silverstone showed an interest in taking over the package. Is it still the case, because I might be interested as well? Cheers, Laurent. pgpNLxDMRS3TA.pgp Description: PGP signature
docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.diff.gz to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.diff.gz docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.dsc to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1.dsc docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i386.deb to pool/main/d/docbook-to-man/docbook-to-man_2.0.0-11.1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 196835 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
