Bug#201513: libgtop-dev: preinst fails if doc directory isn't a symlink
Package: libgtop-dev Version: 1.0.13-7 Severity: grave /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgtop-dev.preinst contains the following: -- #!/bin/sh [ -L /usr/share/doc/libgtop-dev ] && rm /usr/share/doc/libgtop-dev -- If the doc directory is not a symlink, this line returns an exit status of 1 and the preinst fails, causing the package installation to fail. This will happen when the package is being installed for the first time or when it is upgraded from any version which didn't use a symlink. I think a simple 'exit 0' as the last line of the preinst would fix the problem. thanks, -Brian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cinla 2.4.21-pre7 #3 Mon Jun 9 20:44:55 PDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libgtop-dev depends on: ii libgtk1.2-dev 1.2.10-16 Development files for the GIMP Too ii libgtop1 1.0.13-7 Libraries for gtop system monitori -- no debconf information
Bug#27199: marked as done (lshell fails to set limits in many cases)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 1998 07:45:42 + Received: (qmail 7334 invoked from network); 29 Sep 1998 07:45:42 - Received: from va.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 29 Sep 1998 07:45:42 - Received: (qmail 25238 invoked from network); 29 Sep 1998 03:45:39 - Received: from bluebox.ne.mediaone.net (HELO osiris.ml.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by va.debian.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 1998 03:45:39 - Received: (qmail 14834 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 1998 03:44:23 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:44:22 -0400 From: Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lshell fails to set limits in many cases, default limits too low Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: lshell Architecture: i386 Version: 2.01-9 * lshell doesn't set the memory limit at all. Try 'sort /dev/zero' to deplete all memory and swap. * lshell doesn't set limits for processes a user starts via cron or a cgi script. Try making a cron job for 'sort /dev/zero' or a cgi script to= =20 do the same. Also try making a forkbombing/fd eating cgi script or cron j= ob * lshell fails to set reasonable default limits for file descriptors. Some programs (most notably Netscape) which need many file descriptors for network operations will fail without warning, often giving bogus error messages. --=20 Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GNUPG v0.3.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Get GNUPG from ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/gcrypt/ iEYEARECAAYFAjYQV5UACgkQDUb+fNId9JW0PQCglTORmU1+TCH7DQPeqyBkMpeIg2AAoJ/t MUBh6RhhxgHWLQ78/cRGzUCQ =30z+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- --- Received: (at 27199-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:13 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciPO-0002hr-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3BDA326D75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AEDC22A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it was not maintained anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#35142: marked as done (lshell: Shells started by lshell are not login shells)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 1999 00:46:02 +
Received: (qmail 29126 invoked from network); 28 Mar 1999 00:45:59 -
Received: from d15-5214-bp.elender.hu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 1999 00:45:59 -
Received: (qmail 10145 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Mar 1999 23:58:10 -
Date: 27 Mar 1999 23:58:10 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lshell: Shells started by lshell are not login shells
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: lshell
Version: 2.01-9
When lshell exec's the shell it is supposed to run, it does the following:
[pid 989] execve("/bin/bash", ["bash"], [/* 6 vars */]) = 0
However, bash needs a hyphen ('-') prepended to argv[0] in order to
recognize that it is a login shell. login(1) does the following:
[pid 989] execve("/bin/lshells/bash", ["-/bin/lshells/bash"], [/* 6 vars */]
lshell should to the same. It did previously; I don't know what changed (I
don't suppose that installing a pam-based login could have impacted lshell).
The impact of this bug is that users logging in at the console or via telnet
don't have /etc/profile or ~/.bash_profile executed by their shells, which
is bad.
Regards,
--
Andrew Korn (Korn Andras) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://goliat.eik.bme.hu/~korn
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp key. Homepage is obsolete. QOTD:
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux utopia 2.2.3-ac4 #48 Fri Mar 26 12:15:12 CET 1999 i586
unknown
Versions of the packages lshell depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.1-0.1 GNU C Library: shared libraries
--- Begin /etc/lshell.conf (modified conffile)
root -
default C90P50D40F100
--- End /etc/lshell.conf
---
Received: (at 35142-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19ciPO-0002hr-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3BDA326D75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1AEDC22A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it
was not maintained anymore.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#187724: marked as done (menu entry for xftp)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2003 14:53:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 05 08:53:33 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from guest-206.loria.fr (yellowpig.yi.org) [152.81.114.206] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 191p2y-00077o-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:53:33 -0600 Received: from seventeen ([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail) by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191p2T-0005gT-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 16:53:01 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 21851 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 05 Apr 2003 14:53:00 - Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:53:00 +0200 From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: menu entry for xftp Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: xftp Version: 2.2-18 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, The menu package include a menu entry for xftp. This is deprecated, this should be in the xftp package itself. Here it is ---/usr/lib/menu/xftp--- ?package(xftp):needs="x11" section="Apps/Net" title="xftp" command="xftp" I will keep this entry in menu until this bug is closed. Cheers, Bill -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux seventeen 2.4.20 #1 Wed Mar 5 16:16:52 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=french, LC_CTYPE=french Versions of packages xftp depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libxaw7 4.2.1-6X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-6X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 187724-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:10 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciPO-0002hs-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 2C99726BA3; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8904822A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:19 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it was not maintained anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#161866: marked as done (lshell: default limits uselessly low)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2002 05:44:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 22 00:44:56 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from minoc.dirtside.com [199.33.225.1] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17szY8-0004Ko-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 00:44:56 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by minoc.dirtside.com (8.9.3/) id BAA23334; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 01:44:55 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Really-To: From: William Herrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: lshell: default limits uselessly low X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 01:44:55 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: lshell Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-21 Severity: normal The default limits for lshell v2.01-11 are set for 24 open files and 30 processes. This is not enough for a user to have multiple sessions or even run a single copy of mozilla. If the admin doesn't realize lshell is installed, its very difficult to figure out where these mysterious limits are coming from. You can't even grep for it; the numbers which appear in "ulimit -a" are abreviated in /etc/lshell.conf and lshell doesn't make a note of its presence in any of the standard locations for adjusting system rlimits (e.g. /etc/limits, /etc/security/limits.conf). This renders the system effectively unusable if lshell is installed by mistake (e.g. during an upgrade when you're yessing everything that comes by). Suggested fixes: Set the defaults near the normal parameters for a debian linux system. Tweak system limits.conf with a comment to the effect that additional control is provided by lshell.conf. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux minoc 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jun 12 21:50:46 EDT 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C --- Received: (at 161866-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciPO-0002hr-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3BDA326D75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AEDC22A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it was not maintained anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#151548: marked as done (lshell should ask to set default shell for new users to lshell version)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2002 11:02:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 01 06:02:09 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl-213-023-053-138.arcor-ip.net (datas-world.dyndns.org) [213.23.53.138] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17Oywa-0005hi-00; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 06:02:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1001) by datas-world.dyndns.org with local; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 13:01:28 +0200 Subject: lshell should ask to set default shell for new users to lshell version From: "Torsten Knodt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.43 Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 13:01:28 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: lshell Version: 2.01-11 Severity: wishlist Hello, I think lshell should ask to change the default shell to the lshell version in adduser.conf. I know, there will be the problem, that packages are not allowed to change files in other packages then themselves. With kind regards Torsten Knodt -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tk-hybrid-1 2.4.18hybrid #1 Thu Jun 20 18:23:08 CEST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages lshell depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 151548-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:18 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciPO-0002hr-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3BDA326D75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AEDC22A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it was not maintained anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#129951: marked as done (lshell: absolute path of login shell may have 2 or more "/lshells")
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2002 12:11:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 19 06:11:35 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp01.mem.interq.net [210.157.1.51] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16RuLP-0001bL-00; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 06:11:35 -0600 Received: from grain (kyoto-ppp-210-172-160-67.interq.or.jp [210.172.160.67]) by smtp01.mem.interq.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12489 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:11:33 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=oohara) by grain with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16RuLY-00080l-00; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:11:44 +0900 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 21:06:14 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lshell: absolute path of login shell may have 2 or more "/glshells" X-Debbugs-CC: Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1.52 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: lshell Version: 2.01-10 Severity: normal lshell silently assumes that the absolute path of the login shell has exactly only one occurrence of the string "/lshells". This may surprise a user. At least this should be documented somewhere. -- Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695 I always put away what I take. --- Ryuji Akai, "Star away" --- Received: (at 129951-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:17:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:17:20 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciPO-0002hr-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:17:10 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3BDA326D75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AEDC22A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:17:24 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package was removed from Debian unstable a while ago because it was not maintained anymore. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#134118: marked as done (override disparity)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:15:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2002 19:13:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 13:13:33 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from klecker.debian.org [198.186.203.20] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16bnnZ-00072e-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:13:33 -0600 Received: from dwhedon by klecker.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16bnnY-0007KF-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:13:32 -0800 From: David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: override disparity X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54.1 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:13:32 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: dot-forward-src Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-15 Severity: wishlist next upload should fix the priority. There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): dot-forward-src_0.71-4_all.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux klecker 2.2.20 #1 SMP Sat Nov 10 15:29:57 CET 2001 i686 --- Received: (at 134118-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 09:15:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 04:15:32 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ciNn-0002aA-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:15:31 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 20C6326BA3; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:15:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9BC722A75; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:15:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:15:40 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This packae has been removed a while ago. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#191224: More info
I ran across this bug also, here is the output where it occurs: School/school_schedule.htm(9): metacharacter ">" should be represented as ">" School/school_schedule.htm(14): unknown attribute "TOPMARGIN" for element . School/school_schedule.htm(14): should set all or none of BGCOLOR, TEXT, LINK, ALINK, VLINK attributes on BODY element School/school_schedule.htm(19): unknown element occurs twice here School/school_schedule.htm(173): unmatched (no matching seen). --> occurs twice here School/school_schedule.htm(174): unmatched (no matching seen). Here is the subject file: -- Unity School of Creative Learning 2001 - 2002 School Schedule Kindergarten -- 2nd Grade First Day for Students...August 20th Summer Program Begins May 29, 2002 K - 2nd Grade closed on the following holidays Labor Day .. September 3 Grading Day . October 19 Thanksgiving Vacation . November 22, 23 Christmas Vacation . December 24 - 28 New Year's Day January 1, 2002 Grading Day February 22 Easter Vacation March 29 & April 1 Last Day for Students .. May 23 Preschool closed the following holidays Labor Day .. September 3 Thanksgiving Vacation . November 22, 23 Christmas Vacation . December 24 - 28 New Year's Day January 1, 2002 Easter Vacation March 29 & April 1 Teacher Preparation Day May 24 Memorial Day May 27 Independence Day July 4 Our goals are to provide a caring environment that allows children to experience success and build self-esteem, as well as support each child emotionally and developmentally. Small classes are provided for children 2 years through 2nd Grade with a caring, trained and educated staff. Please call Marilyn at 577-3300 Hours: Preschool begins at 9 a.m. and ends at 12:30 p.m. Elementary begins at 8:45 a.m. and ends at 2:45 p.m. Extended care is available from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. | Home | Site Map | Contact Us | | About Unity | Bookstore | Calendar | Church | Health Ministry | | Newsletter - Expanding Horizons | Prayer Ministry | School | Weddings | | Your Unity Family | Serving Our Community | Visit Us | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Obviously, this is incorrect html, but hopefully it leads you to the bug source. -- Debian GNU/Linux Operating System By the People, For the People Chris Tillman (a people instance) toff one at cox dot net
Bug#190338: marked as done (svgalibg1: non-PIC shared library : /usr/lib/libvga.so.1)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#176070: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2003 13:10:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 23 08:10:48 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from amontsouris-108-2-1-160.abo.wanadoo.fr (smtp.all-3rd.net) [193.251.54.160] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 198K1P-0001TM-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:10:47 -0500 Received: from vodka.all-3rd.net ([10.1.3.1]) by smtp.all-3rd.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198K0u-000421-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:10:16 +0200 Received: from speedblue by vodka.all-3rd.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198K0t-0004Ig-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:10:15 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: svgalibg1: non-PIC shared library : /usr/lib/libvga.so.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:10:15 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: svgalibg1 Version: 1:1.4.3-11 Severity: serious svgalibg1 seems to contain a library bot built with -fPIC. Prelink complains about that: $ prelink /usr/bin/xaos prelink: /usr/bin/xaos: Cannot prelink against non-PIC shared library /usr/lib/libvga.so.1 Best Regards. Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux vodka 2.4.21-pre5-ac3 #5 Tue Apr 22 18:18:23 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages svgalibg1 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 176070-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 16:34:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 11:34:47 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cpEs-0006Lk-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:34:46 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cpCU-0005cV-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 From: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#176070: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-13 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svgalib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svgalib-bin_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib_1.4.3-13.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-13.diff.gz svgalib_1.4.3-13.dsc to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-13.dsc svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalibg1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated svgalib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:14:52 +0200 Source: svgalib Binary: svgalib1-altdev svgalib1 svgalibg1-dev svgalibg1 svgalib-bin Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.4.3-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C
Bug#176070: marked as done (svgalibg1: contains non-PIC shared library)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#176070: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 01:12:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 09 19:12:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tc2.perso.ens-lyon.org (arrakis.ens-lyon.fr) [62.212.101.78] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18WnjE-0007i6-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:12:56 -0600 Received: from joss by arrakis.ens-lyon.fr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Wnj8-0008CC-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:12:50 +0100 Subject: svgalibg1: contains non-PIC shared library From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-DCC-WEiAPG-Metrics: tc2 1072; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 10 Jan 2003 02:12:50 +0100 Sender: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: svgalibg1 Version: 1:1.4.3-11 Severity: serious svgalibg1 seems to contain a library not built with -fPIC. At least prelink complains about that, and objdump -x shows a TEXTREL section. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom --- Received: (at 176070-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 16:34:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 11:34:47 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cpEs-0006Lk-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:34:46 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cpCU-0005cV-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 From: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#176070: fixed in svgalib 1:1.4.3-13 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of svgalib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: svgalib-bin_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib-bin_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1-altdev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalib_1.4.3-13.diff.gz to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-13.diff.gz svgalib_1.4.3-13.dsc to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalib_1.4.3-13.dsc svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1-dev_1.4.3-13_i386.deb svgalibg1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb to pool/main/s/svgalib/svgalibg1_1.4.3-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated svgalib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:14:52 +0200 Source: svgalib Binary: svgalib1-altdev svgalib1 svgalibg1-dev svgalibg1 svgalib-bin Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.4.3-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: svgalib-bin - Console SVGA display utilities svgalib1 - Console SVGA display libraries (for libc5) svgalib1-altdev - Console SVGA display development libraries and headers (for libc5 svgalibg1 - Console SVGA display libraries svgalibg1-dev - Console SVGA display development libraries and headers Closes: 173471 176070 190338 Changes: s
Processing of libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.changes
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon
libming override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb: package says section is interpreters, override says python. libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb: package says section is interpreters, override says perl. python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb: package says section is interpreters, override says python. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 174365 201227 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#174365: marked as done (python2.2-ming: Dangling symlinks in doc/python2.2-ming)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174365: fixed in libming 0.2a.cvs20030716-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2002 14:25:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 26 08:25:02 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.winnegan.de [217.89.86.2] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18RYwX-000651-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 08:25:01 -0600
Received: from keuner.winnegan.fake (unknown [192.168.53.67])
by mail.winnegan.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7D7A013906; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:24:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bsb by keuner.winnegan.fake with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18RYwP-0004td-00; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:24:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:24:53 +0100
From: Siggy Brentrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: python2.2-ming: Dangling symlinks in doc/python2.2-ming
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10
Sender: Siggy Brentrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: python2.2-ming
Version: 0.2a.cvs20020905-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
$ readlink /usr/share/doc/python2.2-ming/{README,TODO}
/home/erich/debian/ming/libming-0.2a.cvs20020905/py_ext/README
/home/erich/debian/ming/libming-0.2a.cvs20020905/py_ext/TODO
These seem to be located on the previous maintainer's machine.
Thanks
Siggy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux keuner 2.4.19-keuner #1 Thu Sep 19 12:28:09 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages python2.2-ming depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libming 0.2a.cvs20020905-3 Library to generate SWF (Flash) Fi
ii python2.2 2.2.2-3An interactive object-oriented scr
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 174365-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 18:23:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 13:23:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cqwI-0006qN-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:23:42 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cqqe-0008Gu-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400
From: Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#174365: fixed in libming 0.2a.cvs20030716-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libming, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz
libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug re
Bug#201227: marked as done (libming: FTBFS with current flex)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#201227: fixed in libming 0.2a.cvs20030716-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2003 14:35:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 14 09:35:04 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19c4Pw-00045u-00; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:35:04 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19c4Pw-0002jG-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:35:04 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19c4Pu-00083V-Sh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:35:02 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libming: FTBFS with current flex From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:35:02 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libming Version: 0.2a.cvs20020905-3 Severity: serious >From my build log: ... flex -i -Pswf4 swf4compiler.flex gcc -g -Wall-c -o lex.swf4.o lex.swf4.c swf4compiler.flex: In function `comment': swf4compiler.flex:288: error: `yytext_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function) swf4compiler.flex:288: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once swf4compiler.flex:288: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [lex.swf4.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libming-0.2a.cvs20020905/src/actioncompiler' make[1]: *** [dynamic] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libming-0.2a.cvs20020905/src' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 201227-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 18:23:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 13:23:42 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cqwI-0006qZ-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:23:42 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cqqe-0008Gw-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400 From: Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#201227: fixed in libming 0.2a.cvs20030716-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:17:52 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libming, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-dev_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming-util_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.diff.gz libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1.dsc libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libm/libming/libming_0.2a.cvs20030716.orig.tar.gz libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/libswf-perl_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/php4-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.1-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb python2.2-ming_0.2a.cvs20030716-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libming/python2.2-ming_0.2a
sted2_2.07m+20021104-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.diff.gz sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.dsc sted2_2.07m+20021104-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 196303 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#196303: marked as done (sted2: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multiline strings)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:17:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#196303: fixed in sted2 2.07m+20021104-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2003 22:54:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 05 17:54:54 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19O3dG-00065o-00; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:54:54 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19O3dF-0001GQ-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 18:54:54 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19O3dF-0006hY-6U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:54:53 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sted2: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multiline strings From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:54:52 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: sted2 Version: 2.07m+20021104-1 Severity: serious >From my build log: ... if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -O2 -MT rcptomid.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/rcptomid.Tpo" \ -c -o rcptomid.o `test -f 'rcptomid.c' || echo './'`rcptomid.c; \ then mv ".deps/rcptomid.Tpo" ".deps/rcptomid.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/rcptomid.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi rcptomid.c:837:18: missing terminating " character rcptomid.c: In function `set_tempo_track': rcptomid.c:838: error: parse error before "This" rcptomid.c:839: error: stray '\' in program make[4]: *** [rcptomid.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sted2-2.07m+20021104/sted2/sayleen' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sted2-2.07m+20021104/sted2' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sted2-2.07m+20021104' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/sted2-2.07m+20021104' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 196303-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2003 21:23:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 16:23:11 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ctjz-0003eN-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:23:11 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19cteA-00046D-00; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:17:10 -0400 From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $ Subject: Bug#196303: fixed in sted2 2.07m+20021104-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:17:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sted2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.diff.gz sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2.dsc sted2_2.07m+20021104-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sted2/sted2_2.07m+20021104-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sted2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a probl
Bug#201636: libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error
Package: libgtop-daemon Version: 1.0.13-6 Severity: normal Something is not installing correctly: >dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb (Reading database ... 84759 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libgtop-daemon 1.0.13-6 (using .../libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb (--install): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7_i386.deb I'm not sure what it means though. HTH... -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux Arf 2.4.21-1-k6 #2 Mon Jun 16 22:19:43 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux Versions of the packages libgtop-daemon depends on: iU libgtop1 1.0.13-7 Libraries for gtop system monitoring library ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii zlib1g 1.1.4-14 compression library - runtime
